Three student loan changes in Republican bill: Getting out of debt would be 'extremely hard,' advocate says
GOP House and Senate lawmakers' proposals would eliminate several repayment plans, keep borrowers in debt longer and roll back relief options for those who become unemployed or run into another financial challenge.
The House advanced its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in May. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions released its budget bill recommendations related to student loans on June 10. Senate lawmakers are preparing to debate the massive tax and spending package.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, said his party's plans would lift the burden on taxpayers of subsidizing college graduates' loan payments.
″[Former President Joe] Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college,' Cassidy said in a statement on June 10. He said his committee's bill would save an estimated $300 billion out of the federal budget.
However, consumer advocates say that the legislation will deepen a lending crisis in which millions of borrowers are already struggling to pay off the debt from their education.
'It's not about fiscal responsibility, it's about doing some funny math that justifies tax cuts,' said Astra Taylor, co-founder of the Debt Collective, a union for debtors.
'It's going to be extremely hard for people to get out of debt with these changes,' Taylor said.
Here are three big proposals in the GOP bills to overhaul federal student lending.
1. Fewer repayment plans, larger bills
Under the Republican proposals, there would be just two repayment plan choices for new borrowers, compared with roughly a dozen options now.
Student loan borrowers could either enroll in a standard repayment plan with fixed payments, or an income-based repayment plan known as the ' Repayment Assistance Plan,' or RAP.
Under RAP, monthly payments would typically range from 1% to 10% of a borrower's income; the more they earn, the bigger their required payment. There would be a minimum monthly payment of $10 for all borrowers.
A typical student loan borrower with a college degree could pay an extra $2,929 per year if the Senate GOP proposal of RAP is enacted, compared with the Biden administration's now-blocked SAVE plan, according to a recent analysis by the Student Borrower Protection Center.
The new plan would fail to provide many borrowers with an affordable monthly bill — the goal of Congress when it established income-driven repayment plans in the 1990s, said Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at The Institute for College Access & Success.
'If Republicans' proposed 'Repayment Assistance Plan' is the only thing standing between borrowers and default, we can expect many to suffer the nightmarish experience of default,' Zampini said.
2. Longer timelines to loan forgiveness
As of now, borrowers who enroll in the standard repayment plan typically get their debt divided into 120 fixed payments, over 10 years. But the Republicans' new standard plan would provide borrowers fixed payments over a period of between 10 years and 25 years, depending on how much they owe.
For example, those with a balance exceeding $50,000 would be in repayment for 15 years; if you owe over $100,000, your fixed payments will last for 25 years.
Meanwhile, current income-driven repayment plans now conclude in loan forgiveness after 20 years or 25 years. But RAP wouldn't lead to debt erasure until 30 years.
'Thirty years is your adult life,' Taylor said.
If RAP becomes law, she said, 'We anticipate an explosion of senior debtors.'
3. Fewer ways to pause bills
House and Senate Republicans are also calling for the elimination of the economic hardship and unemployment deferments.
Those deferments allow federal student loan borrowers to pause their monthly bills during periods of joblessness or other financial setbacks, often without interest accruing on their debt. Under both options, which have existed for decades, borrowers can avoid payments for up to three years.
Under the Senate Republicans' proposal, student loans received on or after July 1, 2026, would no longer qualify for the unemployment deferment or economic hardship deferment. The House plan does away with both deferments a year earlier, on July 1, 2025.
'These protections enable borrowers to stay in good standing on their loans while they get back on their feet,' Zampini said.
