Is China waking up to Israel's strategic importance? Beijing rethinks Middle East strategy
China's growing engagement in the Middle East—heightened by the recent escalation of conflict in Gaza—has drawn significant global attention and speculation. Traditionally, Beijing's regional strategy has focused on securing long-term economic and energy interests: ensuring access to vital energy resources, safeguarding major international trade corridors, and investing extensively in infrastructure, technology, and energy sectors, particularly in the Persian Gulf.
Yet, despite these strategic imperatives, China continues to pursue a deliberately ambivalent and multidimensional approach toward key regional actors, most notably Iran and Israel. This carefully calibrated posture reflects broader geopolitical shifts, the erosion of US hegemony, and, above all, the mounting instability across the Middle East—developments that increasingly threaten both regional equilibrium and China's own economic security.
Energy and strategic interests
Energy security is a central pillar of China's strategic outlook. As the world's largest oil importer, China currently sources around 40% of its oil from the Middle East–a figure expected to double by 2035. This heavy reliance exposes Beijing to acute vulnerabilities should conflict or instability disrupt critical maritime chokepoints such as the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz. These strategic routes also account for roughly 60% of China's trade with Europe and Africa, further amplifying the stakes of regional volatility.
Beyond energy, China's broader economic footprint in the region—particularly through the global Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)—faces mounting risks. Saudi Arabia, China's largest trading partner in the region, exemplifies this accelerating interdependence: their bilateral trade reached $107.53 billion in 2024, underscoring the rapid deepening of their economic ties.
Navigating regional rivalries
Alongside its pursuit of undermining the American regional influence and asserting itself as a stabilizing global power, Beijing–long known for its cautious and natural approach–has recently adopted a more pragmatic, proactive stance in the diplomatic arena. This shift reflects a delicate balancing act and the adaptation of a flexible, well-calibrated strategy, aimed at maximizing the value derived from diverse strategic partnerships while carefully avoiding alienating any particular state or favouring one over another.
China's sophisticated manoeuvring between rival actors and competing regional interests—exemplified by its concurrent cooperation with Saudi Arabia, whose Crown Prince's global ambitious vision, "Vision 2030," is being advanced in tandem with China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This occurs despite its deepening ties with Iran and opposition to its nuclear program and while simultaneously leading diplomatic efforts and negotiations with both the United States and Arab leaders, aimed at promoting a ceasefire and preventing further security escalation in the Middle East.
Furthermore, China draws a clear distinction between declarative rhetoric and operational conduct, as well as between political confrontations and broader systemic interests. These distinctions enable it to uphold the principle of non-intervention—avoiding direct political or military involvement—while simultaneously continuing to lead a critical discourse that includes sharp condemnation of Israel and its military policies, alongside consistent support, on the other hand, for the Palestinian and Iranian positions.
The Israel-Iran conflict: A critical turning point
However, a closer look reveals that the recent direct confrontation between Iran and Israel, which erupted in June, along with US military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, has triggered a significant shift in China's perception of both actors. This shift is already challenging its previously neutral stance, testing its relationships with regional states and its ability to navigate among them. Moreover, this development increases China's dependence on oil powers, intensifying its need to diversify energy sources and alternative trade and supply routes, including diversified engagements with Central Asian states.
Alongside its commitment to invest approximately $400 billion in the development of critical infrastructure across Iran, including the establishment of logistical corridors and the strengthening of security and economic cooperation as part of the BRI project, Beijing is simultaneously cultivating economic and strategic partnerships with Israel, primarily in the fields of high-tech, innovation, and science.
Recent reports indicate that bilateral trade volume between China and Israel reached $16.27 billion in 2024, compared to $14.56 billion in 2023. Furthermore, in May of this year, Chinese exports to Israel totalled $1.45 billion, while imports from Israel reached $1.7 billion–figures that reflect Israel's rising significance in Beijing's calculations.
Moreover, alongside efforts to restore Iran's military capabilities and renew its missile systems damaged during Israeli and American strikes, China—having for the first time adopted a relatively moderate and conciliatory stance toward Israel—simultaneously directed sharp criticism at the Iranian leadership, accusing it of ideological dogmatism and adherence to an extreme political position.
From Beijing's perspective, the conflict with Israel has demonstrated that Iran—significantly weakened—is no longer keeping pace with global developments, and that the so-called 'Axis of Resistance,' including the network of proxies it has cultivated across the Middle East over the years, is gradually fracturing. Senior Chinese scholars have even suggested that the Ayatollah regime, now perceived as teetering on the brink of collapse, no longer serves the strategic interests of China's leadership in the region.
Strategic adjustments
Recently, voices in Israel are increasingly calling for a reassessment of relations with China, despite constraints imposed by the United States. This presents an opportunity to adopt a new, pragmatic foreign policy approach—one that advances Israel's interests in China, across Asia, and more broadly among countries of the 'Global South.' At the same time, it could help integrate China into initiatives aimed at promoting stability in the Middle East, including the future rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip. All of this is especially relevant today, amid mounting global criticism of Israel, the renewal of nuclear talks with Iran, and the unpredictable foreign policy of the President of the United States.
