From $100 Bill To Mount Rushmore: How Republicans Are Planning To Honour Trump
All would be possible under a flurry of bills Republican lawmakers have sponsored this year.
Trump is six months into his second term, but some Republicans are ready to elevate him into the pantheon of American greats, proposing an ever-growing list of bills paying tribute well before his second term ends. One lawmaker even proposes carving his face into Mount Rushmore.
It's a legislative exercise mixing flattery and politics, providing another stark reminder of the Republican Party's transformation under Trump as lawmakers from red-leaning states and congressional districts look for ways to win the president's good graces - and stay close to his supporters.
Doug Heye, a Republican strategist who served as communications director of the Republican National Committee, said the bills have an important audience despite their seeming frivolity.
"This is more about one person," Heye said. "It's not, 'Hey, voters, look what I'm trying to do for Donald.' It's, 'Hey, Donald, look what I'm trying to do for you.'"
House Republicans moved quickly to honor Trump after his second term began. The bill to rename Dulles International Airport in Virginia after Trump was introduced 72 hours after his swearing-in.
"Best president in my lifetime," said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Addison McDowell of North Carolina. "And I can't think of a better way to honor somebody than to cement their place in history by naming an international airport in our nation's capital after him."
Rep. Brandon Gill of Texas waited a few more weeks before sponsoring his bill to put Trump on the $100 bill, which now features Benjamin Franklin. His legislation stated no $100 bill printed after Dec. 31, 2028, could be printed without Trump's portrait on the front, even though federal law bans living figures from being placed on U.S. currency. That law, enacted just after the Civil War, was intended to avoid the appearance of a monarchy.
Another proposal from Rep. Greg Steube of Florida would rename Washington's subway system the Trump Train. There's also a bill from Rep. Claudia Tenney of New York combining Trump's birthday with Flag Day to designate June 14 a federal holiday.
Perhaps the most daring idea comes from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, who wants the Interior Department secretary to arrange for Trump's likeness to be carved into Mount Rushmore alongside Washington, Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and Teddy Roosevelt. She has two models of it in her office.
Luna said through two assassination attempts and a "sham impeachment," Trump has "shown not just resiliency in character but also to have been able to do what no other president has been able to accomplish."
Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina admits he wasn't enamored with Trump at first. Now, Wilson carries a pamphlet he gives to colleagues asking them to sponsor a bill that would direct the Bureau of Printing and Engraving to design and print a $250 bill bearing Trump's image. The honor would coincide with the 250th anniversary of the United States declaring its independence.
"I believe the president has served in such a manner that he deserves it," Wilson said.
It's not just a few random Republicans taking part. In the GOP's tax cut and immigration law, leadership changed the name of a new savings account for children from "MAGA accounts" to "Trump accounts."
"Because Trump is a transformational leader and he advocated for them," Rep. Jason Smith, the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said of the name change.
Several lawmakers are also talking Trump up as someone who should win the Nobel Peace Prize.
As a candidate, Trump promised he would end the Russia-Ukraine war on his first day in office before saying later as president he was joking. Solving that conflict and Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza has eluded Trump.
But Republicans - and at least one foreign leader, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - are still proposing that Trump receive the prize. Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio has called on the Senate to nominate Trump, while Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee asked her social media followers to share her post if they agree he deserves it.
Tenney recently wrote on X that she has nominated Trump twice and will continue to do so until he's awarded the prize.
An appropriations bill making its way through the House includes an amendment from Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho that would name the Opera House at the Kennedy Center for first lady Melania Trump.
Simpson said the White House didn't know about the amendment until it was introduced. He said the effort is different from renaming Dulles Airport in Trump's honor because the theater isn't currently named after anyone.
"She's just been a supporter of the arts, always has been, and we're trying to keep the arts alive in this bill," Simpson said. "So we thought it was the appropriate thing to do."
For many Republicans, lauding Trump in legislation is simply smart politics. Trump's endorsement helped catapult many lawmakers into elected office, and his support could be helpful as individual members try to get their priorities into law.
