Stop selling China mega dam bogey to push Siang project: Arunachal Pradesh activists to Centre
The Yarlung Tsangpo is the upstream of the Siang in Arunachal Pradesh, which meets two more rivers in Assam downstream to flow as the Brahmaputra.
The Medog Hydropower Station planned by China in Tibet is expected to generate 60,000 MW of electricity, three times more than what the country's Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River does. India and Bangladesh have expressed concerns about the potential downstream impact of the Tibet project, although Beijing claims it is a clean energy initiative.
'Instead of creating fear over the Medog project, the government of India should consult with its Chinese counterpart to get an accurate status of the project before pushing the SUMP through,' Ebo Mili, a lawyer and anti-dam activist from Arunachal Pradesh's Dibang Valley, told journalists in New Delhi on Saturday (August 2, 2025).
Members of the Siang Indigenous Farmers' Forum (SIFF) and their legal advisors organised the press conference along with anti-dam activists from Uttarakhand.
SUMP expands to the (11,500 MW) Siang Upper Multi-purpose Project, which the activists said would submerge 27 villages across and displace 1,50,000 members of the Adi tribe, apart from destroying swathes of forest, farmland, and cultural heritage sites such as Kekar Moying, a landmark where the pre-independence Anglo-Abor War took place.
Underscoring the absence of a water treaty with China, Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu described the Medog project as a ticking 'time bomb' that could be misused to destroy the State's Siang belt. He defended the SUMP as a much-needed 'defensive measure' against the sudden release of water by China from the Medog project.
China does not have a water treaty with any of the 13 countries it borders. Lamok Padun, the SIFF's president, said most villagers in the Siang belt are opposed to the SUMP, but the Arunachal Pradesh Government was hell-bent on pushing the project. He said one of the strategies being employed is to pressure the village chiefs into inking a deal with the government for a pre-feasibility report (PFR).
China's mega dam will be 'water bomb': Arunachal MP
'Village heads are being suspended for opposing the SUMP, protestors and members of the SIFF are being detained and arrested arbitrarily, leaders of the SIFF and Adi Students' Union are being criminalised through false charges, and pro-PFR signatures of villagers in the submergence zone are being forged,' he said.
Bhanu Tatak, the SIFF's legal advisor, said the Union and State Governments have been militarising the entire Siang region to prevent people from organising protests. 'The government is resorting to violent means to gag us,' she said.
The National Hydropower Corporation has been assigned to conduct the PFR for the SUMP, estimated to cost ₹1.13 lakh crore under heavy security cover. In December 2024, more than 350 environmentalists, journalists, scientists and civil society organisations submitted a letter to President Droupadi Murmu, urging her to direct the government to withdraw security forces from the area.
The Adi people inhabiting the Siang belt rever the Siang River as 'Ane', which means 'mother', and consider damming it a sacrilege.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Chinese Ambassador mocks Donald Trump after 50% tariff on India: ‘Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile'
Chinese Ambassador to India Xu Feihong on Thursday slammed US President Donald Trump over his 50 per cent tariff imposition on New Delhi. "Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile," the Chinese envoy to India wrote on X. His post accompanied a quote by Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi, who said on August 6 that the US is using tariffs to suppress other countries. 'Using tariffs as a weapon to suppress other countries violates the UN Charter, undermines WTO rules and is both unpopular and unsustainable,' he had said in a phone call with in a phone call with Celso Amorim, chief advisor to the president of Brazil. Feihong's remarks came hours after Trump indicated a possibility of slapping extra tariffs on China for its continued purchase of Russian oil. On Wednesday (local time), the US President had hit India with additional tariffs of 25 per cent specifically tied to the purchase of Russian oil. India had responded by calling the decision 'unfortunate' and comparing itself with other countries, including China, who had bought oil from Russia but did not face such penalties. Donald Trump had on Thursday indicated that he might increase tariffs on China over its continued ties with Russia, a country that he has off late reprimanded for its war with Ukraine. At a news conference in the White House, the US President was asked if similar secondary sanction would apply to China given that the Chinese are the largest buyers of Russian Crude oil. 'It may happen, I don't know, I can't tell you yet, we did it with India and we are doing it probably with a couple of others, one of them could be China,' Trump replied. According to data by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CERA) for June 2025, China has bought 47 per cent of Russia's crude exports, followed by India (38 per cent), the EU (6 per cent), and Turkiye (6 per cent). 'China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests,' China's Foreign Ministry posted on X on Wednesday, responding to a US threat of imposing 100 per cent tariff. 'Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything. China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security and development interests," the ministry said.
