
BJP MPs object to Medha Patkar, Prakash Raj at parliamentary panel meeting, walk out
The meeting, which was eventually cancelled, had been convened to discuss the implementation and effectiveness of the 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013'. While the BJP MPs alleged that the committee's chairman Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, a Congress MP from Odisha, had kept the members in the dark about the witnesses summoned for deposition and had summoned 'anti-nationals' and 'urban Naxals', Ulaka said the Lok Sabha Speaker's office had cleared the names but the BJP leaders were 'not ready to listen'.
Of the 29 members of the parliamentary panel, 14 were present on Tuesday, and with eight MPs of the BJP-led NDA boycotting, Ulaka had to cancel the meeting as there was no quorum. BJP sources said apart from their party's MPs, ally Janata Dal (Secular)'s leader and former PM H D Deve Gowda followed them. However, Congress sources claimed that Deve Gowda did not boycott the meeting.
Sources said the BJP MPs felt 'agitated' when they saw Patkar and Raj, and refused to enter the meeting hall unless Patkar, a founding member of the Narmada Bachao Andolan, was sent back. As a member of the Narmada Bachao Andolan, Patkar has earned the ire of BJP leaders and workers for her campaign against the Sardar Sarovar Dam project in Gujarat. Raj, a popular actor, is known for his anti-BJP views.
The BJP MPs are learnt to have questioned Ulaka for inviting 'anti-nationals'. One BJP MP is learnt to have said that if people such as Patkar and Raj were being invited to depose before a parliamentary panel, next time they might as well invite the Pakistan PM. Another BJP MP is said to have complained about 'urban Naxals' being invited to Parliament.
'We boycotted the meeting because we were kept in the dark about who was coming as witnesses. We entered and saw Medha Patkar sitting there. We should have been given the list of these people and which NGO they belong to. How could the chairman keep such information from us?' BJP MP Sanjay Jaiswal told The Indian Express.
The ruling party's members said Ulaka rejected their suggestion to hear senior officials from the Department of Land Resources, and the ministries of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and Tribal Affairs who too had been invited on Tuesday. 'We were very clear that we would not allow the activists to depose first,' said Jaiswal.
'It was not decided in any of the meetings who would come to the parliamentary committee. Prakash Raj's name was not in the list. Why should we listen to someone whose background we don't know?' said BJP MP Raju Bista.
Responding to the BJP leaders, Ulaka told The Indian Express, 'We had such meetings several times. It is a normal procedure; the agenda was set, officers from the ministries concerned and the stakeholders, including those who are working in NGOs and other civil society representatives, were invited. The Speaker's office was informed and the list was approved. However, when they (BJP MPs) saw Medha Patkar, they, in a synchronised way, started shouting, 'She should not be allowed.' I told them just listen to her as she is someone who has been fighting for the landless people and their rehabilitation.'
'What's wrong with listening to her?' the Congress MP asked. 'The committee together prepares the report, and we submit our recommendations to the government. It's the government that takes the decisions, we do not.'
His party colleague and fellow panel member Imran Masood labelled the BJP members' behaviour as 'anarchy'.
'If you have called someone, you should listen to them, irrespective of whether you agree with them or not. They walked out. We called them … This is anarchy. You are not following parliamentary procedure. Why can't you listen? The BJP people didn't want to hear about issues related to land acquisition of marginalised people,' he said.
