Pakistan targeted civilian areas in J&K, and Poonch suffered most damage, says Amit Shah
'Pakistan carried out a highly condemnable attack on residential areas and religious places', said Amit Shah.
Commenting on the damages suffered by people in Poonch during shelling by Pakistan, he said, 'A programme has been organised to distribute appointment letters to the family members of those who were killed in these attacks. We all know that compensation and government jobs cannot compensate for the damage that has been done to their lives. However, it is just to express the feelings of the Jammu and Kashmir government, Centre and people of India that we are with them.'
Home Minister #AmitShah visits Dungas in Poonch. Several properties were destroyed here in shelling and firing from Pakistan, post #OperationSindoor.
🎥PTI pic.twitter.com/ZJzPYUnhBX — The Hindu (@the_hindu) May 30, 2025
'Pakistan targeted the civilian areas in J&K, and Poonch suffered the most damage. For the first time, firing was done on Poonch post-independence. The entire world is condemning the attack by Pakistan. The Indian Armed Forces gave a befitting reply by destroying nine Pakistani air bases, and as a result, they had to come forward for a ceasefire', Amit Shah added.
Amit Shah on Amarnath Yatra
Mr. Shah said that the central government and the Jammu and Kashmir administration will leave no stone unturned to provide all necessary facilities to the pilgrims of the annual Amarnath Yatra.
The 38-day pilgrimage to the 3,880-meter-high cave shrine in south Kashmir is scheduled to start on July 3 and conclude on August 9, according to the announcement made by the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board (SASB).
"The central government and J&K administration will leave no stone unturned to facilitate the pilgrims with all necessary facilities," Mr. Shah said on X.
He instructed officials to maintain the utmost vigilance and ensure the seamless completion of the sacred yatra.
On Thursday (May 29, 2025) night, he chaired a high-level review meeting for the Amarnath pilgrimage and evaluated the security arrangements and preparedness for the pilgrims.
Mr. Shah also reviewed the overall security situation in Jammu and Kashmir at the meeting.
During his two-day stay in the Jammu region, Mr. Shah is also visiting religious places on Friday (May 30, 2025) and meeting people and BSF personnel affected by shelling in the district, which recorded the highest number of civilian casualties — 14 out of the total 28 deaths — during Pakistani shelling and drone attacks between May 7 and 10, they said.
The journey to the Amarnath cave shrine can be undertaken through two routes — the traditional 48-km route via Pahalgam in south Kashmir''s Anantnag district and the 14-km shorter but steeper Baltal route in central Kashmir's Ganderbal district.
The Centre has ordered the deployment of 580 companies, comprising about 42,000 on-ground personnel of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), for the annual Amarnath Yatra.
(With inputs from PTI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Can a Secular State Build Temples? Bihar Poses the Test
Published : Aug 12, 2025 17:59 IST - 8 MINS READ Can the Indian state build a temple or a mosque? Perhaps the question needs to be reframed. In the present context, imagining the state building a mosque appears absurd. On and after December 6, 1992, it was made amply clear that the Indian state can indeed assist in the destruction of a mosque. It was once declared in an act of bravado that the state would rebuild the mosque, which was demolished in a criminal act, as clarified by the Supreme Court nearly 25 years after the crime was committed. That obviously was never to happen. What was done instead was to usurp the land of the mosque legally for the construction of a temple. By 2025, we have come to realise that the state has consistently taken many leaps. It uses different excuses to make mosques controversial, as we see it doing in the cases of the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Eidgah of Mathura. It is even agreeable to participate in their removal directly or indirectly. The Uttarakhand government has not taken any steps to prevent the demolition of hundreds of mazars in the State. It has instead come out with justification of the crime by claiming that the mazars are part of the land grab conspiracy (land jihad, as they love to call it), and it is fair to free the pious land. Therefore, we must instead ask: 'Can the Indian state build a temple? Does it have the constitutional authority or sanction to do so?' The powers and rights of the state and the government are derived from the Constitution. To the question, 'Can the state construct a religious site?', the constitutional answer is unambiguous: 'NO'. India is a secular republic. It cannot promote or patronise any one religion. It cannot engage directly in religious activity. However, the state does have a role in maintaining public order when religion enters the public sphere. Its involvement in facilitating the Amarnath Yatra or ensuring the peaceful conduct of Ram Navami processions stems from this duty. Providing logistical support such as transportation, temporary shelter, or repairing roads to pilgrimage sites falls within this ambit. But the state is not to go beyond this. Also Read | Kanwar Yatra's transformation into political weapon And yet, we know that Prime Ministers shoot arrows at Ravana during Ramlilas, and Chief Ministers participate in the Jagannath Rath Yatra. Now governments shower flowers on