Education gap widening due to economic pressures
She pointed to socio-economic challenges, particularly among low-income (B40) families, that have forced many students to sacrifice study time to support their families financially.
'In today's rapidly changing world, the education gap is widening. We must implement and sustain targeted interventions that address the root causes,' she told reporters after launching the 2025 Putrajaya Tuition Mission programme here today.
Dr Zaliha raised concerns over the more than 10,000 students absent from the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examination in 2023, many due to financial strain at home.
'Some students have been forced to work as food delivery riders after school to cover their families' daily expenses, which impacts their ability to prepare for exams,' she said.
Dr Zaliha emphasised that the issue is not a lack of desire to learn, but that students with potential are hindered by life's hardships.
'These realities cannot be ignored and a clear link between poverty and school dropout rates is evident,' she added.
Earlier, the minister launched the initiative under the Usaha Jaya Insan Programme (PUJI), which aims to reduce student dropouts with a RM120,000 fund for learning materials, seminars, motivational sessions and tuition for 100 selected Putrajaya students.
Describing the programme as a long-term investment, Dr Zaliha said it would help break the cycle of social and economic hardship and believes it should be expanded to reach more needy children.
As a result, Dr Zaliha has instructed the Federal Territories Department to work with the Education Ministry to explore extending the initiative to Kuala Lumpur and Labuan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
2 hours ago
- Daily Express
Upko urges stern, proactive actions after Zara Qairina case
Published on: Thursday, August 14, 2025 Published on: Thu, Aug 14, 2025 Text Size: Upko deputy president Datuk Donald Peter Mojuntin ( pic ) has urged for stern and proactive actions to tackle school bullying and strengthen procedures in suspicious death cases, following the death of 13-year-old Zara Qairina Mahathir. He said rising bullying incidents in schools, including cyberbullying, have become a serious concern, with official data showing more than 11,500 students involved as of October this year. Donald stressed that bullying causes lasting harm, including depression, anxiety, and a higher risk of suicidal behaviour, and called for collective action from families, schools, communities, and government agencies, supported by existing programmes like the Education Ministry's BEST initiative. He also emphasised the importance of mandatory post-mortems in sudden or suspicious deaths under Sections 329 and 331 of the Criminal Procedure Code, saying these are key to uncovering the truth and ensuring justice. Donald welcomed the Attorney-General's Chambers' decision to hold a full inquest into Zara's death, expressing hope it would provide her family with clarity and peace of mind while serving as a turning point in addressing both bullying and investigative procedures. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Where were you when…? — Nahrizul Adib Kadri
AUGUST 14 — There's a question that often arises when something big happens — a historic moment, a national milestone, a collective high. It usually begins like this: 'Where were you when…?' Most of the time, it's not about geography. It's about memory. About anchoring ourselves to something larger. About remembering not just what happened, but how it made us feel. For me, one such moment was the night of the 1992 Thomas Cup finals. Malaysia versus Indonesia. Badminton, of course. It was a Saturday, and I was a 17-year-old schoolboy at the Malay College Kuala Kangsar. I watched it from the common room of our hostel, surrounded by boys in kain pelikat, clutching pillows, Milo mugs and SPM notes, all eyes fixed on a grainy television screen that struggled to keep up with the speed of the shuttle. We won. We brought the cup home after 25 years. And for a few beautiful hours, everything else faded — prep class, homesickness, SPM trial stress — replaced by a kind of joy that felt bigger than sport. Bigger than school. Something national, something shared. That moment, and others like it, become personal chapters in a larger story: the story of how we remember Malaysia. The Malaysian team from 1992 Thomas Cup finals. Another such chapter came in May 2018, when Malaysians went to the polls in what would become one of the most significant general elections in our history. For the first time, the ruling coalition was changed. Not through force, not through upheaval, but through the quiet, determined power of the vote. People queued in the heat, some for hours. Some travelled across borders, taking buses and flights home just to mark an X on a ballot. There was tension, yes. But there was also something else: hope. Hope that this country belonged to its people. That we were no longer just passengers, but co-pilots. That power could change hands peacefully. That we, the rakyat, are the ones responsible in deciding the direction of this country moving forward. You didn't need to be in Putrajaya or Dataran Merdeka to feel it. You could have been watching from a living room in Penang, or a mamak in Johor Bahru, or a hostel room in Sarawak. It didn't matter where you were; because the moment definitely reached you. That's what makes these memories powerful. They become shared reference points in the timeline of our lives. Of course, not every Merdeka memory is tied to politics or