Hope Florida Foundation to amend tax return to show golf tourney made more money
TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Ron DeSantis held a two-day golf tournament at a high-end resort in Panama City Beach last year to raise cash for the Hope Florida Foundation, the nonprofit associated with the First Lady that is under investigation.
The May 2024 event at a resort that bills itself as the 'true gem' of Florida's Gulf Coast lost more than $17,000, according to the foundation's delinquent federal tax return filed in April — six months past its due date.
But now the foundation said it will amend its tax return by attributing more donations to the golf fundraiser, ones it previously failed to report to IRS. The event, it claims, was an 'extraordinary success,' though by IRS rules it still lost money, even if the foundation's 990 tax form is amended.
The problems with Hope Florida's tax return underscores the financial challenges that have plagued the two-year-old foundation and prompted state lawmakers this spring to launch an investigation into the charity, trumpeted by Ron and Casey DeSantis as way to help Floridians get off government assistance.
'The incompetence is astounding,' Rep. Alex Andrade, R-Pensacola, said by email when he was told about how the group's tax return was to be amended.
Andrade used his House Health Care Budget Committee this spring to investigate the Hope Florida Foundation, which was used as a pass through for $10 million from the state's Medicaid settlement. That money wound up in the account of a political action committee set up by DeSantis' former chief of staff, James Uthmeier, to defeat a ballot initiative to legalize marijuana. Andrade said it was illegal to shift state money that should have gone to help provide health care for the poor to a political operation.
Uthmeier, who DeSantis has since appointed Florida's attorney general, has denied any wrongdoing.
The House investigation also showed that the Hope Florida Foundation had not filed its tax return, produced a required audit or kept up with other paperwork.
Andrade ended his investigation in April saying he there was evidence that DeSantis administration officials and others tied to Hope Florida had committed 'conspiracy to commit money laundering and wire fraud' in moving the Medicaid money. The DeSantises and others involved also deny any wrongdoing.
Andrade handed over information, he said, to the U.S. Department of Justice and the Leon County State Attorney's Office, which confirmed it is investigating the allegations.
The golf fundraiser coincided with a press conference where DeSantis and his wife handed out $140,000 in checks to seven local nonprofits and churches.
But it was not announced in advance by the governor's office or the Hope Florida Foundation and seemed to have little social media presence.
Now the Foundation is spinning the initial loss claimed for the fundraiser into gold.
'The Governor's Cup was an extraordinary success that was not paid for at taxpayer expense and raised a net profit of nearly $700,000 for the Hope Florida Foundation,' the foundation said in a recent statement provided by Jeff Aaron, the outside legal counsel hired in October to help fix the foundation's finances and other problems.
Aaron provided a list of donations that were not part of Hope Florida's tax form and said an amended form would be filed soon.
Aaron said the tournament raised $785,000 donations and had $95,547 in expenses for a total profit of $689,452.
But the foundation's tax return tells a different tale. It shows the Governor's Cup only made $22,000, and with $40,000 in expenses reported a loss of $17,000.
The IRS requires the donations to be subtracted from the gross revenues to show how much the revenue the event generated selling event-related goods and services. So while the tax return notes the foundation received about $400,000 in contributions, that money is not counted as revenue for the fundraiser.
And because the tournament didn't produce enough revenue to cover the expenses, the expenses come out of the donations, said Laurie Chaney, CEO of Charity Watch, an independent nonprofit watchdog.
'That isn't a good thing,' Chaney said.
While the new numbers provided by Aaron show the golf tournament garnered more donations than originally reported, it still wouldn't help the bottom line, according to the IRS. Rather, the additional expenses Aaron flagged would mean the event lost even more than the foundation's 990 tax form shows, a total of $73,000.
Chaney said she hasn't seen many successful charity-run golf tournaments.
'For organizations that use golf tournaments as their primary means of raising funds, it sometimes appears that charities are using them more to subsidize their board members' golf hobbies than as an efficient means of raising donations to support their charity's mission,' she said.
The foundation's tax return was prepared by Carroll & Company, the same Tallahassee accounting firm that handled the books for the political action committee Keep Florida, the one set up by Uthmeier that got money from Hope Florida.
It also did accounting for DeSantis' Florida Freedom Fund, another political committee set up to combat the marijuana legalization initiative as well as a ballot amendment to overturn a six-week abortion ban and expand women's reproductive rights.
