Singapore gold investment soars 37% to 2.2 tonnes in Q2 while jewellery demand wanes
The World Gold Council said geopolitical tensions, market volatility and macroeconomic uncertainty will continue to drive investment demand in gold.
SINGAPORE - Singapore investors' appetite for gold remained strong in the second quarter of 2025 with 2.2 tonnes of gold bars and coins purchased, according to the World Gold Council's latest report released on July 31.
However, demand for gold jewellery in Singapore dropped 8 per cent to 1.5 tonnes, as record gold prices curbed spending power and global jewellery buying slumped to pandemic-era lows.
While the 2.2 tonnes of gold investment in Singapore represent a 37 per cent rise from the same period in 2024, the amount is below the prior-quarter's 2.5 tonnes, which was the highest on the council's record.
In South-east Asia, gold investment demand in Q2 continued to grow across Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand, with double-digit year-on-year increases. However, Vietnam saw a 20 per cent decline compared with the year-ago period.
Globally, total bar and coin investment increased 11 per cent year on year, adding 306.8 tonnes.
Chinese investors led the way with demand reaching 115 tonnes, while Indian investors continued to add to their holdings, with a total of 46 tonnes in Q2. European net investment more than doubled to 28 tonnes, while US bar and coin demand halved to 9 tonnes in the second quarter.
Fan Shaokai, head of Asia-Pacific (ex-China) and global head of central banks at the World Gold Council, noted that geopolitical tensions, market volatility and macroeconomic uncertainty will continue to drive investment demand in gold.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore SMRT's finances hit by 2024 EWL disruption; profit after tax for trains division dips 8%
Asia US-Malaysia tariff deal set for Aug 1 after Trump-Anwar phone call
Business Deepening Singapore-Latin America ties a matter of urgency amid global trade uncertainty: Alvin Tan
Singapore Underground pipe leak likely reason for water supply issues during Toa Payoh fire: Town council
Multimedia 60 years, 60 items: A National Day game challenge
Life Milo tees, kaya toast pimple patches, crockery: Here are the SG60 merch to collect
Singapore SingHealth nurses get $5.7m from Wee Foundation for education, skills development
Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family'
Meanwhile, gold exchange-traded fund (ETF) investment continued to drive total demand, with record inflows of 170.5 tonnes over the quarter, compared with outflows in Q2 last year. Global gold ETF demand reached 397 tonnes, the highest first-half total since 2020, noted the council.
On the other hand, central banks and other institutions' buying dropped 21 per cent on the year to 166.5 tonnes.
'While central bank gold purchases slowed for a second consecutive quarter, demand remained robust, underscoring gold's enduring appeal as a store of value and portfolio diversifier,' said Mr Fan, who expects central banks to continue to add gold to their reserves in the long term.
Overall, total gold demand reached 1,249 tonnes, including over-the-counter transactions. This was a 3 per cent rise on the year amid a high-price environment, where annualised gold prices stood at US$3,280.4 per ounce in the quarter, based on the report.
The council highlighted that jewellery demand continued to decline with the consumption volume down 14 per cent on the year, nearing low levels last seen in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic.
In particular, jewellery demand in China dropped 20 per cent to 69.2 tonnes, and Indian demand fell 17 per cent to 88.8 tonnes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump orders firing of US official as cracks emerge in jobs market
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump on Aug 1 lashed out at a Labour Department statistics official, saying without evidence that she had "rigged" the July employment data. WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump said on Aug 1 he has ordered the firing of a key economic official, accusing her of manipulating employment data for political reasons – without giving evidence – after a new report showed cracks in the US jobs market. US job growth missed expectations in July, Labour Department data showed, and revisions to hiring figures in recent months brought them to the weakest levels since the Covid-19 pandemic. Mr Trump lashed out at the department's commissioner of labour statistics – Dr Erika McEntarfer – after the report, writing on social media that the jobs numbers 'were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, he charged that Dr McEntarfer had 'faked' jobs data to boost Democrats' chances of victory in the recent presidential election. 'McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months,' Mr Trump said, referring to latest data for July. 'Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative,' he added. But he insisted that the world's biggest economy was 'booming' under his leadership. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Tech Reporting suspected advanced cyber attacks will provide a defence framework: Shanmugam Business Singapore's US tariff rate stays at 10%, but the Republic is not out of the woods yet Asia Asia-Pacific economies welcome new US tariff rates, but concerns over extent of full impact remain Business ST explains: How Trump tariffs could affect Singapore SMEs, jobs and markets Asia Indonesia's Mount Lewotobi Laki-laki erupts Singapore Thundery showers expected on most days in first half of August Singapore Synapxe chief executive, MND deputy secretary to become new perm secs on Sept 1 Singapore 5 women face capital charges after they were allegedly found with nearly 27kg of cocaine in S'pore The United States added 73,000 jobs in July, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent, said the Department of Labour earlier on Aug 1. Hiring numbers for May were revised down from 144,000 to 19,000. The figure for June was shifted from 147,000 to 14,000. This was notably lower than job creation levels in recent years. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the economy lost jobs. The employment data points to challenges in the key labour market as companies took a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Mr Trump's sweeping – and rapidly changing – tariffs this year. The numbers also pile pressure on the central bank as it mulls the best time to cut interest rates. With tariff levels climbing since the start of the year, both on imports from various countries and on sector-specific products such as steel, aluminum and autos, many firms have faced higher business costs. Some are now passing them along to consumers. 'Gamechanger' 'This is a gamechanger jobs report. The labour market is deteriorating quickly,' said Ms Heather Long, chief economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union. She added in a note that of the growth in July, '75 per cent of those jobs were in one sector: health care.' 