Bahrain asks schools to go online; people to use main roads only 'if necessary'
[Editor's Note: Follow our live blog for real-time updates on the latest developments in the Israel-Iran conflict.]
Bahrain activated a remote learning system on Sunday (June 22) in light of the recent escalation of conflict in the region, according to Bahrain's news agency.
All public and private educational institutions in Bahrain, including kindergartens, schools, and universities, have been instructed to activate and use their digital and online platforms for teaching and learning purposes.
After the US bombed Iran's three nuclear sites, the Ministry of Education issued instructions to all public and private educational institutions to move to online learning as a precautionary measure.
The ministry added that any educational institution wishing to make enquiries or receive support in managing its operations may contact the Ministry and the Higher Education Council through the official communication channels in place, as per usual practice.
The Ministry of Interior has also urged citizens and residents to limit travel and use main roads to "only when necessary". This measure is taken to maintain public safety and to allow emergency and relevant authorities to use the roads efficiently.
Considering the ongoing strikes between Iran and Israel, Bahrain's Civil Service Bureau (CSB) has also announced the activation of a remote working system across ministries and government agencies, with up to 70 per cent of employees working from home.
This excludes sectors where physical presence is essential or which have specific procedures in place for emergencies, and will be implemented in line with public safety requirements, starting today and until further notice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
5 minutes ago
- The National
Yemeni power plant hit by 'aggression', Houthi media says
A power plant south of Sanaa was hit by an "aggression," rendering some of its generators out of service and causing shortages, Yemen's Houthi-run Al Masirah TV said early Sunday morning. The channel did not attribute blame for the reported "aggression." It added that civil defence teams were working to extinguish a fire caused by the incident. Residents told Reuters that at least two explosions were heard earlier in Sanaa. Israel has previously carried out strikes targeting the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen in what it says is in response to their attacks on Israel. It has typically targeted three ports of Hodeidah, Ras Isa and Salif, as well as the Ras Al Khatib power station. The last such attack launched by Israel was last month. The Israeli army on Thursday said it intercepted a ballistic missile launched by the group off the coast of Eilat. The Houthis have repeatedly launched projectiles towards Israel since October 2023 - the majority of which have been intercepted - and at ships believed to be Israeli-affiliated, in what they say is in support of Palestinians in Gaza. The US and the UK have also previously launched attacks against the Houthis in Yemen. But in May, Washington announced a surprise truce with the Iran-backed group, agreeing to stop the bombing campaign in return for an end to the attacks on the vital shipping lanes. The Houthis pledged in June to resume attacks in the region after the US entered the Israel-Iran war with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Yemeni security sources told The National at the time that the rebels were considering renewed attacks on US targets around the Middle East and increasing attacks on Israel in support of Tehran.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
The stars now speaking up for Gaza: U2, Madonna, Olivia Rodrigo and Radiohead
As the situation in Gaza deteriorates by the day, more public figures have been using their platforms to speak out against Israeli action. Burying one's head in the sand, it seems, is increasingly being considered a form of complicity. Many celebrities, particularly in the music scene, have been persistently vocal about the continuing atrocities. Concert stages like the Glastonbury festival have become important platforms for activism and many musicians have organised events for the cause, such as the upcoming Together or Palestine event. Since then, a new wave of musical voices has piped up. It includes artists who have broken long silences on the issue. U2 It has branded itself as 'humanitarian' nearly since its inception, but U2 have long faced criticism for taking both sides in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Just two days after the Hamas attacks on October 7, lead singer Bono dedicated the song Pride (In the Name of Love) to the victims at the Nova music festival, altering the lyrics to: 'Early morning, October 7 / Sun is rising in the desert sky / Stars of David, they took your life / They could not take your pride.' While Bono has grown increasingly critical of Israel's actions since 2023, he has often repeated contested Israeli talking points alongside his condemnations, which has garnered controversy in pro-Palestine circles. The band's other members had stayed largely silent. That changed on August 10, when the Irish group shared a joint message on their official website and Instagram, which included individual statements from each member. The statements were notably different in tone and content. Bono's statement began by critising Hamas for the October 7 attacks before slating Israel for its 'moral failure', adding 'the government of Israel led by Benjamin Netanyahu today deserves our categorical and unequivocal condemnation'. The Edge was the only member to use the term 'genocide', also referring to it as ethnic cleansing and drawing historic parallels to Ireland. 'We are all deeply shocked and profoundly grieved by the suffering unfolding in Gaza,' he wrote. 'What we are witnessing is not a distant tragedy – it is a test of our shared humanity.' But the divide between the members' rhetoric on Gaza has only grown more stark since the statement was released. Bono wrote a solo opinion piece for The Atlantic on Monday, writing: 'Hamas had deliberately positioned themselves under civilian targets, having tunnelled their way from school to mosque to hospital' – a statement that echoes the rhetoric of many Israeli politicians. Olivia Rodrigo The singer-songwriter shared an Instagram message in July condemning the Gaza humanitarian crisis as 'horrific and completely unacceptable'. She had been quiet about the war to that point but highlighted the suffering of children and families, writing: 'There are no words to describe the heartbreak I feel witnessing the devastation that is being inflicted upon innocent people in Palestine. 