Sree Narayana Guru is guiding light for nation-builders: PM Modi
In his address, Modi underscored the historic significance of the 1925 meeting between the two legends, which he described as a pivotal moment that shaped the future of India's freedom movement.
He stated, 'This meeting not only showed a new direction for our struggle for independence but also infused the movement with a deeper meaning, reinforcing the dream of an independent India,' and asserted that Sree Narayana Guru's teachings have a timeless relevance, particularly for those who are committed to the service of the nation and society.
"India's speciality is that whenever our country gets entangled in the whirlpool of difficulties, some great personality is born in some corner of the country to show a new direction to society," the PM said, while adding that some of them work for the spiritual upliftment of society, while others accelerate social reforms in the social sphere.
"The ideals of Sree Narayan Guru are a great treasure for all of humanity. Those who work with the resolve to serve the nation and society, Sree Narayan Guru is like a guiding light for them," he said.
The PM also expressed his deep connection to the ideals of Sree Narayana Guru, particularly in relation to his work for the oppressed and marginalized communities.
PM Modi noted, "Whenever I make decisions for the betterment of the exploited and poor, I always remember Guru Ji. A hundred years back, under British rule, people used to fear speaking against those deteriorated societal conditions. Sree Narayana Guru did not fear anything because he believed in harmony and equality; he believed in truth, service and cordiality. This very inspiration shows us a way of 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'; this very belief gives us the strength to make an India where the person standing at the last is our first priority," he added.
Emphasising India's global leadership, Modi further noted the country's role in promoting initiatives like World Yoga Day and the One Sun, One World, One Grid project, which aims to create a sustainable energy future. "India is leading the way in global movements focused on environmental sustainability, health, and unity. In 2023, during India's leadership of the G-20, we embraced the theme 'One Earth, One Family, One Future,' reflecting our shared global responsibility,' the PM added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Order on food curbs on Independence Day wrong: Congress
Maharashtra Congress President Harshwardhan Sapkal addresses a press conference, at Tilak Bhavan in Mumbai on Wednesday. (ANI Photo) MUMBAI: Maharashtra Congress president Harshwardhan Sapkal condemned proposals by civic bodies to ban meat sales on Independence Day , reports Prafulla Marpakwar. "We are stunned and surprised over the new proposal of the govt, it will be wrong on the part of Mahayuti to give directions on consumption of food on Independence Day," he said. The govt has clarified it is not directing what people should eat, while civic bodies say the ban is on slaughter. Sapkal alleged BJP had no role in freedom struggle and sided with British. He accused it of pushing "one nation, one leader" & eroding India's unity.
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
India can construct on tributaries of Indus, Jhelum, Chenab under IWT : Court of Arbitration
New Delhi, Aug 13 (UNI) The Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague has, in an Award on Issues of General Interpretation of the Indus Water Treaty (IWT), said India is permitted by the Treaty to construct on the tributaries of the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab ('Western Rivers') even though the general rule is that India shall ''let flow'' the waters of the Western Rivers for Pakistan's use. The Court in an Award on August 8, said that even though the ''general rule'' is that India shall 'let flow' the waters of the Western Rivers for Pakistan's use, there are certain specified exceptions to this rule, including in relation to the generation of hydroelectric power. In the Award the Court did not address the application of its findings to the specific circumstances of the Kishenganga Hydro-Electric Plant ('KHEP') or Ratle Hydro-Electric Plant ('RHEP'), two Indian projects presented in Pakistan's Request for Arbitration. ''This arbitration concerns the interpretation and application of the Indus Waters Treaty to certain design elements of the run-of-river hydro-electric plants that India is permitted by the Treaty to construct on the tributaries of the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab Rivers (the 'Western Rivers'). About the overall Approach to the Interpretation