spectacle. Sometimes, it's quieter. A flag being raised in your neighbourhood. A conversation over teh tarik about what independence really means. A late-night drive on empty roads, with patriotic songs playing softly on the radio. These small moments matter too. Because nationhood is built not just on events, but on experience. It's not just the milestones we remember; it's the way they made us feel connected. Even when we were far apart. And that's the thread I keep coming back to: our shared experiences. You and I may have grown up in different towns, spoken different dialects, attended different schools. But the moment the Sidek brothers stepped onto the court, or when the results rolled in after GE14; we were there, in spirit, together. And yet, these memories, whether personal or collective, are slowly fading. We live in a time of fast timelines and short attention spans. Moments come and go, swallowed by algorithm and speed. The things that once glued us together are being replaced by smaller, more personalised stories. Of course they are important, yes, but they are also often disconnected from the whole. That's why I believe now, more than ever, we need to start recording our stories. Not for history books, but for each other. For the generations who didn't grow up with the Thomas Cup, or the Reformasi years, or who never saw a transfer of power that felt truly earned. It doesn't have to be big. Just honest. Write about where you were when something mattered. Tell your children what Merdeka meant to your parents. Share with a friend that memory you've always carried but never voiced. Because if we don't pass these stories on, who will? So this Merdeka, ask someone: 'Where were you when…?' and listen carefully. Then share your own. Memory, like nationhood, lives best when it is passed from hand to hand. * Ir Dr Nahrizul Adib Kadri is a professor of biomedical engineering at the Faculty of Engineering, and the Principal of Ibnu Sina Residential College, Universiti Malaya. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
King obligated to follow pardons board's advice, lawyer tells court
The Malaysian Bar took its case to the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn a lower court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review against the Federal Territories Pardons Board's decision in Najib Razak's SRC International case. PUTRAJAYA : The Yang di-Pertuan Agong is required to follow the advice of the Federal Territories Pardons Board (FTPB) following a 1994 constitutional amendment, the Court of Appeal heard today. Lawyer Yeo Yang Poh said there could only be one decision in the pardon process after Article 40(1A) was added to the Federal Constitution that year. The provision stipulates that the king 'shall accept and act in accordance with' advice in the exercise of his functions under the constitution or federal law. 'The FTPB now decides for the king, which is in line with a constitutional monarchy. 'The king does not make a second decision,' Yeo said in the Malaysian Bar's appeal to reverse the High Court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review challenging the FTPB's decision in former prime minister Najib Razak's SRC International case. The appeal was heard by Justices Lim Chong Fong, Azhahari Kamal Ramli, and Leonard David Shim. On Feb 2, 2024, the FTPB announced that the former prime minister's prison sentence following his conviction in the SRC case had been reduced from 12 years to six, and his fine from RM210 million to RM50 million. Yeo, who appeared with Zainur Zakaria, Rajpal Singh Ghai, and Ahmad Amir Mahmood, said previously that the personal decision made by the king was held to be non-justiciable. 'After Article 40(1A), the king no longer has personal discretion, without which no prerogative exists,' he added. He said the king now exercised his constitutional power by accepting and implementing the FTPB's decision, and that the constitutional change elevated the monarch above the fray of any perceived political influence or personal preference. 'A decision made by a statutory body such as the FTPB is justiciable,' he said, adding that the Bar's leave application was far from frivolous. Yeo said the courts had consistently taken the position, following the 1985 case of Sim Kie Chon v Superintendent of Pudu Prison & Others, that the decision of a pardons board is not subject to legal challenge, as they were in the UK. In November last year, Justice Ahmad Kamal Shahid held that the king's decision and the FTPB's advice were part and parcel of a single process culminating in the pardon. Consequently, Ahmad Kamal, now a Court of Appeal judge, said that the subject matter of the Bar's proposed judicial review application was not suitable or appropriate to be reviewed by the court. The judge ruled that the prerogative of mercy, under Article 42 of the constitution, involved a direct exercise of the king's personal discretion. The Bar filed its application in the High Court on April 26, 2024, naming the FTPB and Najib as respondents. It sought declarations that the FTPB's Jan 29 decision halving Najib's prison sentence and reducing his fine was illegal, unconstitutional, and invalid. Najib was convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC and has been serving his sentence in Kajang prison since Aug 23, 2022. He filed a petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022. Senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for the FTPB, while Shafee Abdullah represented Najib. The hearing has been adjourned to a date to be fixed after case management on Aug 18.
