
HSE accused of ‘abandoning rural mothers' at protest over Portiuncula maternity services
HSE
was accused of abandoning mothers in rural areas during a protest prompted by concerns over the future of maternity services at
Portiuncula University Hospital
in
Co Galway
.
About 2,000 people from western and midland counties marched through Ballinasloe on Saturday to chants of 'Care Can't Wait – Reinstate".
The demonstration was organised by the Portiuncula Maternity Alliance (PMA), which was established after the HSE decided that expectant mothers with high-risk pregnancies would have their antenatal care moved from Portiuncula to other locations.
The decision was taken on foot of a report published last month that
summarised five reviews of care provided
to women and their babies at Portiuncula and found there were 'significant clinical risks' at the maternity unit.
READ MORE
The HSE has said it was committed to implementing the 34 recommendations contained in the reviews and had established an implementation team to do this.
Protesters carried county flags and placards, one of which read 'No births on the M6!'. Among those participating were nuns from the Franciscan Missionaries of the Divine Motherhood, the order that established the hospital in 1943.
Cllr Evelyn Francis Parsons, a GP and Independent member of
Galway County Council
, told protesters it was wonderful to see such a turnout and that 'together we will not let [the hospital] be downgraded'.
'This hospital and especially its maternity unit is not just bricks and mortar, it has been part of our families, our community for many, many years,' she said. 'Behind every statistic, behind every policy decision, there are real people, mothers, babies, families and staff.'
She said mothers' voices have not been heard much in the debate about Portiuncula and she shared some experiences of women cared for there in the past.
Ms Parsons cited the case of Mary O'Malley, whose child experienced hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, a brain injury caused by a lack of oxygen and blood flow to babies.
'Her care was reviewed. These are her words: 'Forcing a high-risk pregnant woman to travel is not a safety plan. It's a terrifying gamble with our lives, with our babies lives, on the road. We were promised a safe modern service. Instead of delivering that promise, the HSE is abandoning rural mothers, and forcing us to bear the risk of its own strategic failures'.'
Kevin Connolly, a retired paediatrician who worked at Portiuncula from 1978 to 2010, said he was very proud to have worked at the hospital.
'I am very concerned that the right thing is not being done, the wrong thing has been imposed on us,' he said. 'What has been imposed on us is not safe, is reducing capacity and taking away resources. It is patently the wrong thing to do and it must stop. We have to win.'
Ms Parsons said that 'when services are downgraded they rarely come back', noting the experiences of Nenagh and Roscommon, where accident and emergency departments were closed years ago.
'But I also want you to look at Portlaoise, they fought and they saved their maternity unit. And so can we,' she added.
'We demand proper staffing, proper resourcing and proper respect for our healthcare workers, our nurses, midwives, doctors and all the other staff.
'This is about mothers, the guardians of our future, it's about our babies, our families. It's about equality, about rural families. They deserve the same level of care as families in Dublin, Galway or anywhere else in Ireland.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Assessments of children who may have had unnecessary hip surgeries pushed back to next year
Children who may have been subjected to unnecessary hip dysplasia surgery must wait until next year before they are assessed by a team of external experts for a second medical opinion. In May, the HSE published an independent audit on hip surgery thresholds for children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. It examined 147 cases across three hospitals : Temple Street , the National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh and Crumlin Hospital . In Temple Street, 60 per cent of surgeries audited did not meet the clinical threshold for surgical intervention, while this was the case for 79 per cent in the Cappagh hospital. Following the report, the HSE announced it was commissioning an independent expert review panel that will work to review patient files to determine the appropriateness of the original decision to operate. READ MORE The HSE said then that the review panel would be set up within six months. However, a spokeswoman for the executive has now said it will be January before the review of individual cases begins. The health service issued an international call for experts, with applications accepted up until last Friday. 'Expressions of interest have been received from a wide range of regions including Ireland, the UK , the USA , Canada , Asia and other parts of Europe,' the spokeswoman said. 'These submissions will be subject to a shortlisting and recruitment process prior to the formal announcement of the panel, which is expected to convene in September.' She said an international expert has been identified and agreed to chair the external panel, and terms are being negotiated. The organisation is designing a 'robust scientific and methodological framework' for the review, which is expected to be agreed between September and December this year. 'It is expected that the review of individual cases will commence in January. This timeline reflects the complexity of the work involved and the need to ensure a rigorous and comprehensive approach,' it added. The HSE, Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and patient advocates held a meeting on the external review panel last Thursday. In a statement following the meeting, Hip Dysplasia Advocacy Group, a newly-established representative organisation, said there must be 'full transparency' between the HSE and the families regarding these reviews. It said 'everyone is left completely in the dark'. 'We strongly suggested they set up a webpage to inform families of updates in a timely manner and we hope to see this implemented swiftly,' the statement said. The advocacy group described the engagement with CHI at the meeting as positive, adding that the paediatric healthcare provider anticipates all follow-up appointments for affected children will be completed by the end of the year.


Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Why do my potatoes look warty – and are they safe to eat?
Why is the skin of my home-grown potatoes covered in patches of what almost looks like a rough, warty growth, and are they still safe to eat? Andrew Cullinane, Co Galway It sounds as if your potatoes have a disease known as common scab. The good news is that while it sounds horrible and looks unsightly, it doesn't affect the flavour or edibility of the tubers themselves. Symptoms of common scab, which is naturally present in many soils as a microorganism known as Streptomyces scabium, are exacerbated by the developing baby potatoes being exposed to periods of sustained dry weather like those experienced in Ireland this spring and summer. It's also more likely to affect potatoes grown in a limy soil, or a soil to which lime has recently been applied. The rough, scabby growth on the skin of your potatoes is actually the plant's way of limiting damage to the flesh of the tubers. There is no treatment for this disease, which can also be inadvertently introduced into a garden or allotment by way of infected seed potatoes. For this reason, it's always recommended to source the latter from reliable suppliers as certified free from disease. It's also a good idea to keep young plants sufficiently watered during any prolonged dry spells. Crop rotation will help too, by preventing a build-up of the disease in the soil. READ MORE It's worth noting that some varieties, typically those with thinner skins, are more vulnerable to common scab than others. Examples of varieties with good resistance to the disease include 'Connect' (maincrop); 'Cammeo' (maincrop) and 'Charlotte' (early). Importantly, all these varieties also have good resistance to blight, a far more destructive disease that can wipe out an entire crop in a bad year. [ Is it too late to save my blighted potato plants? Opens in new window ] If your potatoes are a maincrop variety that you're planning on storing to use over the coming months, then take extra care to give them a cool, dark, dry spot to reduce the possibility of the scabbed areas of the tubers becoming infected by soft rot, which could then spread to the rest of the potatoes and destroy them. For the same reason, make sure to examine the stored tubers regularly to check for any early signs of rot, discarding any that you find (but not in the compost heap). Finally, for obvious reasons, also avoid reusing any of them as seed potatoes next spring. An interesting footnote to the above is that the microorganism that causes common scab in potatoes belongs to the same Streptomyces genus that's also played a vital role in the production of the majority of antibiotics. Just a few years ago, a new soil-dwelling species of Streptomyces was discovered by scientists in west Fermanagh, which promises significant potential as a new generation of antibiotic. How amazing is that?


Irish Independent
12 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Anti-sunscreen ‘lies' sweeping social media are dangerous, dermatologist warns
Influencers on platforms such as TikTok are claiming in posts that chemicals in sunscreen are dangerous. Some viral clips have gone so far as to claim 'the sun does not cause skin cancer'. Reality TV star Sam Faiers from The Only Way Is Essex was criticised when she recently posted that none of her family used sunscreen as she believed it was 'full of toxic ingredients'. Professor Anne Marie Tobin, the HSE's national clinical lead for dermatology, said there is 'absolutely no truth' to the claims and warned that misinformation is particularly dangerous for the Irish population. She said 75pc of Irish people have skin that is at risk of burning on exposure to the sun, 'and never tan or tan only after a long time, so they're at particular risk of skin cancer'. It makes no sense to me. It's anti-science, anti-evidence — it's just untrue The consultant dermatologist at Tallaght University Hospital said there is no evidence to suggest the chemicals in sunscreen are harmful. 'It makes no sense to me. It's anti-science, anti-evidence — it's just untrue. By not using sunscreen, people are increasing their risk of cancer. Apart from the risk of skin cancer, exposure to the sun really damages your collagen, that's incredibly ageing.' Prof Tobin said sunscreen has decades of scientific backing, and added: 'It originated in Western Australia, where they have a very high skin cancer rate. There's good evidence to show that it works. Skin cancer is entirely preventable. Unlike certain cancers, like colon cancer, you can completely avoid it.' She said the rates continue to be 'very high' in Ireland, despite the availability of sunscreen for several decades. One blistering sunburn in childhood or adolescence more than doubles your chances of developing melanoma in later life,' she added.