logo
BREAKING NEWS Ofcom launches probe into whether BBC Gaza documentary narrated by Hamas official's son misled audience

BREAKING NEWS Ofcom launches probe into whether BBC Gaza documentary narrated by Hamas official's son misled audience

Daily Mail​14-07-2025
Ofcom has said it will launch a probe into whether the BBC 's controversial Gaza documentary, narrated by the son of a senior Hamas official, misled audiences.
The watchdog announced the measure this afternoon following the shambolic release of the Beeb's programme, Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone.
The documentary was axed from BBC iPlayer in February after it emerged its 13-year-old narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas' s deputy minister of agriculture.
In a newly published review, Peter Johnston - director of editorial complaints - said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'.
His report found nobody at the BBC knew of the father's position when the documentary first aired on February 17, but three people at Hoyo Films, the independent production company that made the film, were aware.
Mr Johnston said Hoyo Films did not 'intentionally' mislead the BBC about the position of the narrator's father, but says the independent production company 'bears most responsibility for this failure'. He said the BBC also 'bears some responsibility'.
BBC director-general Tim Davie has apologised for a 'significant failing' in relation to the documentary and pledged the corporation would take action to prevent it happening again.
The report cost approximately £100,000 to carry out.
The review found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that 'outside interests' 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'.
It said that 'careful consideration of the requirements of due impartiality was undertaken in this project given the highly contested nature of the subject matter'.
The detail of the background information regarding the narrator's father is deemed as 'critical information', which the report says was not shared with the BBC before broadcast.
Mr Davie said: 'Peter Johnston's report identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy in this documentary. I thank him for his thorough work and I am sorry for this failing.
'We will now take action on two fronts - fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.'
The BBC board said: 'We thank Peter Johnston for his work. His report is a comprehensive examination of a complex programme, the production of which spanned many months from concept through to broadcast - and is critical in laying bare the facts of what happened.
'Nothing is more important than trust and transparency in our journalism. We welcome the actions the executive are taking to avoid this failing being repeated in the future.'
The scandal drew the ire of Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, who described feeling 'exasperated' as she called for an 'adequate explanation from the BBC about what has happened'.
'I have not had that from the chair or director-general yet,' she told The Times earlier this month..
She added: 'I have been very clear that people must be held accountable for the decisions that were taken. I have asked the question to the board (of the BBC). Why has nobody been fired?
'What I want is an explanation as to why not. If it is a sackable offence then obviously that should happen.
'But if the BBC, which is independent, considers that it is not, I think what all parliamentarians want to know is why.'
The review led the broadcaster to delay and then pull entirely another documentary from the region, Gaza: Doctors under Attack, which has since been broadcast on Channel 4.
The documentary was originally commissioned by the BBC more than a year ago but paused its production in April and was eventually aired by Channel 4 earlier this month.
It is a one off-documentary that examines allegations that Israeli forces have repeatedly targeted hospitals in breach of international law.
The programme was made by two-time Emmy-winning journalist Ramita Navai, fellow two-time Emmy-winning director Karim Shah and ex-Channel 4 News Editor Ben De Pear, who is the executive producer of Basement Films, which was commissioned by the BBC to create the film.
Channel 4 said it had fact-checked the documentary to ensure that it meets its editorial standards and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code.
Hoyo Films said in a statement that they take the report findings 'extremely seriously' and 'apologise for the mistake that resulted in a breach of the (BBC) editorial guidelines'.
They added: 'We are pleased that the report found that there was no evidence of inappropriate influence on the content of the documentary from any third party.
'We appreciate the rigorous nature of this investigation, and its findings that Hoyo Films did not intentionally mislead the BBC, that there were no other breaches of the editorial guidelines in the programme, and that there was no evidence to suggest that the programme funds were spent other than for reasonable, production-related purposes.
Hoyo Films welcomes the report's recommendations and hope they will improve processes and prevent similar problems in the future.
'We are working closely with the BBC to see if we can find an appropriate way to bring back to iPlayer the stories of those featured in the programme.
'Our team in Gaza risked their lives to document the devastating impact of war on children.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Premier League club in row with council over proposed housing near stadium
Premier League club in row with council over proposed housing near stadium

