
Grey-haired granny activists are ruining Britain
Scenes of retired aromatherapists from Totnes being carted off by London's finest underline what an authoritarian, unsustainable mess the proscription of Palestine Action has created. If found guilty, those alleged to have caused £7m of damage at RAF Brize Norton last month are thoroughly deserving of a long stretch inside. As are the scumbags alleged to have attacked a Jewish-owned business in Stamford Hill, over a bogus connection to an Israeli arms manufacturer. Because nothing says 'right side of history' like smashing in Jews' windows. But proscribing the organisation, and thus making it a crime under the Terrorism Act even to express solidarity with it, is an outrageous affront to freedom of speech that has only handed these Israelophobic old codgers an opportunity to pose as the heirs to Nelson Mandela.
Nevertheless, there is something striking about the advanced age of many of today's perma-protesters, and this isn't unique to Palestine Action. When road-blocking irritants Extinction Rebellion staged two mass civil-disobedience campaigns in London in April and October 2019, activists aged 56 and over made up almost a third of those charged with an offence, according to an academic study. (Less surprising was that the participants were 'predominantly middle class', with 85 per cent of them holding a degree.)
Just Stop Oil also made good use of the elderly, enlisting two octogenarians, who looked like they were straight out of a Werther's Original advert, to attack the glass case of Magna Carta at the British Library last year. When I was covering those pathetic People's Vote marches raging against Brexit a few years ago, I was often confronted by well-off older people, fresh from their second home in the south of France, telling me I'd stolen my own future.
What to make of all this? Leftish protest has long been colonised by the middle-class and time-rich, and it doesn't get more time-rich than being a middle-class retiree. A lot of this is surely seasoned placard-wavers keen to relive the glory days of the Sixties and Seventies, with whatever bats--- cause they have attached themselves to becoming almost secondary. Decades of anti-Israel propaganda seem to have convinced our more credulous pensioners – as it has much of the low-information middle classes – that Israel is committing a long-dreamed-for 'genocide' in Gaza, rather than waging war on jihadists who murdered, raped and kidnapped its people on October 7.
Where environmental activism is concerned, there's also a large dose of generational guilt, fuelled by a simplistic, eco-alarmist discourse that the boomers lived it large, racked up all the carbon emissions, and are now leaving their grand-kids to fight it out in the post-apocalyptic Mad Max -style dystopia that is supposedly just around the corner.
Older people can often get a bad rap in political debate these days, and often for things that actually reflect well on them – like their support for Brexit or preference for parties who know what a woman is. Those grey-topped Palestine Action or Extinction Rebellion activists are hardly reflective of where most retirees are at politically. Still, they are a useful reminder that age and wisdom do not always go hand-in-hand.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Microsoft workers occupy HQ in protest against company's ties to Israeli military
Dozens of Microsoft employees occupied the company's east campus in Redmond, Washington to protest against what they say is the use of its software by the Israeli military to carry out operations in Gaza and enable the surveillance of Palestinians. Three months after the company said it was launching an independent investigation into the use of its Azure software, current and former staff occupied a space they declared the 'Free Zone', holding placards that read 'Join The Worker Intifada – No Labor for Genocide' and 'Martyred Palestinian Children's Plaza'. The protests, organised by the No Azure for Genocide group, has demanded Microsoft divest from Israel. Earlier this year, employee Joe Lopez interrupted a speech by CEO Satya Nadella at the annual developer conference. 'Satya, how about you show how Microsoft is killing Palestinians,' said Lopez. Demonstrator Hossam Nasr said on Tuesday they had decided to escalate their actions because there had been no adequate response from Microsoft. He felt personally motivated to speak out more vigorously after the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) carried out the targeted killing of the high-profile Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif, one of five members of the media who was killed earlier this month in the operation. 'I watched him report on Gaza relentlessly, through starvation, through extermination campaigns, through bombing. He was the voice of the business. He was intentionally targeted,' said Nasr, 26, who worked for Microsoft for three years but was fired last year after organising a vigil for Palestine outside the company's offices. 