'The economy needs certainty soon on tariffs,' Ms Long said. 'The longer this tariff whiplash lasts, the more likely this weak hiring environment turns into layoffs.' But it remains unclear when the dust will settle, with Mr Trump ordering the reimposition of steeper tariffs on scores of economies late on July 31, which are set to take effect in a week. The president also raised tariffs on Canadian imports, although broad exemptions remain. Mortgage Bankers Association economist Joel Kan said that for now, 'goods-producing industries saw contraction for the third straight month.' 'Service industries involved in trade also saw declines in job growth, potentially a result of the uncertain tariff environment, as businesses either put their activity on pause or pulled back altogether,' Mr Kan added in a note. 'Overly cautious' A sharp weakening in the labour market could push the Federal Reserve towards slashing interest rates sooner to shore up the economy. On Aug 1, the two Fed officials who voted this week against the central bank's decision to keep rates unchanged warned that standing pat risks further damaging the economy. Both Fed vice-chair for supervision Michelle Bowman and governor Christopher Waller argued that the inflationary effects of tariffs were temporary. They added in separate statements that the bank should focus on fortifying the economy to avert further weakening in the labour market. Putting off an interest rate cut 'could result in a deterioration in the labor market and a further slowing in economic growth,' Ms Bowman added. Mr Waller said: 'I believe that the wait and see approach is overly cautious.' AFP
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Adriana Kugler resigning from US Fed, opening door to Trump appointment
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ms Adriana Kugler will exit the central bank on Aug 8, before the conclusion of her term. WASHINGTON - The Federal Reserve said on Aug 1 that governor Adriana Kugler is resigning early from her term and will exit the central bank on Aug 8, potentially shaking up what was already a fractious succession process for Fed leadership amid difficult relations with President Donald Trump. The Fed said in a statement that Ms Kugler, who became a governor in September 2023, will leave before her term's conclusion, which was scheduled for Jan 31, 2026. In a press release, the Fed said Ms Kugler will return to Georgetown University as a professor next autumn. Ms Kugler did not attend this week's rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meeting. Ms Kugler's early departure may shake up the timeline for the succession process now surrounding Fed chair Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Mr Trump has threatened to fire Mr Powell repeatedly, believing interest rates should be much lower than they are. Mr Trump will now get to select a Fed governor to replace Ms Kugler and finish out her term. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Tech Reporting suspected advanced cyber attacks will provide a defence framework: Shanmugam Business Singapore's US tariff rate stays at 10%, but the Republic is not out of the woods yet Asia Asia-Pacific economies welcome new US tariff rates, but concerns over extent of full impact remain Business ST explains: How Trump tariffs could affect Singapore SMEs, jobs and markets Asia Indonesia's Mount Lewotobi Laki-laki erupts Singapore Thundery showers expected on most days in first half of August Singapore Synapxe chief executive, MND deputy secretary to become new perm secs on Sept 1 Singapore 5 women face capital charges after they were allegedly found with nearly 27kg of cocaine in S'pore Some speculation has centred on the idea Mr Trump might pick a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the Fed appointment, although Mr Trump said later he was happy to have an open slot to fill. 'I would not read any political motivation into what (Kugler is) doing, although the consequence of what she's doing is she's calling Trump's bluff,' said Mr Derek Tang, an analyst at LH Meyer, a research firm. 'She's putting the ball in his court and saying, look, you're putting so much pressure on the Fed, and you want some control over nominees, well, here's a slot.' The mechanics of filling the soon-to-be open governor role have a number of moving parts that make it hard to say how Mr Trump will approach finding a replacement for Ms Kugler. Mr Tang noted the president could even fill the position temporarily with a recess appointment while the Senate, responsible for confirming Board of Governors officials, is not in session. There's also some uncertainty about what would happen to someone quickly confirmed to the role given that the term ends early in 2026, although some Fed observers noted a governor can stay in office in an expired term until a replacement has been confirmed. Over recent days, Mr Trump's rhetoric about the Fed has remained heated - he called Mr Powell on Aug 1 'a stubborn MORON' - but he appears to have backed away from his threats to fire the central bank leader. Challenging term In a letter to Mr Trump announcing her resignation, Ms Kugler wrote 'I am proud to have tackled this role with integrity, a strong commitment to serving the public, and with a data-driven approach strongly based on my expertise in labour markets and inflation.' Ms Kugler's time at the Fed was a challenging one as central bankers raised rates aggressively to combat high inflation pressures. Those high rates have put them in the crosshairs of Mr Trump and have caused economic challenges, although inflation pressures have moved much closer to the central bank's 2 per cent target. At the FOMC meeting this week, the Fed maintained its interest rate target range at between 4.25 per cent and 4.5 per cent as policymakers stayed on the sidelines to see how Mr Trump's aggressive regime of large import tax increases will affect the economy and inflation pressures. Two Fed officials opposed that stance and wanted a rate cut, worried that risks to the job market are rising and that the inflation threat posed by tariffs is transient. The Fed's dissenters found some support for their concerns in the release on Aug 1 of weaker-than-expected jobs data that was particularly notable for downward revisions to prior month's job gains. Some Fed officials who spoke on Aug 1 noted the report with concern but said they need to see more evidence the job market is running into trouble before changing their views on monetary policy. Mr Trump reacted to the jobs data with a double-barrelled attack, hitting the Fed for not cutting rates while directing his staff to fire the commissioner of the Labour Department's Bureau of Labour Statistics, claiming - without evidence - the hiring numbers had been rigged. Mr Trump's move rattled markets and raised questions about the future integrity of one of the most important statistical reports financial markets rely upon.
