BBC blasted for burying Afghan cover-up under MasterChef stories
Former Newsnight journalist Lewis Goodall, now host of The News Agents podcast, tweeted: 'I am loath to criticise my former BBC colleagues and I'm aware they weren't in on the story.
'But the idea of a TV presenter losing his job being the top story on the website as opposed to Parliament being kept in the dark for two years about the Afghan data leak is risible.'
On the News at 10, the first 13 minutes of the programme was devoted to an exclusive interview with US president Donald Trump and developments in the war in Ukraine before turning to the Torode (above) story and the BBC's annual report.
The programme then turned to Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech – which unveiled a package of reforms to deregulate the financial markets – before turning to the Afghanistan cover-up.
A super-injunction – the first ever obtained by the UK Government – was lifted on Wednesday permitting reporting on the story.
READ MORE: BBC Gaza documentary review could give bosses 'cover' on Palestine, expert says
It was revealed that a Ministry of Defence (MoD) officer had leaked the data of thousands of Afghans who had collaborated with the UK military during the war – which went unnoticed until 18 months later.
The MoD only became aware of the breach after it was mentioned in a Facebook group in August 2023.
Rishi Sunak's government responded by creating a new asylum route for Afghans – on which the media was unable to report because of a gagging order.
Ministers feared those who had their personal details exposed would be at risk of persecution from the Taliban.
A super-injunction prevents reporting on certain topics but also prevents reporting on the fact that there even is an injunction.
The cost to the taxpayer for the blunder is expected to be at least £800 million – though more might have to be paid out if the Government is successfully sued for compensation by those affected.
There is an interim injunction in place which prevents reporting on further details yet to be revealed.
The story splashed the front pages of eight national newspapers.
The BBC was approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns
RSPCA spokesman David Bowles likened the process to 'Deliveroo for dogs' and called on the Government to tighten regulations on animal rescues. He told the BBC: 'The RSPCA's major concern is these dogs are essentially ticking time bombs – coming over, not being health tested. 'Diseases are now coming in through these dogs. They're affecting not just the dogs that are being imported, they could also affect the dogs already in this country and their owners. 'They've almost set up a Deliveroo for dogs and that is a real problem.' There is no requirement for rescue organisations to be licensed in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. It comes weeks after a bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the Commons with cross-party support. Legislation put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been 'mutilated', including having their ears docked. The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.' He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial. He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation. 'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'
Scottish Sun
5 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Scots Madonna tribute act stalked her estranged husband and his new partner for a year
Obsessed Bryceland even lurked outside their home ABUSIVE SINGER'S SHAME Scots Madonna tribute act stalked her estranged husband and his new partner for a year Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MADONNA tribute act subjected her estranged husband and his new partner to a year-long stalking campaign. Police Scotland worker Kirsty Bryceland, 46, bombarded prison worker ex Jamie Bryceland with 'abusive and derogatory messages'. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Kirsty Bryceland stalked her ex-husband and his new partner for a year Credit: YouTube 4 She now faces a battle to keep her civilian job with Police Scotland Credit: Alamy 4 She was fined £500 at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court Credit: Les Gallagher She also created fake online profiles to hound his girlfriend, Lisa McWhinnie, and posted images of her alongside vile comments. Obsessed Bryceland even lurked outside their home in Stewarton, Ayrshire. And she sent them a chilling selfie showing she was there. She now faces a battle to keep her civilian job with the force after admitting the harassment campaign that left the couple living in fear. Bryceland was fined £500 at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court and banned from contacting the victims for a year. The blonde advertises on the website. She offers tribute gigs as the Like A Virgin legend from £180. She hit the headlines in 2016 when she complimented bodybuilding photos illicitly posted on Facebook by caged murderer Jack Cramb. The lifer killed Barry Bradley, grandson on notorious Stirling heroin dealer Margaret 'Big Mags' Haney in 2010. Bryceland posted: 'Ur guns are getting bigger! Well done!' Obsessed stalker faked pregnancy, swerved car into ex & bombarded him with messages in relentless campaign of harassment Cramb replied: 'Thanks Kirsty x.' Bryceland insisted it was a 'coincidence', adding: 'I don't comment on anyone to do with Jamie's work.' Police said: 'A 46-year-old woman has been convicted of stalking in 2023. "She was found guilty in June.'
