
South Lebanese watched war next door in Israel while still facing attacks from their neighbour
From their vantage point 1,385 metres above sea level they were able to observe the culmination of a nearly year-long war between the Israeli military and the Iran-backed Lebanese armed group that reduced many towns and villages across southern Lebanon to rubble.
'We saw the movement of various Israeli vehicles in the vicinity of this post. And then there was a tank which was firing from that [hilltop],' Lt Col Singh says, pointing into the distance and then to a map showing where artillery shells had landed in the area.
'It was difficult, definitely it was difficult. But we were following the procedures, the alert levels,' he says. The peacekeepers spent many hours sheltering in the base's fortified bunkers, unable to conduct their usual patrols or receive fresh supplies.
More than six months later, the Unifil soldiers are back on their patrols amid the comparative calm that has followed a ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel in November. Lt Col Singh says the patrols are conducted in co-ordination with the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), which has increased its deployment in southern Lebanon to ensure the withdrawal of Hezbollah from the region, collect its weaponry and dismantle its military sites; all conditions of the US-brokered truce.
However Israel has continued to conduct air strikes inside Lebanon on a near daily basis. The Israeli army says the attacks target Hezbollah figures, weapons and military sites, but they have also killed civilians and destroyed infrastructure. On Friday, at least one civilian was killed and 20 injured in Israeli strikes near the city of Nabatieh.
Despite these attacks, residents of the south who fled the war have returned to their wrecked homes and villages.
Lt Col Singh points to an Israeli base on a ridge opposite the Unifil base, from where Israeli soldiers opened fire a week ago. In the valley below sits Shebaa Farms, an Israeli-occupied sliver of land claimed by both Syria and Lebanon that has long been the scene of sporadic clashes between Hezbollah and Israeli troops.
His finger moves left to Mount Hermon in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, an area seized from Syria during the 1967 Middle East war. Another UN peacekeeping force is deployed there to monitor a buffer zone between Israeli-occupied territory and Syria, established under a ceasefire agreement following a war between the two countries in 1973. Despite this, Israeli troops invaded the zone after former Syrian president Bashar Al Assad was toppled in December.
Mount Hermon is also visible from Deir Mimas – a small Lebanese village to the south-west that sits about 2km from the UN-demarcated border between Israel and south Lebanon.
Israeli troops entered the village in late September as Israel ramped up its response to Hezbollah's cross-border fire with a ground invasion of border areas and intensified bombardment across Lebanon. Footage emerged of Israeli soldiers desecrating a church in the village.
The end of September should have been the time of the olive harvest in the picturesque village, perched above a steep valley from where Hezbollah would launch rockets at Israel. Instead, its residents fled.
'Some trees were damaged by the missiles,' said Michel Bechara, an olive farmer from Deir Mimas who decided to remain in Beirut. 'Others don't carry olives because of the bombs that came.
'Some people moved back to the south, but definitely life is not that stable there."
Though Israeli troops have left the village, they continue to occupy five points of Lebanese territory along the border, in another violation of the ceasefire.
'We've had enough'
Beirut resident Hassan Fakih says Israel's continuing attacks weigh on his mind as he awaits the arrival of his brother with his family for their annual visit to the family home in south Lebanon.
His concerns rose after Israel launched devastating air strikes on Iran on June 13 and Iran responded with drone and missile attacks. The 12-day war sparked fears of a wider regional conflict before it ended this week after US President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire.
The war provided Lebanese with the rare sight of Tel Aviv being struck. 'People were running in Tel Aviv. A lot of people's homes are destroyed, it looks like south Lebanon,' said Mr Fakih, who admitted to a sense of satisfaction at seeing the tables turned.
'But I'm happy it was not Hezbollah doing it. We've had enough,' he said.
The same sentiment was expressed by Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam in Qatar's capital on Tuesday. Like aircraft across the region, his flight to Doha was diverted the previous evening as Iran launched missiles at the Al Udeid American airbase in Qatar in retaliation for the US bombing of its nuclear sites at the weekend.
"We thank God for having succeeded, over the past two weeks, in preventing Lebanon from being drawn into a new war. We now aspire to open a new page of diplomatic action," Mr Salam told reporters.
'Normality has returned'
Hezbollah, severely weakened by Israel's attack's, ultimately did not intervene in support of its patron. The group has vacated its most threatening positions in the south and much of its arsenal is believed to have been destroyed by Israel.