Kelly Kundinger, currently a senior advisor to Sen. Ashley Moody, was the chief operating officer for the Florida Freedom Fund and responsible for the golf tournament's billing. She did not return an email seeking comment.
'At its most basic, the accounting of the event should match the 990,' said Glen Casel, a former Central Florida nonprofit executive with 30-plus years of experience, who called the addition of hundreds of thousands of dollars 'alarming.'
'It is not normal to have hundreds of thousands of dollars in corrections,' he said.
Among the donors to the golf tournament was Centene Corp., the state's largest Medicaid managed care provider, which has played a notable role in the Hope Florida foundation controversy. It was Centene that made the legal settlement with the state, totaling $67 million, that spun off the $10 million the Hope Florida Foundation channeled to two political nonprofits aligned with efforts to defeat the marijuana initiative.
Centene gave the golf tournament $100,000 more than was reported to the IRS, according to Aaron's list of donors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. A centerpiece of Donald Trump's tax bill would make millions of Medicaid recipients work, volunteer or study to maintain their publicly-financed health insurance. Republicans say the work requirement is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to take charge of their physical and fiscal health. Dr. Mehmet Oz challenged this population to "prove that you matter." But health advocacy groups and analysts say most recipients already work in jobs that don't provide affordable health insurance or pay enough for people to afford their own insurance. They say mandating a Medicaid work requirement − combined with more frequent eligibility checks − would create an administrative nightmare that drops coverage for many who qualify for the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled residents. What is Medicaid churn? Medicaid rolls vary from month to month as people lose eligibility due to a new job, a raise or other income source that disqualifies them for coverage. A job loss or change in life circumstances could make someone newly eligible. The constant change of Medicaid rolls is what health policy experts call churn. A person who temporarily loses coverage due to a paperwork issue or mistake then must again sign up. "Churn is what happens when these eligibility systems become difficult to navigate," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The federal government requires state Medicaid programs to check enrollees eligibility once a year. The Trump tax cut legislation would mandate states double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states would have the added duty of verifying a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation, which passed the House and awaits Senate approval, mandates Medicaid recipients who are "able-bodied" adults without children work 80 hours per month or qualify for an exemption such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The bill defines able-bodied as people who are not medically certified as physically or unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks due to administrative miscues. "People are going to have to document work status or exemption status multiple times a year, and at each point there's a risk that someone who is eligible could lose coverage," Tolbert said. Thousands lost coverage under Arkansas work requirement During the first Trump administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gave states the option of implementing a work requirement for nondisabled adults on Medicaid. Arkansas' work requirement cut more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program. People were removed often because people were unaware of paperwork requirements to keep their coverage, research shows and analysts said. In April, a study by researchers from the Urban Institute and Loyola University Chicago found the Arkansas uninsured rate jumped 7.4 percentage points among low-income adults age 30 to 49 after the state's work requirement began. The policy's impact on employment among that age group was "negative, small and statistically insignificant," the study said. Arkansas adults who didn't have access to the internet at home were disproportionately harmed by the policy, a sign adults might've had trouble accessing the state's online portal to report work histories or exemptions, the Urban Institute said. If the work requirement for Medicaid recipients is adopted nationwide, health experts say millions of working poor Americans will inevitably lose coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated 10.9 million Americans would lose health insurance coverage through 2034 under the legislation. Most would lose coverage due to the Medicaid work requirement and the twice-a-year eligibility checks, but about 3.1 million would become uninsured from tweaks to Affordable Care Act enrollment, according to a KFF analysis. The ranks of the uninsured could grow larger if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made ACA plans more affordable for consumers. If the tax credits expire and Congress passes the current version of the Trump tax bill, as many as 16 million Americans would lose coverage , according to CBO. "Coverage loss from work requirements should actually be very small," said Kathy Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "But we anticipate it will be very large, because people will not be able to comply with the requirements and will lose their coverage." Dr. Oz: Medicaid spending is 'crippling the system' The Trump administration's top Medicaid official has defended the House legislation as a necessary