Plus, Trump wields his endorsement aggressively to replace members he finds disloyal and reward allies. He's already endorsed Gill and Luna for reelection in 2026, calling them "MAGA Warriors."
But the power of a Trump endorsement extends beyond the primary, especially in the midterm elections.
"In the general election, they just send a signal to Trump voters to turn out, to trust somebody and vote for them," said Steve Stivers, former chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee.
Democrats have taken note of the flurry of Trump tributes, seeing it as a chance to portray a pliant Republican majority as being focused on placating Trump rather than helping Americans.
"House Republicans continue to embarrass themselves," said Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York. "These people are sycophants."
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Record-breaking $27.7 tariff haul in July has Trump celebrating, but will it last?
Record US tariff revenue July 2025: US President Donald Trump is celebrating record tariff revenue, reaching $27.7 billion in July. While Trump hails this as a win, economists caution that American businesses and consumers are primarily bearing the costs. Tariffs constitute less than 10% of total government receipts, and the federal deficit continues to grow. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tariff Collections See Massive Year-Over-Year Growth Donald Trump Hails July Tariff Revenue Surge as a Win Tariffs Still a Small Piece of the Fiscal Puzzle Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who's Really Paying the Tariffs? US Tariff Rate Heading to Historic High Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs US president Donald Trump is celebrating a record-breaking month for US tariff revenue due to the billions pouring into federal coffers as revenue supplied by importers hit another monthly record, as per a report. But economists and analysts are warning that the financial boost may be short-lived and that American businesses and consumers are footing most of the bill, as reported by Yahoo data released Tuesday by the Treasury Department shows the US collected $27.7 billion in customs duties in July, a new monthly record and a sharp jump from the $26.6 billion collected in June and $22.2 billion in May, as per the report. Just a year ago, monthly tariff collections hovered around $8 billion, according to Yahoo Finance. Altogether, tariff revenue for the current fiscal year has climbed to roughly $135.7 billion, with two months still to go before the government's fiscal year ends on September 30, as per Yahoo READ: Houthis spare Chinese car ships, but others aren't so lucky - here's the surprising reason In a post on Truth Social, Trump celebrated the milestone, calling the revenue "has been incredible for our Country, its Stock Market, its General Wealth, and just about everything else," as quoted in the report. He also took a swipe at Goldman Sachs, which has raised concerns about the long-term effects of his tariffs and disputed his repeated claim that foreign nations are the ones paying the duties, according to the Yahoo Finance the president's enthusiastic framing, a closer look at the numbers paints a more complicated picture, as per the tariffs brought in $27.7 billion last month, that sum accounted for less than 10% of total government receipts, which topped $338 billion in July, reported Yahoo Finance. The boost in tariff revenue also didn't help reduce the growing budget deficit, which widened by $291 billion last month alone, according to the report. Over the past 10 months, the federal deficit has grown to $1.63 trillion, as per the Yahoo Finance READ: Is it AI or Trump's policies? US sees brutal 140% layoff spike in July, worst surge since early COVID chaos Economists have pointed out that contrary to Trump's claims, it's not foreign governments footing the tariff bill, it's US businesses and, increasingly, American consumers, according to the from Goldman Sachs estimates that as of June, US companies absorbed about 64% of the costs from higher tariffs, while consumers paid about 22%, as reported by Yahoo Finance. But that is shifting, and by October, the investment bank forecasts that consumers could end up covering nearly 67% of tariff costs as businesses pass price hikes down to them, compared to only 8% for US businesses, reported Yahoo Finance. Goldman Sachs also predicted that foreign exporters' share would be around 25%, as per the READ: Giant Wyoming data center to guzzle 5x more power than residents, but the user remains secret However, further tariff increases are on the horizon. Last week, the Trump administration implemented new hikes on imports from key trading partners, including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, and in the coming weeks, tariffs on some Indian goods are set to climb to 50%, as reported by Yahoo at the Yale Budget Lab estimate that once all of Trump's planned measures are fully implemented, the US average effective tariff rate will soar to 18.6%, the highest level since 1933, according to the READ: 10 must-change iOS 18.6 settings that'll make your iPhone feel like day one again As per economists, mostly US businesses and consumers, not foreign governments, despite Trump's than 10% of total government receipts, which stood at $338 billion.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
