logo
Prince William to ditch 'ridiculous' tradition in shake-up from King Charles

Prince William to ditch 'ridiculous' tradition in shake-up from King Charles

Daily Mirror23-06-2025
Prince William may abandon a royal tradition that has been passed down through the generations and is reminiscent of a Disney movie, a royal source has claimed
Prince William is facing calls to break with a long-standing Royal Family tradition deemed "ridiculous" and fit for a Disney fairy tale. As the Prince of Wales, who recently turned 43, begins to contemplate his coronation ceremony, there is speculation that he may opt for a more low-key affair.
His father, King Charles, has already set the tone by shortening his coronation ceremony by half an hour compared to Queen Elizabeth II's three-hour extravaganza. According to Sunday Times Royal Editor Roya Nikkah, Prince William has hinted that his coronation will be a departure from the norm, seeking a ceremony that is both "relevant" to modern times and "unifying" for the Commonwealth.

A source close to the Prince revealed that his coronation may be more subdued, drawing inspiration from the simple coronations of medieval kings. They suggested that the ceremony should focus on elements that are pertinent to today's society, reflect diversity, and strip away unnecessary pomp.

One proposal is to do away with the Imperial State Crown, a £5 billion masterpiece crafted in 1937, featuring 3,170 precious stones. The crown has been a staple of coronations, with Charles donning it to lead the procession after his crowning.
However, some argue that it is time to retire this symbol of a bygone era. An insider scoffed at the idea of a Disney-esque coronation, recalling instead the memorable attire from William and Catherine's wedding day: "That ridiculous thing that looks like it's out of Disney? No. What I remember most about that day were William and Catherine's robes, Catherine's beautiful, simple headpiece, and William wearing nothing on his head," reports Cambridgeshire Live.
The choice of crown for Prince William's future coronation remains uncertain, but there's a nostalgic pull towards the Imperial State Crown, which carries connections to his father and grandmother, as highlighted by The Times.
Prince William isn't one to always stick to tradition; in 2024, he eschewed the expected Court Dress at the Order of the Garter event.
While King Charles III donned the traditional "knee socks and embroidered garter," William chose a modern white tie ensemble with regular trousers.

Daily Mail Diary Editor Richard Eden expressed his letdown at the time, saying: "William was at the event, but he opted for white tie and just regular trousers – so a bit of a disappointment really. It would be great to see him in those silk stockings and breeches."
Despite previous appearances in knee-breeches, Eden notes William seems "uncomfortable" in such formal wear, though he muses that Princess Kate likely relishes these occasions.
Eden observed: "You can always see her sort of teasing and giggling at him – particularly when it's the Order of the Garter ceremony where he has to wear all the velvet robes and the feathers. That's always fun."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This Midwest city is transforming into a real-life Goosebumps story for Halloween
This Midwest city is transforming into a real-life Goosebumps story for Halloween

Time Out

time2 hours ago

  • Time Out

This Midwest city is transforming into a real-life Goosebumps story for Halloween

Remember getting goosebumps reading Goosebumps as a kid? This October, you can relive those middle school scares as R.L. Stine's hometown gets a Fear Street makeover, just in time for Halloween. Columbus, Ohio will celebrate the beloved series all month with loads of events and a meetup with the author himself. Columbus will transform into a living, breathing Goosebumps book, bathed in an eerie, slime-green light. The takeover coincides with several spooky milestones: the tenth anniversary of the Goosebumps film, the Disney+ reboot's continued buzz and the August release of Stine's latest page-turner, The Last Sleepover. This celebration is set to be a Halloween experience that's equal parts nostalgia trip, pop culture celebration and spine-chilling party. The scares kick off October 2 with a free outdoor screening of Goosebumps at Columbus Commons, part of the Sunset Movie Series. From there, the fright factor only ramps up. On October 23, Stine will unveil an actual "Fear Street" sign before his public author talk and signing at Columbus Metropolitan Library. That night, look up—City Hall, the Short North arches, Franklin Park Conservatory and other landmarks will glow neon slime-green in his honor. Even more local institutions are joining in to celebrate the hometown horror. Franklin Park Conservatory will host a Goosebumps -themed scavenger hunt, ZipZone Outdoor Adventures will offer spooky night flights and the Columbus Crew will debut an MLS-first: a UV-reactive slime-covered jersey designed with Adidas. And because no Halloween is complete without themed bites and drinks, the city's award-winning dining scene is going all in. Law Bird (a 2025 James Beard semifinalist) will serve a special Goosebumps menu, Budd Dairy Food Hall is crafting cocktails inspired by the books and Land-Grant Brewing Co. is transforming into "Nightmare on Town Street" with cauldrons, cobwebs and a signature green lime slushie. From a witch-and-warlock paddle on the Scioto River to story time challenges at local bookstores, this celebration is for fans old enough to remember the '90s TV series and new readers discovering the scares for the first time. Columbus isn't just honoring R.L. Stine—it's inviting you to step inside his twisted imagination.

