UK banks put £75bn into firms building climate-wrecking ‘carbon bombs', study finds
Banks in the City of London have poured more than $100bn (£75bn) into companies developing 'carbon bombs' – huge oil, gas and coal projects that would drive the climate past internationally agreed temperature limits with catastrophic global consequences – according to a study.
Nine London-based banks, including HSBC, NatWest, Barclays and Lloyds are involved in financing companies responsible for at least 117 carbon bomb projects in 28 countries between 2016 – the year after the landmark Paris agreement was signed – and 2023, according to the study.
If the projects go ahead, the study says they will have the potential to produce 420bn tonnes of carbon emissions, equivalent to more than 10 years of current global carbon dioxide emissions.
'Despite the UK's seemingly ambitious climate plans, it is astonishing how much money has flowed from UK banks to companies worldwide developing the biggest climate-wrecking and damaging projects since 2016,' said Fatima Eisam-Eldeen, a lead analyst at the Leave It in the Ground Initiative, the climate thinktank that produced the study. 'Real climate ambition and leadership would mean proper financial regulation not only within the country but also beyond the country's borders by stopping all financial flows to companies exacerbating the climate crisis we all suffer.'
The report follows a Guardian investigation that revealed how big fossil fuel companies were quietly planning scores of vast projects that threaten to shatter the effort towards the international goal of limiting global heating to 1.5C above preindustrial levels.
In that investigation the countries found to have the most carbon bomb plans were the US, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Russia and China, with the UK playing a minor role.
However, the findings, which look at how the companies behind these projects are being financed, reveal the UK is a key financial hub for destructive fossil fuel mega-projects, financing companies that are involved in more than a quarter of the carbon bombs identified across the globe.
Lucie Pinson, the director of the campaign group Reclaim Finance, said UK banks were turning the City of London into 'Europe's stronghold for financing fossil fuel expansion, undermining the role the UK has played in advancing climate finance'.
She added: 'As international tensions escalate, these banks must now choose which world they want to help build, Trump's world of fossil fuels, where the most powerful profit at the expense of millions, including their own fellow citizens, or a world where economic, financial and political leaders roll up their sleeves and drive the ecological transformation of our economies.'
The new study used the list of carbon bomb projects identified in the original 2022 research then worked out which companies were behind them. It then tracked who was financing these companies.
When approached by the Guardian, some banks objected to the study's methodology, questioning whether it was fair to attribute the entire emissions of a carbon bomb to a bank that had given finance to a company as a whole rather than to the specific project.
But the researchers say that banks usually fund the company rather than specific fossil fuel development, and that this finance is critical in allowing the companies to push ahead with these destructive projects.
The report found HSBC is financially supporting companies involved in the most carbon bomb projects: 104. It calculated that emissions caused by burning the extracted fossil fuel from these projects would add up to 392 gigatons – or 392bn metric tonnes – of carbon dioxide.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Standard Chartered bank came next, supporting companies involved in 75 carbon bombs, then Barclays, financing companies involved in 62 mega-projects. Lloyds backed firms involved in 26 and NatWest financed firms involved in 20.
HSBC, Lloyds and Standard Chartered declined to comment on the report when approached by the Guardian.
A Barclays spokesperson said it could not comment on individual projects but that the bank provided 'financing across the energy sector: supporting energy security, working with customers and clients on their low-carbon transition and mobilising sustainable and transition financing with a target of $1tn by 2030. We are taking pragmatic steps to meet our 2030 financed emissions targets, while helping the world meet its energy needs securely and affordably.'