'Quoting fired losers': Trump slams media for 'very unfair' coverage ahead of Putin meeting
Trump accused the media of relying on commentary from what he described as 'fired losers' and 'really dumb people,' singling out former National Security Advisor John Bolton US President Donald Trump meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G-20 Summit on July 7, 2017, in Hamburg, Germany. File image/ AP Ahead of the meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, US President Donald on Wednesday slammed the media for 'unfair' coverage of his upcoming meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin. Trump accused the media of relying on commentary from what he described as 'fired losers' and 'really dumb people,' singling out former National Security Advisor John Bolton. 'Taking to Truth Social, Trump wrote, 'Very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin. Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton, who just said that, even though the meeting is on American soil, 'Putin has already won.' What's that all about? We are winning on EVERYTHING. The Fake News is working overtime (No tax on overtime!).' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The president also suggested that even if he secured a favourable deal with Russia, such as acquiring territory like Moscow and Leningrad, the media would still frame it negatively. 'If I got Moscow and Leningrad free, as part of the deal with Russia, the Fake News would say that I made a bad deal! But now they've been caught. Look at all of the real news that's coming out about their CORRUPTION. They are sick and dishonest people, who probably hate our Country. But it doesn't matter because we are winning on everything!!! MAGA' he added. Trump had previously threatened to impose sanctions and secondary tariffs if Moscow did not take steps toward a ceasefire by Friday, August 8. However, no punitive measures were enacted, despite the lack of progress from the Kremlin. Instead, following a visit to Moscow by Trump's envoy, a direct meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin was scheduled for August 15. Notably, Zelenskyy — who has repeatedly requested a face-to-face meeting with Putin to help bring an end to the war — was not invited to the talks, which are set to take place in Alaska. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump previously floated the idea of 'swapping' Ukrainian territories during the upcoming talks, an idea firmly rejected by Kyiv and Europe as they are all Ukrainian territories. Some, including Zelenskyy, have also likened the meeting, which provided an audience with Putin on US soil, as a political victory for the Russian leader. While Trump has publicly raised the idea of a possible land swap as part of a broader resolution, both the White House and the State Department downplayed expectations on Tuesday, describing the Alaska summit as a 'listening exercise' rather than a formal negotiation. With inputs from agencies
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ahead of Trump-Putin Meeting, Zelensky Says He Won't Exchange Land for Peace
KYIV, Ukraine—President Trump's face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday will heap pressure on one person not at the table: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Zelensky has tried to position himself as the party who was eager for a peace deal—something Trump has sought to broker since he returned to office this year. Concerns run high in Kyiv that Trump will seek to strike a deal with Putin that will be disadvantageous to Ukraine, or at least be persuaded by Putin that Zelensky is the one in the way of an end to the bloodshed. Zelensky told reporters Tuesday that he was ready to meet directly with Putin—a step the Russian leader has refused to take—and offered subtle indications that he could be willing to discuss delicate domestic issues such as territorial concessions. But he also shrugged off the suggestion that a land swap could be part of a cease-fire agreement in the near term, an idea that has recently been floated in calls between various world leaders. He said he didn't believe that Moscow was prepared to give up territory it currently controls in southern Ukraine in exchange for more territory in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region. Instead, Zelensky said, he believed Russia was asking Ukraine to withdraw from territory it currently holds in exchange for Russia agreeing to a cease-fire. Zelensky has said for months that he would accept an unconditional interim cease-fire. 