step to slow spending for the federal health program that covers nearly 80 million low-income and disabled Americans. In a June 4 interview with Fox Business, Dr. Oz challenged Medicaid recipients who would face work requirements should "prove that you matter." Oz, the Trump-appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the work requirement asks "able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school. Do something to show you have agency over your future." In a Fox News interview posted on the social media site X, Oz said Medicaid spending has surged 50% since 2019, a pace that is "crippling the system." However, some Republicans have pushed back on the proposed cuts. In a May opinion piece in the New York Times, Sen. Josh Hawley, R- Missouri, said "slashing health insurance for the working poor" is "morally wrong and politically suicidal." Survey: Americans worried about Medicaid cuts The public is paying attention to the proposed Medicaid cuts. Slightly more than half of adults said they're worried significant cuts in Medicaid spending would negatively affect their family's ability to obtain and afford health care, according to a KFF health tracking poll released June 6. The survey this survey of 2,539 U.S. adults was conducted online and by telephone over three weeks in May. The survey said nearly 6 in 10 adults said the Trump administration's policies would weaken Medicaid, but there is a stark divide based on party affiliation. Nine in 10 Democrats but just 2 in 10 Republicans expect the administration's policies would weaken Medicaid. Republicans also were far more likely than Democrats to say that the Trump's policies would strengthen Medicaid. Still, while the survey suggests people are tracking the news, many likely wouldn't know whether their coverage has changed until they try to get medical care. "People don't often know that they've lost coverage until they try and fill a prescription or see a doctor," Tolbert said.
Fox News
40 minutes ago
- Fox News
Dem governor expected to defend state's controversial sanctuary policies during GOP-led hearing
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker will be among several Democratic governors who are expected to face a grilling before GOP lawmakers during a Thursday hearing on their states' controversial sanctuary status. According to prepared remarks obtained by Fox News Digital, Pritzker will defend his state's policies, saying his administration was left to fill the void in the absence of help from the federal government in dealing with the border crisis. He will accuse certain border state governors and mayors of having abandoned the nation's highest ideals by having spent millions of taxpayer dollars treating immigrants as "pawns" rather than doing "everything possible to make the promise of America the practice of America." He will take aim at Republican Govs. Greg Abbott of Texas and Ron DeSantis of Florida for having bused illegal immigrants to predominantly liberal cities and states in the north – actions, he will argue, were political stunts that only exacerbated the problem. Pritzker will say that Illinois' resources were strained because of a lack of federal support – from both Republicans and Democrats – during the crisis. The Democratic governor is expected to highlight his state's efforts to address the influx of immigrants into the "Land of Lincoln" by processing new arrivals, supporting temporary shelter and permanent housing, and enabling them to live independently and contribute to the economy. Pritzker will note that even though state resources were strained during this period, it did not stop his administration from focusing on public safety by investing in state and local law enforcement, including the Illinois State Police (ISP) troopers. He will highlight statistics showing that violent crime has gone down under his stewardship. Pritzker will reaffirm his intolerance for violent criminals – whether documented or undocumented – and note that Illinois law enables government employees to cooperate with federal immigration officers executing criminal warrants. He is expected to say that federal officials are welcome to operate in Illinois but will make clear that Illinois will not divert limited resources when it is not in the best interest of the state. He will say that he wants residents to feel comfortable turning to local law enforcement for help. Pritzker is also expected to invoke his own family's history, having fled to the U.S. to escape the Russian massacre of Jews in Ukraine. He is expected to implore Congress to fix the nation's broken immigration system so that law-abiding immigrant families can have the same opportunity his family did. The governor will close his remarks by arguing that reforming the system does not have to come at the expense of securing the border. Pritzker will be joined by fellow Democratic Govs. Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. "A Hearing with Sanctuary State Governors" begins will at 10 a.m. EST before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Politico
42 minutes ago
- Politico
Republicans stuff new tax cuts into their megabill, hoping voters will take note