On the outskirts of a town to the north of Nabatieh, near a bridge across a small ravine, a mound of dirt visible in the distance indicates where a major Hezbollah tunnel was destroyed earlier this year, according to a local.
'It was big,' he says. 'But not Emad-4,' he adds, referring to a large underground tunnel facility seen in a video Hezbollah released last year.
As incoming missiles triggered sirens across northern Israel during the war with Iran, farmers across the border in Lebanon were harvesting fields of wheat that line the road running north of the battered town of Khiam and then east to the Unifil base in Shebaa
'The difference between now and the [Hezbollah] war is that at that time the LAF was not here, the civilians had moved out. Shebaa, the village, was empty," Lt Col Singh says.
'But after the war, the LAF came in, they have occupied all the posts that were there. The civilians have come – they are now into a normal routine and have celebrated Eid and had their festivals.
'Normality, we can call it, has returned.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
41 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Vast majority of US refugee admissions will go to white South Africans: Report
US President Donald Trump's administration is considering allocating three-quarters of a significantly reduced refugee admission cap to white South Africans, Reuters reported on Monday. According to meeting notes reviewed by Reuters, the acting director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement at the Department of Health and Human Services, Angie Salazar, told people working in the refugee resettlement space that she expected the refugee admissions cap to be set at 40,000 for the coming fiscal year. Two other sources, who wished to remain anonymous, told Reuters that 30,000 of these spaces are expected to be allocated to Afrikaners, white South Africans who are descendants of largely Dutch people who colonised South Africa. The cap is much lower than the one the Biden administration set at 125,000 from fiscal years 2022 to 2025. Over those fiscal years, the number of refugees admitted was 25,465 (2022), 60,014 (2023), 100,034 (2024) and 27,308 (2025), respectively, according to data from the Migration Policy Institute. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The resettlement priorities also mark a different strategy for the US government. Previous administrations focused on resettling people with humanitarian concerns, such as those impacted by war, or who were facing persecution. It also welcomed people from around the world regardless of their ethnic background, religion or sexuality. In comparison, the Trump administration is focusing largely on a group from one part of the world who Trump claims are facing a "white genocide", something that South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and a delegation of white South Africans, who visited Trump in the Oval Office, have denied as baseless. Other groups that could be prioritised would be Afghans who helped US forces, and possibly Ukrainians, who have previously been resettled in the US. White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told Reuters that "no decisions were final" until a decision is made in October, praising President Trump for his "humanitarian heart". The news overlaps with a suspension of all visitor visas for Palestinians in Gaza, who are currently facing what is widely considered a genocide. The suspension will impact people in urgent need of medical evacuation. 'Selective' resettlement In May, almost 60 white South Africans were granted refugee status in the US and were resettled later the same month. This was in spite of Trump suspending the country's refugee resettlement programme after returning to office, leaving 12,000 vulnerable people in limbo who had been conditionally approved for resettlement and had flights booked before 20 January, as well as almost 90,000 others who had been approved for resettlement. US grants dozens of white South Africans refugee status Read More » While US vetting processes for refugees normally take 18 to 24 months, according to the State Department's website, the Afrikaners' cases were expedited. Currently, multiple legal cases have been filed against the Trump administration to enable those who were approved for resettlement to be allowed into the US, including a class action lawsuit filed by the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP). IRAP's Senior Policy Director Rricha deCant told Middle East Eye in a statement that, from his first day in office, Trump suspended resettlement for thousands of approved refugees who were vetted and scheduled for travel. "Despite multiple court orders, the government has fought tooth and nail to keep these refugees out of the United States, while selectively welcoming white South Africans. "We will continue to fight in court for the right of all refugees to safely resettle in the US, and we hope to see a Presidential Determination that recognises many groups of humanitarian concern that should be urgently resettled - including refugees from Afghanistan, Sudan, Venezuela and unaccompanied children of all nationalities."


