US Military Planted UFO, Area 51 Myths To Mask Classified Weapons: Report
The US Justice Department deliberately fuelled UFO conspiracy theories, including those centred around Area 51, to conceal Cold War-era military projects, a new report has revealed.
Area 51, a classified US Air Force facility in the Nevada desert, has long been the subject of rumours suggesting the government hid aliens, crashed spacecraft and extraterrestrial technology there.
A Department of Defence review, reported by The Wall Street Journal, found that in the 1980s, an Air Force colonel was sent on a mission to spread false information. He visited a bar near Area 51 and gave the owner fake photos of flying saucers, which sparked new UFO rumours around the already secretive military base.
The now-retired colonel later confessed to Pentagon investigators that the mission aimed to divert attention from the real purpose of the site: testing the then-secret F-117 Nighthawk stealth aircraft.
Officials believed embedding the programme within alien folklore was the best way to shield it from Soviet surveillance during the Cold War.
US defence agencies allegedly leaned into UFO myths multiple times to safeguard sensitive military developments.
Sean Kirkpatrick, appointed in 2022 as the first director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), was tasked with reviewing decades of military reports on unexplained aerial phenomena. His investigation uncovered several instances where UFO conspiracies appeared to originate within the Pentagon itself.
One such case involved an internal Air Force prank called "Yankee Blue," in which new recruits were briefed on a fictitious unit investigating alien aircraft. They were ordered never to discuss the content, with many unaware the entire scenario was fabricated. This practice reportedly continued until the Pentagon issued a directive to stop it in 2023.
Mr Kirkpatrick's review also revisited a well-known 1967 incident involving former Air Force captain Robert Salas, who claimed he saw a UFO disable ten nuclear missiles at a Montana base. Mr Salas said he was ordered to remain silent about the event.
AARO's findings, however, suggest the phenomenon was likely the result of a failed electromagnetic pulse (EMP) test meant to assess the base's resilience to nuclear interference, a test Mr Salas and others were never briefed on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Why can't Army deploy women officers to counter terror, insurgency in times of emergency, SC asks in a judgment
The Supreme Court on Monday (August 11, 2025) asked why the Army cannot deploy women officers to counter terror and insurgency in an emergency if other Armed Forces like the Air Force sent women behind enemy lines in jets, choppers and parachutes. The question came in a judgment pronounced by a Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, which struck down a policy of the Army restricting the appointment of women officers to the Judge Advocate General (JAG) branch. The women candidates were represented by Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan. The Bench said a policy bifurcating candidates on the basis of gender and reserving more posts for men did not meet the standards of law. The judgment authored by Justice Manmohan clarified that the court was not imposing its views on the Army, but implementing the Constitution and the mandate of law. 'No nation can be secure when half of its population [i.e. its women force] is held back,' Justice Manmohan observed. It directed the Union government to publish a common merit list for all JAG candidates, men and women, and make the marks public. The apex court dismissed the Union government's argument that the JAG branch consisted of 'exclusively combatant personnel' as they were a reserve for mobilisation. The court said this contention ran contrary to the right of women to form part of all combat support arms services. It further violated the right of women to be treated as equals in all aspects of their employment in the Army. Besides, the court noted that with a strength of over 1.4 million active, 2.1 million reserve and 1.3 million paramilitary personnel compared to just 285 JAG officers, it would be an extreme stretch to claim that women ought to be excluded, as there may be JAG deployment in times of war. The court said the Centre's argument that women officers were not deployed for counterinsurgency or in counter-terror forces as they were 'not expected to discharge the role of combatants in case of armed conflicts' had no legislative sanction or basis. Justice Manmohan said there was no restriction in other Armed Forces on the appointment of women in combat posts. The Air Force has continually opened new combat air force roles for women as fighter pilots, helicopter pilots, etc. 'When women officers like Captain Ojaswita Shree of the elite Parachute Air Defence Unit, Major Dwipannita Kalita of highly specialised airborne medical unit of the Army and Flight Lieutenant Shivangi Singh (pilot of Rafale jet) of the Air Force can operate behind enemy lines with all expected risks, why women officers in times of emergency cannot be deployed for counter-insurgency or in counter-terror forces or attached to infantry/artillery units,' the apex court questioned. The court reasoned that if women officers could be entrusted with complex tasks such as transporting convoys of 30 to 50 vehicles through militant-prone areas in Leh, Srinagar, Udhampur and the North-East, why cannot they be relied on in operational areas. 'For instance, Major Gopika Bhatti commanded a convoy from Leh to Pathankot in 2010, overseeing junior commissioned officers and jawans, managing logistics, arms, and ammunition. Women officers like Colonel Anshu Jamwal have been actively involved in UN Peacekeeping missions since 2004, serving in combat zones like Syria, Lebanon, Ethiopia, Congo and Israel, further illustrating their capability to perform in high-risk, operational environments,' Justice Manmohan observed. 'This court understands that people always fear change. But as Bill Gates, Microsoft co-founder, famously said, 'People feared electricity when it was invented. Didn't they?' Justice Manmohan wrote.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Samajwadi Party, democracy two banks of a river: Yogi Adityanath