Kanwariyas! Or police officers are seen massaging the feet of the Kanwariyas. That is obviously going too far. But if we leave aside these egregious acts, we know that Indian secularism is not puritanical; it acknowledges and respects religiosity. Therefore, a Chief Minister participating in a Rath Yatra or attending Eid prayers ought not to raise eyebrows. It is often believed that such gestures nurture communal harmony. After all, when Diwali is celebrated at the White House or 10 Downing Street, Hindus in India too feel a sense of joy and inclusion. But this does not answer the core question: 'Can the state go further and build a religious site?' The Ayodhya verdict This question first emerged when the Supreme Court, in its Ayodhya verdict, awarded the site of the demolished Babri Masjid for the construction of a Ram temple. Even then, a certain fig leaf of propriety was maintained: the construction was handed over to a trust, not undertaken directly by the government. The state was asked to form the trust. But it was not directly made responsible for the construction of the temple. Also, apparently, state funds were not used. Still, the credit for the temple was claimed by the BJP. The Prime Minister was thanked for the court's verdict. At the inauguration, he played the role of the principal yajman. The temple's consecration was converted into a state event, rightly criticised as not only the inauguration of a temple, but the symbolic inauguration of a Hindu Rashtra. Since we did not pause long enough to reckon with that moment, we are now forced to confront the same question again. Just days ago, in Sitamarhi, Bihar, the State government initiated the construction of a grand Sita temple. Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and Union Home Minister Amit Shah participated in the bhoomi pujan at 'Punaura Dham', believed to be Sita's birthplace. Both acted as chief yajmans in this religious ceremony. Before the event, the Bihar government ran full-page advertisements in nearly every newspaper for at least three days, announcing its plans for the comprehensive development of the temple and its precincts. It has acquired 50 acres of land for Rs.165.57 crore, and has earmarked Rs.882.87 crore for the project. This number will undoubtedly increase. Periodic advertisements—each costing lakhs, if not crores—will accompany the progress of this project. Can the Bihar government do this? Can a secular state extend such unambiguous patronage to one particular religion? This is a question that the media ought to have asked, and political parties in Bihar, too, should have done that. But the media, silenced by advertisement revenue and its growing alignment with the BJP and the State government, has abdicated its responsibility. Otherwise, it could have posed a simple question: 'Why are taxpayers' funds being used to build a site belonging to a particular religion?' Hindutva and public indifference No one objected to Amit Shah or Nitish Kumar attending the event in a personal capacity. But how can they act as chief yajmans while holding public office? How can the state itself build a temple? India's political landscape is now so deeply suffused with Hindutva that even self-professed secular parties lack the courage to ask these questions. More troubling still is the public indifference. As a society, we no longer find these questions necessary. No one now reminds us that, in the early years of Independence, Mahatma Gandhi had opposed the use of public funds for the renovation of the Somnath temple. Prime Minister Nehru had even objected to President Rajendra Prasad attending the temple inauguration. At the temple's groundbreaking in Sitamarhi, hundreds of sadhus were in attendance. Was their travel and accommodation arranged by the state too? The media ought to have shown interest in such questions. But to do so, it must reacquaint itself with the basic principle that India is a secular republic. That Nitish Kumar has occasionally donned a Muslim skullcap offers no defence of his current actions. Nor is this the only instance. The Bihar Transport Department has announced that it will subsidise fares for people travelling to and from the State during the 'festive season lasting three months'—specifically for Durga Puja, Diwali, Chhath, and Holi. Its calculation is wrong. From Durga Puja to Holi is not three months, but nearly six months of the calendar year. 'If the fate of Bihar's people was truly tied to a temple, why have they been made to endure Nitish Kumar's government for nearly two decades and the BJP's at the Centre for 11 years?' Why is public money being used exclusively to support Hindu festivals? Again, this policy was advertised in full-page newspaper ads, the cost of which must also be counted. Governments often justify such expenditures under the guise of 'religious tourism'. They argue that these initiatives generate revenue for the state and also provide employment to local people residing in those religiously significant places. Thus, the state's participation in religious activity is repackaged as secular—a convenient fabrication. The devotee earns spiritual merit, and the state earns money: a win-win, apparently. But would the state demonstrate the same generosity during Eid or Bakrid? Does it do so? Shortly after Nitish Kumar returned to power, one saw advertisements inviting people to perform pind-daan in Gaya. The Bihar government was essentially claiming that performing these Hindu rituals in Gaya would liberate the souls of ancestors. Clearly, it was peddling spiritual