
Three student loan changes in Republican bill: Getting out of debt would be 'extremely hard,' advocate says
Republicans' 'big beautiful' bill, if enacted as drafted, would make some of the biggest changes to the federal student loan system in decades.
GOP House and Senate lawmakers' proposals would eliminate several repayment plans, keep borrowers in debt longer and roll back relief options for those who become unemployed or run into another financial challenge.
The House advanced its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in May. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions released its budget bill recommendations related to student loans on June 10. Senate lawmakers are preparing to debate the massive tax and spending package.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, said his party's plans would lift the burden on taxpayers of subsidizing college graduates' loan payments.
″[Former President Joe] Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college,' Cassidy said in a statement on June 10. He said his committee's bill would save an estimated $300 billion out of the federal budget.
However, consumer advocates say that the legislation will deepen a lending crisis in which millions of borrowers are already struggling to pay off the debt from their education.
'It's not about fiscal responsibility, it's about doing some funny math that justifies tax cuts,' said Astra Taylor, co-founder of the Debt Collective, a union for debtors.
'It's going to be extremely hard for people to get out of debt with these changes,' Taylor said.
Here are three big proposals in the GOP bills to overhaul federal student lending.
1. Fewer repayment plans, larger bills
Under the Republican proposals, there would be just two repayment plan choices for new borrowers, compared with roughly a dozen options now.
Student loan borrowers could either enroll in a standard repayment plan with fixed payments, or an income-based repayment plan known as the ' Repayment Assistance Plan,' or RAP.
Under RAP, monthly payments would typically range from 1% to 10% of a borrower's income; the more they earn, the bigger their required payment. There would be a minimum monthly payment of $10 for all borrowers.
A typical student loan borrower with a college degree could pay an extra $2,929 per year if the Senate GOP proposal of RAP is enacted, compared with the Biden administration's now-blocked SAVE plan, according to a recent analysis by the Student Borrower Protection Center.
The new plan would fail to provide many borrowers with an affordable monthly bill — the goal of Congress when it established income-driven repayment plans in the 1990s, said Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at The Institute for College Access & Success.
'If Republicans' proposed 'Repayment Assistance Plan' is the only thing standing between borrowers and default, we can expect many to suffer the nightmarish experience of default,' Zampini said.
2. Longer timelines to loan forgiveness
As of now, borrowers who enroll in the standard repayment plan typically get their debt divided into 120 fixed payments, over 10 years. But the Republicans' new standard plan would provide borrowers fixed payments over a period of between 10 years and 25 years, depending on how much they owe.
For example, those with a balance exceeding $50,000 would be in repayment for 15 years; if you owe over $100,000, your fixed payments will last for 25 years.
Meanwhile, current income-driven repayment plans now conclude in loan forgiveness after 20 years or 25 years. But RAP wouldn't lead to debt erasure until 30 years.
'Thirty years is your adult life,' Taylor said.
If RAP becomes law, she said, 'We anticipate an explosion of senior debtors.'
3. Fewer ways to pause bills
House and Senate Republicans are also calling for the elimination of the economic hardship and unemployment deferments.
Those deferments allow federal student loan borrowers to pause their monthly bills during periods of joblessness or other financial setbacks, often without interest accruing on their debt. Under both options, which have existed for decades, borrowers can avoid payments for up to three years.
Under the Senate Republicans' proposal, student loans received on or after July 1, 2026, would no longer qualify for the unemployment deferment or economic hardship deferment. The House plan does away with both deferments a year earlier, on July 1, 2025.
'These protections enable borrowers to stay in good standing on their loans while they get back on their feet,' Zampini said.