A spokesperson for NatWest said it had lent more than £93bn in climate and sustainable funding and financing since the start of 2021, against a target of £100bn by the end of this year. They added: 'Whilst we recognise the importance of the entire energy industry in furthering the goals of decarbonisation and energy security, our lending to oil and gas represents less than 0.7% of our financing activity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
30 minutes ago
- Sky News
No sign of cost of living crisis end amid big consequential geopolitical shifts
Is the cost of living crisis over? If you're looking purely at the annual inflation data, the numbers us journalists, not to mention politicians and economists, tend to focus on, the answer might seem like: probably, yes. Sure, the rate is, at 3.4% in May, higher than the Bank of England's 2% target. But it's far below the double-digit peaks experienced in 2022. Plus, the Bank itself thinks prices are likely to drop back down towards 2% in the coming year or two, even assuming a few more interest rate cuts. End of story, right? Well, not quite. Because look a bit deeper into the numbers and you notice a couple of important things. The first is that whether the cost of living squeeze is over really depends on how you slice up the numbers. Look in a slightly different way and actually this is still an ongoing crisis for millions of families around the country. To see what I mean, recall that when economists talk about inflation, they are really referring to something quite specific. The rate at which the average level of prices across the economy (actually, it's a shopping basket of representative goods) has changed over the past year. And the change in that level over the past year is indeed 3.4%. But look back a bit further, say the past four years, and the rate of change is 25%. Why looking back makes sense Both of these numbers are accurate. They are both expressions of inflation, except that one is for a single year and the other is for a four-year period. But when you're going to the supermarket, or buying a big ticket item like a computer or a car, are you really thinking back over a 12-month horizon or, perhaps, thinking back further? For a lot of people, that four-year horizon feels much more representative of their everyday lives and retail decisions than the one-year horizon. True: the fact that it's up 25% is largely because of the enormous rise in prices in 2022 amid the energy price shock and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 3:05 But (and one can't emphasise this enough), it's not like prices went up and then went down. The prices went up and stayed up (in fact, they carried on getting more expensive). And when you look at the four-year, "recent memory" rate of inflation, it's higher in recent months than any period going back to the early 1990s. Now, economists have very good reasons for focusing on the annual rate of inflation. But by the same token, you can see why so many people scoff when they see the latest inflation data, finding it bears little resemblance to their lived experience. The problem isn't so much the data itself but the way we focus on an annual rate. Expect yo-yoing in the coming months However, even that annual rate might be in for more of a roller coaster than most economists assume. Because the second important underlying issue to remember is that we're living through big, consequential geopolitical shifts that could well be very inflationary but are really hard to model. Consider the events in the Middle East. Military conflict between Israel and Iran has already pushed the oil price up by 18% in June alone. If that price stays elevated, that will feed into higher petrol and other prices in the UK and further afield. And since no one has a clue what will happen next, you can expect that price to yo-yo around quite violently in the coming months. More broadly, it's very hard to know for sure what the impact of tariffs will be on UK inflation. The Bank of England's estimates in its latest set of forecasts suggested a reassuringly small impact on both economic growth and inflation. But no one really knows whether manufacturers will lift prices just for American consumers or for the rest of the world too. Finally, it's worth noting that in much the same way as the past few decades of globalisation were, all else equal, quite deflationary - with prices dropping as manufacturers shifted production to cheaper parts of the world, primarily Asia - the reversal of those forces could be very inflationary. Again, all this stuff is very hard to model and forecast. But we are living through a period of volatility, with significant historical shifts. It would be remarkable if that weren't reflected in the economic data, at some point.
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
HS2: 16 years of high hopes, bruising reality and burgeoning costs
Under detailed plans ministers set out more than a decade ago, HS2 wwas to cost £32.7bn and trains would be running by next year. Now that money has already been spent, the planned network has been cut back to one line, no track has been laid and no train has been built. On Wednesday, the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, announced that the London to Birmingham line would be delayed from the 2033 target, but did not set a new date. She called the project an 'appalling mess' but vowed to 'sort it out'. As Labour attempts to draw a line under a 'litany of failure' and reset construction work on the high-speed line, here are the key moments in a story of high hopes and bruising reality. 