'If energy communities are left behind then more will be attracted by climate denial'
The energy transition will only happen thanks to the efforts of tens of thousands of energy workers.
This might seem an obvious point, but it is one that is surprisingly absent from the national debate on Net Zero. We talk about the technologies we might need, the costs to government or the potential savings on household bills and the impact on our energy security, far more than we talk about the workers.
As a country we spend far more time debating the people blocking wind farms than we do discussing the people building them.
If we are going to achieve the government's ambitious decarbonisation goals, we need to bring energy workers to the centre of the national conversation. This is vital to resolving the serious workforce challenges presented by a rapid transition to new forms of energy generation.
If we are going to seize the opportunities on offer, we will need tens of thousands of skilled workers to build new wind farms and nuclear power stations, install millions of solar panels, retrofit houses and change heating systems, and deliver the upgrades to the grid that will get clean power to where it is needed.
And if the UK is going to maximise the economic benefits from this transition, we also need to make sure that the kit we use is manufactured in the UK as much as possible, whether that is for turbines or nuclear fuel.
For the first time in decades, we have a government that understands that this can only be done with a clear industrial strategy. The market alone will deliver a transition that is neither quick nor just.
The approach of the previous government saw major infrastructure decisions like Sizewell C kicked into the long grass, a ridiculous ban on onshore wind, and no interest in British jobs. As a result, we missed crucial opportunities to onshore key production lines, and thousands of jobs that could have been based in Britain were shipped overseas. This was a tragedy and it was avoidable.
The Labour government's Clean Energy Industrial Strategy is a welcome antidote to this, backed up by Great British Energy and a National Wealth Fund investing in UK energy projects.
The first year has seen progress on new nuclear and renewable projects. For the first time in years, energy trade unions like Prospect and GMB have been properly consulted on the polices that will shape our members' lives.
But we need to be bigger and bolder when it comes to the workforce and jobs. Research we commissioned from YouGov has found that only 8% of UK voters have seen an increase in energy jobs in their area because of the transition. When thinking about the future only 31% of people in the UK think that the transition will have a positive impact on jobs nationally, and that falls to 20% when asked to think about jobs in their local area.
These numbers fall still further in traditional energy communities in the north of England, Wales and Scotland where thousands of jobs in oil and gas are at risk of disappearing without being replaced by new work.
This is the context that the populist Right is seeking to exploit, and it is these energy communities they are often targeting. Let's be clear, Reform's policy to scrap the energy transition would be a disaster for Britain and would put thousands of jobs at risk.
The public aren't convinced either, only a small minority oppose the transition, but the majority do want to see a focus on the economy and on jobs. If this transition doesn't result in good, unionised jobs, and if energy communities are left on the scrapheap, then more and more people will be attracted by the siren voice of climate denial.
The answer is to put workers front and centre, and make clear that this transition is going to be delivered by them and with their interests in mind. We need an ambitious energy workforce plan that focuses on job numbers and job quality, a real Just Transition plan for energy communities, and a huge national effort to train the next generation of energy workers.
Our unions have formed a new campaign group, Climate Jobs UK, to fight for these outcomes and we will be turning up the volume in the coming years to make sure the voice of energy workers is impossible to ignore.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal
July 31 (Reuters) - Meta's Facebook must face a consumer protection lawsuit brought by the District of Columbia's attorney general accusing the social media giant of misleading consumers about its data-privacy practices, an appeals court ruled on Thursday. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals revived the District's lawsuit for now in a unanimous three-judge ruling, opens new tab, finding that a lower court judge applied the wrong legal standard in dismissing the case in 2022. The District's lawsuit was part of a wave of court and regulatory actions stemming from revelations in 2018 that Facebook had allowed the now-defunct British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to access data from as many as 87 million users. The consultancy's clients included President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign. Facebook has denied any wrongdoing, and said that it made clear and appropriate disclosures to users about its privacy policies. It still can seek dismissal of the lawsuit. In a statement, Facebook said it was weighing its options and remained confident it will prevail. The District attorney general's office had no immediate comment on Thursday's ruling. The District's lawsuit accused Facebook of duping users into thinking the company had strong enforcement measures to audit third-party applications. The lawsuit said Facebook allowed third parties like Cambridge Analytica to harvest user data without consent on a widespread basis. In the lower court ruling, Judge Maurice Ross of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia concluded that "Facebook did not materially mislead consumers as to their response to Cambridge Analytica." The appeals court said the attorney general should have a lower burden of proof in making renewed arguments that Facebook made unintentionally misleading claims to the platform's users about their control over their information shared on the site. Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and officers of the company this month agreed to settle claims seeking $8 billion for alleged damage caused by allowing repeated violations of Facebook users' privacy. The accord, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, did not disclose a settlement amount. Facebook in 2022 said it would pay $725 million to resolve a class action in federal court in California over the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In 2019, Facebook agreed to pay a record-breaking $5 billion fine to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission probe into its privacy practices. The case is District of Columbia v. Facebook, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 23-CV-0550. For plaintiff: Jeremy Girton of D.C. attorney general's office For defendant: Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Alexander Isak training at former club Real Sociedad amid transfer speculation
