Trump open to meeting Putin and Zelenskyy
The meeting could take place as early as next week, The New York Times newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources.
The possibility was discussed in a call between Trump and Zelenskyy that, according to a senior Ukrainian source, also included Nato secretary general Mark Rutte and the leaders of Britain, Germany and Finland.
It came after Washington's envoy Steve Witkoff visited Moscow for talks with Putin earlier in the day.
"The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the president is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky," said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
The New York Times reported that Trump intended to meet first with Putin, and then to follow that up with a three-way meeting involving the Russian and Ukrainian leaders.
Nato and Ukrainian officials did not confirm the report when contacted by AFP.
Earlier on Wednesday, Trump hailed the meeting between his envoy and Putin as "highly productive," but US officials said sanctions would still be imposed on Moscow's trading partners.
Trump, who had boasted he could end the conflict within 24 hours of taking office, has given Russia until Friday to make progress towards peace or face new penalties. - AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
Apple leads surge in global tech shares after Trump tariff relief
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as he and Apple CEO Tim Cook present Apple's announcement of a $100 billion investment in U.S. manufacturing, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 6, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File photo (Reuters) -Global technology stocks advanced on Thursday in a relief rally after the latest tariff salvo from U.S. President Donald Trump largely exempted industry heavyweights from his threat to impose 100% levy on chips and semiconductors. Trump said the new tariff rate would apply to "all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States," but would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the U.S. or were in the process of doing so. Apple's stock rose 3.3% in premarket trading after Trump's announcement on Wednesday that the company will invest an additional $100 billion in the U.S., a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. U.S.-listed chipmakers advanced broadly, with Advanced Micro Devices up 2.5%, Intel gaining 2.1% and Nvidia up 1.1%. "A major uncertainty has been removed and investors can finally move on," UBS analysts said in a note. Semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials and chipmakers Texas Instruments, GlobalFoundries and Broadcom - Apple's partners in the investment effort - climbed between 0.8% and 10.1%. European chipmakers also joined the rally, with ASML, ASMI and BE Semiconductor Industries climbing about 3% each. Germany's Infineon said it could not speculate on possible semiconductor tariffs, as no details have been disclosed yet. Its shares were up 0.6%. Trump's latest on semiconductor tariffs seemingly rules out Taiwanese chip contract manufacturer TSMC, which makes chips for most U.S. companies, including Nvidia, as it has factories in the U.S. "The market remains keen to buy TSMC on dips. Investors also believe they need to remain positioned in AI - with or without tariffs," UBS analysts said. TSMC shares closed almost 5% higher to hit all-time highs, while Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix climbed 2.5% and 1.4%, respectively. South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix will also not be subjected to 100% tariffs on chips, the country's top trade envoy said. Samsung has invested in two chip fabrication plants in Austin and Taylor, Texas, while SK Hynix has announced plans to build an advanced chip packaging plant and research and development facility for artificial intelligence products in Indiana. Since stepping into the White House in January, Donald Trump has made several tariff threats, specifically on semiconductors, aimed at reshaping the supply chain of the industry and spurring domestic production. "The (100% tariff) figure fits Trump's approach of 'open high, negotiate down' and the final figure could be similar to reciprocal tariffs to limit inflation in consumer goods, given that many have chips," said Phelix Lee, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. Not everyone has come out of the latest blitz on the right side, with the Philippines and Malaysia looking to find out more details about the tariff rate. Dan Lachica, the president of the trade body for the Philippine semiconductor industry, said 70% of its electronics exports are semiconductors and the new tariff rate would be "devastating". Philippine stocks were down 0.1% after falling as much as 0.9% during the day. Malaysia's trade minister said the country has reached out to U.S. counterparts for clarity on the tariffs. (Reporting by Ankur Banerjee and Rae Wee in Singapore and Shashwat Chauhan in Bengaluru; Editing by Christian Schmollinger and Arun Koyyur)
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Trump announces 100 pct chip tariff, pressuring Asian producers
An employee works at a semiconductor chips factory in Huai'an, in eastern China's Jiangsu province on April 29, 2024. – AFP photo TOKYO (Aug 7): Donald Trump has announced a 100 per cent tariff on semiconductors from firms that do not invest in the United States — sparking volatility in Asian chipmaker shares today. The US president unveiled the levy at the White House on Wednesday ahead of the imposition of sweeping tariffs on goods from dozens of countries, with chips so far exempt. It comes with the United States and China locked in a high-stakes race to develop the high-end semiconductors used to power artificial intelligence systems. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100 per cent on chips and semiconductors, but if you're building in the United States… there's no charge,' Trump said. He did not give a timetable for the new levy, which he has repeatedly threatened in the past, to be enacted. Arisa Liu, senior semiconductor researcher at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, said it would impact the 'strategic direction of global semiconductor companies'. 'Since the United States is the world's largest player in AI and related high-performance computing, this will have a relatively greater impact on companies involved in advanced processes,' she said. 'The highest-end semiconductors will be excluded,' Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, told AFP. But 'this kills producers of low-end chips', including those based in Malaysia or China, she warned. Today, shares in Taiwan's TSMC — world's largest contract maker of chips, which counts Nvidia and Apple among its clients — soared nearly five per cent after the government said the company would not be affected. Taiwan is a global powerhouse in semiconductor manufacturing, with more than half of the world's chips and nearly all of the high-end ones made there. 