'Without them, borrowers who suddenly can't afford their payments will have little recourse, and many will likely enter delinquency and eventually default,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Be ready to be shocked and offended at university, students told
Students should be ready to be shocked and offended at university, according to the man in charge of ensuring free speech on Ahmed, from the Office for Students (OfS), which regulates universities, told the BBC that exposure to views which students might find offensive was "part of the process of education".It comes as the OfS published guidance for universities in England on how a new law, designed to protect free speech, will work when it comes into force from had requested clarity from the OfS on how to best uphold freedom of speech, after the University of Sussex was fined £585,000 for failing to do so in March. The university was issued with the fine earlier this year under existing powers, after the OfS said its policy on trans and non-binary equality had a "chilling effect" on freedom of Stock had previously resigned from her post as philosophy professor at the university, following protests by students against her gender-critical university has begun a legal challenge against the fine, arguing that the investigation was flawed. Universities UK, which represents 141 institutions, said at the time of the fine that it would write to the OfS to clarify what would represent a breach of freedom of speech now say they are "pleased" the OfS has taken on feedback, and would "make sure universities are appropriately supported to comply" with the new this summer, the new law will place a stronger responsibility on universities in England to uphold freedom of speech and academic OfS can sanction universities, with the potential for fines to run into millions of pounds, if they are found to have failed to do every aspect of university life - from protests to debates, training and teaching - is covered by the new guidelines on how the law will be returning students, or those starting university this year, there may be not be a noticeable immediate change, but Dr Ahmed says the law is about the freedom for anything to be discussed or directly to students, the director for free speech said: "You should expect to face views you might find shocking or offensive, and you should be aware that's part of the process of education."He added that students should be able to express any view, no matter how offensive it is to others, as long as it is not outside what is generally allowed by law, such as harassment or unlawful discrimination. 'Be respectful of everyone's opinions' Paris and Marie-Louise, who both study mental health nursing at the University of Salford, said they felt that being respectful of others' opinions is key. Paris said she thought it was important to be able to "express your emotions and feelings without being disrespectful", and allow others to do so too."I think it's important to be able to allow other people to express themselves, because at the end of the day everyone's gone through different situations that may lead to them having different opinions," she Marie-Louise said freedom of speech "doesn't mean you have to be nasty" or "act out of manner", but rather "just stay true to yourself".In the OfS guidelines, 54 detailed scenarios are used to explore how the new law might be interpreted, with some likely to provoke debate and even looks at "simulated military checkpoints" as part of student protests about Palestine - something that has happened in the United States, but not on campuses in the right for peaceful student protests is balanced with universities being able to limit the time and place they happen, in order to ensure no students are intimidated or prevented from attending guidelines also make it clear that any agreements with foreign states that enable censorship on campus must be changed or scrapped. 'Offensive, shocking, controversial or disturbing' But not everyone accepts there are serious issues around freedom of expression at challenged on the scale of the issue, Dr Ahmed pointed to polling carried out for the OfS, which he said suggests a fifth of academics do not feel free to discuss controversial topics in their issues most frequently highlighted by those expressing concern were race and racism, as well as sex and gender, with women more likely to feel unable to speak out. The guidelines also make clear that the OfS expects universities to support and protect academics whose views might provoke protest from students, and not to delay speaking up in their Ahmed told the BBC universities could not sack a lecturer "simply because that person expresses views students find offensive, shocking, controversial or disturbing - and that's essential to academic freedom."What is less clear is what happens when an academic leaves a job because they feel the situation is Jo Phoenix won a case for constructive dismissal with the Open University, and a tribunal found she had faced harassment for her gender-critical employment tribunal, due to take place next year, will look at an allegation by a different academic that he was constructively dismissed after students boycotted his teaching over his opinion that racial diversity programmes had gone too the meantime, the law will come into effect, with a complaints system to follow. Students will be able to complain to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator if they feel free speech or academic freedom is not upheld, while academics or visiting speakers will go direct to the OfS. Universities have expressed unease about the new system, pointing out they already have a legal obligation to uphold free speech. A Universities UK spokesperson said: "We strongly agree that universities must be places where free speech is protected and promoted."It added that issues were complex, and said it was pleased the regulator had taken on board feedback on its previous draft guidelines.


