
'Undemocratic': Congress, BJP Exchange Barbs In Karnataka Assembly Over Greater Bengaluru Bill
The Greater Bengaluru Governance (Amendment) Bill, 2025 sparked intense debate in the Karnataka Assembly, with both the ruling Congress and the Opposition BJP clashing over its implications for the city. The Congress government presented the bill as a means to improve governance in the rapidly growing metropolis, while the BJP accused the Congress of seeking to centralise power and diminish the role of elected officials.
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah rebutted these claims, accusing the Opposition of distorting facts to mislead the public.
The bill, introduced by Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, who also oversees Bengaluru Development, was passed by the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on Monday. The discussions were marked by heated exchanges, with BJP leaders arguing that the amendment would undermine the autonomy of corporators and concentrate power in a few hands. Congress ministers dismissed these concerns as mere political posturing.
An amusing moment occurred when MLA Munirathna attempted to disrupt the discussion on the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA). Shivakumar quipped, 'We will give you an opportunity to participate, don't worry. We had forgotten about you as you are busy running around between SIT's and investigations," a comment that elicited laughter from the legislators.
So why was the amendment made?
Shivakumar elaborated that despite the PIL being dismissed, the amendment was necessary to make it clear that 'the GBA will not interfere in the functioning of the corporations" and to prevent future misunderstandings. He emphasized that the amendment was intended to protect the autonomy of the Mayor and councillors as per the Constitution. He also highlighted the disparity in tax contributions, pointing out that areas like Mahadevapura contribute the most taxes in Bengaluru, while central areas collect far less.
He reassured that Mayors and corporators would retain their constitutional powers. Addressing concerns about the inclusion of villages and financial assistance, Shivakumar noted that constitutional rules limited direct fund transfers. 'We will deliberate on which villages to include and are ready to withdraw the amendment if the Opposition disagrees," he said.
Reiterating the government's non-political stance on governance, Shivakumar stated, 'We do not want to do politics over Bengaluru's future. The government will not interfere with financial independence, tax collection, elections, or reservation. The 74th amendment has been fully protected." A notification is expected by August 25, after the Governor's assent.
Why is the BJP objecting?
The Karnataka BJP strongly opposed the Bill, arguing that it undermines the Constitution's spirit. Opposition members claimed that the Greater Bengaluru Authority, led by the Chief Minister, was designed to weaken the autonomy of city corporations. 'The Bill is undemocratic and against the spirit of decentralisation," they argued.
Leader of the Opposition R. Ashok criticised the proposed name 'Greater Bengaluru', suggesting a Kannada name instead. He warned that Kannadigas might lose their political voice in areas with high migrant populations, citing Delhi's failed experiment with multiple corporations as a cautionary example. He also noted the potential economic disparities due to differing revenue contributions from areas like Mahadevapura.
The key contention in the Bill
A primary point of contention was the proposal to divide Bengaluru into several municipal corporations, which the BJP opposed. The Opposition argued that splitting the city would reduce native Kannadiga control, particularly in migrant-dominated areas. Ashok called it an 'emotional issue," warning the government of long-term repercussions.
'Secondly, the concept of decentralisation has been damaged and freedom taken away. The corporation should have been independent, but you have made it a parasite by dividing it into five divisions. If one corporation collects good revenue, another will go bankrupt. They will come under the grip of the government," he said.
Ashok further criticized the Bill, stating, 'Former PM late Rajiv Gandhi brought the 73rd Amendment to the Constitution, but this Bill goes against its objectives. What benefit will the people of Bengaluru get? This is not decentralisation of power. Since Dy CM Shivakumar is in charge of Bengaluru, there is centralisation of power. We don't want this. You may have the majority and get it passed, but this is not in the interest of society. Roll back this Bill."
Raising concerns over discrimination politicking
Other BJP MLAs, including Yelahanka's SR Vishwanath, cautioned that the Congress-led government might politically discriminate in allocating funds to corporations, especially if different parties controlled the state and civic bodies. They urged the government to wait until the ongoing delimitation exercise was completed to avoid confusion in constituency boundaries.
Former Deputy CM and MLA CN Ashwath Narayan appealed to Congress MLAs to protect local bodies' rights. He warned that judicial intervention might become necessary if constitutional objectives were not upheld. He questioned the need for the PIL against the GBA Act and highlighted the importance of local bodies functioning independently as per the Constitution.
