Pennsylvania's "invisible workforce" provides $32 billion in unpaid care
Why it matters: She's part of Pennsylvania's "invisible workforce" of family caregivers providing an estimated $32.5 billion in unpaid care this year, per a new report from researchers at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. That's up from $22 billion in 2023.
The big picture: Nationwide, millions of families are helping to fill the void of a "shrinking healthcare workforce," per the report.
The U.S. is facing a nursing shortage that's projected to reach more than 63,000 nurses in 2030, per the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
With little help from their states, many family caretakers are left drained from juggling competing responsibilities, including work and caring for children.
What they're saying: "We have soul contracts," Chew, 69, says of her commitment to her husband, whom she met at Penn State five decades ago.
Chew doesn't qualify for state aid. She has had to dip into the couple's retirement fund to pay for Ben's care, which costs $15,000 a month, including help from a night nurse so Chew can sleep.
It'd be less expensive to place Ben at a full-time dementia care residential facility, but Chew can't stand the thought of doing that to the "love of my life."
"I have siblings," says Chew, who posts about caretaking and the couple's adventures on social media. "If I have to end up on their couch one of these days, I will."
How it works: Researchers used Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2024 to assign hourly wages to various caretaking roles — nurse, cook, financial planner — that they used to calculate unpaid labor totals for each state.
Because most dementia patients require round-the-clock care, such caretakers would need to make at least $100,000 to be fairly compensated for the hours of unpaid work they perform, John McHugh, one of the report's lead researchers, tells Axios.
Dementia care accounts for 40% of Pennsylvania's unpaid caregiver costs, per a statewide snapshot.
Threat level: Nearly half of U.S. states are on the brink of caretaking crises, including Florida ($60.7 billion), Louisiana ($12.8 billion) and Georgia ($26.8 billion), which require immediate attention, per the report.
Pennsylvania is one of 21 states that are considered "safe for now," the report says, though researchers warn rising dementia cases could push some of those states over a tipping point.
Cuts to programs like Medicaid, which some Republicans in the House are pushing, could also propel "some of these states into an at-risk category," McHugh says.
Zoom in: Pennsylvania's situation is stable thanks to an influx of nurses, as well as more than 4,500 home care agencies operating in the Commonwealth, according to the state Department of Health.
The state has about 85 home health aides per 1,000 residents over 65, per the report.
Yes, but: Pennsylvania has an aging population; 20% of the state's residents are 65 and up.
What we're watching: The report calls for Pennsylvania lawmakers to enact paid family leave and provide tax credits to ease the financial burden on unpaid caretakers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
A record low level of Americans drink, and a majority now say alcohol is bad for your health
A record low number of Americans are drinking, according to a new Gallup poll released this week. Just 54% of Americans said they consume alcohol at all. Gallup has been tracking Americans' drinking behavior since 1939, and their views of the health implications of drinking since 2001. For the first time, a majority of Americans – 53% – said that moderate drinking, defined as one or two drinks per day, is bad for your health. 'This is a message that those of us in public health have been advocating for a long time,' said Dr. Katherine Keyes, an epidemiologist at Columbia University who studies trends in alcohol consumption. 'And so it's certainly heartening to see that that message is really seems to be penetrating in the American public.' Even among people who do drink, the poll found that people are also drinking less. A record low 24% of drinkers said they had a drink in the past 24 hours, while 40% said it was more than a week since they last imbibed – the highest figure Gallup has recorded since 2000. The poll was conducted in July. Alcohol consumption surged during the Covid-19 pandemic, then began to decline more recently. It's unclear whether changing attitudes are driving the change in drinking, but the drop spans across age groups. Gen Z drinks less than older generations, but adults age 35 to 54 have reduced their drinking by 10 percentage points since 2023 and those 55 and older by five. Evidence has been mounting against alcohol consumption because of its health risks, negating a decades-long perception that some moderate drinking could be beneficial to health. On Thursday, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology released updated blood pressure guidelines that urged people to abstain from alcohol, rather than recommending a limit of 2 drinks per day for men and 1 drink per day for women. And earlier this year, former US Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy warned that alcohol consumption can increase cancer risk and called for an updated health warning label on alcoholic beverages. Federal officials are currently revisiting long-standing advice on alcohol consumption in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, a policy document that sets nutrition standards for everything from school lunches to public health messaging. The current guidelines drinking – a limit of two drinks or less per day for men, and one per day for women – have been the same since 1990. For the 2025–2030 cycle, the guidelines' advisory committee declined to review the recommendations on alcohol consumption and instead deferred to two separate evidence reviews, one led by the Department of Health and Human Services and another by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Both reports concluded that higher levels of alcohol consumption were associated with increased risk of certain types of cancer but they stopped short of recommending specific intake limits. The USDA and HHS guidelines are expected to be released by the end of the year. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pledged to release simpler, slimmed-down dietary guidelines and well before the deadline. 'Certainly, the scientific evidence that we have would support lowering the recommended alcohol intake for Americans below what it is now. Whether the dietary guidelines will shift to reflect the science that we have remains to be seen,' Keyes said.