'Without them, borrowers who suddenly can't afford their payments will have little recourse, and many will likely enter delinquency and eventually default,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Ukraine will not give up land, Zelensky says as Trump plans to meet Putin
Putin talks not the first time Alaska has hosted big diplomatic momentpublished at 00:55 British Summer Time 9 August 00:55 BST 9 August Image source, Getty Images Trump's scheduled meeting with Putin is not the first time the US has held a highly anticipated meeting with another nation in Alaska. In 2021, Biden administration officials had their first face-to-face encounter with Chinese counterparts in Anchorage, the largest city in Alaska and home to about 300,000 people. A US and Chinese delegation met for two days at Captain Cook, a modest four-star hotel in downtown Anchorage. Most of the discussions took place behind closed doors. The meeting got off to a tense start, with the US saying they had "deep concerns" about some of China's overseas activity, while Chinese officials accused the US delegation of being "condescending". The White House is yet to confirm exactly where the Putin meeting will be held.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
People in the US: have you been affected by interest resuming on student loan debt under the Save plan?
Under the Biden administration, about 8 million people enrolled in a 2023 income-driven repayment plan for student debt – the Saving on a Valuable Education (Save) plan. But as of 1 August, the Trump administration has resumed charging loan interest under the Save plan to borrowers, who have been in forbearance since last year. The Department of Education has recommended people switch to another repayment plan for their federal student loans. Borrowers can still forgo payments, but will see interest accruing on their loans and won't make any progress toward student loan forgiveness. We want to hear from you. Are you a US borrower who enrolled in the Save plan? What do you plan to do now that interest is again being charged? Will you be forced to make changes to your spending habits in order to make new payments? How will this affect you? You can tell us how you've been affected by filling in the form below. Please include as much detail as possible. Please include as much detail as possible. Please include as much detail as possible. Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. Contact us on WhatsApp or Signal at +447766780300. For more information, please see our guidance on contacting us via WhatsApp, For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead. If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Will Trump's axing of labor statistics chief taint jobs data?
These experts cite three reasons Trump administration officials are not likely to manipulate the statistics for political reasons: There's too much data underlying the most publicized jobs figures; broadly comparable numbers are published in other reports; and there are disincentives for chicanery. "I think it would be pretty hard to revise any statistics" based on politics "or try to fudge the numbers somehow," said Sara Estep, an economist at the left-leaning Center for American progress. Still, Estep and other experts say the trustworthiness of the data is being called into question - a development that itself could have a negative impact on the economy and markets - and outright attempts to massage the numbers aren't out of the realm of possibility. "The concern is that this could mark the start of a slippery slope toward greater White House influence over economic statistics, which in a worst-case scenario might involve censoring, reengineering, or suspending official releases like payrolls or CPI (inflation) to serve the Trump administration's agenda," Capital Economics wrote in a note to clients. A White House spokesperson didn't immediately return an email message seeking comment. But on "Meet the Press" on Aug. 3, Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told moderator Kristin Welker that Trump simply wants to make the jobs report more transparent. "If there are big changes and big revisions - we expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example - then we want to know why. We want people to explain it to us," Hassett said. What was the jobs report for July? On Aug. 1, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, after the agency reported a disappointing 73,000 job gains in July and, more significantly, revised down payroll additions for May and June by a historically massive 258,000 positions. Economists said the large revisions can be explained by small business' unusually low response rates to BLS' initial surveys as they grapple with cost increases from Trump's double-digit tariffs on imports and the effects of the duties on business confidence and hiring. But on Truth Social, Trump said without providing evidence that "today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad," noting McEntarfer was appointed by former Democratic President Joe Biden. After firing McEntarfer, he appointed William Wiatrowskias interim BLS head and said he would name a permanent replacement within days. William Beach, McEntarfer's predecessor as BLS chief and a Trump appointee, said it's "impossible" for a BLS commissioner to manipulate the jobs data. He added that person doesn't see the report until the numbers are loaded and readied for distribution the Wednesday before its release the first Friday of the