
Ghosted after payday? Mumbai startup founder's viral post sparks storm over work culture and employee ethics
Kiran Shah
, the founder of Mumbai-based startup
Market Fit@Go Zero
, found himself at the center of a heated LinkedIn storm after posting a candid message about employees who allegedly 'ghosted' the company right after payday. His frustration? That some team members waited to receive their salaries on the 1st of the month, only to resign without a word the very next day.
This shift to early-month salary payments, implemented in December 2023 to ease employees' financial burdens, unexpectedly created a trend that Shah described as not just disruptive—but indicative of deeper professional ethics. In his post, Shah didn't mince his words: 'Don't ghost your employer once you get the salary… Do it in a professional way that doesn't burn bridges.'
From Empathy to Outrage: A Founder's Candid Take
Shah emphasized that his intent in advancing salary credit dates was rooted in empathy. He recalled his startup's earlier policy of paying salaries on the 10th or 15th, a common practice in bootstrapped firms. But when employees shared that the delay caused financial strain, he changed it to the 1st of the month. Ironically, it's after this shift that a few employees—exactly three, by his count—exited silently the very day salaries hit accounts.
'Of course it hampers operations,' Shah wrote, 'but I won't revert to the old system just because of a few such dumb folks. That would go against the culture I'm trying to build.' While some praised him for raising concerns around professional decency, others were far less forgiving.
In a candid LinkedIn post, Shah described how four employees quit the very day they received their salaries — without notice, without explanation. (Screenshot: LinkedIn/Kiran Shah)
Critics Clap Back: Is Timely Pay a Privilege or a Right?
Shah's post—initially meant to reflect on the values of communication and professionalism—was quickly interpreted by many as an attempt to guilt employees for exercising their right to resign. One user shot back, 'Receiving salaries on time is not a favour, it's a right.' Others questioned the startup's
HR practices
and suggested that the real issue was not the mode of exit but the reasons prompting such exits in the first place.
You Might Also Like:
Can posting regularly on LinkedIn boost your job prospects? A career coach thinks so, but netizens beg to differ
'Worry less about how they're leaving and more about why,' another commenter offered, calling attention to what could be deeper organizational issues that make employees disengage silently.
A Second Post, a Clarification, and a Cultural Reflection
Faced with criticism and misinterpretation, Shah followed up with another post to set the record straight. He clarified that only three people had resigned unprofessionally, while others—such as a core team member—had left on good terms, even amid crucial business periods.
He addressed accusations of toxic work culture by pointing to Go Zero's zero-layoff history, lean team size, and a culture of respect. 'I've fired people when needed, but always communicated expectations clearly,' he said. He also lamented how media and social media alike often choose sensation over substance.
But beyond HR policies and exit etiquette, Shah's reflection turned philosophical. 'Culture,' he said, 'is misunderstood in India. Most workers care more about stability, dignity, and meaningful work than offsites and perks. That's the culture I strive to nurture.'
You Might Also Like:
Marketing professor's hilarious LinkedIn comment on alma mater IIM Ahmedabad will leave you in splits. Netizens call him 'legend'
Beyond Go Zero: A Mirror to Modern Workplaces
While Kiran Shah's post may have sparked criticism, support, and trolling in equal measure, it struck a nerve that many employers and employees today grapple with: what defines a
professional exit
? Is giving notice a duty or a courtesy? And when founders publicly air grievances, does it reflect transparency—or managerial fragility?
In an age where hustle culture, quiet quitting, and evolving workplace dynamics collide, Shah's experience offers a revealing look into the growing pains of startups—and the fragile trust that binds teams together. Whether you're the boss or the beginner, one thing is clear: how you enter and exit a workplace says as much about the organization as it does about you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu Surges Union government to simplify rules, regulations for startups
Coimbatore: Simplification of rules and regulations, including those related to GST, licensing and bank loans, is the need of the hour to propel the growth of startups, said Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu here on Saturday. He was speaking at the first demo day organized by the Coimbatore-based startup incubator Aalamaram to celebrate the 23 startups it successfully nurtured and showcase their offerings. Six startups exhibited their products at the event, which saw participation of several startup founders and investors. Speaking after the event, Sridhar Vembu said all the 23 startups should be nurtured in a big way so that billion-dollar enterprises could emerge from them. "Not every startup may be successful. It is not important what percentage of startups succeed. What matters is how many jobs are created through startups," he said. When asked about the kind of support the govt should provide, he said the Union govt had already simplified several procedures to benefit startups. However, further simplification is needed, particularly in GST compliance, licensing and access to bank loans, he said. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "In my opinion, the govt should not fund startups, as it could lead to favouritism and corruption. The startup ecosystem should remain private. The govt's role should be limited to providing easy approvals and relaxed regulations," Sridhar Vembu said.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
AAI seeks 17 more acres for airport expansion in Coimbatore
Coimbatore: The Airports Authority of India (AAI) has requested the district administration for an additional 17 acres for the city airport expansion project. The district administration said the land acquisition would begin as soon as they received administrative sanction. Vidya Chandran, district revenue officer (land acquisition for airport), said the district administration had already acquired and handed over 604 acres of the 628 acres requested by the AAI for the airport expansion. Of the remaining land parcels, nine acres is entangled in litigation. The remaining 15 acres is yet to be acquired because of multiple ownership and legal heir issues, she said. "As and when we acquire and hand over the remaining land to the AAI, the people who own land in Singanallur, Irugur and Neelambur areas will face connectivity issues, as some roads will be disturbed during the land acquisition. The additional 17 acres will help address the connectivity issues," the officer said. Pointing out that Chinniyampalayam was a crucial area for the proposed runway extension, city airport director G Sambath Kumar said the land earmarked there was yet to be acquired. "The land acquisition issues are being handled by the state govt." He said the AAI had finalised an Erode-based private construction firm to set up a precast compound wall around the newly acquired land. The work is expected to commence by the first week of August, he said. The AAI had floated a tender on March 19, 2025, to construct the precast boundary wall for 16.67km for the newly acquired land at a cost of Rs29 crore, with a deadline to complete the work in 456 days.


