logo
Complaints to Ombudsman rose 30% in five years to 2024

Complaints to Ombudsman rose 30% in five years to 2024

RTÉ News​17-06-2025
The number of complaints to the Ombudsman rose by over 30% between 2019 and 2024, according to its latest annual report.
Last year, almost 1,500 complaints out of a total of 4,478 were about local authorities. Almost 1,400 related to Government departments and offices.
The Department of Social Protection was the subject of over 600 complaints.
There were 887 complaints about public bodies in the health sector with 705 involving the HSE and 149 about the child and family agency Tusla.
The Ombudsman Ger Deering used the annual report as an opportunity to call on the Government to provide funding to support younger people in nursing homes and, where appropriate, move them to more suitable accommodation.
Following an investigation by the Ombudsman in 2021, the HSE set up an 'under-65 programme' and successfully transitioned over 100 people to more suitable accommodation.
The scheme - according to the report - also "improved the lives" of those who could not transition out of nursing homes.
'Completely unacceptable' scheme cannot be delivered - Ombudsman
However, the HSE has said that there is insufficient funding to continue to assist many of the young people to move to more appropriate accommodation or to continue the programme.
Mr Deering described as "completely unacceptable", that the programme, which brought hope and independence to people with disabilities "cannot be delivered because of a lack of funding".
When it comes to supporting disabled people to access transport, he welcomed a commitment from the Department of Transport to develop a new scheme.
The Ombudsman has noted that over the last 13 years, he and his two predecessors highlighted the lack of appropriate supports for people with disabilities since the Mobility Allowance and the Motorised Transport Grant were closed to new applicants.
He expressed cautious optimism that "a long-standing injustice" was about to be righted, adding that, progress would be closely monitored.
Department of Social Protection complaint
A number of complaints have been highlighted in the report including one where the Department of Social Protection mistakenly recalled payment from a deceased carer's account.
'Anne' contacted the Ombudsman after the department recalled a payment of over €2,700 it incorrectly believed it had paid to the bank account of her son and carer, Martin, who had recently died.
Anne and her family contacted the department several times over a 12-month period to highlight the error and get a refund, but the Department refused.
It emerged that while Anne had notified the Department of her son's death, the department had attempted to continue to pay Carer's Allowance and a Carer's Support Grant into Martin's account.
As his account had been closed, the bank automatically returned any payments to the department.
However, the department did not know that the payment had been returned and also recalled the payment which meant that the money left Martin's bank account in error.
This error arose as the Department had not updated the returned payments to its account, and therefore believed that Martin had received the payment.
The department apologised to Anne for the error and refunded the money it had incorrectly retrieved.
It also agreed to pay a Carer's Support Grant of €1,850 to Anne's family as a goodwill gesture but also as Martin would have met the conditions of that Grant before his death.
In another instance, 'Fiona' had a poor experience in the Coombe Hospital in Dublin when her child was born and was extremely upset and felt traumatised by the experience.
While she had initially raised concerns with the hospital ended up making a formal complaint to the hospital two years later.
However, the hospital refused to deal with the matter as it was outside the time limit for making complaints.
The Heath Act, 2004, includes a 12-month time limit for making complaints. However, it also provides for the extension of the time limit where special circumstances make it appropriate to do so.
The Ombudsman queried whether the hospital had considered using its discretion in this case.
In response, the hospital offered to meet Fiona who wanted a written response.
According to the report, the hospital issued a comprehensive and empathetic letter which Fiona felt resolved the issues for her.
The Ombudsman raised a similar issue to Fiona's in his annual report for 2023.
Ot has led him to call on all public bodies - particularly those in the health sector - to be mindful that some people may not be in a position to make a complaint within a specific timeframe for a variety of reasons, including feeling upset or traumatised.
In such cases he said the body should consider using its discretion to deal with the complaint.
'Andrew' contacted the Ombudsman when his mother's belongings, including her dentures and shoes, went missing during her time in St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin.
The hospital told him that it had no record of the items being with his mother when she was admitted.
However, the Ombudsman discovered evidence that both the woman's dentures and shoes were with her when she was in the hospital.
An initial report from the hospital's speech and language therapist showed that Andrew's mother had no issues eating, while a subsequent report highlighted that she was having difficulty eating and was missing some teeth.
The Ombudsman also uncovered a therapist's report that said she had difficulty "putting on her shoes".
The hospital apologised to Andrew and his mother and reimbursed them for the value of the items lost.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Assessments of children who may have had unnecessary hip surgeries pushed back to next year
Assessments of children who may have had unnecessary hip surgeries pushed back to next year

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Assessments of children who may have had unnecessary hip surgeries pushed back to next year

Children who may have been subjected to unnecessary hip dysplasia surgery must wait until next year before they are assessed by a team of external experts for a second medical opinion. In May, the HSE published an independent audit on hip surgery thresholds for children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. It examined 147 cases across three hospitals : Temple Street , the National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh and Crumlin Hospital . In Temple Street, 60 per cent of surgeries audited did not meet the clinical threshold for surgical intervention, while this was the case for 79 per cent in the Cappagh hospital. Following the report, the HSE announced it was commissioning an independent expert review panel that will work to review patient files to determine the appropriateness of the original decision to operate. READ MORE The HSE said then that the review panel would be set up within six months. However, a spokeswoman for the executive has now said it will be January before the review of individual cases begins. The health service issued an international call for experts, with applications accepted up until last Friday. 'Expressions of interest have been received from a wide range of regions including Ireland, the UK , the USA , Canada , Asia and other parts of Europe,' the spokeswoman said. 'These submissions will be subject to a shortlisting and recruitment process prior to the formal announcement of the panel, which is expected to convene in September.' She said an international expert has been identified and agreed to chair the external panel, and terms are being negotiated. The organisation is designing a 'robust scientific and methodological framework' for the review, which is expected to be agreed between September and December this year. 'It is expected that the review of individual cases will commence in January. This timeline reflects the complexity of the work involved and the need to ensure a rigorous and comprehensive approach,' it added. The HSE, Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and patient advocates held a meeting on the external review panel last Thursday. In a statement following the meeting, Hip Dysplasia Advocacy Group, a newly-established representative organisation, said there must be 'full transparency' between the HSE and the families regarding these reviews. It said 'everyone is left completely in the dark'. 'We strongly suggested they set up a webpage to inform families of updates in a timely manner and we hope to see this implemented swiftly,' the statement said. The advocacy group described the engagement with CHI at the meeting as positive, adding that the paediatric healthcare provider anticipates all follow-up appointments for affected children will be completed by the end of the year.