'In my view, essentially, they are offering simply not to advance any further,' Zelensky said of Russia. 'This is a very conditional exchange.' Ukrainian soldiers and army engineers inspect new fortifications in the Donetsk region of Ukraine. A Ukrainian soldier in a bunker which forms part of the new defensive fortifications built in eastern Ukraine. Zelensky's comments underscore the difficult position that the coming Trump-Putin meeting has put him in. He is wary of any cease-fire proposal that Putin might offer without Ukraine at the table. At the same time, he must be careful not to provoke Trump's anger—as he did during his disastrous trip to Washington in February—by appearing not to take peace talks seriously. On Wednesday, Zelensky arrived in Germany, where he will join German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a video call with Trump and other European leaders. Volodymyr Fesenko, a Kyiv-based political analyst at the independent think tank Penta Center for Political Studies, said the meeting posed several potential risks for Zelensky. Putin will aim to negotiate a cease-fire with Trump with conditions that are favorable to Russia, which Trump could then pressure Ukraine to accept. But just as great a risk, he said, was that Putin would try to turn Trump—who has shown more sympathy toward his Russian counterpart than other recent presidents—against Ukraine and toward Moscow. The U.S. leader might then cut off military or economic support for Kyiv, or lift sanctions on Russia. Already, in the lead-up to the meeting, Trump halted plans to hit Russia with additional sanctions. In addition, Trump criticized Zelensky earlier this week after the Ukrainian leader initially dismissed the idea of a land swap. 'I get along with Zelensky, but I disagree with what he's done,' Trump said. 'Very, very severely disagree.' 'Putin's goal in this case is not to end the war, but to form a negative attitude toward Ukraine and Zelensky, to cause a quarrel between Trump and Zelensky,' Fesenko said. 'A real problem has already emerged—Trump's irritation with Zelensky's position.' Some Western officials see signals that Putin could be more prepared for serious peace talks than he has been in the past. In a recent discussion with U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, Putin didn't mention some of his previous demands, such as the demilitarization of Ukraine or Ukrainian withdrawal from four regions that Russia partly controls and now claims as its own, The Wall Street Journal reported. Instead, according to officials briefed on the discussion, Putin had said that he would be open to a cease-fire if Ukraine withdrew from only its two easternmost regions of Luhansk and Donetsk. Russia already controls all but a small sliver of the Luhansk region, and some Western officials hope that Russian-held territory in southern Ukraine could be handed back if Kyiv withdraws from the parts of the Donetsk region it still controls. Though Ukrainians have grown more willing to make concessions to end the war since the full-scale invasion began in 2022, public opinion polls show they remain opposed to giving up territory. A June survey from the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology found 52% of Ukrainians opposed to territorial concessions, with 38% willing to accept territorial losses as part of a peace deal. Though Zelensky has repeatedly dismissed the idea of territorial concessions, his comments on Tuesday indicated, at the very least, a willingness to discuss it. 'I am not ready to discuss it over the phone,' he said of 'the territorial question.' 'These are serious matters to be decided at the leaders' level.' So far, Putin has declined to meet directly with Zelensky, who he has tried to paint as an illegitimate leader who shouldn't be recognized. Zelensky has also, since early in the war, insisted that security guarantees—provided by the West—must be part of any peace agreement, since Russia has repeatedly violated earlier cease-fire pacts. Residents of Dnipro, Ukraine, fled their homes after Russian rockets hit a nearby building in June. In his comments on Tuesday, he didn't mention membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization—long his priority, but one which most analysts say isn't realistic in the short term. Instead, he insisted that Europe would have to play an important role in any peace negotiations. European leaders have been frozen out of the Trump-Putin meeting on Friday, and Zelensky noted that in recent months it is Europe—not the U.S.—that has taken on most of the cost of helping fund and arm Ukraine. 'The presence of Europe in one form or another is very important,' Zelensky said. 'Ultimately no one except Europe is currently providing us with security guarantees. Even financially—funding the needs of our army, which is a security guarantee.' Write to Ian Lovett at Ahead of Trump-Putin Meeting, Zelensky Says He Won't Exchange Land for Peace