The Samajwadi Party and democracy are two banks of a river, chief minister Yogi Adityanath said in the state assembly on the opening day of the Monsoon session on Monday. Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath speaks in the state assembly on the opening day of the Monsoon session on Monday. (Deepak Gupta/HT Photo) Replying to the issue of alleged misbehaviour with the leader of opposition Mata Prasad Prasad in Gorakhpur, the chief minister criticised the Samajwadi Party for doing politics of obstruction. He accused the SP of hiding behind the 'facade' of democracy while subjecting traders to atrocities and a 'goonda tax' during its rule. Asserting that no development took place during the Samajwadi Party rule, he said, 'During the SP regime, encephalitis claimed the lives of 700-1500 children every year, including hundreds in Mata Prasad Pandey's constituency in Siddharthnagar, yet no action was taken. Health, education, and development have never been your priorities.' Recalling the Sambhal incident, the chief minister said his government is carrying out a purification drive in the area to undo the negativity spread by the party. 'The SP is still clinging to its old habits, opposing development at every step,' he remarked. Accusing SP of being anti-growth, he said the party's politics in Sambhal, Bahraich, and Gorakhpur was rooted in obstruction, not progress. 'The BJP and NDA governments are committed to development, but the SP simply cannot tolerate it,' he said. Criticising the Samajwadi Party for opposing the Gorakhpur Heritage Corridor, he called its stance 'anti-development.' He said Gorakhpur traders opposed Pandey's visit because of bitter memories of the SP-era fear and Goonda Tax. 'The traders have not forgotten the exploitation they suffered under SP rule. You went there uninvited, trying to obstruct development, and they respectfully opposed you,' he said, stressing that people cannot expect either security or development from the SP. 'The corridor will link iconic landmarks, including Ghantaghar, the city's oldest market, and the Gita Press. I inspected the site three days before the Leader of Opposition's visit, personally meeting every trader. Long plagued by congestion and illegal encroachments, the market is now seeing road expansion and decongestion works,' he said. The CM assured that all affected traders will receive fair compensation, with no one left to bear losses in the name of development.
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
India "Losing Trust" In Partnership With US: Amitabh Kant On Tariff Move
New Delhi: The trust built up between India and the US for over two decades is bound to b pulled down by the pejorative comments and tariff moves of US President of Donald Trump, former Niti Aayog chief and G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant said today. In an exclusive interview with NDTV, Mr Kant said, "What Donald Trump has done, by his harsh use of words, including saying that the Indian economy is a dead economy, is that Indians are increasingly losing trust in the United States' ability to be a reliable partner for India in the long run". The US President, demanding that New Delhi stop oil imports from Russia, had doubled the tariff on Indian imports in crucial sectors earlier this month, stacking up 25 per tariff on top of 25 per cent he had imposed in July. He had also said like Russia, the Indian economy is dead. "I don't care what India does with Russia," Donald Trump had said in a social media post. "They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world," the post read. India, Mr Kant insisted, should maintain its strategic autonomy and never compromise. "I think simply by bullying and putting you under pressure, India should never compromise. We must maintain strategic autonomy. We never did this even during the Cold War, so there's no question of doing it now," he said. India has declared the US President's action "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". "India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests," the foreign ministry categorically said in one of its strongest statements. What Donald Trump's tariff move amounts to is an opportunity for India "to bring in radical reforms in our own economy," and "diversify our exports" in a big way, Mr Kant said. "We need to become far more globally competitive... There's a lot of homework to be done by us in terms of labor reforms, in terms of reducing the cost of energy, so on, so that making GST far more efficient, reducing personal taxes, many other things, including ensuring bringing down the statutory liquidity ratio so that your interest rates can come down, so that you are able to then ensure that your producers are able to export and penetrate global markets," he enumerated. But also, the US being a "critical market", India should "try and work towards a win-win solution," he added.