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
A record low level of Americans drink, and a majority now say alcohol is bad for your health
A record low number of Americans are drinking, according to a new Gallup poll released this week. Just 54% of Americans said they consume alcohol at all. Gallup has been tracking Americans' drinking behavior since 1939, and their views of the health implications of drinking since 2001. For the first time, a majority of Americans – 53% – said that moderate drinking, defined as one or two drinks per day, is bad for your health. 'This is a message that those of us in public health have been advocating for a long time,' said Dr. Katherine Keyes, an epidemiologist at Columbia University who studies trends in alcohol consumption. 'And so it's certainly heartening to see that that message is really seems to be penetrating in the American public.' Even among people who do drink, the poll found that people are also drinking less. A record low 24% of drinkers said they had a drink in the past 24 hours, while 40% said it was more than a week since they last imbibed – the highest figure Gallup has recorded since 2000. The poll was conducted in July. Alcohol consumption surged during the Covid-19 pandemic, then began to decline more recently. It's unclear whether changing attitudes are driving the change in drinking, but the drop spans across age groups. Gen Z drinks less than older generations, but adults age 35 to 54 have reduced their drinking by 10 percentage points since 2023 and those 55 and older by five. Evidence has been mounting against alcohol consumption because of its health risks, negating a decades-long perception that some moderate drinking could be beneficial to health. On Thursday, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology released updated blood pressure guidelines that urged people to abstain from alcohol, rather than recommending a limit of 2 drinks per day for men and 1 drink per day for women. And earlier this year, former US Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy warned that alcohol consumption can increase cancer risk and called for an updated health warning label on alcoholic beverages. Federal officials are currently revisiting long-standing advice on alcohol consumption in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, a policy document that sets nutrition standards for everything from school lunches to public health messaging. The current guidelines drinking – a limit of two drinks or less per day for men, and one per day for women – have been the same since 1990. For the 2025–2030 cycle, the guidelines' advisory committee declined to review the recommendations on alcohol consumption and instead deferred to two separate evidence reviews, one led by the Department of Health and Human Services and another by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Both reports concluded that higher levels of alcohol consumption were associated with increased risk of certain types of cancer but they stopped short of recommending specific intake limits. The USDA and HHS guidelines are expected to be released by the end of the year. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pledged to release simpler, slimmed-down dietary guidelines and well before the deadline. 'Certainly, the scientific evidence that we have would support lowering the recommended alcohol intake for Americans below what it is now. Whether the dietary guidelines will shift to reflect the science that we have remains to be seen,' Keyes said.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge orders RFK Jr.'s health department to stop sharing Medicaid data with deportation officials
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ordered the nation's health department to stop giving deportation officials access to the personal information — including home addresses — of all 79 million Medicaid enrollees. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services first handed over the personal data on millions of Medicaid enrollees in a handful of states in June. After an Associated Press report identified the new policy, 20 states filed a lawsuit to stop its implementation. In July, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services entered into a new agreement that gave the Department of Homeland Security daily access to view the personal data — including Social Security numbers and home address — of all the nation's 79 million Medicaid enrollees. Neither agreement was announced publicly. The extraordinary disclosure of such personal health data to deportation officials in the Trump administration's far-reaching immigration crackdown immediately prompted the lawsuit over privacy concerns. The Medicaid data sharing is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to provide DHS with more data on migrants. In May, for example, a federal judge refused to block the Internal Revenue Service from sharing immigrants' tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help agents locate and detain people living without legal status in the U.S. The order, issued by federal Judge Vince Chhabria in California, temporarily halts the health department from sharing personal data of enrollees in those 20 states, which include California, Arizona, Washington and New York. 'Using CMS data for immigration enforcement threatens to significantly disrupt the operation of Medicaid—a program that Congress has deemed critical for the provision of health coverage to the nation's most vulnerable residents,' Chhabria wrote in his decision, issued on Tuesday. Chhabria, an appointee of President Barack Obama, said that the order will remain in effect until the health department outlines 'reasoned decisionmaking' for its new policy of sharing data with deportation officials. A spokesperson for the federal health department declined to directly answer whether the agency would stop sharing its data with DHS. HHS has maintained that its agreement with DHS is legal. Immigrants who are not living in the U.S. legally, as well as some lawfully present immigrants, are not allowed to enroll in the Medicaid program that provides nearly free coverage for health services. But federal law requires all states to offer emergency Medicaid, a temporary coverage that pays only for lifesaving services in emergency rooms to anyone, including non-U.S. citizens. Medicaid is a jointly funded program between states and the federal government. Immigration advocates have said the disclosure of personal data could cause alarm among people seeking emergency medical help for themselves or their children. Other efforts to crack down on illegal immigration have made schools, churches, courthouses and other everyday places feel perilous to immigrants and even U.S. citizens who fear getting caught up in a raid. 'Protecting people's private health information is vitally important,' Washington state's Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement. 'And everyone should be able to seek medical care without fear of what the federal government may do with that information.' Seitz and Kindy write for the Associated Press.
