Heart guitarist Nancy Wilson says it's 'more embarrassing' to be an American now than during the Vietnam War
Wilson, 71, made the remark in a recent interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, where she reflected on the legendary rock group's 1975 hit "Crazy on You," which was her sister, Heart vocalist Ann Wilson's critique of the Vietnam War.
"We were kind of embarrassed at that time to call ourselves American because of the dirty politics of the Vietnam War," Wilson shared.
"To be as subtle as possible, it's more embarrassing now," she said.
Madonna Takes Aim At Trump Admin In Pro-lgbtq+ Post: 'Dismantling All The Freedoms We Have Been Fighting For'
She made the case that the songs fit for the tumultuous political climate of the time still resonate today.
Read On The Fox News App
One of the band's most popular hits, "Barracuda," for instance, "took aim at "a real sleazeball with a satin jacket" who, at the time the song was written in the 1970s, "wanted to make more money out of" the women in the band, the article reads.
Wilson suggested the track's commentary on sexism and oppression wasn't specific to its day and the issue persists nearly 50 years later.
"[It's] even more relevant in the salacious billionaire culture with the grab-them-by-the-(expletive) mentality," she said, referencing a controversial 2005 remark by President Donald Trump that The Washington Post published before the 2016 election.
Semisonic Band Condemns White House's Use Of Their 'Closing Time' Song In Deportation Video
The Wilson sisters have been no fans of Trump for some time, however.
Ann, 74, told The Hill in 2018 that anyone but Trump could use "Barracuda" on the campaign trail, telling the outlet she "definitely wouldn't" vote for him in the 2020 race, but would have to "do some research" and "think about" who her pick would be instead.
She supported Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in the 2016 race, the outlet reported.
Late Republican Sen. John McCain, who challenged former President Barack Obama for the White House in 2008, got ire from Nancy Wilson for continuing to use "Barracuda" as a theme for his running mate, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, on the campaign trail despite being asked to stop.
According to The Hill, she told EW.com at the time, "I think it's completely unfair to be so misrepresented. I feel completely f—ed over."
Though Nancy sees many of the societal issues of the 1970s in today's world, she told the Journal Sentinel she predicts change will come with time.
"I think for women in the culture the pendulum will come back again, and there'll be another renaissance in the arts to push back against the oppression of the cranky old rich White guys," she said.
"I hope I am alive to see that next revolution," she added.Original article source: Heart guitarist Nancy Wilson says it's 'more embarrassing' to be an American now than during the Vietnam War
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
DC city council member: Trump decision ‘dangerous escalation of power'
Washington, D.C. City Councilman Charles Allen said President Trump's decision to federalize his city's police to respond to crime is a 'dangerous escalation of power' that is also misguided. 'The President taking over local control of MPD & putting the US military onto the streets of DC under the guise of public safety is wrong,' Allen wrote on X. 'It's an extreme, outrageous, and dangerous move for our city and the safety of all our residents.' Allen, the subject of a recall effort over crime last year, said every American should be concerned about what Trump is doing in the nation's capital city. 'National Guard soldiers are trained for warfare & natural disasters, not for community policing,' Allen wrote. 'Today's announcement will put untrained and unaccountable members of the military in an untenable position in our communities. It's unnecessary, unwarranted, & a dangerous escalation of power in the Nation's Capital simply because he can,' Allen said. He also suggested the effort could be about Trump trying to distract the country from other issues. 'It might make sense if he's trying to create compelling TV and distract folks from the real scandals he's facing, but it doesn't make our city safer & it's a dangerous abuse of power and authority,' Allen wrote. Trump said he was taking action because of what he and other officials argued was rampant crime in Washington, D.C. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it,' Trump said. His decisions come a week after a high-profile incident in which a 19-year-old federal employee was left bloodied and beaten near Logan Circle in D.C. Under the Home Rule Act, Trump can temporarily take control of the District's police department if he determines 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' The president announced Monday he was declaring a public safety emergency in the District. Crime rates in D.C. are high, though data also shows crime has fallen since a post-pandemic high. Data from the District shows violent crime is also down so far in 2025 compared with the previous year. Allen was the subject of a recall petition campaign last year that failed to get enough signatures to make the ballot. The councilman was targeted over his record and positions on crime amid a spike in carjackings and killings in his ward after the pandemic.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
What the new China chip taxes tell us about doing business in Trump's America
Depending on your age, you might think I'm describing Soviet-era Russia — or Russia in the Putin era. You'd certainly think about modern-day China, where the government is an official partner in many private companies, and has unofficial but meaningful influence over most of them. And in 2025, you might also think that's beginning to describe America in the second Trump administration. Last week, for instance, Donald Trump called on the CEO of Intel to resign because of his past business connections to China. In June, Trump approved Nippon Steel's plan to buy US Steel — but only after the US government was granted a " golden share" in the company that gives Washington the ability to approve or veto some actions, like closing plants. In January, Trump floated the idea of having the US government own a portion of TikTok's US operations. And now Trump is requiring Nvidia and AMD to hand over 15% of revenue from high-end chip sales to China, as first reported by the Financial Times. (Nvidia has released a statement noting it "follow[s] rules the US government sets for our participation in worldwide markets," without addressing reports about the deal directly; AMD and the White House have yet to comment.) You can make arguments for or against any one of these transactions — US chip sales to China have been a particularly divisive issue, even within the Trump administration. But taken together, there's little question that in Trump 2.0, we should expect the federal government to insert itself into private business. Call it "state capitalism, a hybrid between socialism and capitalism in which the state guides the decisions of nominally private enterprises," Wall Street Journal columnist Greg Ip wrote Monday morning. It's an exceptionally timely piece he appears to have written before the Nvidia/AMD story broke, because it doesn't contain any reference to it. (You can make the list of Trump's interventions even longer if you'd like: He personally required former Paramount owner Shari Redstone to pay him $16 million to settle a seemingly specious lawsuit, for instance. And Brendan Carr, the Trump-appointed head of the Federal Communications Commission, has required Paramount's new owners to promise to " root out the bias that has undermined trust in the national news media." You could also include the concessions Trump is demanding from some of the nation's most prestigious universities and law firms.) The chip story is particularly hard to get your head around, since it inverts the premise of the tariff plans Trump has been pushing this year. Instead of taxing goods made overseas and imported into the US, the US is now taxing goods made by American companies, in America — the thing he supposedly wants to see much more of. It's not surprising to see Donald Trump say one thing and do another. And half a year into his second presidency, it's no longer surprising to see the Republican-controlled Congress let him do just about anything he wants: This is the same Congress that passed a law last year requiring TikTok's US operations to find a US buyer or shut down — and hasn't said a word about the fact that Trump has decided to ignore that law, repeatedly. And again, you might not care about the moves the Trump administration has made to steer companies to date. You might even like them. But the odds are increasing that he's going to end up involving the federal government in an industry or company you do care about. Maybe one you work in. How are you going to feel about it then?
Elle
an hour ago
- Elle
From Seventh Avenue to Parisian Ateliers—Here are 10 Books to Learn About Fashion History
Every item on this page was chosen by an ELLE editor. We may earn commission on some of the items you choose to buy. There's no way to dive into fashion without immediately coming face to face with two of the modern greats: Alexander McQueen and John Galliano. Dana Thomas's Gods and Kings follows the course of the pair's similarly timed (and in the eyes of the media, often rival) careers while giving context to both their personal lives and the rapid rise and growth of LVMH. It was a time of big ideas, scrappy personalities, and cutthroat business—and it changed fashion forever. The Battle of Versailles is probably one of the lesser-known events to occur within the infamous palace halls, but it's definitely one of the most important for the fashion industry. Written by Pulitzer Prize–winning fashion critic Robin Givhan, the book examines the unprecedented runway walk-off between European and American designers that solidified Seventh Avenue in fashion history. Also by Givhan, 'Make It Ours' is an in-depth look at both the late Virgil Abloh and the traditional luxury industry over which he triumphed. The book deftly chronicles the rise of his career alongside the rapidly changing fashion landscape, leading to his historic and ultimately brief appointment at Louis Vuitton. With an approach that's part biography and part cultural analysis, Givhan offers a thorough portrait of luxury's streetwear era. A little bit more on the theory side, Sex and Suits charts the history of men's and women's dress all the way from medieval times to the modern day. The book questions why menswear underwent such a drastic transformation following the 18th century and looks at how gender affects fashion to this day. Hollander is unafraid to get into the nitty-gritty—all of her books are a must-read. 'It's been Bleak Street over here in America!' Those are the famous words of the late André Leon Talley, who once declared a 'famine of beauty' in New York fashion. Talley's memoir paints a moving portrait of his singular career. From North Carolina to New York to Paris and beyond, The Chiffon Trenches is an intimate and, at times, ruthless account of his experience across the fashion industry. Believe it or not, the American fashion industry is largely responsible for much of the way designers think about ready-to-wear today. Prior to the modern-day Fashion Week, the youthquake movement, and the Battle of Versailles, European ateliers often snubbed the factories on Seventh Avenue. But Nancy MacDonell's Empresses of Seventh Avenue examines the historic shift in clothing following World War II and the select group of movers and shakers in New York City who made it happen. As the foundational text for the 2025 Met Gala theme, Monica L. Miller's Slaves to Fashion is a crucial examination of the history of the Black dandy. Beginning in the 1700s, Miller observes how the archetype has contextually transformed across generations, from its origins within the slave trade to representations of the Black dandy in art and music today. Claire McCardell helped radically transform the way women dress. To the designer, clothing served as an opportunity for female empowerment, which led to more casual, freeing silhouettes that helped form the basis for American sportswear. Elizabeth Evitts Dickinson's biography sheds light on McCardell's underappreciated career. Behind every garment is the person who made it, and behind every maker is a story about the inner workings of our clothes. Sofi Thanhauser's Worn is a deep dive into global textiles, both historic and new, and how their production processes have changed over time. The book also examines the industry's waste, pollution, and labor exploitation, painting a comprehensive backstory of our garments. From ELLE's own Véronique Hyland, Dress Code dives into how style—and the way we talk about it—shapes our daily lives. The book explores how fashion permeates all aspects of life, from the enduring allure of the 'French girl' archetype to the politics of how we dress in the workplace. Hyland examines how fashion is inextricably linked to our routines and why it remains undervalued within the realms of art and culture.