of Article III and Part 3 of Annexure D the general rule is that India shall 'let flow' the waters of the Western Rivers. However, there are certain specified exceptions to this rule, including in relation to the generation of hydroelectric power, the Court said. India's primary objection to the IWT arises out of from concerns about Pakistan's support for cross-border terrorism and its implications for India's national security and water resource management. India has linked the issue of water sharing with the broader context of bilateral relations, asserting that "blood and water cannot flow together". India stresses the need to re-negotiate the treaty because of climate change and its impact on water availability. The Treaty, signed in 1960, does not adequately address the challenges posed by climate change, necessitating a renegotiation of its provisions. India argues that the Treaty's restrictions on hydropower projects, particularly on the Western Rivers (Chenab, Jhelum, and Indus), need to be revisited in light of modern dam engineering and the need for increased water storage and management. India has formally notified Pakistan to seek modifications to the IWT, citing the need to address the issues of climate change, security concerns, and disputes over hydropower projects. India's request for modifications in and renegotiation of the Treaty based on Article XII (3) of the IWT, is being resisted by Pakistan, fearing reduction in its water share. India does not accept the court's jurisdiction and insists on using a neutral expert has welcomed the Court's Award and threatened India with serious consequences if the IWT was ''touched''. UNI RB 1542
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Fatehpur land dispute: Temple or tomb? An exclusive report based on official records
A ruckus broke out in Uttar Pradesh's Fatehpur after a group offered prayers at a tomb, considering it a temple. The Hindu side claims the land belongs to Hindus and houses a temple dedicated to Lord Krishna and Lord Shiva. The Muslim side, on the other hand, insists it is the tomb of Aurangzeb's Faujdar Abdul Samad and his son Abu what is this dispute really about? How was this tomb declared national property? This exclusive report is based on historical documents and official records related to the dispute traces back to the British era. In 1927–28, a case was filed for the division of 28 bighas of land in Fatehpur between two landlord families — Lal Girdhari Lal Rastogi and the Mansingh family. On 14 August 1928, the court under the then British government allotted Gata numbers 751, 752, and 754 to Lal Girdhari Lal Rastogi and Gata number 753 to the Mansingh family. Gata number 753 measured 1.7650 hectares (1,89,983 square feet). On 30 December 1970, Shakuntala Mansingh, wife of Nareshwar Mansingh — a descendant of the Mansingh family — sold this land to Ramnaresh Singh. Singh later divided the land into plots. According to an SDM Fatehpur investigation report dated 10 July 2014, Singh plotted 1.5890 hectares and sold it to various 2007, the Muslim side, claiming the site as the tomb of Aurangzeb's Faujdar Abdul Samad and his son Abu Bakar, filed a case before the SDM court (Case No. 26/2007). Mohammad Anees filed the case against Ramnaresh Singh. On 20 April 2012, the court ordered the removal of Singh's name from the records and registered the property under 'Mangi Maqbara (National Property), Mutawalli Mohammad Anees' of Abu Gata number 753 is recorded in Fatehpur's land revenue records as belonging to Mangi Maqbara (National Property), with Mutawalli Mohammad Anees as its 2019, the property was formally registered as Waqf land with the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board. It was listed as Waqf No 1635, Fatehpur district, in the names of Abdul Samad and Abu Mohammad. After Mohammad Anees, his son Abu Huraira became the turning point came in 2013, when Mohammad Anees petitioned the Allahabad High Court, claiming illegal encroachment on Gata number 753. The then Chief Justice, DY Chandrachud, directed the Fatehpur district administration to investigate and prevent illegal SDM's investigation revealed that before the legal dispute, Singh had already sold plots carved out of Gata number 753. The report detailed the current status of the land:advertisementTotal area: 1.7650 hectaresBuilt-up houses: 0.5890 hectaresFoundation dug: 1.000 hectaresMangi Maqbara structure: 0.0600 hectaresVacant land: 0.1160 hectares (approx. 12,486 sq ft), under the possession of Mutawalli Anees dispute remains unresolved, with both sides holding firm to their claimsa; one citing religious heritage, the other historical ownership backed by legal records.- EndsTune InMust Watch