From a broad geopolitical and strategic perspective, it is already becoming apparent that even a partial or limited shift in China's stance toward Israel constitutes an important diplomatic signal—one that could eventually lead to a significant strategic turning point. Beyond the inherent advantages of strengthening bilateral ties and expanding Beijing's role as a mediator between regional adversaries, deeper Chinese involvement could help restrain Iran or, at the very least, counterbalance its negative influence while reducing the risk of regional security escalation.
In addition, recognition from China could enhance Israel's prestige and global image—not only as a member of the American-Western bloc and a close ally of the United States, but also as a powerful and legitimate actor on the international stage. Strengthening ties between the two countries could lead to diversification and expansion of investments and partnerships in fields such as technology, innovation (AI), agriculture, and healthcare. This would boost Israeli exports to China's vast market and help position Israel as a regional power. Furthermore, closer relations and a more balanced approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could influence other countries in the Global South and improve Israel's standing in their eyes.
China's real politics
Looking from a broad Chinese vantage point, it is evident that China's diplomatic pivot is a sophisticated and calculated move—another layer in its global geopolitical strategy. Beyond expanding its political and economic influence in the Middle East, strengthening ties with Israel is expected to help China position itself as a responsible, moderate, and balanced global power—one capable of acting as a potential mediator in other regional and international conflicts (such as the dispute between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, the fight against the Houthis, and the war between Russia and Ukraine).
Through this initiative, China seeks to establish its own network of bilateral and multilateral relationships that will grant it geopolitical flexibility, reduce its dependence on any single country, and enhance its status and image on the international stage.
Although this shift may provoke opposition from Iran and other Muslim countries—as well as Western criticism regarding the disruption of the regional balance of power—the success of the move largely depends on how China chooses to frame its new policy. If Beijing emphasizes its pragmatic stance and clarifies that it does not aim to create a new regional security order or to replace the United States in the region, it could profoundly reshape the Middle East landscape, contribute to the regional and global geopolitical balance.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Brazil's Suzano Cuts Pulp Production on Uncertainty Over Tariffs
Brazilian company Suzano SA is cutting wood-pulp production after negotiations with clients in China, its biggest market, were hit by uncertainty over US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs. The world's top exporter of the raw material used in everything from packaging to toilet paper is reducing output for the next 12 months, Suzano said in a statement on Wednesday as it released second-quarter results. Production will be cut by 3.5%, or roughly 450,000 tons.

Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Trump threatens 100% tariffs on computer chips for companies that don't build in U.S.
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he would place a 100 percent tariff on all computer chips imported to the United States, but exempt companies that commit to 'building' on U.S. soil. The proposal puts economic pressure on U.S. firms, particularly in the tech industry, which generally depend on Asia for the crucial components, setting the stage for more of the showy investment deals Trump has prompted from the industry in his second term. Because importers often pass on the tariff costs to consumers, the chip levies could raise the price of consumer goods dependent on chips ranging from smartphones to kitchen goods to automobiles. Apple has secured an exemption from the chip tariff, Trump said Wednesday. He announced the new semiconductor trade policy at a White House event alongside Apple CEO Tim Cook, who said his company would increase its investment in U.S. jobs and suppliers over coming years. 'We're going to be putting a very large tariff on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said. 'But the good news for companies like Apple is if you're building in the United States or have committed to build, without question, committed to build in the United States, there will be no charge.' Apple said in its most recent annual report that 'substantially all' of its products are manufactured at least in part by other companies, 'located primarily in China mainland, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam.' In a Wednesday blog post, Apple said it would spend $600 billion on hiring workers and buying from U.S.-based suppliers during Trump's term, expanding a commitment made in February by $100 billion. Much of that spending will go toward regular business operations such as paying employees and producing TV shows for its streaming service. Apple also touted a deal with its longtime supplier Corning, a high-tech glass maker, to eventually produce all the glass for iPhones and Apple Watches at the company's Kentucky facilities and said it was working with a group of computer chip companies to produce more of the components it uses inside the U.S. 'We're a proud American company,' Cook said at the Wednesday event, where he also said Trump had been 'a great advocate for American innovation and manufacturing' and gifted him a glass sculpture of a silicon wafer mounted on a 24-karat gold base. The president praised Cook, calling him a 'great, great man.' Trump's chip policy is designed to give firms 'breathing room' to move manufacturing facilities and supply chains to the U.S., similar to the White House's treatment of tariffs on automakers, said a Trump administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The president in April revised his original plans for levies on auto imports to relieve manufacturers from the effects of 'stacked' tariffs that would apply to vehicles, component parts and source materials. 