US will strike North Korea if South attacked with nukes, South's spy chief nominee says
Lee Jong-seok made the comment during a nomination hearing in answer to a question if he believed Washington would strike the North and put Americans at risk from a country even if Pyongyang has deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles.
'Yes, that is my belief,' Lee said, after saying the hypothetical scenario of South Korea coming under the North's nuclear attack is directly related to the security alliance between the two countries.
North Korea has for years pursued a nuclear programme and is believed to have stockpiled fissile materials to build atomic weapons though it has not tested a missile mounted with such a weapon.
Lee is nominated to lead South Korea's National Intelligence Service under new liberal President Lee Jae Myung who took office on June 4.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
13 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
DIRCO rejects US human rights report, says it is 'inaccurate & deeply flawed'
JOHANNESBURG - The Department of International Relations & Cooperation (DIRCO) has expressed disappointment at the United States' (US) latest disinformation campaign about the country. Washington's state department has published a human rights report, claiming that government was involved in arbitrary and unlawful killings. The Americans once again take issue with expropriation without compensation, which was signed into law this year. ALSO READ: SA reiterates it won't make concessions on domestic policies in exchange for trade deal with US The report also falsely labels the alleged killing of Lucodia Ndlovu and Mariah Makgato by a Limpopo farmer, who then fed them to his pigs, as extrajudicial killings. A-contextual information, discredited accounts, misleading and distortion - these are just some of the words used by DIRCO to describe the US report on human rights in the country. It criticised America, a country which walked away, refusing to be held accountable by a multilateral peer review system through the UN Human Rights Council for producing what it has termed a one-sided, fact-free report without due process or engagement. South Africa's international relations department said this country operated on a transparent system, where information was freely available. Minister Ronald Lamola's spokesperson, Chrispin Phiri: "We register our profound disappointment with this report. We reject it. It is inaccurate and deeply flawed." And while the US rejects South Africa's move towards expropriation, it's been described by the UN Human Rights office as a critical step towards redress.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
The credibility of the National Dialogue is at stake
Those that walked out must go and sit down away from the public glare and 'talk about talks' until they find common ground. In the run-up to the election that ushered in democracy in 1994, there were quite a number of bilateral talks that took place, not only between representatives of the then-banned ANC and the government at the time, but also between figures like Harry Schwarz of the liberal United Party and Mangosuthu Buthelezi, the leader of the homeland of KwaZulu-Natal. These faith-based talks resulted in what came to be known as the Mahlabatini Declaration of Faith. This was in 1974, about 20 years before democracy. There were also talks between private sector businesspeople and the liberation movements outside of the country and even secret talks between jailed Nelson Mandela and National Intelligence Service leader Neil Barnard. Some of those talks led to absolutely nothing, but others led to the establishment of the Convention for a Democratic South Africa. All the talks that preceded that moment were necessary, even the ones that led to nothing. The Mahlabatini Declaration of Faith, for instance, demonstrated that although people can meet to map out the future of a country in which they deem themselves important enough to engage, credibility cannot be declared by the organisers of the talks themselves, but by those they represent and how they carry the aspirations of those they represent. ALSO READ: Mr President, delay National Dialogue The Mahlabatini declaration led to nothing because it lacked credibility. That is the risk that the National Dialogue runs. To start with, President Cyril Ramaphosa and his advisors should acknowledge that it is the ANC government that brought the country to this moment. What is this moment? A time when the country feels directionless, where the initial hope and belief in a prosperous future have all but faded. That admission is not to say that South Africa's problems were all created by the ANC; no, it would simply be an admission that Project South Africa was handed over to the ANC in 1994 with the country trusting and believing that they would steer the project with honesty and integrity, with the sole aim of building a country that all citizens would be proud of, where dignity is restored to every citizen, especially the poorest of the poor. The admission would be: 'We failed and got distracted by, among other things, the lure of personal wealth.' The only way the National Dialogue will work and not be a waste of taxpayers' money is if all the players realise that it is not about them. ALSO READ: Still no confirmation on cost of controversial National