'It happened the same week news came out from the Guardian that Microsoft is storing mass surveillance data collected from calls from Palestinians.' Earlier this month, the Guardian and Israel's +972 Magazine revealed Israel's military surveillance agency, Unit 8200, was making use of Azure to store countless recordings of mobile phone calls made by Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza. The company said it was not aware 'of the surveillance of civilians or collection of their cellphone conversations using Microsoft's services'. The protest at Microsoft comes against the backdrop of increased warnings from organisations such as the UN about 'widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease' in Gaza. The Gaza health ministry has estimated at least 62,000 Palestinians have been killed since the IDF launched its operations in the aftermath of Hamas's 7 October attacks. Nasreen Jaradat, 29, a Microsoft employee, said: 'Every single second that we wait, things are worse and worse in Palestine.' She added: 'People are getting hungrier and hungrier. More and more people are being bombed and maimed. It's time for us to escalate, however we can.' The protest ended after about two hours when police told the demonstrators to leave and said they would be arrested for trespassing. A Microsoft spokesperson said the group of demonstrators 'was asked to leave, and they left'. The spokesperson said it had nothing to add to a statement made last week about an inquiry it had undertaken into allegations Azure was being used to surveil Palestinians. 'Based on these reviews, including interviewing dozens of employees and assessing documents, we have found no evidence to date that Microsoft's Azure and AI technologies have been used to target or harm people in the conflict in Gaza,' it said. Microsoft employs as many as 47,000 people at Redmond. While some took the flyers handed out on Tuesday by the activists and read them, others continued to tuck into their lunches in the restaurants that surrounded the square. One 28-year-old employee who was watching the protests said he sympathised with the demonstrators but did not think they would have much impact. 'I don't think it will,' said the man, who asked not to be named. The demonstrators say their efforts are part of a process to educate people. 'I think we are inspiring conversation among the people who work at Microsoft to feel more comfortable talking about this with each other and about how their work is contributing to genocide,' said another employee, Julius Shan, 28. People are still learning how the company is linked to genocide, he said. 'But that's the nature of learning new information.'

Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Netanyahu has pushed Hamas to the brink of destruction
It's often been said that there is nothing as pathetic – and embarrassing – as British politicians opining about what they want to see happen in the Middle East. The days when we ran the show ended many decades ago, and the idea that anyone in Israel or the rest of the region gives a damn about what some nonentity British MP thinks is risible. But as the past few weeks have shown, it's not quite as simple as that. The reaction by Hamas to the Government's plan to recognise a Palestine state – the same applies to similar announcements by France, Canada and Australia – shows that we nonetheless have the ability to throw a giant spanner in the works. Sir Keir Starmer's statement last month had one immediate effect: it emboldened Hamas and destroyed ceasefire talks that had appeared to be making progress. As Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, put it: 'When you have all these European nations saying, 'Israel's not going to have a ceasefire, we're going to go ahead and unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state,' what do you think that did with Hamas? It emboldened them. It empowered them. And that's when negotiations were over right then.' That is the context in which the latest development in the ceasefire talks needs to be seen, with Hamas reportedly agreeing to a joint Egyptian-Qatari proposal for it to release 10 of the remaining living hostages and 18 bodies (there are believed to be 20 still alive, and another 30 or so dead) during a 60-day truce, with further negotiations over a permanent ceasefire. The question being asked is why Hamas has seemingly done a volte-face and agreed to a ceasefire, barely three weeks after walking away from the last round. First, we simply don't know what, if any, pressure is being applied by Qatar, which is the only nation other than Iran that can force Hamas to act as it wants. But we do know that there is even more pressure on Hamas now from another direction: Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu has been pilloried in Britain and elsewhere for his recently announced plan to occupy Gaza City and to widen military action to all of Gaza.

The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements
Musician Paul Weller is suing his former accountants after they stopped working with the singer after public statements alleging Israel was committing genocide in Gaza, according to a legal letter. The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included: 'It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide. 'Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views.' Lawyers for Weller claim that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said: 'I've always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide. What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe. 'I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. 'Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship – it's complicity. 'I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people.' Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter also states. Cormac McDonough, a lawyer at Hodge Jones and Allen, representing Weller, said that his case 'reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights'. Mr McDonough added: 'Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza.'



