logo
Should new senior citizen tax cut plan stay or go? Governor candidates are split

Should new senior citizen tax cut plan stay or go? Governor candidates are split

Yahoo17-04-2025
Senior citizens are expected to begin getting Stay NJ tax credits next year — but the 11 people hoping to be our next governor are split on whether the program will work. (Illustration by Alex Cochran for New Jersey Monitor)
New Jersey's next governor may inherit a new property tax cut program aimed at seniors, but the candidates don't all embrace it as is.
Some of the 11 candidates hoping to become our next chief executive say income limits for the program — called Stay NJ — are too generous. Others worry the state's uncertain fiscal outlook makes the program unfeasible unless it's revamped. One candidate, Republican Bill Spadea, called Stay NJ a 'gimmick' that should be eliminated outright.
'We cannot continue with smoke and mirrors that shift the tax burden from one group to another while calling it a tax cut,' Spadea said in a statement from his campaign.
Democratic lawmakers have been promising Stay NJ for years, saying it will be essential to keep senior citizens from fleeing to states with lower taxes. But budget experts have issued private and public warnings about the program's price tag, which is expected to top $1 billion annually.
'The state just can't afford to pay for it,' Richard Keevey, a former state budget director and comptroller, told the New Jersey Monitor.
StayNJ was signed into law by Gov. Phil Murphy in 2023, but it is not scheduled to begin delivering payments to eligible taxpayers until 2026. The program will offer homeowners 65 and over tax credits to make up for half of their property tax bills, capped at $6,500. Homeowners must make less than $500,000 annually to qualify.
Stay NJ payments could go out just as a new governor takes office in January. Murphy, a Democrat, cannot seek a third term this November, and six Democrats and five Republicans are running to succeed him.
Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, a Democrat, has called Stay NJ 'inherently flawed and regressive.' In a statement from his campaign, Baraka said it 'must be overhauled or dismissed,' and took aim at the program's half-a-million-dollar income limit.
'We need to direct government resources toward lifting all boats, not just those already floating comfortably. That means capping rents, building more housing, and investing in real solutions for affordability across the board. Our state budget should reflect our values: working people, not the wealthy, should be first in line for help,' he said.
Two of Baraka's Democratic rivals — Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop and Rep. Mikie Sherrill — noted that statutory language bars the state from issuing Stay NJ payments if certain fiscal goals are not met, like maintaining a surplus that is at least 12% of annual spending (lawmakers could override that provision, and did last year).
Speaking at a press conference in Edison this week, Fulop said 'of course we're not going to stand in the way of a 50% tax reduction for residents' if the state finds a way to fund Stay NJ while keeping its surplus above 12%. But the more likely outcome, he said, is that the program won't work.
Fulop has proposed either restructuring Stay NJ by lowering the income threshold to $150,000 and making the award a flat amount based on income rather than a percentage of property taxes paid, or implementing a new program to provide all homeowners with a single tax credit that limits a homeowner's property taxes 'to an affordable percentage of their income.'
'We're going to clean that up to make sure there's real property tax reform for residents here throughout New Jersey,' he said.
Sherrill told reporters in Bloomfield last month that she thinks StayNJ is a 'great program' for seniors. But in a statement from her campaign on Wednesday, she noted the state's budget issues.
'We have no way to know what state revenues will look like in 12 to 15 months or how much needed federal funding will be ripped away by Trump. However, there are things we must do like fully fund the pension system and protecting direct property tax relief is of equal importance. It is the most direct way our state government can create affordability for New Jerseyans,' Sherrill said.
Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-05) has pledged to cut all New Jerseyans' property tax bills by a dramatic 15%. Gottheimer in a statement from his campaign said he supports Stay NJ, but wants to add additional tax relief, including a $1,000 'senior bonus' for seniors who have lived in New Jersey for at least a decade before turning 70 and an annual tax rebate for renters.
'I'm the only candidate with a tax cut plan that meets our pension obligations, tackles our structural deficit, and is fully paid for without cutting the important programs and services Jersey families and seniors rely on,' he said.
Democrat Sean Spiller, president of the statewide teachers union, said he supports StayNJ. Spiller said in a statement from his campaign that he wants to streamline the state's multiple tax credit programs and make sure benefits get to people who need them most 'without the challenging layers of bureaucracy and redundancies.' Stay NJ benefits would be paid out only if homeowners do not already see their tax bill cut in half by the existing Anchor and senior freeze tax relief programs.
Former state Sen. Steve Sweeney, a Democrat, announced Wednesday he wants to slash the income limit for Stay NJ to $250,000 and eliminate income tax for seniors 65 and up with annual incomes of $250,000 or less. He calls his plan 'Stay NJ Plus.'
'Our seniors deserve the peace of mind that comes with financial stability,' Sweeney said in a statement from his campaign. 'By capping the Stay NJ program at $250,000, we can ensure a fair distribution of resources while continuing to support the goal of keeping our cherished residents in their homes.'
Republican Mario Kranjac, a former mayor of Englewood Cliffs, is open to keeping Stay NJ on a transitional basis,' but if elected governor, he would aim to cut spending and slash taxes, 'making the State more affordable for everyone without special programs primarily designed to buy votes,' said his campaign manager, Michael Byrne.
Republican state Sen. Jon Bramnick said he supports Stay NJ and believes senior citizens deserve tax relief.
'I still support the program but if the Democrats were truly serious about reducing the property tax burden they would have started the program immediately, not three years after passage,' Bramnick said.
Former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, a Republican, did not respond to a request for comment.
Dana DiFilippo contributed.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Forgive Me Nebraska, I Wasn't Familiar With Y'alls Game": Over 2 Million People Have Watched This Video Of A Republican Lawmaker Being Passionately Booed And Heckled At A Town Hall
"Forgive Me Nebraska, I Wasn't Familiar With Y'alls Game": Over 2 Million People Have Watched This Video Of A Republican Lawmaker Being Passionately Booed And Heckled At A Town Hall

