Best Dyson yet: ‘most exciting release in years' finally available for Aussies to buy
The Dyson Supersonic r, once exclusive to the world's top hair professionals, is now officially available for Australian consumers and it's already making waves in the beauty world.
The newly launched Dyson Supersonic r is the latest evolution in Dyson's haircare lineup.
Until now, it's only been available to professional stylists. But from now, everyone can get their hands on this high-performance tool for $799.
Lightweight, compact and seriously smart, the Supersonic r is Dyson's fastest, most precise dryer yet.
It's 30 per cent smaller, 20 per cent lighter and more manoeuvrable than the original Supersonic, making it easier than ever to style those tricky sections at the back of your head without feeling like you've run a marathon.
What's the real difference? It's not just about weight, it's what's inside that counts.
The Supersonic r features intelligent attachment recognition, meaning it knows whether you're using a diffuser, smoothing nozzle or concentrator and adjusts the heat and airflow accordingly.
It even remembers your favourite settings for next time, creating a salon-like experience every time you plug it in.
A serious upgrade in technology
Peter Thomsen, Dyson Styling Ambassador and celeb hair expert, told Best Picks why it's more than just another fancy gadget:
'The Supersonic r is like having a stylist built into your hair dryer. It knows what you're using and how to use it, plus it protects your hair by optimising the heat. The result is faster, shinier and healthier styling, especially for people who style often.'
Dyson has completely reengineered the dryer's heat control and design.
Instead of pushing heat through the front alone, the Supersonic r distributes airflow throughout the funnel of the handle, meaning more consistent drying and smoother results.
'What truly sets the Dyson Supersonic r apart is its intelligent attachment recognition and personalised styling technology,' says Peter.
'The device knows which tool you're using, like the diffuser or concentrator, and adjusts the heat and airflow for that specific attachment. It even remembers your preferences. It's like having a mini stylist in your bathroom.'
For anyone who finds styling their hair at home a frustrating chore, Peter says this new tech is a game-changer.
'It takes the guesswork out of styling. You don't have to fiddle with heat settings or worry about damaging your hair, the Supersonic r handles it all for you, and it's incredibly intuitive.'
He also highlights Dyson's upgraded heat control and airflow system, which delivers faster, healthier results without frying your ends.
'Heat and airflow are now distributed through the funnel of the handle, not just the head of the dryer. That means more consistent drying and better styling precision, whether you're smoothing out curls or adding volume,' Peter explains.
It's a leap forward in both form and function, and it feels noticeably lighter in your hands, too.
'Most exciting release in years'
The Supersonic r comes in two eye-catching shades: Ceramic Pink, inspired by pearl tones, and Jasper Plum, a rich violet hue available exclusively at dyson.com.au.
We were lucky enough to get hands-on with the device and can confirm: it's as good as the hype suggests. It feels light, dries hair quickly, and leaves a high-shine, smooth finish without the usual heat damage.
It's a bit of a splurge but if you style your hair regularly or want to upgrade your hair routine, the Supersonic r is one of the smartest investments you can make.
Peter agrees that it's worth the splurge, especially for regular stylers or anyone serious about hair health.
'If you already own a Supersonic, this is a serious upgrade.'
. It's honestly one of the most exciting releases I've seen in years.'
it's well worth the investment.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
5 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Huge payout may be on the cards after Apple and Google's Epic loss
Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a 'substantial degree of market power' because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. 'This judgment is a turning point,' Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers said. 'It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike.' The lawyers said the decision could result in 'one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths'. The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the 'rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others.' Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. 'A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct,' the company wrote. 'Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!' Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems.
The Advertiser
5 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Huge payout tipped after Apple and Google's Epic loss
Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems. Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems. Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems. Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems.
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Apple, Google lose out to Fortnite developer in landmark ruling
Tech giants Apple and Google have lost a landmark Federal Court trial in a judgment that will likely reshape Australia's digital app stores and potentially lead to one of the largest class action payouts in Australian history. In a 2000-page judgment on Tuesday, Justice Jonathan Beach ruled largely against the tech companies, finding they abused their market power to reduce competition. He rejected claims from Fortnite maker Epic Games, however, that Apple and Google had breached consumer law or engaged in unconscionable conduct. The high-stakes legal trial began five years ago as four separate cases: Epic vs Apple, a class action lawsuit brought by small Australian app developers against Apple dubbed 'Anthony v Apple', and two separate cases against Google. Each case dealt with overlapping issues, so they were heard as one 16-week trial last year. The trial centred largely around Apple and Google's fee that it takes from app purchases – in many cases a cut of up to 30 per cent – and allegations that the companies maintained an illegal monopoly over their app stores. The issues date to August 2020 when Epic implemented a direct payment option in Fortnite, bypassing Apple's 30 per cent commission fee. Apple, in response, kicked Fortnite off its App Store for breaching its rules, and Epic then filed suits in Australia against both Apple and Google in November 2020. Loading Epic argued that Apple and Google created 'walled gardens', effectively locking out competition, and misused their market power in breach of Australian competition law. 'The industry is being strangled by a few gatekeepers imposing insane amounts of control and extracting huge taxes, which not only raise prices for consumers but also make a lot of kinds of products just unviable,' Epic boss Tim Sweeney said in a past interview. Sweeney last year flew in from the US to appear at the trial. Apple and Google had argued that they do not have a monopoly, and that their app store restrictions are necessary for privacy and security reasons.