month. Keith Hall, who was appointed BLS commissioner by former President George W. Bush and served from 2008 to 2011, told USA TODAY that too many career, nonpartisan civil servants have a hand in drafting the report for the data to be distorted. About 40 people, both Republicans and Democrats, see the final jobs number shortly before publication, Beach previously said. Is Trump trying to control independent federal agencies? Yet, economists worry Trump could test that presumption. His removal of McEntarfer marks his latest challenge to federal agencies whose independence is critical for a smoothly functioning economy. For months, Trump has tried to badger Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates and has threatened to fire him, though experts say Powell can't be removed without cause. Economists say the jobs report is considered the global gold standard for accurate and unbiased economic data, providing the best broad snapshot of the U.S. economy in close-to-real time and helping guide the actions of investors, corporations, governments and consumers. Trump's removal of McEntarfer "presents risks to the conduct of monetary policy, to financial stability, and to the economic outlook," JPMorgan Chase economist Michael Feroli wrote in a note to clients. He added "the risk of politicizing the data collection process should not be overlooked." Here's why some experts say they're not worried about the reliability of the jobs numbers: Other federal jobs measures If a BLS commissioner or other key employees finagled the jobs numbers, "discrepancies would quickly emerge in other metrics like jobless claims, which are reported at the state level and [are] less prone to federal influence," Capital Economics said in its research note. Initial unemployment insurance applications provide a reliable gauge of layoffs. And the jobs report represents the net total of all layoffs, hiring, quits, retirements and job switches across the economy. Private jobs reports Even if the administration "brought all major statistical agencies under tight control, economists and investors could still infer the true state of the economy from private sources," Capital Economics said. Those include the ADP employment report and job postings from Indeed, the leading job search site. "Any tampering with official data would likely be exposed sooner or later and would be politically damaging once uncovered," Capital Economics said. Markets are watching - and reacting If evidence emerged that the administration was fiddling with the jobs data, investors likely would demand a higher return for holding assets as such as U.S. Treasuries, pushing up interest rates, Capital Economics said. Trump has fervently advocated for lower rates. The research firm added that "the administration has some inclination to avoid upsetting markets - especially when it leads to higher bond yields and increased debt-servicing costs." Trump tends to push the envelope but not rip it up Trump has shown a propensity to push the boundaries in his efforts to achieve his goals "without clearly crossing" the line, Capital Economics said. For example, he has stopped short of firing the Fed's Powell. "This fits a broader pattern of the administration applying maximum pressure to get its way on issues from deportations to federal layoffs, without openly defying the courts," Capital Economics wrote. Lots of people compile the jobs report The jobs report is like a massive puzzle put together by hundreds of employees and the pieces need to fit. If the final numbers were fudged, employees who worked on inputs to those numbers would realize that and speak up, Hall said. "All of the data, detail and all of the industry statistics need to add up," he said. The underlying jobs data BLS is famously transparent and provides the underlying data behind all its jobs numbers, Estep said. For example, the unemployment rate is based on a survey of 60,000 households, and the agency has their individual responses, she said. At the same time, here's why some experts are still worried: Private jobs data relies on federal numbers Although ADP and other private firms provide jobs data, they're typically "benchmarked to the federal data, as private sector data are very rarely nationally representative," Feroli said. ADP, for instance, relies on the federal jobs report from two months earlier to estimate last month's numbers. The risk of political meddling In the Meet the Press interview, Hassett told Welker, "The president wants his own people there [at BLS] so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable." Said Estep: "I would keep an eye out" for the potential replacement of some longterm public servants with political appointees at BLS and other agencies. "Are they somehow installing more plans for the politicization of these statistical agencies?" Estep asked. The data may be accurate, but is it trustworthy? Even if it's unlikely the data will be manipulated, "it may be less trusted," Estep said, noting that could affect markets and the behavior of companies and consumers. "The trust component, that's really scary." In an opinion piece posted on David Madland, senior fellow at the Center for American progress, wrote: "Government data analysts will do their best to produce credible reports, and much of what they publish will be accurate, but these workers will be increasingly subject to political pressures, or outright meddling. "Reputational damage has already been done - and the decline in trust carries real consequences."