Anti-sunscreen ‘lies' sweeping social media are dangerous, dermatologist warns
Anti-sunscreen ‘lies' sweeping social media are dangerous, dermatologist warns

Irish Independent

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Anti-sunscreen ‘lies' sweeping social media are dangerous, dermatologist warns

Influencers on platforms such as TikTok are claiming in posts that chemicals in sunscreen are dangerous. Some viral clips have gone so far as to claim 'the sun does not cause skin cancer'. Reality TV star Sam Faiers from The Only Way Is Essex was criticised when she recently posted that none of her family used sunscreen as she believed it was 'full of toxic ingredients'. Professor Anne Marie Tobin, the HSE's national clinical lead for dermatology, said there is 'absolutely no truth' to the claims and warned that misinformation is particularly dangerous for the Irish population. She said 75pc of Irish people have skin that is at risk of burning on exposure to the sun, 'and never tan or tan only after a long time, so they're at particular risk of skin cancer'. It makes no sense to me. It's anti-science, anti-evidence — it's just untrue The consultant dermatologist at Tallaght University Hospital said there is no evidence to suggest the chemicals in sunscreen are harmful. 'It makes no sense to me. It's anti-science, anti-evidence — it's just untrue. By not using sunscreen, people are increasing their risk of cancer. Apart from the risk of skin cancer, exposure to the sun really damages your collagen, that's incredibly ageing.' Prof Tobin said sunscreen has decades of scientific backing, and added: 'It originated in Western Australia, where they have a very high skin cancer rate. There's good evidence to show that it works. Skin cancer is entirely preventable. Unlike certain cancers, like colon cancer, you can completely avoid it.' She said the rates continue to be 'very high' in Ireland, despite the availability of sunscreen for several decades. One blistering sunburn in childhood or adolescence more than doubles your chances of developing melanoma in later life,' she added.

HSE accused of ‘abandoning rural mothers' at protest over Portiuncula maternity services
HSE accused of ‘abandoning rural mothers' at protest over Portiuncula maternity services

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

HSE accused of ‘abandoning rural mothers' at protest over Portiuncula maternity services

The HSE was accused of abandoning mothers in rural areas during a protest prompted by concerns over the future of maternity services at Portiuncula University Hospital in Co Galway . About 2,000 people from western and midland counties marched through Ballinasloe on Saturday to chants of 'Care Can't Wait – Reinstate". The demonstration was organised by the Portiuncula Maternity Alliance (PMA), which was established after the HSE decided that expectant mothers with high-risk pregnancies would have their antenatal care moved from Portiuncula to other locations. The decision was taken on foot of a report published last month that summarised five reviews of care provided to women and their babies at Portiuncula and found there were 'significant clinical risks' at the maternity unit. READ MORE The HSE has said it was committed to implementing the 34 recommendations contained in the reviews and had established an implementation team to do this. Protesters carried county flags and placards, one of which read 'No births on the M6!'. Among those participating were nuns from the Franciscan Missionaries of the Divine Motherhood, the order that established the hospital in 1943. Cllr Evelyn Francis Parsons, a GP and Independent member of Galway County Council , told protesters it was wonderful to see such a turnout and that 'together we will not let [the hospital] be downgraded'. 'This hospital and especially its maternity unit is not just bricks and mortar, it has been part of our families, our community for many, many years,' she said. 'Behind every statistic, behind every policy decision, there are real people, mothers, babies, families and staff.' She said mothers' voices have not been heard much in the debate about Portiuncula and she shared some experiences of women cared for there in the past. Ms Parsons cited the case of Mary O'Malley, whose child experienced hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, a brain injury caused by a lack of oxygen and blood flow to babies. 'Her care was reviewed. These are her words: 'Forcing a high-risk pregnant woman to travel is not a safety plan. It's a terrifying gamble with our lives, with our babies lives, on the road. We were promised a safe modern service. Instead of delivering that promise, the HSE is abandoning rural mothers, and forcing us to bear the risk of its own strategic failures'.' Kevin Connolly, a retired paediatrician who worked at Portiuncula from 1978 to 2010, said he was very proud to have worked at the hospital. 'I am very concerned that the right thing is not being done, the wrong thing has been imposed on us,' he said. 'What has been imposed on us is not safe, is reducing capacity and taking away resources. It is patently the wrong thing to do and it must stop. We have to win.' Ms Parsons said that 'when services are downgraded they rarely come back', noting the experiences of Nenagh and Roscommon, where accident and emergency departments were closed years ago. 'But I also want you to look at Portlaoise, they fought and they saved their maternity unit. And so can we,' she added. 'We demand proper staffing, proper resourcing and proper respect for our healthcare workers, our nurses, midwives, doctors and all the other staff. 'This is about mothers, the guardians of our future, it's about our babies, our families. It's about equality, about rural families. They deserve the same level of care as families in Dublin, Galway or anywhere else in Ireland.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store