Narayan elaborated, 'The head of the state is the Chief Minister, and the head of the GBA is also the Chief Minister. The freedom and empowerment that should have been given to local bodies are taken away through this Bill. The Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, overall, intends to interfere, and this is evident."
He demanded more autonomy for civic bodies, arguing that local bodies should have authority over tax collection. 'If the CM and Dy CM interfere, how will you save democracy?"
Congress defends the Bill
Shivakumar responded to the Opposition, emphasising the need for proper governance in Bengaluru. He invited open discussions, stating, 'There must be clarity in this matter. Bengaluru needs proper governance. Let us discuss this for a full day if needed. Opposition members have more experience than us, and I am ready to accept their suggestions. If there are flaws in our draft, we will correct them. There is no secrecy here. We even formed a House Committee for open discussions."
He assured that the government would consider Opposition leaders' opinions while finalising the bill. 'Let us first conduct elections. August 18 was the last date for objections, August 25 is the deadline for the Governor's assent, and the final notification will be issued on September 2."
top videos
View all
BJP members questioned the necessity of a GBA headed by the Chief Minister when Mayors already head city corporations. They warned that multiple corporations would create revenue and development imbalances. They also raised concerns about notices sent to 30,000 households demanding additional taxes and accused the Commissioner of bypassing MLAs on various issues.
Congress leaders defended the Bill, highlighting its importance in addressing Bengaluru's civic issues. Shivajinagar MLA Rizwan Arshad, who chaired the Joint Committee for GBA, stressed the need for decentralisation due to the city's diverse problems. Shivakumar rejected claims that the Bill aimed to divide the city, arguing that administrative efficiency required such measures. 'This is only a small amendment for the sake of clarity. The government's intention is to ensure no interference in the administration of city corporations," he explained.
About the Author
Rohini Swamy
Rohini Swamy, Associate Editor at News18, has been a journalist for nearly two decades in the television and digital space. She covers south India for News18's digital platform. She has previously worked with t...Read More
Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
bengaluru karnataka politics
view comments
Location :
Bengaluru, India, India
First Published:
August 20, 2025, 13:04 IST
News politics 'Undemocratic': Congress, BJP Exchange Barbs In Karnataka Assembly Over Greater Bengaluru Bill
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Loading comments...
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘We have to raise voice against forces continuing with defaming Dharmasthala'
Former Muzrai Minister B. Nagaraj Shetty on Wednesday called upon people to raise their voice against forces that continue to defame Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara temple and pattadhikari of Sri Kshetra Dharmastala D. Veerendra Heggade. Talking at the 'Janagraha Sabhe' of the Dharmasthala Dharma Raksha Vedike in Bantwal, Mr. Shetty said concerted efforts were being made by a group to denigrate Hindu religious places. Forces have tried to denigrate many temples. The temple and the pattadhikari have involved in many benevolent and social empowerment activities and unfortunately they were being targeted by some vested forces, using the ongoing probe by Special Investigation Team into the complaint of mass burial of bodies in Dharmasthala. Raising questions over the way the SIT was investigating into the mass burial issue, BJP leader Harikrishna Bantwal said the SIT has so far not asked the complainant about the place from where skeletal remains, which the latter produced before the magistrate at the time of recording his voluntary statement, were brought. Former MLA Rukmayya Poojari and BJP leader Ramdas Bantwal also spoke. Orator Chakravati Sulibele and activist Vasanth Giliyar took part in the 'Dharma Jagruti Sabhe' of Punyakshetra Samrakshana Samiti in the Shri Rama Bhajana Mandira in Malpe, Udupi. While asking the State government not to bow down to pressure and pro-people organisations, they asked the government to allow SIT to do a comprehensive investigation into the complaint. The statement was issued after members of the organisations held a roundtable discussion in Mangaluru. Apart from mass burial issue, the State government should ensure a proper inquiry into deaths of teacher Vedavalli in 1979, PU student Padmalatha in 1986, of deaths of siblings Narayan and Yamuna in 2012, and reinvestigation of Soujanya rape and murder case of 2013, the organisations said in the statement.