CNA
17 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: How the US weaponised Pakistan against India
NEW DELHI: Many in New Delhi welcomed President Donald Trump's return to power, expecting him to take the Indo-US relationship to new heights. They must wonder where it all went wrong, given that Trump launched an unprecedented broadside against India this week – threatening tariffs of 25 per cent and warning that a surcharge would be added unless India stops buying Russian oil and weapons. He even expressed dissatisfaction with the nation's participation in the 'anti-US' BRICS grouping. Normally, Prime Minister Narendra Modi might just overlook a few social media posts. It may be humiliating to wind up with higher tariff rates than India's peers after wooing Trump, but that can be shrugged off as well. Yet the president didn't stop at trade. He twisted the knife by announcing a tariff deal with Pakistan on the very same day – and added that US companies would help India's troubled neighbour extract oil from recently discovered reserves, and that 'maybe they'll be selling oil to India one day.' I'm not sure Trump knows what he's playing with. Yes, the government was looking forward to a more transactional era: For New Delhi, almost everything is negotiable. But not its relationship with Pakistan. Citizens already resented Trump claiming credit for a ceasefire between the nuclear-armed nations earlier this year. Nothing is more likely to cause any Indian leader to dig in his heels and stop talking about economic ties than a mention of Pakistan. INDIA HAS LITTLE LEVERAGE Policymakers are grimly absorbing some unpalatable truths. Has New Delhi overestimated its geopolitical importance? The tariff threat was bad enough: 25 per cent is higher than the 19 per cent agreed with the Philippines and Indonesia, and much higher than the 15 per cent offered to US allies like the European Union, Korea and Japan. For some reason, India expected it was so indispensable to the US that it would receive a better deal than long-term allies – even one that preserved the barriers it has erected around industry and agriculture. Instead, unless it gives away far more than planned, it might wind up as one of the few countries that emerged from Trump's tariff 'pause' with a higher, not lower rate than was originally threatened. New Delhi has learned, too late, that it has very little actual leverage in Washington. The Chinese may be granted another extension because they have things that they can threaten the US economy with. The Europeans and East Asians can promise to buy American-made weaponry or invest in the US. India can neither threaten nor bribe. For years, it has nevertheless managed to punch above its actual economic weight by tacitly promising to be part of Washington-led attempts to contain a rising China. Tacitly, not openly, mind – India doesn't believe that closeness to the US precludes it from participating in China-dominated groupings or supporting Beijing's clients in Moscow. But Trump's ire demonstrates that this balancing act has may finally have run its course. Russia might not be his top priority, but its second-largest client's refusal to fall in line will still irritate him. He received fulsome praise from Pakistan's leaders after he announced a ceasefire; the Indians pointedly ignored him. This White House wants homage, not defiance. There was certainly a cantankerous edge to his remark that, for all he cared, India and Russia could 'take their dead economies down together'. INDIA'S US POLICY IS IN SHAMBLES Had he merely demanded more distance between Delhi and Moscow – and done so, if possible, without insulting India's economic prospects – leaders might well have quietly given in. The discount on Russian oil is only between US$6 and US$10 a barrel, and according to research from Standard Chartered, the impact on inflation of switching to US sources would be negligible. Sure, the government would have to somehow convince its nationalist base that the switch would be in the country's interest after spending two years claiming the opposite. But trust in the prime minister is high enough for him to pull that off. What voters won't accept, however, is any dilution of the government's hard line on Pakistan. Capitulation to Trump after he has signalled he prefers their neighbours would be a tough sell, even for Modi. In less than 24 hours, New Delhi's policy for the Trump era, and its carefully cultivated strategic ambiguity amid US-China tension, were both left in shambles. I expect Modi will still be able to push through some sort of deal, if with more concessions and domestic political damage than he would like. But Trump is clearly asking himself exactly what India brings to the table as a partner. Equally, citizens will wonder if the US is once again making the mistake – as it has so often before – of trusting Pakistan's establishment while ignoring India. New Delhi's confidence that it could navigate the Trump era has been well and truly shattered; it will take a long time for the relationship to recover from this tumultuous week.
