AGC refutes Dr M's claim that Anwar's pardon was invalid
PETALING JAYA: The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has refuted claims by former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who alleged that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's pardon was invalid as it did not follow proper procedures.
The AGC said a meeting of the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, was held on May 16, 2018 at the Istana Negara.
"The Pardons Board meeting was chaired by (then) Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Muhammad V and was attended, among others, by Dr Mahathir himself in his capacity as the prime minister then," said the AGC in a statement on Tuesday (June 3).
The AGC said upon the advice of the Pardons Board, Sultan Muhammad V had also graciously consented that the petition for a full pardon for Anwar and ordered for his immediate release with effect from the date of the sitting of the Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya.
"For the purpose of the said meeting, the AG had also provided a written legal opinion on the matter in accordance with Clause (9), Article 42 of the Federal Constitution for the consideration of the Pardons Board
"The AGC views this matter seriously as it involves constitutional and institutional interests. The AGC also emphasises that any statement which could mislead the public regarding the decision of the Pardons Board is wholly inappropriate," it said.
The statement was issued following allegations by Dr Mahathir in a recent TikTok video, where he cast doubt on the validity of the pardon process.
He alleged that he had signed the pardon document without receiving advice from the then-attorney general, Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali, who was said to be on garden leave at the time, and further claimed that no meeting of the Pardons Board had been convened.
Sultan Muhammad V granted Anwar a full pardon in May 2018.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
15 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
High court judge Roz Mawar praised for sound, solid judgment in denying PMX's immunity bid
TWO prominent lawyers are impressed with the grounds of Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain in rejecting Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's bid to suspend the civil lawsuit by his former research assistant Yusoff Rawther who accused him of alleged sexual assault in 2018 at the PKR party office. Former de facto law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim who was at Justice Roz Mawar's court yesterday (June 4) afternoon said he left the venue 'fully satisfied'. 'Her dismissal of Anwar's attempt to delay the hearing of Yusoff's civil claim of sexual assault is 100% correct,' the founder of one of Malaysia's largest legal firms, Zaid Ibrahim & Co, penned on X. I was in Justice Roz Mawar's court this afternoon, and I left fully satisfied. Her dismissal of Anwar Ibrahim's attempt to delay the hearing of Yusof's Lawther civil claim of sexual assault is hundred per cent correct I always find her judgement sound ( except one), and she is… — Zaid Ibrahim (@zaidibrahim) June 4, 2025 'I always find her judgement sound (except one) and she is undoubtedly one of our best judges.' In dismissing Anwar's application to refer eight legal questions arising from a civil suit filed by Yusoff to the Federal Court, Justice Roz Mawar ruled that the questions posed by PMX failed to cross the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. 'None of the articles cited in the Federal Constitution – as argued by the defendant's lawyers – gave rise to any real, substantial and justiciable questions of law that require a determination by the Federal Court,' she deduced. In rejecting an application by Anwar's lawyer, Alan Wong, for a stay pending appeal on grounds that 'sorry, my hands are tied', Justice Roz Mawar said the trial of Yusoff Rawther's suit will begin at 9am on June 16 as scheduled. She further ordered PMX to pay RM20,000 in costs to Yusoff. In summing up, the opposition-slant Zaid now hopes that PMX will not proceed with the application to stay the proceeding which has been set for hearing on June 16 because there are no merits to his application. 'Furthermore, his lawyer had stated in open court that his client was ready to proceed with the trial. Why the need for deferment?' asked the former defence counsel of now incarcerated former premier Datuk Seri Najib Razak. 'As the leader of the Reformasi movement in the country, it does not look good for the PM to be seen as avoiding his accuser in (an) open court. After all, he had said on many occasions (that) the accusations were frivolous and untrue.' 'Beauty with brain' Commenting on the KL High Court declining his application to refer eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution, Anwar reiterated that the matter has never been about seeking personal immunity or escaping legal scrutiny. 'It concerns the integrity of our constitutional system and the need to ensure that high public office is protected from litigation that may be strategically timed, politically motivated or institutionally disruptive,' argued PMX in a statement. STATEMENT ON HIGH COURT DECISION AND CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE This afternoon, the High Court declined my application to refer 8 constitutional questions to the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution. This matter has never been about seeking personal… — Anwar Ibrahim (@anwaribrahim) June 4, 2025 'I remain fully committed to the rule of law, the independence of our courts and the dignity of democratic governance. The legal process will continue, and I'll continue to discharge my responsibilities without distraction or compromise.' Meanwhile human rights activist and lawyer Siti Kasim described Justice Roz Mawar who was appointed as a High Court judge on Nov 12 last year as a 'beauty with brain' after having read her grounds of judgment. 'It's not only that she's pretty and beautiful but she's also very smart … Her decision is solid-molid [sic],' reacted the Orang Asli advocate with a caveat. 'Perhaps Yusoff Rawther will have his day in court, perhaps not because PMX's clever lawyers may appeal and then ask for stay although Justice Roz Mawar has insisted that the case will go on as scheduled on June 16. 'But still, I've strong feeling that the Court of Appeal shall uphold the judgment of Justice Roz Mawar because there's no other way for them to go around it; after all, her explanation is so detailed … Reading a solid judgment coming from a clever judge feels like reading a good book. 'Anyway, good luck to both Yusoff Rawther and PMX. May the righteous party win the case.' – June 5, 2025 Main image credit: SK Studio/YouTube; Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman
Focus Malaysia
15 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Claim that Malay language is under threat merely political rhetoric, say analysts
EXPERTS have described the allegation that the Malay language is being sidelined under the MADANI Government as unfounded and contradictory to the administration's ongoing efforts to strengthen the national language's status. Universiti Malaya socio-political analyst Professor Datuk Dr Awang Azman Awang Pawi views the MADANI Government as more progressive and consistent in promoting Malay as the primary medium of administration and national discourse, as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. 'The claim that the Malay language is losing its role is merely a political strategy,' he said, commenting on a statement made yesterday by former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad who alleged that the Malay language and the position of the Malays are facing mounting threats under the current government. According to Awang Azman, the statement is also inconsistent with Dr Mahathir's administrative history, notably when he introduced the Teaching and Learning of Science and Mathematics in English (PPSMI) policy in 2003. 'The policy provoked an intense backlash, as many parties, including the Movement to Abolish PPSMI, criticised it for diminishing the Malay language as a medium of knowledge and education,' he said. Awang Azman stated that calls to unite the Malays must be accompanied by concrete actions that are consistent with the principles of justice, inclusivity and respect for Malaysia's cultural and linguistic diversity. Echoing this view, National Professors Council Fellow Prof Dr Azmi Hassan pointed out that this is not the first time Dr Mahathir has used the 'Malay issue' to advance his political objectives. 'There is no such thing as the Malay language being under threat. It is only a small minority who view Malay as unintellectual, but in reality, it is they who lack intelligence. 'The current situation is much more stable compared to when the ICERD issue (International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination) and the recognition of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court arose in 2018 duringDr Mahathir's administration, which at that time sparked concern among the Malay community,' he said. Meanwhile, a lecturer at the Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Law, International Islamic University Malaysia, Associate Professor Datuk Dr Shamrahayu A. Aziz, emphasised that the rights of the Malays, including the status of the Malay language as the official language, are enshrined in the Federal Constitution. 'The King and the ruling government are responsible for implementing the relevant provisions. If anyone claims that the government is failing to uphold these provisions, they must present clear evidence. 'This issue concerning the rights of the Malays has long been used as a political argument by various parties, but its status remains steadfastly protected within the framework of the Constitution,' he said. Shamrahayu stressed that every government is responsible for ensuring the ongoing fulfilment of Malay rights, adding that any neglect of these provisions contradicts the spirit of the Constitution. ‒ June 6, 2025 Main image: Tech Wire Asia
Focus Malaysia
15 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Taking a leaf from Tun M, Ramasamy moots umbrella body to champion non-Malays' political, economic rights
LEGAL and constitutional protections are no longer enough to safeguard not just the Malays – but all Malaysians – from the looming spectre of economic and political decline. Twice former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad recently proposed the formation of an umbrella organisation to defend and promote Malay economic and political interests. His concern: the Malays face an uncertain and troubling future despite formal guarantees. Dr Mahathir believes that the current administration under Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim lacks sufficient Malay support to effectively defend their interests. On other occasions, Dr Mahathir has even suggested that the Pakatan Harapan (PH)-led coalition is politically dependent on the DAP, thus raising doubts about its ability to act independently or inclusively. But Dr Mahathir's alarm shouldn't just concern the Malays. The future of all Malaysians – including the Chinese, Indians and native communities in Sabah and Sarawak – is being called into question. UMNO vice-president Datuk Seri Khaled Nordin has pointed to legal provisions and the role of Malay rulers as safeguards. But these are formal structures without agency. Without proactive and visionary leadership, they cannot ensure the well-being of Malays or non-Malays alike. 'Fate of non-Malays equally worrisome' Although Dr Mahathir stopped short of detailing the exact economic, social or political threats, his warning speaks to a broader fear: the current government's inability to manage national affairs effectively. And while his message was targeted at Malays, its implications apply to every ethnic group in Malaysia. Dr Mahathir's emphasis on Malay solidarity seems calculated – an attempt to build a united front against the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar-led Madani government. Whether Malays will rally under his new political umbrella remains to be seen. Many have already shifted their allegiance from the PH coalition to the Perikatan Nasional (PN) opposition which appears to support Dr Mahathir's latest initiative. While Dr Mahathir's concern is centered on Malays, the fate of non-Malays under the PH-led government is equally worrisome. Anwar's much-vaunted reform agenda has all but collapsed, replaced by political manoeuvring, favouritism and family politics. The so-called reformist seems more focused on securing legal and constitutional immunity than delivering real change. Meanwhile, the DAP – once the voice of disillusioned Chinese Malaysians – has retreated into the politics of silence and complicity. Among Indian Malaysians, their disillusionment with multi-racial parties within the PH coalition which began in 2023 has since accelerated. Perhaps it is time for non-Malay communities to consider their own umbrella coalition – a political force to defend their rapidly eroding rights in an increasingly fragmented and directionless Malaysia. The writing is on the wall: without meaningful reform and inclusive governance, the entire nation – not just the Malays – faces an ominous and uncertain future. – June 6, 2025 Former DAP stalwart and Penang chief minister II Prof Ramasamy Palanisamy is chairman of the United Rights of Malaysian Party (Urimai) interim council. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image credit: UKEC