The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bill introduced by Amit Shah is a conspiracy to destabilise non-BJP governments: Dipankar Bhattacharya
Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) said that 'The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025' introduced by Union Home Minister Amit Shah is a well-planned conspiracy to destabilise non-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) governments in States and obstruct their functioning. Also Read | No foreign voters in Bihar SIR list; Modi brings divisive agenda: CPI(ML) Addressing the press in the State capital, Mr. Bhattacharya said the Bill is the death knell for India's Constitutional federal system and parliamentary democracy. 'According to this Bill, if a Minister is sentenced to five years on any charge and remains in jail for 30 days, he will have to step down from the post. Obviously, the Prime Minister or the BJP ministers will not be sent to jail. This provision is a well-planned conspiracy to destabilise non-BJP governments and not to allow them to function,'Mr. Bhattacharya said. He further said, 'After the misuse of the ED [Enforcement Directorate], the CBI [Central Bureau of Investigation], the NIA [National Investigation Agency] and converting Governor offices into BJP offices, now if this law comes into effect, the existence of non-BJP governments will become almost impossible. Every citizen who believes in democracy, the Constitution and the rule of law should strongly oppose this Bill.' Mr. Shah today introduced three Bills in the Lok Sabha to provide a legal framework for the removal of the Prime Minister, Union Ministers, Chief Ministers and Ministers in States and Union Territories who are 'arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges' Praise for V-P candidate Mr. Bhattacharya also welcomed the selection of Justice B. Sudershan Reddy for the post of Vice-President by the Opposition asserting that it's a positive and timely decision. Praising him, Mr. Bhattacharya explained that Mr. Reddy's track record in protecting the Constitution and human rights has been remarkable. He added that Mr. Reddy had declared the Salwa Judum campaign in Chhattisgarh as unconstitutional. He also stressed that this country does not need a person associated with the RSS [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh] ideology. Speaking about the ongoing 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' led by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Mr. Bhattacharya said that the march is becoming a mass movement to protect democracy and the Constitution, and is also garnering widespread public support. Lashing out at the Election Commission (EC), Mr. Bhattacharya said the names of migrant workers are being deleted, citing the excuse of Bangladeshi infiltrators. 'Any leader of Gujarat becomes a voter of Bihar, but the names of Biharis who go to Gujarat to earn money are being deleted. There is also Form 6A for NRIs but no form for the migrant workers of Bihar,'Mr. Bhattacharya said. He alleged that scams are going on as the names of lakhs of people are found without addresses, and the ECI is calling them homeless voters. Mr. Bhattacharya asked the EC how the verification happened and how it communicated with the voters. He also flagged the objections raised by the political parties and Booth Level Agents (BLAs), which have been denied by the EC, saying the political parties have registered no such claims. Attacking the Nitish Kumar-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in the State, the CPI-(ML) leader said that the government has been a burden for twenty years and had to be uprooted from the power.


Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Reddy a fearless champion of equality': Mallikarjun Kharge introduces V-P candidate to Opp leaders
Calling upon every MP to support former SC judge B Sudershan Reddy for the Vice President's post, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said his nomination stood as the Opposition's firm commitment to restoring steadily declining 'fairness, impartiality, and dignity to the functioning of the Rajya Sabha'. Reddy, who will be the joint Opposition candidate, was formally introduced to senior leaders, including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Sharad Pawar among others, at a meeting in the Central Hall of Parliament on Wednesday. At a time when the integrity of India's democratic institutions was 'facing unprecedented challenges', Kharge said Justice Reddy's contest against NDA's C P Radhakrishnan was 'an ideological battle for the soul of our nation'. 'This Vice-Presidential election is not merely a contest for an office; it is an ideological battle for the soul of our nation. While the ruling party has chosen the ideology of RSS, we uphold the Constitution and its values as our guiding light,' he said on the eve of the last day of filing nominations for the polls scheduled on September 9. Terming him a 'towering figure in Indian jurisprudence', Justice Reddy, Kharge said, was 'renowned for his unwavering commitment to justice' and had been a fearless champion of social, economic, and political equality, delivering landmark judgments that have 'strengthened the fabric of our democracy'. Referring to the three Bills introduced by Home Minister Amit Shah in Parliament on Wednesday, he said, 'Constitutional Amendment Bills that undermine the core values of parliamentary democracy and federalism are being introduced in subterfuge at the fag end of the session, leaving no scope for meaningful debate or scrutiny.' 'Over the last 11 years, we have witnessed the blatant misuse of parliamentary majority to arm the autonomous agencies like ED, I-T, and CBI with draconian powers to target Opposition leaders. Now, these new Bills are set to become instruments in the hands of the ruling party to further undermine and destabilise democratically elected governments in the states,' he added.