Scroll.in
3 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
China steps as subsidies, incentives as birthrate plunges – but nothing seems to be helping
China's central government introduced a childcare subsidy on July 28 that will provide families with 3,000 yuan (around £312) a year for each child under the age of three. The announcement came days after plans were unveiled to roll out free preschool education across the country. These developments mark a shift from previous years, when the government largely left the issue of addressing China's declining birth rate to local authorities. Many of those efforts, which range from cash incentives to housing subsidies, have made little difference. By stepping in directly, Beijing has signalled that it sees the situation as urgent. Fewer Chinese women are choosing to have children, and more young people are delaying or opting out of marriage. This has contributed to a situation where China's population shrank for a third consecutive year in 2024. An ageing population and shrinking workforce pose long-term challenges for China's economic growth, as well as its healthcare and pension systems. Before the central government's recent roll-out, regions in China had already been experimenting with policies to increase birth rates. These include one-time payouts for second or third children, monthly allowances and housing and job training subsidies. One of the most eye-catching local policies came from Hohhot, the capital city of Inner Mongolia province. In March 2025, the authorities there began offering families up to 100,000 yuan (£10,400) for having a second and third child, paid annually until the children turn 10. The authorities in some other cities, including eastern China's Hangzhou, have offered childcare vouchers or subsidies for daycare. Policies like these have seen the number of births increase slightly in a few regions. But uptake is generally low and none have managed to change the national picture. There are several reasons why incentive-based policies have not moved the needle. First, the subsidies are generally small – often equivalent to just a few hundred US dollars. This barely makes a dent in the cost of raising a child in urban China. China ranks among the most expensive countries in the world for child-rearing, surpassing the US and Japan. In fact, a 2024 report by the Beijing-based YuWa Population Research Institute found that the average cost of raising a child in China until the age of 18 is 538,000 yuan (£59,275). This is more than 6.3 times as high as China's GDP per capita. The burden is so widely felt that people in China jokingly refer to children as tunjinshou, which translates to 'gold-devouring beasts'. Second, the incentives largely don't address deeper issues. These include expensive housing, intense education pressures, childcare shortages and some workplaces that penalise women for taking time off. Many Chinese women fear being pushed out of their jobs simply for having kids. Some local authorities have attempted to tackle the structural realities that make having and raising children in China difficult, and have enjoyed some success. In Tianmen, for example, parents of a third child can claim US$16,500 (£12,500) off a new home. However, these policies are confined to specific districts and villages or are limited to select groups. Support remains fragmented and insufficient, while the prospects of scaling these piecemeal initiatives nationwide are slim. Third, gender inequality in China is still deeply entrenched. Women carry most of the childcare and housework burden, with parental leave policies reflecting that imbalance. While mothers are allowed between 128 to 158 days of maternity leave, fathers receive only a handful – varying slightly by province. Despite public calls for equal parental leave, major legal changes seem far off. These factors have together given rise to a situation where, as in east Asia more broadly, many young people in China simply are not interested in marrying or having children. According to one online survey from 2022, around 90% of respondents in China said they wouldn't consider having more children even if they were offered an annual subsidy of 12,000 yuan (£1,250) – far more than the recently announced 3,000 yuan subsidy. Is Beijing too late? The new measures show that Beijing is taking China's declining birth rate seriously. But it might be too late. Fertility decline is hard to reverse, with research showing that social norms are difficult to snap back once they shift away from having children. South Korea has spent decades offering its citizens generous subsidies, housing support and extended parental leave. Yet, despite a recent uptick, its birth rate has remained among the lowest in the world. Projections by the UN paint a stark picture. China's population is expected to drop by 204 million people between 2024 and 2054. It could lose 786 million people by the end of the century, returning its population to levels last seen in the 1950s. Still, the recent announcements are significant. They are the first time the central government has directly used fiscal tools to encourage births, and reflect a consensus that lowering the cost of preschool education can help boost fertility. This sets a precedent and, if urgency keeps rising, the size and scope of support may increase as well. However, if China hopes to turn things around, it will need more than cash. Parenting must be made truly viable and even desirable. Alongside financial aid and free preschool, families need time and labour support. This also means confronting cultural expectations. Raising a child shouldn't be seen as a woman's job alone. A real cultural shift is needed – one that treats parenting as a shared responsibility. My generation, which was born under the one-child policy, grew up in a time where siblings were heavily fined. I was one of them. But, just as fines didn't stop all of those who wanted more children, cash rewards will not easily convince the many who don't.