'We're fully cognizant of the fact that you can't set up a factory overnight on something as complicated as semiconductors,' the official said. 'This is designed to reflect that and build in some flexibility.' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said the administration is taking a 'nuanced, multifaceted approach' to boosting American manufacturing. Spokespeople for the Semiconductor Industry Association, which represents semiconductor companies and has lobbied against restrictions on imports, did not immediately return a request for comment. Trump's tariff regime for his second term, launched in February, blindsided the tech industry which has made innovations such as smartphones into mass market products in part by creating complex supply chains that crisscross the Pacific Ocean. Tech firms joined other companies in announcing plans in line with Trump's urging for more investment in the U.S. Companies including Amazon, chipmaker Nvidia, ChatGPT creator OpenAI, and pharma companies Roche and Eli Lilly announced multibillion-dollar spending commitments that were lauded by the White House. A string of industry CEOs met with the president over the past weeks and months. Apple stood to lose hundreds of millions of dollars from the tariffs, Cook told investors in May. But after the CEO met with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and other senior White House officials in April, Trump said he would exempt iPhones and other consumer tech products, The Washington Post previously reported. Trump has repeatedly threatened to place tariffs on computer chips, crucial components in electronic devices of all kinds and in products such as cars and home appliances. But the components were exempted from his initial tariffs announced in February, pending an investigation by the Commerce Department to evaluate whether chips are subject to a trade law that can be used to apply tariffs to products presenting a national security risk. The administration has conducted a similar process for steel and pharmaceuticals. Trump's pledge to exempt companies 'that build in the United States' and Apple's apparent success in securing an exemption suggests other tech bosses may seek similar treatment with their own promises to invest in the United States. Although Trump has said his tariffs are intended to boost U.S. manufacturing, he did not make clear if only new factories would qualify for an exemption, or what scale of investment he would deem sufficient. That could give him significant leverage over corporations reliant on chips. Despite efforts by successive administrations to increase domestic chip manufacturing, Asian suppliers dominate. The White House has celebrated the president's trade policies as creating a 'Trump effect,' incentivizing businesses to create jobs and prosperity for his supporters. But many of the investments announced by tech companies since he took office in January were in the works before his November victory, or have not yet come to fruition. During his first week in office, Trump announced OpenAI, SoftBank, Oracle and other corporations would invest up to $500 billion in a project called Stargate to build as many as 20 data centers, warehouses stuffed with computers, to power AI projects. As of July, the only facility the companies have announced is a complex in Abilene, Texas, which began construction during the Biden administration. The Washington Post has a content partnership with OpenAI. In his first term, Trump announced a multibillion-dollar deal for Taiwanese tech manufacturer Foxconn to build a facility in Wisconsin. It never opened. Cook, who Trump accidentally called 'Tim Apple' at a White House event in his first term, has successfully navigated Trump's previous attempts to levy tariffs that would constrain his company's smartphone business. Cook developed a warm relationship with Trump during his first term, unlike other Silicon Valley CEOs, in part through communicating with him directly without intermediaries, The Post previously reported. That playbook has been emulated by executives at many other businesses, who now regularly call or dine with Trump.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces 100% tariffs on chips, mining stocks tumble
Trump announces 100% tariffs on chips, mining stocks tumble originally appeared on TheStreet. President Donald Trump announced on Aug. 6 that he will impose tariffs as high as 100% on imports of chips and semiconductors to the U.S. Only those manufacturing these products in the U.S. can escape this charge, he added. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that the new rate would apply to all chip and semiconductor imports except those from companies that have committed to manufacturing in the U.S. As reported earlier, the Bitcoin mining industry has taken a hit due to Trump's tariffs on chips. Mining is the process of using high-tech hardware to validate and secure transactions on a blockchain network that forms the infrastructure of the crypto industry. While the U.S. is the world leader among crypto mining countries, it is Asian countries such as China, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand that are the key manufacturers of mining rig equipment on which even the miners based in the U.S. are announcement immediately sent shockwaves through the stocks of nearly all crypto mining companies. MARA Holdings (Nasdaq: MARA), a prominent Bitcoin miner based in Florida, fell 0.13% in after hours to $15.87 at the time of writing. Similarly, the Colorado-headquartered Riot Platforms (Nasdaq: RIOT) dropped 0.69% to $11.58. Singapore-headquartered miner Bitdeer Technologies (Nasdaq: BTDR) fell 0.62% to $12.89, and the Henderson, Nevada-headquartered CleanSpark, Inc. (Nasdaq: CLSK) fell 0.18% to $10.98. HIVE Digital Technologies (Nasdaq: HIVE) also fell 0.94% to $2.10. Hut 8 (Nasdaq: HUT) fell 0.19% to $20.65. The total crypto market cap stood at $3.76 trillion at the time of writing. Trump announces 100% tariffs on chips, mining stocks tumble first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 6, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio