logo
Man accused of stealing from Homeland Sec. Noem hit with federal charges in three robberies

Man accused of stealing from Homeland Sec. Noem hit with federal charges in three robberies

CNBC28-04-2025

A man accused of stealing the purse of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a restaurant while she was under Secret Service protection was charged Monday by federal prosecutors with that and two other alleged bag thefts in Washington, D.C., a court filing shows.
The defendant, Mario Bustamente Leiva, is charged with robbery, wire fraud and aggravated identity theft in connection with the three alleged thefts between April 12 and 20, the third of which involved Noem as she dined with her family for Easter at Capital Burger.
"Following each robbery, Bustamente Leiva made fraudulent purchases using the credit cards obtained from the victim of each robbery," a U.S. Secret Service agent wrote in a complaint against the Chilean national in U.S. District Court in D.C.
Bustamente Leiva, a 49-year-old who prosecutors say is in the country illegally, was arrested Saturday in a D.C. motel.
His alleged accomplice in the April 12 theft was arrested Sunday in South Florida, according to the Secret Service. That second man was not identified.
A criminal complaint says that Secret Service officers who executed a search warrant in the motel room where Bustamente Leiva was arrested found Noem's purse and wallet, an American Express gift card, more than $3,170 in cash and clothing that appears to match a jacket and sneakers he wore when he allegedly committed the robberies on April 17 and 20.
Noem's bag contained $3,000 in cash when it was swiped, authorities have said.
The complaint also says that after stealing Noem's purse, Bustamente Leiva used several of her credit cards to buy food and alcohol at an Italian restaurant, and that he ultimately spent more than $205 in five purchases charged to her American Express cards.
When he was arrested on Saturday at the motel, Bustamente Leiva was taken to a hospital after complaining of alcohol withdrawal, according to the court filing.
After he was cleared from the hospital, he was interviewed by D.C. police and a Secret Service agent.
He "stated that he was an alcoholic and therefore that he has memory issues," but admitted to stealing Noem's bag, the complaint said.
After being shown a photo of Noem, he "denied having any prior knowledge of who" Noem was, the complaint said.
The complaint details four thefts involving Bustamente Leiva, three of which he is charged with.
In the April 20 incident, the one involving Noem, surveillance video showed the Homeland Security secretary dining at the Capital Burger restaurant and noticing that her purse, which she had placed at her feet, was missing. She then notified her Secret Service detail.
When investigators looked at earlier footage, they saw Bustamente Leiva enter the restaurant at about 7:52 p.m. and sit "down at a table within an arm's reach of" Noem," the complaint says.
Footage showed Bustamente Leiva twisting his body toward Noem's purse and moving his left leg, apparently to drag the purse toward him, according to the complaint.
"The video then captured the suspect bend down with his jacket in one hand and, with his other hand, pick up an object from the floor that law enforcement determined to be [Noem's] purse," the complaint said.
This alleged theft was the fourth one that authorities have connected to Bustamente Leiva, in just over a week's tim.
In the first, on April 12, a woman told police that her purse had been taken from the back of her chair while she was dining at Nando's restaurant on F street in Northwest D.C. Surveillance video revealed Bustamente Leiva "stealthily removing" the victim's "purse from the back of her chair and exiting the Nando's," the complaint said.
"During this offense, Bustamente Leiva appeared to be acting in concert with a second individual, Suspect-2," according to that filing.
After that theft, the two men seen on the video went to a Safeway grocery store, where the man identified as Suspect-2 bought a $500 Visa gift card using the victim's credit card.
Over the next four days, the gift card was used to make $462 worth of charges, including an April 12 transaction for a stay at the Motel 6 where Bustamente Leiva was arrested on Saturday, as well as other hotel stays, according to the complaint.
The complaint details two thefts on the night of April 17, allegedly committed by Bustamente Leiva.
In the first of those, at the Dolcezza coffee and gelato shop in downtown D.C., he is seen on surveillance video using his leg to pull a tan shoulder bag toward him from an outdoor table where a group of customers were sitting. He leaned down and removed a rectangular item consistent with the shape of a wallet or purse, the complaint said.
Bustamente Leiva is not charged with that alleged theft.
A short time later, surveillance video showed him at the Westin Hotel Downtown, a block away.
The video was pulled by police when they investigated a complaint by a woman who had been dining at the Westin, who said her purse had been stolen from the back of her chair, the complaint said.
The woman told police she had learned that her American Express card, which had been in her purse, was used to make an attempted purchase at what turned out to be the same Safeway that Bustamente Leiva and his alleged accomplice visited after the April 12 theft, the complaint said.
Surveillance footage later showed Bustamente Leiva walking by the victim's chair at the Westin, and that her purse disappeared from the back of that chair after he passed by it with a coat covering his left arm, the complaint said.
Other surveillance footage showed him about 15 minutes later at the Safeway, where he purchased a bottle of red wine for $12.12, and a $400 Amex gift card with the victim's American Express card.
Authorities later excluded Bustamente Leiva's alleged accomplice in the other thefts from the April 17 crimes after they learned he "was in custody at the time of the offense awaiting a mental competency hearing," according to the criminal complaint.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Low turnout set to thwart moves to ease Italian citizenship rules
Low turnout set to thwart moves to ease Italian citizenship rules

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Low turnout set to thwart moves to ease Italian citizenship rules

ROME (Reuters) -Voting resumed on Monday for Italy's two-day referendum on proposals to make it easier to obtain Italian citizenship and strengthen labour rights, but low turnout looked set to make the vote invalid. Data overnight showed under 23% of eligible voters had cast their ballots as polls provisionally closed on Sunday, far short of the 50% plus one of the electorate needed to make the outcome of the vote binding. Voting ends at 3 p.m. (1300 GMT). One of the five referendums is about reducing the period of residence required to apply for Italian citizenship by naturalisation to five years from 10 years. This could affect about 2.5 million foreign nationals, organisers say. With Italy's birthrate in sharp decline, economists say the country needs to attract more foreigners to boost its anaemic economy, and migrant workers feel a lot is at stake for them as they seek closer integration into Italian society. Three other referendum questions would reverse a decade-old liberalisation of the labour market, and a fourth concerns liability rules for accidents at work. Opposition leftist and centrist parties, civil society groups and a leading trade union have latched on to the issues of labour rights and Italy's demographic woes as a way of challenging Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing coalition government that took power almost three years ago. Meloni and her allies encouraged their supporters to boycott the vote. The prime minister attended a polling station in Rome on Sunday but her staff confirmed that she did not collect ballot papers and did not cast a vote, a tactic she had indicated that she would adopt. A low turnout and a failed referendum could lead to further infighting among centre-left opposition groups which have struggled to find a way to dent Meloni's popularity since she came to power.

DHS Sec. Noem praised Trump for sending National Guard. She opposed it when Biden for considered it
DHS Sec. Noem praised Trump for sending National Guard. She opposed it when Biden for considered it

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

DHS Sec. Noem praised Trump for sending National Guard. She opposed it when Biden for considered it

DHS Sec. Noem praised Trump for sending National Guard. She opposed it when Biden for considered it Show Caption Hide Caption Trump orders troops to LA as agents, protesters clash over immigration President Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protesters opposed to immigration enforcement. WASHINGTON – As South Dakota governor in February 2024, Kristi Noem threatened then-President Joe Biden when Democrats said he should federalize the National Guard in Texas to disrupt that state governor's anti-immigration efforts. If he did, Noem warned, Biden would be mounting a 'direct attack on states' rights,' and sparking a 'war' between Washington and Republican-led state governments, she said in a Feb. 6, 2024 interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. On June 8, Noem − now President Donald Trump's Homeland Security secretary − cheered Trump for doing the same thing to the Democratic governor of the state of California. Over the weekend, Trump deployed riot gear-clad National Guard troops to Los Angeles to shut down anti-immigration protests over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. If Newsom 'was doing his job," Noem said, "our ICE agents would not be injured and attacked while doing their jobs and carrying out immigration enforcement." 'Under the leadership of @POTUS," Noem added in a post on X, "Trump we will put the safety of American citizens FIRST not these criminal illegal aliens that sanctuary city politicians are defending.' Trump said late Sunday that he sent the National Guard to California to restore order amid mounting violent clashes between police and rock-throwing protesters angry at his aggressive efforts to detain and deport undocumented immigrants in the U.S. illegally. 'We're not going to let this happen to our country." Traditionally, it is up to the governor of a particular state to deploy the National Guard. Trump's National Guard deployment of 2,000 troops in Los Angeles is expected to last 60 days, according to a directive from California's adjutant general. Trump's memo June 7 invoked a section of federal code authorizing the president to call the guard into service to 'repel an invasion of the United States by a foreign nation' or to 'suppress a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States' or to 'execute the laws of the United States when the President is unable to do so with regular forces.' Newsom has vocally opposed Trump's intervention, and on Sunday formally asked the President to rescind the 'unlawful' deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty," he said, 'Rescind the order. Return control to California.' On CBS News' Face the Nation Sunday, Noem explained her reversal by saying, "Governor Newsom has proven that he makes bad decisions." "The president knows that he makes bad decisions, and that's why the President chose the safety of this community over waiting for Governor Newsom to get some sanity," Noem said. "And that's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers are being federalized so they can use their special skill set to keep peace." Noem was against deploying the National Guard when the governor in question was a Republican Last year, Noem's tune was much different. At the time, Democratic lawmakers and immigration-rights activists were lobbying heavily for Biden to federalize the National Guard in Texas to defuse a brewing crisis there over the state's aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration. More: National Guard on the ground in LA as immigration tensions escalate: Live updates Biden's Department of Homeland Security was complaining that razor wire that Texas had installed at the border with Mexico was preventing DHS agents from Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement from doing their jobs. Activists said the wire was endangering the lives of those trying to cross into the United States, especially via rivers at the border where the wire was installed. The Supreme Court had ruled that the federal government could cut through the razor wire. But the Republican governor in Texas, Greg Abbott, was refusing to take it down. The dispute led to a prolonged standoff between Abbott and the Biden administration, with the Texas National Guard at times blocking Border Patrol agents from accessing certain areas of the border. To resolve the standoff, Democrats and others demanded that Biden federalize National Guard soldiers in Texas and order them to stand down and get out of the way of federal immigration agents. In response, Noem not only sent National Guard soldiers from South Dakota to the border to support Abbott's efforts. She also went there personally, she said at the time, to stand with him in case Biden decided to intervene against Abbott's wishes. A 'direct attack on states' rights' that would spark a 'war' For his part, Biden never said he was even considering the move, which would have been unprecedented in recent history. The last time a President deployed the National Guard over the home state governor's objections was during the Civil Rights protests of the 1950s and 1960s, when Southern governors refused to comply with orders to desegregate schools and other public institutions. 'That would be a boneheaded move on his part, total disaster,' Abbott told conservative host Tucker Carlson on his show 'Uncensored." In her interview with Hannity, the Fox News host told Noem that she and other Republican governors who "stood by Gov. Abbott's side' and opposed federal intervention likely caused Biden to back down from doing something that likely would "have precipitated a real, real crisis down there.' That's why she personally went down to Texas, Noem said, because she recognized 'the real threat that was to states' rights.' 'We will defend our Constitution. We will defend our rights because the last several years, we've seen Democrats take away our freedom of religion, our freedom of assembly, our freedom of speech,' Noem told Hannity. 'We can't let them take away our state's rights too, especially our rights protect ourselves.'

The LA riots could destroy Donald Trump's presidency
The LA riots could destroy Donald Trump's presidency

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The LA riots could destroy Donald Trump's presidency

We're only a few days into the anti-riot crackdowns in Los Angeles by various armed government enforcers and already there are lives at stake. No, not the lives of the hundreds of protestors out on the streets across America's second-largest city, but the political lives – or at least longevity – of some of the highest-profile personalities to emerge during president Trump's second turn in the White House. There's Los Angeles mayor, Karen Bass, already weakened by her disastrous performance during last year's wildfire chaos and now even more compromised by the optics of incompetence as her city erupts yet again. And, of course, California governor Gavin Newsom, whose unbridled presidential ambitions could take a fatal hit if his state does not return to law and order – and fast. The riots are a test for Kristi Noem, the US secretary of Homeland Security, aka 'ICE Barbie' – who made waves when she toured a Salvadoran mega prison in March sporting a $50,000 Rolex. Her hardline anti-migrant stance has made her a close Trump confidant – but can it stand up to the ire of the masses she helped mobilise by her often cruel migrant deportation sprees? But the most consequential political life at stake here is that of Donald Trump himself – whose ultra-adversarial, bully-like tactics have yet to be tested as they are right now in California. There has never been anything quite like the anti-ICE protests during either of Trump's terms. The Women's Marches and BLM protests of his first administration may have, at times, turned rowdy and chaotic – but their violence was never directed at the White House like it is right now. This moment is different. Very different. For one thing, the conflict in Los Angeles is a direct response to Trump's hardline policies – in this case the illegal migrant crackdown – and are being mounted by those personally impacted, rather than virtue-signalling college kids motivated by 'privilege guilt.' The riots also come after 18 months of anti-Israel protests that have been some of the most violent protests in modern US history. America's radical Left has not only perfected aggressive adversarialism since Hamas' October 7 attacks – it's normalised it. And now it has even further weaponised this disregard for civility on what could be a far larger scale. Back in 2020, the National Guard were deployed to merely help support local law enforcement efforts when the BLM riots turned critical, and the Left was practically apoplectic. This time, the National Guard are Trump's main characters – and the Marines could be the White House's next course of action. This is a level of pushback practically without precedent – risky and uncertain amid an atmosphere of anti-Trumpism whose long-anticipated #resistance has finally materialised. Now unleashed, the California protesters could prove the ultimate – and most unanticipated – foils to a Trump White House whose run of nearly unchallenged luck looks like it is coming to an end. For many illegal migrants facing deportation, the spectre of arrest or even death rivals the potential violence awaiting in their home nations. These are people with literally nothing to lose – and thanks to Joe Biden there are millions of them existing along America's fringes. These are not the college-educated agitators who fuelled BLM in 2020 and 'Save Gaza' more recently – with middle class families and aspirational futures at stake. Fuelled by governor Newsom's surprising anti-Trump resolve – on Sunday he dared Trump's henchmen to arrest him – the protests could very well continue deep into the week, or even weeks; arrests, injuries or even deaths be damned. Trump has staked his legacy and the future of Maga on an uncompromising commitment to his ideals – and an end to illegal migration has been at the top since he branded Mexicans as 'rapists' on the very first day of his very first campaign a decade ago. Now those Mexicans are brandishing their nation's flag as they finally seek retribution. The past weekend's violence was practically inevitable – even if no one clearly saw it coming. With America already up in flames over Gaza – and the left always salivating at the prospect of an even more spectacular intersectional cause célèbre – the mayhem could easily spread beyond California in the coming days. The #resistance has finally arrived and it's far bloodier than anyone could have anticipated. It may still be early in Trump 2.0, but the Los Angeles riots could easily emerge as its most defining moment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store