Dialogue It is not about Ramaphosa or former president Thabo Mbeki or even their legacies for that matter. It should not be about whether the ANC will get bashed just before an election in 2026, or whether the opposition will feel excluded. It should and must be about whether the South African who lives in a shack in Chris Hani informal settlement, having even given up looking for a job, will have their hope restored. It should be about whether South Africans going about their daily life feel the government has a handle on their own personal safety. They must feel the National Dialogue will fix the police force or will provide a way to stop them and their relatives from getting murdered in broad daylight. How is this going to happen? Those that walked out over the budget and those imposing a budget on the talks need to do what the founders of modern-day South Africa did: go and sit down away from the public glare and 'talk about talks' until they find common ground. ALSO READ: Who is footing the bill for the National Dialogue? Presidency breaks it down
eNCA
3 days ago
- eNCA
New tensions trouble small town America in Trump's second term
BERKELEY SPRINGS - Visitors are still flocking to the quaint mountain town of Berkeley Springs in West Virginia to savour its hot springs, art galleries and gift stores. Residents, however, say they are navigating new tensions. They still smile and shake hands with neighbours at the bakery while getting their morning coffee, as long as they don't mention two words: Donald Trump. The 850 residents of Berkeley Springs are a mix of rural conservatives who have lived here for generations and people who arrived more recently to the town, which is nestled in the Appalachian Mountains. The differences have existed for decades, but things are now growing tense. AFP/File | Paul NOLP "A lot of people who quietly stand up for goodness are getting louder, and then that's making the people who are upset by that also become louder," says Kate Colby, owner of Mineral Springs Trading Company. A large rainbow flag hangs on one wall of her gift store. Some locals told her to take it down, saying it made them feel unwelcome, she says. "They feel like they've got to be louder, and they're aggressive... It just sort of builds, until it combusts," she said with a bitter laugh. The small town dynamics are a portrait in miniature of what is happening across the country: liberal Americans hear the president's frequent diatribes as attacks, while conservatives feel legitimised by his rhetoric. - Keeping quiet - Society in general has grown less civil in the United States in Trump's second term, as he attacks the balance of powers and his political adversaries. "Trump does a really good job polarising everything. He is like, you're on my side, or you can get out," says Nicole Harris. Born in Oregon, Harris recently moved east to landlocked West Virginia, a rural and industrial state where almost 90 percent of the population voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 election. To avoid problems, she keeps quiet: no political discussions with neighbours or with guests at her bed and breakfast, the Grand Castalian Inn. "We're a business, so we accept everyone, and we accept everyone's opinions. I keep my own opinions for myself," she says. AFP/File | Paul NOLP Beth Curtin has owned an antiques store in one of the beautiful brick homes in the centre of town for 36 years. Many of her friends are Trump supporters. She is not. "It is a small community, and so we bump into one another. It's not like, you know, a bigger metropolitan area where you can just hang with people who share your same views.... it's more important that we try to get along and, you know, sometimes you have to bite your tongue," she says. Curtin says she avoids some stores in town because she does not want her money going "towards people who have those views." - 'Communists' - In the air-conditioned chill of the Lighthouse Latte cafe, Scott Wetzel, a wiry, bright-eyed 62-year-old, recalls his farm-based childhood and adult life in landscaping and construction. He views Democrats as "communists" who threaten his way of living. "If I speak of freedom, their idea of freedom is telling me how I could live. That's not freedom. They just don't get it so, but you can't fix that. That's something that's twisted up in their heads," the retiree says. AFP | Paul NOLP He says people are still welcome to "spew that garbage" but "I'm just not gonna listen to it." In early July, some town residents held a march in Berkeley Springs against Trump's "big, beautiful bill." A truck nearby sold caps with his face on them. "There's gonna have to be some shift. We can't keep escalating like this," says Colby, the gift store owner. "We need to get back to a point where everybody can just sort of like, calmly live their own lives side by side, which I think was happening a lot more before Trump's first term," she says. AFP | Paul NOLP Standing on the balcony of his elegant bed-and-breakfast, Mayor Greg Schene offers a more conciliatory view on town life. "This is certainly more of a melting pot," says the Baltimore native, adding that having a spectrum of political beliefs "makes us better." "Finding, you know, some solutions and coming to a middle ground is always better than having one dominant party," Schene said, smiling as he greeted people passing by. by Paul Nolp
