
How Generational Emoji Use Creates Communication Confusion At Work
If you use emojis at work, you might want to rethink how they're coming across. You might use the clapping emoji to say 'nicely done' or the thumbs-up emoji to show approval, but younger professionals often see them differently. That means your message might not land the way you intended. Just like the word 'cool' is no longer considered cool, emoji meanings keep changing. The thumbs-up symbol was one of the first to draw attention for being misinterpreted, and it's still raising questions. When you add symbols to make a message feel warmer or more expressive, and they get misread, it can lead to confusion or mixed signals.
Why The Thumbs-Up Emoji Became A Workplace Issue
Why The Thumbs-Up Emoji Became A Workplace Issue
The thumbs-up emoji gained widespread criticism in 2022, particularly across Reddit and TikTok, where younger users shared examples of how it made them feel dismissed or shut down. What someone meant as, 'All set,' was interpreted as, 'I don't want to deal with this.' A Perspectus Global survey found that a majority of respondents between the ages of 16 and 29 believed you were 'officially old' if you used a thumbs-up or red heart emoji. Nearly one in four Gen Z professionals viewed the thumbs-up as rude or hostile. As emojis continue to carry emotional weight in workplace communication, it becomes more important to understand how those symbols are being received.
What Are The Most Commonly Misread Emojis At Work
What Are The Most Commonly Misread Emojis At Work
The clapping emoji is one I've used regularly to mean congratulations or well done. But Gen Z often uses it not as a show of support, but as sarcastic emphasis.
The smiling face emoji is another that splits the generations. I have used them in my messages to students to ensure they know my tone was intended to be friendly. For younger workers, it can see it as forced, disingenuous, or even condescending. If someone sends critical feedback followed by a smiley face, Gen Z might read it as passive-aggressive rather than thoughtful.
The skull emoji is also interesting. Traditionally, it represented death, danger, or horror. Gen Z now uses it to mean they are 'dead' from laughing. It is humor, not morbidity. In a group chat, it might be the equivalent of someone crying with laughter. But if a manager sees it and interprets it literally, that difference can lead to confusion or concern.
The OK hand sign has evolved as well. While older generations use it to say 'all good' or 'that works,' younger users sometimes interpret it as dismissive or meaningless. In some online circles, it has even taken on other unintended meanings. Even when used with good intentions, it may no longer read that way.
The loudly crying face emoji, the one with a stream of tears flowing, used to be a symbol of deep sadness or grief. In recent years, it has become a favorite for showing extreme emotional responses, including laughter. It is often used dramatically, with exaggerated humor. That difference between serious emotion and playful sarcasm can create major misunderstandings in workplace chats.
Why Emoji Use Creates A Bigger Problem Than Just Confusion
Why Emoji Use Creates A Bigger Problem Than Just Confusion
Most employees are not trying to offend anyone. But, when people misinterpret the tone, they begin to question the intent.
The problem is the lack of shared understanding. When one person thinks a message says, 'You did great,' and the other thinks it says, 'I'm annoyed with you,' that is a breakdown in communication.
Leaders need to recognize this. Just as they would teach team members how to write professional emails, they should also be talking about tone in digital platforms. Tools like Slack, Teams, or group messaging apps have made emoji use even more popular. That's why it matters even more to address the gap.
What You Can Do To Prevent Emoji Issues On Your Team
What You Can Do To Prevent Emoji Issues On Your Team
Start by creating a space for discussion. Ask your team how they interpret certain emojis. You may be surprised how differently people feel about symbols you thought were universal.
Model clear communication. If you use emojis, pair them with wording that makes your meaning unmistakable. A thumbs-up alone might read as abrupt. Saying 'Thanks again for handling that' provides tone. If you want to use a clapping emoji, explain what you're celebrating. That extra sentence makes a difference.
Train managers to pause before they hit send. Communication in a multigenerational workplace requires more awareness than it used to. That includes not just what you say, but how you visually deliver it.
You Don't Have To Change Your Language Or Emoji Use
You Don't Have To Change Your Language Or Emoji Use
You don't have to use the same language Gen Z uses to understand what they mean. Let's say someone just finished a big project, and instead of saying, 'Nice work,' I said, 'That redesign was gas. Straight fire. You get a big W for that one. No cap.' I would sound like Phil Dunphy from Modern Family. It's okay to laugh at that. It's also okay to just say, 'Great job on that redesign. Nicely done.' You don't have to talk like someone younger to connect with them. You just need to stay curious about how your tone might land.