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump calls on ‘highly conflicted' Intel CEO to resign over China ties
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday (August 7, 2025) demanded the immediate resignation of new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, calling him "highly conflicted" due to his ties to Chinese firms and raising questions about plans to turn around the struggling American chip icon. Reuters reported exclusively in April that Mr. Tan — himself or through venture funds he has founded or operates — invested at least $200 million in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms, some of which are linked to the Chinese military. Mr. Trump's comments came a day after Reuters was first to report that Republican Senator Tom Cotton had sent a letter to Intel's board chair with questions about Mr. Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former firm Cadence Design. "There is no other solution to this problem," Mr. Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform, knocking shares of Intel down around 2% in early U.S. trading. A change in leadership at Intel could pile pressure on the company, which is also a pillar of U.S. efforts to boost domestic chipmaking. Last year it secured $8 billion in subsidies, the largest outlay under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, to build new fabs in Ohio and other states. Analysts debated whether Mr. Trump should be making calls on corporate leadership. "It would be setting a very unfortunate precedent. You don't want American presidents dictating who runs companies, but certainly his opinion has merit and weight," said Phil Blancato, CEO of Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management, which does not own Intel shares. David Wagner, head of equity and portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors, responded that while "many investors likely believe that President Trump has his hand in too many cookie jars, it's just another signal that he's very serious about trying to bring business back to the U.S." Intel and Mr. Tan, who took over as CEO in March, did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. An Intel spokesperson said in a statement on Wednesday that "Intel and Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the U.S. and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defence ecosystem." Reuters in April reported that Mr. Tan between March 2012 and December 2024 invested in Chinese firms, including in contractors and suppliers for the People's Liberation Army, according to a review of Chinese corporate databases cross-referenced with U.S. and analyst lists of companies with connections to the Chinese military. Reuters identified 20 investment funds and companies where his venture capital firm Walden is currently a joint owner along with Chinese government funds or state-owned enterprises, according to Chinese corporate records. The government funds are mostly from municipal governments of Chinese tech hubs like Hangzhou, Hefei, and Wuxi. A source familiar with the matter had at the time told Reuters that Mr. Tan had divested his positions in entities in China, without providing further details. Chinese databases reviewed by Reuters at the time had listed many of his investments as current, and Reuters was at the time unable to establish the extent of his divestitures. Mr. Tan, a Malaysian-born Chinese American business executive, was also the CEO of Cadence Design from 2008 through December 2021 during which the chip design software maker sold products to a Chinese military university believed to be involved in simulating nuclear explosions. Cadence last month agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve the U.S. charges over the sales, a deal Reuters first reported. Business turmoil "This all boils down to Lip Bu's past involvement and investment in Chinese semiconductors, which is also what makes him so valuable as CEO," said Anshel Sag, principal analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy. Once the dominant force in chip-making, Intel has in recent years lost its manufacturing edge to Taiwanese rival TSMC. It also has virtually no presence in the booming market for artificial intelligence chips dominated by Nvidia. Its shares are little changed so far in 2025, after dropping more than 60% last year. The company's market value has fallen below $100 billion, with profit margins — once the envy of the industry — running at about half their historical highs. To revive Intel's fortunes, Mr. Tan has set a goal of slashing the chipmaker's workforce by around 22% to 75,000 people by year-end. Intel has also warned of exiting chip manufacturing if it fails to secure a major customer, a potentially drastic move.