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"Forgive Me Nebraska, I Wasn't Familiar With Y'alls Game": Over 2 Million People Have Watched This Video Of A Republican Lawmaker Being Passionately Booed And Heckled At A Town Hall

Republican lawmaker Mike Flood was recently booed and heckled at a town hall in Nebraska, and the video is GLORIOUS. Over two million people have watched this TikTok that began with Mike asking, "Do you think people who are 28 years old, who can work and refuse to work, should get free healthcare?" As the crowd screamed a resounding "YESSSS," Mike looked like he was thinking, "Oh no." Related: The face of someone who did not receive the answer they expected: "I don't think that the majority of Nebraskans agree with you," he finally said. When he asked for the next slide of the presentation, people began chanting, "Tax the rich!" Related: Visibly frustrated, Mike tried again: "If you choose not to work. You. Do. Not. Get. Free. Healthcare." But the crowd wasn't having it and screamed, "BOOOOOO!" Mike continued, "Money does not fall out of the sky. It does not grow on trees. It comes from all of you. I wish there was a world we could live in where everything came from the government, and it was free. But that will never, ever, ever happen." Notably, he did not offer the obvious solution of, IDK, making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share??? Throughout the town hall, people also shouted things like "vote him out!" and "liar!" The only time in the video that Mike received applause was when he supported the release of the Epstein files. Naturally, folks in the comments had a lot to say. This person pointed out, "even if you work healthcare isn't free!!!!" Related: Many people said what we're all thinking: "Healthcare should be a basic human right." "i love that you can hear the whole crowd say 'YES' it restored my faith in American society." "'Should people in the richest society in history have access to life saving care' isn't the gotcha he thinks it is." "Forgive me Nebraska, I wasn't familiar with yalls game DAMN." Related: "*the majority screams yes* 'the majority doesn't agree with you.'" And finally, "'it comes from all of you' SIR YOU FORGOT TO TAX THE BILLIONAIRES." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Republican Booed At Nebraska Town Hall Over Healthcare
Republican Booed At Nebraska Town Hall Over Healthcare

Buzz Feed

time11 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Republican Booed At Nebraska Town Hall Over Healthcare