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
AI versus first jobbers: Here are six tips for bright young students as AI threatens entry-level jobs
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT founder Dario Amodei has set the cat among the pigeons by predicting that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level, white-collar jobs within five years. Aneesh Raman, a senior leader in LinkedIn, sees 'the bottom rung of the job ladder breaking', with entry-level coding, para-legal and consulting analyst jobs under threat of being 'replaced with AI'.Molly Kinder of Brookings says, 'These tools are so good that I no longer need marketing analysts, finance analysts and research assistants.'Even in my tiny company, we have 'replaced' a couple of junior researchers with deep research AI agents from OpenAI and phenomenon of entrylevel jobs being under AI threat is not only anecdotal. Raman sees hard evidence of this on LinkedIn, with 63% of VPs and above agreeing that AI might eventually take on some of the entry-level roles and tasks. The latest US job data reveals that the unemployment rate for college grads has risen by 30%, compared with about 18% for all by big tech and consulting firms support this assertion. PwC recently laid off 1,500 US employees, most of them recent hires. Microsoft got rid of about 3% of its workforce, most of them software engineers and project managers. A now-famous memo by the Spotify CEO froze all hiring, insisting that employees must first prove that AI can't do that job before they hire a human has always impacted jobs, destroying many old ones, but also creating new, unexpected ones. The IT wave put old-school clerks and stenographers to pasture, but created millions of software developers and search engine marketers. Manufacturing went through a similar however, is different in the sense that it is a cognitive technology—one of the brain, rather than of the hand. So, it squarely takes aim at the knowledge worker and the creative seems different with AI is how it is impacting first jobbers and entry-level workers. This is dangerous, as it is in the formative years that youngsters learn skills and gain basic code and debugging are how they rise to become great software engineers; junior paralegals and associates draft clauses and contracts that prepares them for partner-level tasks; and retail and customer service agents learn the basics before they can rise up the hierarchy. These are, coincidentally, the tasks that AI can do best. Deep Research can do the job of researchers; vibe coding with Cursor AI of entry-level software; while Harvey AI and NotebookLM draft excellent curiously, AI seems to be favouring the older people—with their human qualities of judgement, experience, institutional memory and collaboration, sharpened over years. It is in these human skills that young people need to be groomed. But if entry jobs go away, it will create a massive unemployment and educational crisis, and choke the pipeline of young people who can replace the our obsession for software and STEM, it was not only computer or software engineering graduates who joined tech firms as software engineers. Legions of mechanical, electronics and even civil engineers did the same. There is a whole world to build out there outside of software. Manufacturing firms desperately need engineers to run their machines, there are bridges to be built, roads to be repaired and data centres to be run. For instance, Google recently announced a $10 million grant, among other things, to train electricians for the power plant and data centre boom that AI has sowed. This huge shortage means electrical engineers in data centre clusters in the US are earning significantly more than software engineers do. Simply put, say hello to the revolutionary idea that mechanical engineers do mechanical definition of literacy has changed. It was about reading, writing and arithmetic; now it is beyond that to working naturally with AI tools and agents. Young people, including those I teach at Ashoka and other universities, are fast adapting to be AI literate and use AI tools in everything they do, to get a leg up in their job search. At KPMG, recent graduates are reportedly leveraging AI tools and handling tax jobs that used to be done by employees with three-plus years' experience. Big legal firms are encouraging early-career lawyers to work on complex contracts that once senior people will have to rediscover humanities with subjects of logic, grammar, ethics, philosophy and literature to keep our competitive advantage. With AI agents increasingly handling the technical 'how-to' of tasks, the human edge will lie in the 'why' and the 'what next'. The 'humble' subjects of humanities like language, philosophy, grammar and the arts are the ones that provide us critical frameworks for understanding context, ethics, human motivation, creativity and critical judgment —skills that are inherently difficult for AI to replicate meaningfully. As answers become commoditised, questions or prompts become important, and increasingly employers will prefer graduates with a mix of humanities and technical and SMEs build economies, not large monolithic organisations. More and more first jobbers will choose to become entrepreneurs. The New York Times writes about how at Stanford University, fewer grads are considering tech and finance careers, and more of them are plunging into starting companies — 'on the theory that if humans are about to lose their labor advantages to powerful AI systems, they had better hurry and do something big'.There is no rule that people must do only one job at a time. As AI rolls in, multiple skills will become much more important. Be a software engineer and a chef; qualify as a designer and run a pet foster home; build websites as well as toys for children. Think of your career not as a linear progression in a single industry, but a portfolio you are before this era, young people entered jobs as apprentices. They would pay a master blacksmith or surgeon to teach them their craft, before setting up a practice of their own. The modern corporate organisation reversed that trend; young people were paid to learn during their initial years. As AI replaces basic skills and reinvents work, there could be a reversal. There could be a future where humans would invest to do our first job, before we claim the right to earn.