The Sweden international, who is reported to have asked Newcastle executives to explore a move away from St James' Park, has been heavily linked with Liverpool. His former club Sociedad confirmed on Thursday he was 'working with his trainers' at the club's Zubieta facility. Newcastle have been approached for comment. The player did not travel with the rest of the Newcastle squad earlier this month for their pre-season tour of Asia amid speculation over his future, with the club saying at the time he was absent due to a minor thigh injury. The decision to train at his old club rather than his current one will heighten speculation that Isak sees his future away from Newcastle. No offer has been submitted by Liverpool as yet to Newcastle, who would almost certainly be looking for a British record transfer fee for the player. Should Newcastle price Isak out of a move or simply refuse to listen to offers, one option Isak and his representatives might consider would be to unilaterally terminate his contract with three years remaining. A European Court of Justice ruling in favour of former Chelsea midfielder Lassana Diarra last year means players can now terminate their deals 'without unnecessary fears', according to the lawyer who led Diarra's case. The ruling appears to have given players greater leeway to terminate a contract without just cause. The court found some of FIFA's transfer rules were contrary to European law because they restricted freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. Jean-Louis Dupont, who led Diarra's challenge and who was also at the centre of the landmark Bosman case which granted players free agency at the end of their contracts, believes last year's ruling lifts the threat of significant sanctions for players who choose to terminate their deals. Dupont, speaking in general rather than specifically about Isak's case, told the PA news agency: 'In its Diarra judgement, the court ruled that players have a right to termination without just cause and that it is for the ex-employer to establish the existence and the quantum of damages, knowing that losing the opportunity to transfer the player is NOT a damage. 'According to the court, such termination cannot entail disciplinary sanctions (when effected in between seasons). 'FIFA has, imperfectly, amended its rules to abide by the court ruling. But the bottom line is that players have the right to terminate without unnecessary fears.' Asked whether he thought players would now be free from the threat of sporting sanctions such as a ban for terminating their deals, Dupont added: 'Yes. If not, the right to terminate, as granted by the court, would just be theoretical. But, apparently, FIFA is still resisting on this point.' Following the ECJ ruling, FIFA opened a global dialogue on its transfer rules and issued amended, interim rules just before Christmas last year. The world players' union FIFPRO immediately pushed back on the amendments, saying they did not 'provide legal certainty' to players. FIFPRO issued guidance to players in May stating that following the ruling, a player's transfer fee or transfer value could no longer be used in the calculation of any compensation due to the club where the player had been contracted, and advised that the compensation paid should be 'limited to the residual value of the contract, with a possible further reduction or increase on the basis of the national law'. A presumption that a player's new club had induced the termination of contract was removed in the amended rules issued by FIFA last December. Now, a player's old club must prove the new club induced the player to break contract.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
UK stocks mixed; FTSE 100 marks best month in six
July 31 (Reuters) - British equities closed mixed on Thursday, as investors assessed a spate of corporate earnings and looked for potential trade deals before the August 1 tariff deadline expires. The blue-chip FTSE 100 (.FTSE), opens new tab fell 0.05%. However the index posted its best month in six. The domestically focused midcap FTSE 250 index (.FTMC), opens new tab rose 0.9% and logged its fourth consecutive monthly gain. Over the past month, investors have digested a flurry of trade headlines from Washington and are still assessing the impact of U.S. tariffs on corporate earnings, although attention is now turning to hopes of a Bank of England rate cut next week. In the market, aerospace and defence stocks (.FTNMX502010), opens new tab gained the most among sectors, up 5.1%, after Rolls-Royce (RR.L), opens new tab raised its full-year operating profit and free cash flow outlook. Shares of the British aero-engineer hit a record high with 8.5% rise. Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab gained 1.2%. The oil major's second-quarter net profit tumbled by almost a third, but exceeded analysts' forecasts. On trade, Trump released fresh levies ranging from updates on copper tariffs, goods from Brazil, South Korea and India, as well as ending exemptions for small-value overseas shipments, ahead of his August 1 tariff deadline. Industrial miners (.FTNMX551020), opens new tab slipped 2.6% tracking lower copper prices. Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab, Anglo American (AAL.L), opens new tab and Antofagasta (ANTO.L), opens new tab fell between 2.2% to 5.9%. Among other corporate updates, St James's Place (SJP.L), opens new tab was the top gainer in the FTSE 100, up 11.9%, after the wealth manager's half-yearly net inflows doubled and it launched a new share buyback. Rentokil (RTO.L), opens new tab soared 9.5% after the pest control company kept its full-year outlook unchanged and posted half-yearly revenue growth of 3.1%. British American Tobacco (BATS.L), opens new tab rose 1.3% after the company exceeded its first-half profit estimates. Conversely, Mondi (MNDI.L), opens new tab fell the most in the FTSE 100, down 12.1%, after the packaging firm posted a near 17% fall in first-half pretax profit. A slowdown in the London Stock Exchange Group's (LSEG.L), opens new tab recurring revenue growth sent the company's shares down nearly 8%. Just Group (JUSTJ.L), opens new tab surged 67.5% to top the FTSE 250 midcap index, after Canada's Brookfield Wealth Solutions (BNT.N), opens new tab agreed to acquire the insurer for 2.4 billion pounds ($3.18 billion). On the radar next week, the Bank of England is expected to cut borrowing costs for the fifth time since last August.