Palace gave Princess Anne two ‘secret stepchildren' in online blunder
Palace gave Princess Anne two ‘secret stepchildren' in online blunder

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Palace gave Princess Anne two ‘secret stepchildren' in online blunder

The Palace says the fact was attributed after avoiding 'otherwise rigorous checking process' Buckingham Palace erroneously declared that the Princess Royal had two stepchildren in an online profile marking her 75th birthday. The piece – entitled 75 facts about the Princess Royal – included at number 14: 'Her Royal Highness also has two stepchildren from her second marriage to Sir Timothy Laurence, Tom and Amy Laurence.' Sir Tim does not have any children, and while the Queen's son is called Tom Parker Bowles there are no known members of the extended Royal family called Amy. 'Best hidden royal secret ever' The blunder prompted bafflement among royal watchers, who queried whether Sir Tim had children that had been sequestered away. One social media user wrote: 'Pretty sure this is an error, but how did that happen? I can't think of any Tom and Amy siblings in the extended Royal family.' Another said: 'That would be the best hidden royal secret ever.' An hour or so after the piece was published, it was swiftly deleted, and later updated and reposted. A palace source said the inaccurate fact was included in error after it was inserted as a late addition and not put through the otherwise rigorous checking process. The Telegraph was told on Friday that the offending 'fact' had been sourced from a 'reputable publication online'. That publication is understood to be Women and Home magazine, which published incorrect information in 2023. Women and Home was contacted for comment. The palace marked the Princess's 75th birthday with the release of a new portrait taken by John Swannell, her favoured photographer. The King's younger sister is celebrating the milestone with a holiday, sailing around the Western Isles of Scotland with her husband.

Home Alone director reveals why a reboot would be a huge ‘mistake'
Home Alone director reveals why a reboot would be a huge ‘mistake'

Metro

time7 hours ago

  • Metro

Home Alone director reveals why a reboot would be a huge ‘mistake'

Chris Columbus has shed light on why Home Alone 'should be left alone' and not rebooted. The iconic Christmas film was released in 1990 and catapulted Macaulay Culkin to superstardom as youngster Kevin McCallister, who is left to fend for himself when his family accidentally go on holiday without him. His quick-thinking saves the day when he's forced to go up against bumbling burglars Harry (Joe Pesci) and Marv (Daniel Stern), who learn the hard way not to mess with kids during the holidays. The movie was a huge success and went on to spawn an equally epic sequel the following year – with Disney dropping a fresh take on the classic in 2021. However, when questioned on whether he would want to see any further remakes, director Chris insisted that it would be a 'mistake' to go back. Appearing at the premiere for his new Netflix movie, The Thursday Murder Club, he told Entertainment Tonight: 'I think Home Alone really exists not as this timepiece, but it was very special moment. You can't really recapture that. 'I think it's a mistake to try to go back and recapture something we did 35 years ago. I think it should be left alone.' Sharing his surprise that the movie is so beloved more than three decades on, he added: 'When we were making Home Alone, we wanted people to still enjoy the movie 20 years down the road, but we had no concept that it would still be this locomotive that keeps keeps going after all these years. 'It's a very nostalgic experience for a lot of people, it's great.' The franchise was remade in 2021 with Archie Yates playing youngster Max, who – like Kevin – was accidentally left behind when his family swanned off to Japan. He was having the time of his life with his new-found freedom until a couple set their sights on his home, hoping to retrieve a priceless heirloom. Home Sweet Home Alone didn't quite capture the magic of the original film, and was brutally panned by both fans and professionals. More Trending It currently commands a 13% Rotten Tomatoes score from the audience, compared to a slightly higher critics mark of 15%. 'A disgrace to Home Alone,' viewer BlueTop B fumed, as Amilia P agreed: 'One of the worst movies I've ever seen.' 'It really is very remarkably bad,' Tim L complained. As Logan D added: 'If I could give it zero stars I would, just watch the original.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: The most iconic Fast and Furious villain is still 'waiting for a call' to appear in sequel MORE: The first 'feel-good' body horror left me thinking about its extreme scenes for days MORE: I don't think Materialists is a rom-com – it's something new entirely

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store