Curiosity About Emojis Strengthens Communication
Curiosity About Emojis Strengthens Communication
The way we communicate will keep shifting. Emojis change, tone evolves, and what sounds natural today might feel outdated tomorrow. You do not have to mirror every trend, but paying attention helps. Curiosity about how others express themselves makes conversations clearer and more respectful. When you stay open to how people prefer to connect, you create fewer misunderstandings and build stronger working relationships.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Confusion over timing of a military flyover in March preceded dangerous close call at Washington D.C. area airport, NTSB finds
Federal agencies Aviation newsFacebookTweetLink Follow A change in timing of a military flyover at Arlington National Cemetery ended with four Air Force jets dangerously close to a Delta Air Lines Airbus A319 taking off from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, according to a preliminary report by the National Transportation Safety board. CNN was the first to report on the close call. The formation of four T-38 trainer jets was scheduled to fly over the airport at 3:21 p.m. on March 28 on the way to the neighboring cemetery under the control of the Potomac Consolidated Terminal Radar Approach Control, or TRACON. Flights taking off from national airport were being managed by a different team of air traffic controllers located in the tower at the airport. The airport was the site of a mid-air collision in January between a Blackhawk helicopter and an American Airlines regional jet which killed 67 people. In March, about 40 minutes before the flyover was to happen, the TRACON called the tower to confirm they were aware of the incoming military jets, according to air traffic control audio recordings provided to the NTSB by the Federal Aviation Administration. 'The (controller in charge) acknowledged and stated that they were waiting for a 'stop the departures time,'' the NTSB said. The planes would be over the 'target' at 3:21 and 'the stop time would be 17,' the TRACON responded, according to the report. 'If it changed, they would call back.' At 3:02 p.m., about five seconds after a shift change briefing concluded, the T-38's asked the TRACON to change their timing and the controller provided a target time of 3:15. However, 10 minutes later, the TRACON operations supervisor told the tower 'stop all departures hard time is now seventeen.' The tower continued to clear planes to take off, including Delta flight 2983, which started down the runway at 3:15 p.m. Twenty-two seconds later the TRACON supervisors called the tower and asked why they were allowing planes to depart. It was too late to halt the Delta flight's takeoff, so controllers warned the military planes to look out and keep away from it. Politicians have criticized the FAA for not having enough staff at the tower, and the NTSB preliminary report noted a staffing shortage during this incident. 'Due to staffing constraints' the tower operations supervisor had completed their shift at the time of the close call and a controller In charge was providing 'general oversight at the time of the event,' the report notes. The NTSB did not place blame, or identify the cause of the problem, which usually comes in the final report about 18 months after an incident.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EMT class working for county
Jul. 3—Five of six students pass test, hired by county A gamble on training their own EMTs has worked out for Lawrence County EMS. Almost all first responder agencies have issues with getting and retaining trained employees and David Hamm, the director of Lawrence County EMS, felt that creating their own training program was one of the best ways to solve that problem. For the better part of last year, the agency went through a lengthy accreditation process so it could offer initial EMT training and advanced EMT training through the State of Ohio. Hamm said six basic EMT students finished the class and five of them passed the National Registry EMT and have been hired by the county. "The sixth one has not tested yet, but we expect him to pass as well," he said. Hamm said they started the program "because there was a need in the community, there really wasn't a basic EMT program locally for our folks. And we thought we could fill that void. And I think we have done a good job." The basic EMT class used to be offered at Collins Career and Technical Center, but after that program ended a few years ago, people interested in becoming an EMT had to take classes in Ashland, Kentucky. Hamm said they will have another basic EMT class. "We will have another program, possibly the end of this year, but definitely, early next year at the latest," he said. "Right now, we are in the middle of our advanced EMT class. We have several of our basic EMTs enrolled in that, so we expect good things from that too." You Might Like News Fireworks schedule News 'There She is....' News Traffic stop nets 52 grams of cocaine News Ironton Board of Education Special Meeting on Wednesday
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
My husband and I stuck to traditional vows on our wedding day. 3 years later, I still regret that decision.
My husband and I opted for a small, intimate wedding in 2022. I had always wanted to write my own vows, but family advised against it and I didn't push the issue. Three years later, I still wish I had stood up for what I wanted. My husband and I said our "I dos" during the pandemic. For us, it was a great excuse to keep the event on the smaller side, though our families wanted us to invite every extended family member. We would have wanted our wedding to be intimate, regardless of the safety concerns at the time. My husband proposed in July 2021, and we were married six months later. As the planning process progressed, I found that we were making more and more concessions — mostly to our families — instead of sticking to what we wanted for our big day. Looking back, I wish I had stuck to my guns on some of them. I didn't have a strict blueprint for my wedding. I had a handful of things I wanted, such as my son walking me down the aisle since I was a single mom when I met my husband. But most of all I wanted the wedding to be as much my husband's as it was mine. Basically, I wanted everything to be agreed upon by both of us. It seemed the more relaxed we were about the wedding, the more our respective parents worried about some other aspect we hadn't even thought of. But it wasn't just our family. Nearly everyone that learned we were getting married asked if we had done this or that "yet." We just wanted to have a simple party with our closest friends and family, but everyone we talked to pointed something else out that we had been blissfully unaware of. I had always wanted to write my own vows, but as the wedding loomed closer, my husband seemed stressed out about writing his. His father, who was a minister and was going to be the one to marry us, wanted us to stick to the usual script. I was tired of battling everyone's expectations and wanted to ease my soon-to-be husband's stress, so I gave in and simply said, "fine." My husband seemed relieved, and at the end of the day, I thought what really mattered was that we would be married. Looking back, I can see how stressed out I was during the planning process all the way through our wedding, which was far more stressful than I had thought it would be. I know now that my judgement was clouded. There were a lot of things I didn't love about how our wedding played out, but my biggest regret is not committing to writing our own vows. I've even asked my husband if he'd consider remarrying just to recite vows that we've each written, but the moment has come and gone. Part of why my husband was having trouble with his vows was because they would be said in front of everyone we knew, not just the two of us. But if I could go back in time, I would have talked it out with him. Mostly, I know my husband would have stuck to our vows if I had let him know how important it was to me. Compromising is an important part of a relationship, but for our marriage to be successful, I think it's important that neither of us are making too many concessions, especially when it's something that really matters. I worried so much about everyone else, including my husband, that I let go of one of the few things that mattered to me. I think worrying more about everyone else, in different ways, was a mistake we both made. The upside is that we can learn from worrying overly about everyone else but ourselves and work at taking care of each other within our marriage. I catch myself thinking about what I would have said at the altar so much that it's become a fantasy. It's usually when I realize how much I love him or how lucky I feel to be with him. While I can't go back in time, I can write and share my fantasy vows with my husband for the rest of our lives. When I think of it that way, it's a lot more romantic than just telling him once on our big day. Read the original article on Business Insider