'Fight for Malaysia' Trump has previously accused Taiwan of having stolen the US chip industry, and earlier this year, TSMC unveiled a plan to invest an extra US$100 billion in the United States. Samsung Electronics, which is pumping billions into the United States, rose more than two per cent in Seoul, but a range of Japanese chip-making shares sank on the news. Apple is also investing an additional US$100 billion in the United States, Trump and the US tech giant's CEO Tim Cook announced Wednesday, with Cook calling it 'the largest investment Apple has made in America'. Malaysian trade minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz told parliament today that the country, a key chip manufacturing hub, was seeking an explanation from the US side. 'We will continue to fight for Malaysia to ensure that any policy changes or exemption criteria are communicated and negotiated in advance, and that Malaysia's position as a strategic partner is preserved,' he said. Chiang Min-yen, a non-resident fellow at the Research Institute for Democracy, Society, and Emerging Technology, said the tariff would hit legacy chipmakers who don't have the deep pockets to invest in the United States. 'Most of the legacy chip manufacturers in Taiwan, in the US, even in Japan… all face very serious, unfair market competition from Chinese competitors,' he said. If US policies undermine these companies' production efficiency, the Chinese competitors 'will be able to more easily enter the global market' and come to dominate the field in the future, Chiang told AFP. That 'would be very harmful for US industrialisation policies', he warned. 'In the end, we may have to rely more on the Chinese legacy chips, and it would hurt our cybersecurity or even national security.' – AFP Asian semiconductors tariffs trump us
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Indian authorities in Kashmir ban books by eminent writers and scholars
Indian authorities have banned 25 books in Kashmir that they say propagate "false narratives' and "secessionism' in the disputed region, where strict controls on the press have escalated in recent years. The ban threatens people with prison time for selling or owning works by authors such as Booker Prize-winning novelist and activist Arundhati Roy, constitutional expert A.G. Noorani, and noted academicians and historians like Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden and Victoria Schofield. The order was issued on Tuesday by the region's Home Department, which is under the direct control of Lt Gov Manoj Sinha, New Delhi's top administrator in Kashmir. Sinha wields substantial power in the region as the national government's representative, while elected officials run a largely powerless government that came to power last year after the first local election since India stripped the disputed region of its special status in 2019. The order declared the 25 books "forfeit' under India's new criminal code of 2023, effectively banning the works from circulation, possession and access within the Himalayan region. Various elements of the code threaten prison terms of three years, seven years or even life for offenses related to forfeit media, although no one has yet been jailed under them. "The identified 25 books have been found to excite secessionism and endangering sovereignty and integrity of India,' the Home Department said in its notice. It said such books played "a critical role in misguiding the youth, glorifying terrorism and inciting violence against Indian State.' The action was taken following "investigations and credible intelligence' about "systemic dissemination of false narratives and secessionist literature' that was "often disguised as historical or political commentary,' it said. Nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan each administer part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety. A pedestrian walks past a book cart along a roadside in Srinagar on Aug 7. Photo: AFP Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels' goal of uniting the territory, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country. India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. Pakistan denies the charge, and many Kashmiris consider it a legitimate freedom struggle. Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict. Since 2019, authorities have increasingly criminalized dissent and shown no tolerance for any narrative that questions India's sovereignty over Kashmir. In February, police raided bookstores and seized hundreds of books linked to a major Islamic organization in the region. In 2011, police filed charges against Kashmir education officials over a textbook for first graders that illustrated the word "tyrant' with a sketch resembling a police official. A year earlier to that, police arrested a college lecturer on charges he gave his students an English exam filled with questions attacking a crackdown on demonstrations challenging Indian rule in the region. In some cases, the accused were freed after police questioning but most of these cases have lingered on in India's notoriously slow judicial system. The order declared the 25 books 'forfeit' under India's new criminal code of 2023, effectively banning the works from circulation, possession and access within the Himalayan region. Photo: AP Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, a key resistance leader in Kashmir, condemned the book ban. "Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts and the repertoire of lived memories of people of Kashmir,' Mirwaiz said in a statement. He questioned authorities for organizing an ongoing book festival to showcase its literary commitment but on ground banning some books. "It only exposes the insecurities and limited understanding of those behind such authoritarian actions, and the contradiction in proudly hosting the ongoing Book Festival.' Banning books is not common in India, but authorities under Prime Minister Narendra Modi have increasingly raided independent media houses, jailed journalists and sought to re-write history in school and university textbooks to promote the Hindu nationalist vision of his ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. Meanwhile, curriculums related to Muslim Mughal rulers who ruled much of India between sixteenth and nineteenth centuries have been altered or removed. Last year, An Indian court ended decades-old ban on Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses owing to absence of any official order that had banned the book in 1988. - AP