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Two-tier policing is the nail in the coffin for Britain's social contract
Has a British Government ever appeared so terrified of its own people? More to the point, can you think of one that deserved it more? The social contract has been shredded. You go to work and pay your taxes for a state that seems to be crumbling into disrepair. In exchange, the Government takes your money, and uses it to fund an alleged secret scheme to fly in Taliban fighters to live on your street. But don't worry – we've got a new 'elite police squad' to prevent trouble. That police unit won't be patrolling your neighbourhood to keep you safe from harm. Rather, it will be tasked with scouring social media for protest pre-crime, monitoring your opinions for anti-migrant sentiment. The police might not have enough resources to deal with shoplifting. They might not have solved a single theft or burglary, or recover a stolen bike, across a third of England. But we are to believe they have resources for what really counts: scrutinising your views for wrongthink. The current state of affairs is so absurd that simply writing it down feels almost subversive. But each element is true: we do appear to have flown unvetted Taliban members into Britain. The Government really will be watching your posts for signs of dissent. This isn't some accident, some Civil Service blunder. It's by design. It truly appears that Labour's strategy is to impose ever more restrictions on the freedoms of the law-abiding, in the hope that eventually people will acquiesce with a resigned shrug. The problem is that it isn't working. The population is fed up with being punished for doing the right thing. The hectoring about slavery, imperialism, war and all the other iniquities of history used to justify sacrificing our comforts and liberties on the altar of mass migration is no longer having the desired effect. British citizens living today did not build the empire. They didn't enslave anyone. Why should they foot the bill for housing illegal migrants up in four star hotels in central London? Why should they put up with them working in the shadow economy? Unfortunately for the Government, the previously silent majority is beginning to vocally express its frustration. MPs and ministers are fearful that the country is becoming a 'tinderbox'. But even this isn't enough to convince them that we must change course. Why? Perhaps because doing so would be an admission of past failures. For decades we were told that mass migration was an unalloyed good while critics were denounced as bigots. To concede, after all this time, that it has not come without costs – at times intolerable costs – would be catastrophically damaging to the political class. The pro-migration fanatics, who promised to control numbers while throwing open our borders, who overrode objections to impose their policies despite what they were repeatedly being told at the ballot box, would be discredited. So instead, the state appears to be passing through the stages of grief. At first there was denial that people were worried about migration at all; Brexit had allowed us to be liberals. Then there was anger after Southport, with Starmer's denunciation of the 'thugs' taking to the streets. Now we seem to have reached bargaining: if we can stop people talking about it, perhaps they'll stop caring? It was a strategy that might have worked prior to the social media era, and in particular prior to Elon Musk's buyout of Twitter. Now, even the censorship of protest videos, arrest of people for incendiary content, and threat of mass scanning of output isn't sufficient to quell dissent. And though many of the protests now cropping up across Britain are peaceful, shows of police force are not enough to deter outside agitators from hijacking them. Tiff Lynch, the head of the Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, last week warned that officers were being 'pulled in every direction' and commanders were 'forced to choose between keeping the peace at home or plugging national gaps'. Where do we go from here? As the costs of legal migration become apparent, with talk of labour market infusions and attracting the 'best and brightest' seeming increasingly hollow, overall numbers must be reduced. As the impact of illegal migration becomes clearer, the establishment must stop trying to guilt us into acceptance, and finally stop the influx. It's highly doubtful Yvette Cooper has the will or the way. The Home Secretary would prefer to silence opponents, by censoring and arresting those who speak out.