inducements, positioning Gaya as a rival to Kashi—as though salvation were a matter of competitive marketing. That it can do this is a reflection of how deeply eroded public consciousness has become around the idea of a secular state. In the past eleven years, governments have participated so often and so directly in Hindu religious events that it now appears normal. Sita temple: Spiritual or political endeavour? The announcement of the Ram temple in Ayodhya had triggered protests from opposition parties in Bihar, who claimed that Sita was being ignored—that she was not being given an equal place alongside Ram. Thus began the groundwork for a Sita temple in Sitamarhi. Now, that project is under way. At its inauguration, the Union Home Minister declared that this was not merely the beginning of a temple but the beginning of Bihar and Mithila's fortune. But if the fate of Bihar's people was truly tied to a temple, why have they been made to endure Nitish Kumar's government for nearly two decades and the BJP's at the Centre for 11 years? Also Read | Mohan Bhagwat's call for religious harmony reflects the duplicity of RSS Is the Sita temple a spiritual endeavour, or a political one? The Home Minister made it clear. Its purpose or objective is entirely worldly. Instead of speaking about why Sita is significant to the Hindu mind, he used the occasion to attack the opposition and criticise their objections to the Special Intensive Revision, the recent drive by the Election Commission to update the election lists. He vowed to keep out 'infiltrators'. This was not a religious speech; it was a political campaign speech. It confirmed what many had suspected—this temple is a part of a Hindutva political project, akin to the Ram temple in Ayodhya. It has nothing to do with devotion to Ram or Sita. The only discernible development is this: Nitish Kumar has now enthusiastically joined the BJP's Hindutva project. Apoorvanand teaches Hindi at Delhi University and writes literary and cultural criticism.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Youth Congress activists stop express train at Aurangabad to protest against police action on Rahul Gandhi
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: A group of local activists from the student wing of Congress briefly detained the Nagarsol-Narasapur Express train at Aurangabad railway station on Tuesday afternoon. The action was taken in protest against police measures targeting Rahul Gandhi in Delhi. The express arrived at Aurangabad railway station at around 2.10pm for a scheduled five-minute halt, during which approximately 35 activists from the National Students' Union of India (NSUI) entered the station. While security forces attempted to prevent them from reaching the rail line, around eight NSUI activists climbed onto the train, shouting slogans against Centre. The police present at the scene quickly intervened and detained the activists, who were then taken to the railway police chowkey. Railway police registered an offence against eight NSUI activists, including district president Mohit Jadhav, under relevant sections of the Railways Act, 1989. All of them were released later after being served a notice under section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Treatment That Might Help You Against Knee Pain Knee pain | search ads Find Now Undo Aurangabad station master Sunil Birare said the NSUI agitation did not impact the movement of trains. "The Nagarsol-Narasapur Express train had a scheduled departure from Aurangabad at 2.15 pm and left the station with a delay of only a minute. Movement of other trains was unaffected," he said. Jadhav said the NSUI would intensify its agitation in support of Rahul Gandhi and the 'Vote Chori' agitation launched by the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha. "It is high time that we raise our voices against BJP govt in Centre to save democracy. Ours was a peaceful agitation to draw public attention to attempts to rig every poll," he said. When contacted, Congress district president Kiran Patil Dongaonkar said he was unaware of the NSUI agitation at Aurangabad railway station. "The local unit of Congress held a protest on Monday to oppose the police detention of Rahul Gandhi. A section of NSUI activists were perhaps not present for Monday's agitation and, therefore, held a separate protest at the railway station on Tuesday," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Ahmed Patel's son hails PM for Op Sindoor, says nation 'in safe hands'
Faisal Patel NEW DELHI: In remarks likely to raise eyebrows in the Congress, Faisal Patel -- son of the late party stalwart Ahmed Patel - has praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership during Operation Sindoor , the cross-border strike on terror camps in Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. "It can't be better than who's running the show... The armed forces have done a great job, and PM Narendra Modi showed great leadership and brought us out of a huge crisis. I am proud of our armed forces. I have a lot of respect for Jaishankarji. How Modiji picks up bureaucrats, makes them leaders and puts them in ministry roles is a very good thing," Patel told ANI. In an interview to CNN-News18, he called Modi and home minister Amit Shah "great leaders" and declared the country was "in safe hands" - a remark loaded with political irony given Ahmed Patel's long rivalry with Modi during UPA years, when he was Sonia Gandhi's most trusted strategist. Though insisting he remains a Congress member, Patel pointed to internal drift in the party.