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Microsoft accused of delaying tactics with latest review of Israel's use of its tech in Gaza
Microsoft has announced a second investigation into accusations surrounding the Israeli military's use of the company's Azure cloud computing platform in Gaza. This time, however, the company said it would be using lawyers as well as an independent consulting firm for the investigation. The move by Microsoft comes after a report published earlier this month by The Guardian alleged that Israel's military has been used Azure for the 'mass surveillance of civilians in Gaza and the West Bank ' by storing phone call data files. The Redmond, Washington-based technology giant said that if the accusations are true, it would constitute a violation of Microsoft's standard terms of service. For much of the year, controversy has lingered about how various Microsoft products are being used by Israel's military in Gaza, in addition to the company's existing contracts with the Israeli government. In April, during an event marking the company's 50th anniversary, Mustafa Suleyman, Microsoft's head of AI, was interrupted by a protester who criticised the company for having contracts with Israel. Videos posted on social media show Mr Suleyman 's speech coming to a halt as a woman in the audience accuses him of being a war profiteer. Outside the event, demonstrators protested against the company's contracts with Israel. Many of the demonstrators were Microsoft employees, who were terminated for their actions. The protests have stemmed from the group No Azure for Apartheid (NOAA), which was founded by former Microsoft employees. In response to the demonstrations and allegations, Microsoft announced that an internal review had found 'no evidence' its products have been used to harm people in Gaza. The company came to that conclusion based on an investigation conducted with the help of an outside firm, which involved interviews with dozens of employees and the lengthy assessment of documents. 'As with many governments around the world, we also work with the Israeli government to protect its national cyberspace against external threats,' Microsoft said. The company did not find evidence that Israel's military had failed to comply with Microsoft's terms of service, it added. There were some caveats in Microsoft's statement, however. There was acknowledgement that because of the nature of how software and AI tools are used, Microsoft's own investigation might have been limited. 'Microsoft does not have visibility into how customers use our software on their own servers or other devices,' the company said, before concluding with a message expressing concern over the loss of life in Israel and Gaza. Those concerns culminated in a shareholder resolution submitted and supported by 60 investors that is seeking to push Microsoft to evaluate its effectiveness in promoting 'human rights due diligence processes' related to its AI tools. The lead filer of the resolution, set to face a vote at Microsoft's annual shareholder meeting in December, is the Religious of the Sacred Heart of Mary, an international congregation of Catholic women. As for Microsoft's decision to perform yet another investigation into how its cloud and AI offerings are used by Israel's military, NOAA has dismissed the announcement as a delay strategy. 'Microsoft must terminate all Azure contracts and partnerships with the Israeli military government,' the group said. 'The No Azure for Apartheid campaign rejects Microsoft's 'urgent' inquiry into its business with the Israeli Military – as yet another tactic to delay the immediate cessation of ties with the Israeli military.' Other major companies have come under scrutiny for contracts with Israel. Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, Google and others have faced criticism. Israel's campaign in Gaza – which followed the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas-led fighters that resulted in the deaths of about 1,200 people and the capture of 240 hostages – has killed more than 62,000 people and injured about 156,000.


UAE Moments
2 hours ago
- UAE Moments
More Celebrities Speak Out on Gaza: U2, Madonna, Olivia Rodrigo, and Radiohead
More and more artists are stepping into the conversation on Gaza, with U2, Madonna, Olivia Rodrigo, and Radiohead recently making statements. Some are heartfelt, some are cautious, but all show how the crisis is impossible to ignore. U2 Divided in Their Words The Irish band made a joint post on August 10, with each member sharing their take. Bono condemned both Hamas and Israel, calling Netanyahu's government a 'moral failure.' Meanwhile, The Edge didn't hold back—using words like 'genocide' and 'ethnic cleansing.' The mixed messaging sparked even more debate among fans. Olivia Rodrigo's Emotional Plea The young pop star spoke up in July, calling the Gaza humanitarian crisis 'horrific and completely unacceptable.' She spotlighted children suffering without food, water, or medical care and even donated to Unicef, encouraging her fans to pitch in too. Madonna's Call to the Pope Madonna appealed to Pope Leo XIV earlier this month, asking him to bring light to Gaza's children. Her post was deeply personal—she tied it to her son's birthday, saying the best gift she could give was to fight for innocent lives. Still, she avoided directly condemning Israel, sticking to a 'both sides suffer' message. Radiohead's Complicated Stance Radiohead has long faced heat for performing in Israel despite boycott calls. But in May, Thom Yorke finally addressed Gaza head-on, slamming Netanyahu's government as 'out of control' and labeling the siege 'horrific.' Critics, however, said his words still fell short—especially when he questioned the 'Free Palestine' rallying cry.