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
U.S. intelligence assessment on Iran's nuclear program remains unchanged
The U.S. assessment of Iran's nuclear program has not changed since March when the director of national intelligence told lawmakers that Tehran has large amounts of enriched uranium but has not made a decision to rush towards building an atomic bomb, according to the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee and a source with knowledge of the matter. Comments by President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have painted a different picture, suggesting that Iran is now racing toward creating a nuclear weapon. Trump said Wednesday that Iran was 'a few weeks' from having a nuclear weapon and Netanyahu said in a recent interview that Iran was pursuing a 'secret plan' to build a bomb within months. 'The intel we got and we shared with the United States was absolutely clear, was absolutely clear that they were working on a secret plan to weaponize the uranium,' Netanyahu recently told Fox News. 'They were marching very quickly. They would achieve a test device and possibly an initial device within months and certainly less than a year.' U.S. intelligence reporting on Israel is typically based in part on information provided by Israel's intelligence services. It was unclear if Netanyahu's remarks were based on a different interpretation of the same intelligence. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters he was perplexed by Trump's assertions as lawmakers have received a different picture from U.S. intelligence officials. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, told lawmakers in March that U.S. spy agencies assessed that Iran had not made a decision to build nuclear weapons but it had stockpiles of enriched uranium far beyond what is required for civilian purposes. The U.S. intelligence community's view has not changed since her testimony, the source with knowledge of the matter said. Warner said Wednesday that he received further confirmation of the March intelligence assessment 'this week.' On Tuesday, President Trump publicly dismissed Gabbard's testimony, saying 'I don't care what she said.' Warner said the administration needed to clarify if there was new intelligence on Iran's nuclear work. 'So far, at least, the intelligence community has stood by its conclusion that Iran is not moving towards a nuclear weapon. They were enriching additional uranium, but they were not weaponizing that yet, and that (decision) was left with the supreme leader,' Warner said. 'If there has been a change in that intelligence, I need to know, and I want to make sure that if it is changed, it's based upon fact and not political influence,' the senator said. Building the bomb For Iran to acquire a nuclear arsenal, it would need to enrich uranium to 90 percent purity. At the moment, it has a significant amount of uranium enriched to 60 percent, about 400 kilograms' worth, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. It would take a small technical step to enrich to 90 percent. Iran has enough uranium now to produce up to 10 weapons over several weeks, according to U.S. officials' estimates. But enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels is only the first step. Then Iran would have to build and test a device that can be delivered in the form of a bomb or missile. Estimates vary, but Western officials and analysts say it could take months to more than a year to build a nuclear weapon. Weapons experts say Iran is not weeks away from securing a nuclear weapon, but it is weeks away from securing enough fissile material for an eventual weapon. The director general of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, said in a report earlier this month that 'Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that is producing and accumulating uranium enriched to 60 percent.' But on Tuesday, Grossi told CNN said that U.N. inspectors did not have proof Iran was engaged in 'a systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon.' Israel's air strikes on Iran have probably set back the country's nuclear program by a few months, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter. Since launching its campaign against Iran last week, Israel has bombed centrifuge plants used to enrich uranium, including a site at Natanz south of Tehran, and labs used to convert uranium gas into a metal, according to the IAEA and Israeli officials.


BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
UCC ranked 246th best university in the world, its highest ranking in ten years
University College Cork (UCC) has received its highest leading education ranking in a decade, rising 27 places to 246th in the world. The QS World University Rankings are an independent assessment which examines universities against indicators relating to academic reputation, employer reputation, internationalisation, teaching, research, sustainability, as well as the employment outcomes of graduates. Advertisement The rise comes on the back of a 19-place improvement last year. It is the third year in a row that UCC has climbed in the ranking. QS rated UCC highly across the set of nine indicators, with particular strengths for sustainability, internationalisation and academic and employer reputation. The ranking itself continues to grow with 8,467 institutions across 106 locations evaluated and 1,501 universities making the final published listing. UCC President Professor John O'Halloran welcomed their further improvement in the rankings. 'We are pleased with the further improvement of 27 places, as this result positions UCC inside the Top 250 universities in the world, a key target in our strategic plan. UCC is outcome and impact-focused, and we are delivering on our strategy. "The ranking result reflects the dedication and hard work of all our staff and is one that our students, staff and alumni all over the world can be proud of. The positive outcome also reflects UCC's growing international reputation and the quality of the teaching, research and innovation at the University.'