Former Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff's law firm latest to strike deal with Trump
The law firm that employs Doug Emhoff, husband of former Vice President Kamala Harris, is the latest to strike a deal with the Trump administration and agree to conform with the president's policies.
On Tuesday, Trump announced that Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, which Emhoff joined as a partner in January, agreed to provide at least $100 million in pro bono legal work during Trump's time in the White House and beyond. The president said the services will be dedicated to helping veterans, Gold Star families, law enforcement members and first responders.
Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform, that the firm agreed to combat anti-Semetism and not engage in 'DEI' efforts.
'Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP proactively reached out to President Trump and his Administration, offering their decisive commitment to ending the Weaponization of the Justice System and the Legal Profession,' the White House said in a statement. 'The President is delivering on his promises of eradicating Partisan Lawfare in America, and restoring Liberty and Justice FOR ALL.'
Emhoff told his law firm's leadership that he disagreed with making a deal with Trump, according to a source familiar with the conversations who was not authorized to speak publicly.
Harris and Emhoff did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday
Trump's agreement with Emhoff's firm is the latest in a stretch of deal-making between the White House and major American law firms the president has accused of liberal bias, frivolous or fraudulent litigation or other malpractice.
The president's efforts have raised widespread alarm among Democratic elected officials as well as constitutional and campaign attorneys about their impact on the separation of powers embedded in the United States constitution and the independence of the judiciary.
'The actions against law firms are blatantly illegal. Capitulating just encourages going after more law firms,' said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of UC Berkeley Law, who tried to rally other law school deans to speak out with him against the White House's targeting of individual law firms, with limited success. 'The best hope was their sticking together and fighting the illegal, retributive orders.'
The head of Emhoff's firm — which has 1,200 employees across six countries — confirmed the agreement, according to Trump's post.
'The substance of that agreement is consistent with our Firm's views on access to Legal representation by clients, including pro bono clients, our commitment to complying with the Law as it relates to our employment practices, and our history of working with clients across a wide spectrum of political viewpoints,' said Thomas M. Cerabino, the chairman of firm, according to Trump's post.
Emhoff, 60, has worked as an entertainment, media and intellectual property attorney, and was hired to help advise corporations, entities and people in the midst of crisis or dealing with shifting legal ground, according to the firm's announcement when he was brought on board in January.
Cerabino said at the time that Emhoff was 'a trusted counselor to many global business leaders across a broad range of industries.'
Shortly before Trump announced the agreement on social media Tuesday, Emhoff spoke to Georgetown Law School students.
'The rule of law is under attack. Democracy is under attack. And so, all of us lawyers need to do what we can to push back on that,' he said. 'Us lawyers have always been on the frontlines, fighting for civil rights, for justice....I love being a lawyer, this is what we do: we fight for people. We fight for what's right.'
.
Trump has attacked major law firms for employing attorneys who have participated in cases against him and his allies in the past, including supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. He has also targeted them for promoting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, including in hiring, and for allegedly showing a liberal political bias in selecting pro bono clients.
Trump issued a presidential memorandum threatening all law firms with sanctions, revoked security clearances and other punishments if his administration determines that they have improperly sued the federal government.
Several firms have struck deals to preempt or avoid further reprisal, while others have sued, alleging they are being unlawfully targeted for retribution.
The firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison agreed to contribute $40 million in legal services to causes Trump has championed and to represent clients regardless of political affiliation. The firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom agreed to provide more than $100 million in free services for Trump-backed initiatives.
Leaders of those firms have defended the deals, arguing the work promised as part of them serve the interests of the firms.
Several other firms have sued the administration over its attacks.
'For more than 100 years, Jenner has stood firm and tirelessly advocated for our clients against all adversaries, including against unlawful government action. We once again go to court to do just that,' the firm Jenner & Block wrote in a recent statement about its decision to litigate. 'To do otherwise would mean compromising our ability to zealously advocate for all of our clients and capitulating to unconstitutional government coercion, which is simply not in our DNA.'
The firm WilmerHale hired the prominent conservative attorney Paul Clement to handle its case.
Many in the legal world, including prominent academics, have balked at the agreements that law firms have struck with the Trump administration, worrying that they represent a major threat to the legal profession and the core tenet of American law, that everyone deserves representation from competent counsel in court — whether or not a political ally resides in the White House.