Republicans are using their domestic policy megabill as an opportunity to pile on new tax breaks in hopes of quickly juicing people's tax refunds, the economy and their political fortunes ahead of next year's midterm elections. Their plan would spend more than $200 billion on tax cuts this year, in addition to simply extending tax cuts enacted in 2017 that are set to expire at the end of this year and would likely go unnoticed by most taxpayers. An enlarged Child Tax Credit, a supersized break for state and local tax (SALT) deductions and a slew of other goodies would be made retroactively available for this tax year so that people can claim them when they file their tax returns next spring. Businesses too would receive a bevy of backdated tax cuts. Almost two-thirds of filers are in line to receive, on average, an extra $1,200 next year, the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center figures, though that could be pared back by the Senate. Republicans are already touting the coming benefits to voters, though they risk being eclipsed by complaints from Democrats that the wealthy would see much bigger tax cuts and that people at the bottom of the income ladder would receive little while being hurt by cuts in spending on programs like Medicaid. The add-ons are intended to address a major, if sometimes overlooked, political problem for Republicans when it comes to this year's tax debate: They're mostly just extending temporary provisions that people have been using for years. If that's all they did, many people wouldn't see much change in their tax bills. With the new provisions, Republicans are trying to ensure voters can feel a quick jolt to their personal finances. At the same time, lawmakers are also trying to use the legislation to offset the expected hit to the economy from President Donald Trump's trade wars. 'We want to see the impact of these provisions as quickly as possible,' said Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), a tax writer. The strategy comes with some downsides. For one thing, the additional tax cuts are increasing the bill's cost, no small thing amid the mounting focus on government debt. A plan to raise the cap on state and local tax deductions to $40,000, from $10,000, would cost $33 billion in 2025 alone, TPC says. Some Senate Republicans, calling the provision too expensive, are now trying to ratchet that back to $30,000. It's also hardly a sure thing the plan will actually pay political dividends — Republicans never got much credit from voters for the tax cuts that flowed from their original Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Polling at the time showed many people didn't believe their taxes had gone down. The plan would also put a lot of pressure on Treasury and the IRS, which have faced significant staff cuts, because they would have to quickly sort out the details of how the provisions would work so that people can claim them. That's partly why Republicans are rushing the legislation through Congress, in addition to the need to hike the debt limit, which is also included in the package. 'One of the reasons we've got to get everything done by July is so there's time to get information to people and there's time to be able to get the guidance documents out from the IRS, because that's going to take them months,' said Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), a tax writer. Republicans are trying to get legislation to Trump's desk by their July 4 recess, though lately they've been warning that deadline could slip. The effort has left some observers wondering if Republicans might send checks to millions of taxpayers as downpayments on the tax savings, like they did after former President George W. Bush's tax cuts. That would draw public attention to the new tax cuts, and Trump has periodically teased the idea of sending voters some sort of tariff-related payment. But Republicans say there are no plans for checks. Aside from increasing the child credit and sweetening the SALT deduction, Republicans plan to boost the standard deduction by $2,000 for couples. They're also creating a string of new breaks: a $10,000 deduction for auto-loan interest, a $4,000-per-person deduction for seniors, a $300 break for people who give to charity, deductions for overtime pay and income from tips, and a new tax-preferred investment account for children. Most people would see their taxes go down under the GOP plan, with those in the middle of the income spectrum receiving an average of $830, the Tax Policy Center says. Low-income people projected to benefit would get relatively little, about $250, and the top 20 percent of earners would get about $2,500. Those averages, though, obscure the fact that benefits would vary widely, even among taxpayers with similar incomes, because so many of the new breaks are narrowly targeted at specific groups. Raising the SALT cap to $40,000 would save someone in the top 1 percent of earners about $4,000, TPC estimates. Parents with two kids would see an additional $1,000 from the child credit increase. The auto-loan interest deduction would be worth as much as $1,200 to a couple making $50,000. Altogether, tax cuts for individuals would run about $140 billion this year, according to TPC. Meanwhile, businesses would get retroactive breaks for research, investment and interest expenses, as well as a new break for building factories — which would cost a combined $57 billion through the fiscal year that ends in September, the official Joint Committee on Taxation says. In order for people to claim all of the new benefits, they'll need to know the nitty gritty of how they're supposed to work, and it will be up to the administration to sort that out. The legislation orders Treasury, for example, to come up with a list of occupations that would be eligible for Trump's new tip deduction. The deduction for auto-loan interest would be reserved for vehicles that had 'final assembly' in the U.S., with a complex rule for how that would be determined. Employers will surely have lots of questions about how business breaks are supposed to work as well. 'Every business is going to say, 'What does this mean?'' said Lankford. 'So the earlier we can get this done, the greater the economic effect that can happen this year.'