2009 The Labour government announces plans for a high-speed railway running from London to northern England and sets up HS2 Ltd. 2010 The coalition government comes to power, backing greener transport, and reviews the scope of the line, including a possible spur to Heathrow. January 2012 The transport secretary, Justine Greening, gives the official ministerial green light. HS2 will be a Y-shaped network from London to Birmingham, continuing to Manchester and Leeds. It will cost £32.7bn. Trains are expected to be running in 2026 and the full network operating by 2033. June 2013 With tunnels added through the Chilterns – the result of much Conservative backbench pressure – the government resets the HS2 budget at £50bn. January 2014 A new chief executive of HS2 Ltd is appointed, On a salary of £750,000, Simon Kirby becomes the UK's highest paid public servant by some distance. March 2014 MPs overwhelmingly vote in favour of HS2, with only 41 votes against, and the hybrid bill starts to make its way through parliament. November 2015 Costs are revised upwards again to £55.7bn. June 2016 The National Audit Office says HS2 could be delayed by a year. February 2017 After three years of detailed scrutiny, the HS2 bill becomes law, enabling preparatory work to start on the first phase between London and Birmingham. The new chief executive, Mark Thurston, who had worked on the 2012 Olympics, arrives in the spring. July 2017 HS2 Ltd admits making £1.8m of unauthorised redundancy payments to staff, which it calls a 'serious error'. 2018 Demolition of streets, homes and businesses begins around Euston station in London. July 2019 Boris Johnson is elected Tory leader and becomes prime minister after promising a review of HS2 on the campaign trail. September 2019 A report by the HS2 Ltd chair, Allan Cook, warns that the railway may not be finished before 2040, and could cost £88bn. January 2020 A National Audit Office report estimates that completing the full HS2 network will cost between £72bn and £98bn at 2019 prices. February 2020 Johnson pledges to build HS2 despite the doubts raised in the Oakervee review he commissioned. The building of the planned north-east leg, however, will be 'reviewed', effectively putting it on ice. May 2020 MPs on the public accounts committee (PAC) say HS2 has gone 'badly off course'. September 2020 A ceremony marks the formal start of construction work after contracts to build the first phase of the line were signed during the Covid lockdown. January 2021 Protesters dig a network of tunnels outside Euston as HS2 prepares to fell dozens of trees around the station. November 2021 The government confirms that the eastern leg from Birmingham to Leeds will be scrapped. March 2023 Construction of phase 2a – Birmingham to Crewe – will be delayed by two years, the government announces, and work at Euston is put on hold. The cost the HS2 terminal is put at £4.8bn, almost twice the initial budget. The first HS2 services will now start and stop at a new Old Oak Common, six miles from central London, until at least the 2040s. June 2023 In the six-monthly HS2 update, ministers say services between Birmingham and Old Oak Common should begin between 2029 and 2033, with trains only reaching Manchester at some point between 2035 and 2041. Thurston resigns the following month. October 2023 The prime minister, Rishi Sunak, axes the remaining northern half of HS2 in a speech at the Conservative party conference in Manchester, to the fury of the rail industry and northern politicians. Sunak says the Euston HS2 station can only be built with private finance and blames HS2 Ltd for cost overruns. October 2024 The new Labour government says it will fund the line into Euston. It vows to get a grip on the project costs and commissions a review into the delivery failings. November 2024 The HS2 chair, Jon Thompson, reveals that a 'bat shed' to protect species in woodland near the line cost £100m. December 2024 A new chief executive, Mark Wild, takes over HS2 Ltd, promising to review and reset the remaining construction work. A leaked report suggests the cost for the truncated line has risen to £80bn at current prices. February 2025 Another scathing PAC report says HS2 has been a 'casebook example of how not to run a major project'.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Ayrshire-based civil engineering company cuts project time in half with technology investment
Ayrshire-based civil engineering firm Dalcon Ltd has boosted onsite productivity and halved project timescales by investing in four Trimble® Earthworks excavator systems from SITECH UK & Ireland. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... With the help of SITECH, authorised dealer of Trimble® Civil Construction Field Systems, Scotland-based Dalcon Ltd. has invested in four Trimble Earthworks for Excavator systems. This machine control platform is designed to significantly improve productivity, cost efficiencies and sustainability onsite by integrating several advanced technology features. Neil Wilson, Director at Dalcon Ltd, said: 'This is our largest investment in advanced construction technology to date and the effect on productivity has been eye opening, with one project already being eight weeks ahead of schedule, and on track to be completed in half the estimated time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Since SITECH delivered and installed the systems, we have seen a significant increase in accuracy, efficiency and productivity across multiple projects. By automating processes that were previously achieved manually we have reduced the time taken on excavation jobs. The system enables operators to grade to specification whilst maximising each truck load, helping contractors to achieve more with the same machine. With the help of SITECH, authorised dealer of Trimble® Civil Construction Field Systems, Scotland-based Dalcon Ltd. has invested in four Trimble Earthworks for Excavator systems. 'Reducing downtime is key to enhancing productivity for contractors. By leveraging precision technology, we can minimise the risks of over-digging or striking hazardous areas and minimise the need to wait for updated site-data from surveyors. In addition, the system allows for site connectivity and remote diagnostics which further reduces the risk of downtime. Our team can monitor the integrated machines from anywhere, increasing the ability to run multiple sites as efficiently as possible.' Neil explains how the systems have also made an impact on safety for contractors: 'Crucially, the technology is accessible for operators of all skill levels, and by automating processes we have reduced the need for personnel to be working directly alongside heavy machinery by approximately 25%. The system uses angle sensors and GNSS receivers to provide highly accurate information on the excavator's position and bucket location, which reduces the risk of accidents on site, freeing up personnel for more vital tasks.'