'The way the system of justice is supposed to work is that everyone has a right to counsel and you don't get punished for representing people who are politically unpopular,' said a veteran Washington, D.C., campaign lawyer, who requested anonymity to speak candidly because they feared retaliation. 'It's a chink out of our system of government to villainize law firms like this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
24 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China Opposes Trade Deals at Its Expense
With 10 days to go until President Trump's country-specific tariffs are set to resume, China warns the US it will not tolerate trade deals with other countries that go against its interests. Bloomberg's Stephen Engle reports. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Returns On Capital At Hiap Teck Venture Berhad (KLSE:HIAPTEK) Paint A Concerning Picture
If you're not sure where to start when looking for the next multi-bagger, there are a few key trends you should keep an eye out for. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Hiap Teck Venture Berhad (KLSE:HIAPTEK) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Hiap Teck Venture Berhad: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.00092 = RM1.4m ÷ (RM2.0b - RM492m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to April 2025). Therefore, Hiap Teck Venture Berhad has an ROCE of 0.09%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Metals and Mining industry average of 7.3%. See our latest analysis for Hiap Teck Venture Berhad Above you can see how the current ROCE for Hiap Teck Venture Berhad compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Hiap Teck Venture Berhad for free. On the surface, the trend of ROCE at Hiap Teck Venture Berhad doesn't inspire confidence. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 4.2%, but since then they've fallen to 0.09%. And considering revenue has dropped while employing more capital, we'd be cautious. This could mean that the business is losing its competitive advantage or market share, because while more money is being put into ventures, it's actually producing a lower return - "less bang for their buck" per se. In summary, we're somewhat concerned by Hiap Teck Venture Berhad's diminishing returns on increasing amounts of capital. Yet despite these concerning fundamentals, the stock has performed strongly with a 79% return over the last five years, so investors appear very optimistic. In any case, the current underlying trends don't bode well for long term performance so unless they reverse, we'd start looking elsewhere. If you're still interested in Hiap Teck Venture Berhad it's worth checking out our to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects. If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Canada and US Trade Talks Resume After Digital Tax Reversal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Canada and the United States have resumed trade negotiations after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed to rescind the country's digital services tax on U.S. technology companies. The development follows President Donald Trump's announcement on Friday that he was suspending all trade talks with Canada "effective immediately" over the tax policy. Why It Matters Trump's Friday announcement followed Canada's confirmation that it would proceed with its digital services tax on technology giants, most of which are U.S.-based, despite a previous G7 agreement where the Trump administration had agreed to drop a retaliatory tax proposal from congressional consideration. Canada's quick reversal signals the high stakes involved in maintaining trade relationships with the United States, particularly given the countries' deeply integrated economies. What To Know Carney's office confirmed on Sunday that both leaders have agreed to restart negotiations after Canada committed to abandoning the 3 percent levy targeting major U.S. tech giants including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber, and Airbnb. The tax was scheduled to take effect Monday and would have applied retroactively, creating an estimated $2 billion bill for American companies. The conflict escalated rapidly after Canada's Finance Department confirmed Friday that companies would still be required to make their first digital tax payments Monday, despite ongoing negotiations. The tax targeted revenue generated from Canadian users rather than corporate profits, making it particularly burdensome for technology companies operating internationally. Trump's response was immediate and severe. He announced the suspension of all trade discussions "effective immediately" and threatened to impose new tariffs on Canadian goods within seven days. The president criticized Canada as "a very difficult Country to TRADE with" and described the digital tax as "a direct and blatant attack on our Country." The dispute has unfolded against already strained U.S.-Canada relations. Since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly criticized Canada and suggested it should become the 51st U.S. state. These tensions contributed to the political environment that led to Justin Trudeau's resignation and Mark Carney's subsequent election on an anti-Trump platform. Canada's decision to rescind the tax came "in anticipation" of reaching a broader trade agreement, according to government officials. What People Are Saying Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Friday: Canada will "continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians. It's a negotiation." President Donald Trump previously said in the Oval Office that he expected Canada to lift the digital services tax: "Economically we have such power over Canada. We'd rather not use it. It's not going to work out well for Canada. They were foolish to do it." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (R) greets U.S. President Donald Trump at the official welcome ceremony during the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 16, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta. Canada is hosting this year's meeting... Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (R) greets U.S. President Donald Trump at the official welcome ceremony during the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 16, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta. Canada is hosting this year's meeting of the world's seven largest economies. MoreWhat Happens Next With negotiations resuming, both countries will likely focus on addressing broader trade issues beyond the digital services tax. The Trump administration has indicated expectations for additional Canadian concessions, particularly regarding agricultural tariffs that have been a longstanding source of friction. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