Apart from Patkar and Raj, the committee had invited 10 more civil society representatives. Although Standing Committee reports carry significant influence, they are not legally binding on the government. The meeting on Tuesday would have been the 29th meeting of the committee. Till now, it has discussed matters such as 'Rural Employment through Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)', the 'Status of Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan (RGSA)', and reviewed the progress made under Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
Op Sindoor delegations conveyed national unity message: Jaishankar to Quad leaders
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday lauded India's Operation Sindoor outreach by the all-party delegations and the representatives of different political parties who formed a highly qualified group of leaders, saying they sent a unified message to the world, and that he is proud of them not just as a minister, but also as an Indian to reporters after holding the QUAD meeting with his counterparts from the US, Japan and Australia in Washington DC, Jaishankar said that since Parliamentarians from different parties participated in the global outreach, it was India's "political pluralism" coming together for a common cause in the national interest, which was conversations and the impact that they had was very good for our country. It really served our national interest. When you have a broad-based set of people who speak with one voice abroad, it conveys a strong message of national unity," Jaishankar said at a media briefing. Seven multi-party delegations recently travelled to over 30 countries to highlight India's strong stance against terrorism following Operation Sindoor. Each group visited key capitals around the world to underline India's resolve against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism and reinforce the country's commitment to global peace."When you have leaders like Shashi Tharoor, Supriya Sule, Kanimozhi from opposition parties as well as from the ruling alliance, including Ravi Shankar Prasad or Jai Panda or even Sanjay Jha; People like Salman Khurshid, Anil Sharma, Ghulam Nabi Azad who have had previous experience with foreign affairs, I call it political plularism come together for India and send a strong unified message," the External Affairs Minister 50 individuals were part of the outreach mission, including current and former MPs and ex-diplomats. Among the leaders who headed the delegations were BJP's Ravi Shankar Prasad and Baijayant Panda, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, JD(U)'s Sanjay Jha, Shiv Sena's Shrikant Shinde, DMK's Kanimozhi, and NCP(SP)'s Supriya presence of leaders from the opposition as well as the ruling alliance lent the initiative a bipartisan government's decision to send inclusive delegations, featuring MPs like Asaduddin Owaisi (AIMIM), Manish Tewari (Congress), and Prem Chand Gupta (RJD), was widely seen as an attempt to present a unified front on an issue of national Operation Sindoor outreach programme was aimed at conveying to the world that India's military retaliation against Pakistan was non-escalatory in nature as it was carried out in response to the Aprill 22 Pahalgam attack, which killed 26 civilians, and also to make India's zero-tolerance stand against terrorism clear.- EndsMust Watch


India Today
15 minutes ago
- India Today
Kanwar Yatra nameplate diktat: Unholy segregation or holy practice? Big debate on Gaurav Sawant's show
A controversy has erupted over orders by the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring food stalls along the Kanwar Yatra route to prominently display the names and licences of owners. Opposition parties have criticised the move as religious profiling, while the BJP has defended it as a measure to allow pilgrims to make informed choices. The orders have sparked a debate on religious sentiments, food preferences during pilgrimages, and concerns over vigilantism. Critics argue it could lead to segregation and targeting of minority-owned businesses, while supporters say it enables transparency for pilgrims observing dietary restrictions. Also on the show, Colonel John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute, discusses India's Operation Sindoor. Spencer analyzes India's changed doctrine towards terrorism, emphasising an immediate and overwhelming response while avoiding nuclear escalation. He highlights India's strategic messaging, targeting of terrorist sites, and the performance of indigenous weapons systems compared to Pakistan's Chinese-supplied equipment. Spencer also discusses the importance of integrated military capabilities and the continued relevance of ground forces in modern warfare alongside advanced technologies.


Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
INDIA bloc flags EC's ‘disastrous' SIR plan, says lakhs may lose voting rights in Bihar
Jul 02, 2025 11:18 PM IST The INDIA bloc on Wednesday told the Election Commission that its plan to carry out a special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar would disproportionately impact 'disadvantaged communities.' Congress MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi with Bihar party President Rajesh Ram, CPI (ML) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya, RJD leader Manoj Jha, and other INDIA bloc leaders address the media after meeting the Election Commission, outside Nirvachan Sadan, in New Delhi, Wednesday, July 2, 2025. (PTI) The parties said the exercise risked disenfranchising lakhs of genuine voters due to its documentation demands and rigid timeline. 'The methodology, timeline, and process prescribed for the SIR is guaranteed to ensure a disastrous result that will result in the deletion of tens of lakhs of genuine voters, especially those at the margins of society,' the parties said in a joint representation.