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Premier League club in row with council over proposed housing near stadium

Premier League newcomers Sunderland have opposed plans to build houses near their Stadium of Light ground, saying development could have 'catastrophic consequences'. Chairman Kyril Louis-Dreyfus said the club will make formal objections to the city council's plans to allow for homes to be built in what had been a buffer zone around the stadium. Sunderland City Council has proposed that 600 homes, including maisonettes, townhouses and family homes, should be built south of the stadium, as part of a wider redevelopment of the city centre. Sunderland City Council chief executive Patrick Melia has insisted that the stadium was a 'key asset for the city' and the redevelopment plans would enhance fans' experience. Former chairman Sir Bob Murray, who oversaw the move from Roker Park to the 49,000-seat ground in 1997, called the change a 'disgrace'. He said the local authority had previously agreed protections which would prevent development near the stadium, thus allowing the club to increase capacity if needed, but that the city council had 'torn them up'. Sir Bob said having houses up close to the Stadium of Light risked hemming it in, which was the cause of the move from Roker Park. Mr Louis-Dreyfus has now spoken out against the plans as well. He said: 'As the custodian of Sunderland AFC, it is my duty to safeguard the future of our club. 'This includes the Stadium of Light – the beating heart of our city. 'Unfortunately, Sunderland City Council has recently taken steps relating to the Sheepfolds development that could have catastrophic operational consequences on our club and, by extension, our community. 'We are under no illusion that the city needs a more appropriate housing provision and support those endeavours fully. 'However, later this week we will be submitting a formal objection against the proposals relating to the Sheepfolds and I encourage all city stakeholders to come together and join us in protecting the future of our football club and the City of Sunderland. 'Together, we have limitless potential, but it will only be realised through delivering on a shared purpose and vision.' There were fears that having homes close to the stadium could impact its ability to host major concerts as well as block any future expansion plans. The Stadium of Light has hosted England games and was built on the site of the former Monkwearmouth Colliery. In response to the objections, council chief Mr Melia said: 'We are very much invested in the future of the Stadium of Light and recognise it as a key asset for the city. 'It is our view that the proposals set out for the Sheepfolds neighbourhoods will improve operations and fan experience in terms of match days and other events and we remain committed to working with SAFC in relation to their plans for the expansion of the Stadium of Light – we have held many discussions with Mr Louis-Dreyfus and his team to this effect. 'This consultation process provides a real opportunity for the public and stakeholders to share their thoughts with us as the local planning authority and we will consider all views and comments prior to determination of the application.'

Council seeks High Court ban on asylum seekers being housed at protest-hit Epping hotel
Council seeks High Court ban on asylum seekers being housed at protest-hit Epping hotel

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Council seeks High Court ban on asylum seekers being housed at protest-hit Epping hotel

Epping Forest District Council has applied for an interim High Court injunction in a bid to stop asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel in the town. Documents were lodged with the High Court in London on Tuesday, the council said in a statement. It comes after a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel, after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Councillor Chris Whitbread, Leader of Epping Forest District Council, said: 'The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago. 'So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel. 'There are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel. The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. 'This will only increase with the start of the new school year. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen. 'In our view placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a clear breach of planning permission. It is not in use as a hotel, and it doesn't function as a hotel. 'The establishment of a centre to accommodate asylum seekers in this particular location, in close proximity to five schools, a residential care home, and the shops and amenities of the market town of Epping is not appropriate in planning terms.'

Epping council applies for asylum injunction over The Bell Hotel
Epping council applies for asylum injunction over The Bell Hotel

BBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Epping council applies for asylum injunction over The Bell Hotel

A district council has applied for an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants being housed at a of people have demonstrated outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, in recent months, protesting against it being used to house asylum Forest District Council said there was a "clear risk of further escalating community tensions".Its Conservative leader Chris Whitbread said: "We should not have to take this fight to the High Court, but we are left with no choice. It is now up to the judge." Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store