Republican lawmaker Mike Flood was recently booed and heckled at a town hall in Nebraska, and the video is GLORIOUS. Over two million people have watched this TikTok that began with Mike asking, "Do you think people who are 28 years old, who can work and refuse to work, should get free healthcare?" As the crowd screamed a resounding "YESSSS," Mike looked like he was thinking, "Oh no." The face of someone who did not receive the answer they expected: "I don't think that the majority of Nebraskans agree with you," he finally said. When he asked for the next slide of the presentation, people began chanting, "Tax the rich!" Visibly frustrated, Mike tried again: "If you choose not to work. You. Do. Not. Get. Free. Healthcare." But the crowd wasn't having it and screamed, "BOOOOOO!" Mike continued, "Money does not fall out of the sky. It does not grow on trees. It comes from all of you. I wish there was a world we could live in where everything came from the government, and it was free. But that will never, ever, ever happen." Notably, he did not offer the obvious solution of, IDK, making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share??? Naturally, folks in the comments had a lot to say. This person pointed out, "even if you work healthcare isn't free!!!!" Many people said what we're all thinking: "Healthcare should be a basic human right." "i love that you can hear the whole crowd say 'YES' it restored my faith in American society." "'Should people in the richest society in history have access to life saving care' isn't the gotcha he thinks it is." "Forgive me Nebraska, I wasn't familiar with yalls game DAMN." "*the majority screams yes* 'the majority doesn't agree with you.'" And finally, "'it comes from all of you' SIR YOU FORGOT TO TAX THE BILLIONAIRES." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below!

Trump claims Democrats are denying Republicans congressional districts in Mass. See the maps for yourself.
Trump claims Democrats are denying Republicans congressional districts in Mass. See the maps for yourself.

Boston Globe

time11 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump claims Democrats are denying Republicans congressional districts in Mass. See the maps for yourself.

But that's not the only way Massachusetts has come into the conversation. Advertisement Amid Texas' ongoing redistricting controversy this week, and plenty of Democratic backlash, Trump Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'If you look at what's going on with the redistricting, or whatever you want to call it, the Democrats have done it long before we started,' he said following an executive order signing Tuesday afternoon. 'I got 40 percent [of the presidential vote] in Massachusetts, and yet they have 100 percent of the vote in terms of Congress. So there's no Republican, there's no anything. So I should, we should, have 40 percent. You know why? They redistricted.' Is there any truth to Trump's claims, and would it even be possible to draw a congressional district in Massachusetts with a Republican majority? In short, not really. Advertisement Trump won 36 percent of the Massachusetts presidential vote in 2024 (about 1.2 million votes), not 40 percent or 41 percent as he claimed Tuesday morning in a Trump did not win the majority of votes as of 2023. Massachusetts has not elected a Republican to the House for 31 years. In that time, the state's congressional districts have been redrawn three times, following the 2000, 2010, and 2020 censuses, as is required of states by the Constitution. The most drastic change to the state's congressional districts occurred following the 2010 census, when Massachusetts lost its 10th district (also a Democratic seat) due to low population growth. The state's current congressional districts were signed into law by Republican former governor Charlie Baker Under federal law, districts within a state must have roughly equal populations. Based on the 2020 census, the average population for each House seat is a little over 760,000 people. Districts must also be one, uninterrupted shape. The federal Voting Rights Act also dictates that congressional districts cannot be drawn with the intent of suppressing the voting rights of people of color. Advertisement In Massachusetts, the majority of registered voters — In 2024, five of Massachusetts' nine House members Though there are plenty of Republican-leaning voters in Massachusetts, it would be practically impossible to create a Republican-controlled congressional district because the state's major population hubs tend to vote Democratic. A red congressional district, no matter how wonkily drawn, would likely lack the required population size to qualify. When Democratic Secretary of State Bill Galvin was asked Tuesday if Massachusetts might draw a new Congressional map before the next census as Texas is attempting to do, Galvin said it is unlikely. 'We have no Republicans to give,' he said. Julian E.J. Sorapuru can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store