'Mothers, fathers and children in Gaza are starving, dehydrated and being denied access to basic medical care and humanitarian aid. There is no child in Israel, Palestine or anywhere in the world who deserves to suffer through what we're seeing these children endure. It is horrific and completely unacceptable. To give up on them is to give up on our shared humanity.' Rodrigo also announced a personal donation to Unicef to support victims of the conflict, encouraging her followers to contribute as well. Madonna Like Bono, Madonna 's stance on Gaza has long had a 'both sides' tone. She has often framed the conflict broadly, avoiding direct condemnation of Israel's actions. Earlier this month Madonna made a post online, appealing to Pope Leo XIV to visit Gaza. The singer said the pontiff is 'the only one of us who cannot be denied entry' and should 'bring [his] light to the children before it's too late'. Madonna, who was raised Catholic, said politics could not resolve the crisis and that she was turning to 'a Man of God' to help. She explained that her own children were the motivation for the post in her caption, writing: 'Today is my son Rocco's birthday. I feel the best gift I can give to him as a mother is to ask everyone to do what they can to help save the innocent children caught in the crossfire in Gaza.' However, Madonna still did not outright condemn Israel. 'I am not pointing fingers, placing blame or taking sides. Everyone is suffering.' Radiohead For years, Radiohead 's position on the Israel-Palestine conflict – and, at times, outright dismissal of pro-Palestinian voices – has been a point of contention in the music community and beyond. The group, known for its progressive politics, has long downplayed calls to boycott or challenge Israeli policies, with many pointing out the gap between their humanitarian branding and their apparent disregard for Palestine's humanitarian crisis. In 2017, the band faced calls from artists and activists, including Roger Waters, to cancel a planned Tel Aviv concert. Singer Thom Yorke defended the performance, calling the boycott 'patronising' and stressing the band's belief in cultural exchange. Yorke later displayed a rude gesture to pro-Palestinian protesters at a 2017 Glasgow concert. In May, Yorke released a statement addressing the conflict after mounting pressure, which many criticised as not going far enough. Yorke began by acknowledging a pro-Palestinian concertgoer who shouted at him about the war during a show in Australia in 2024. Yorke said he did not engage at that moment because it didn't seem like the best time to discuss the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. He also expressed that he was in shock that his supposed silence was being taken as complicity and struggled to find an adequate way to respond. In his statement, Yorke condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government, accusing them of exploiting grief to exert control over Gaza and the West Bank. He also called Israel's siege 'horrific'. 'I think Netanyahu and his crew of extremists are totally out of control and need to be stopped, and that the international community should put all the pressure it can on them to cease,' Yorke wrote. 'Their excuse of self-defence has long since worn thin and has been replaced by a transparent desire to take control of Gaza and the West Bank permanently.' Yorke also criticised Hamas, saying he believe the group 'chooses, too, to hide behind the suffering of its people'. The final part of his statement drew the most criticism, as he seemingly dismissed the 'free Palestine' cause because of the continuing hostage situation. 'At the same time the unquestioning Free Palestine refrain that surrounds us all does not answer the simple question of why the hostages have still not all been returned? For what possible reason?' Yorke wrote.
The National
14 hours ago
- The National
Syrian army plans to seize eastern provinces if Kurds fail to co-operate
The Syrian military is planning a major offensive by October to capture two main provinces on the Euphrates River from a mostly Kurdish militia that has refused to submit to Damascus, security sources told The National. If the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) does not hand over the bulk of its territorial possessions, a Syrian attack force of 50,000 being assembled near the desert city of Palmyra will sweep north and capture the governorates of Raqqa and Deir Ezzor with support from their overwhelmingly Arab tribal populations, the sources said. One of the sources, who holds a sensitive security position in Syria and requested anonymity, said the offensive would not go ahead 'without an American green light'. Another key would be ensuring non-intervention by Israel, which last month bombed Damascus to repulse a government offensive on the southern provincial capital of Sweida. US-sponsored talks have failed to make progress in bridging differences between the two sides. The secular SDF is increasingly being seen as recalcitrant in Washington by not handing any significant powers to Damascus, the source said – a view closer to that of Turkey, which wants the SDF's demise. Deadly clashes Re-establishing central control of SDF territory has emerged as a major obstacle to stabilisation since the removal of former Syrian president Bashar Al Assad in December by Hayat Tahrir Al Sham (HTS), an al Qaeda splinter group now in control of the state. Deadly clashes have increased between the SDF and forces loyal to Damascus since the US-sponsored talks between the two sides faltered last month. The two sides signed a deal in March to integrate the SDF into the Syrian army, but relations have soured since then. At Saudi and Turkish urgings, the US embarked in May on normalisation with Damascus. President Donald Trump met President Ahmad Al Shara in Riyadh, giving a glimpse of a potential alliance that could weaken Iran and Russia, and their allies in the Middle East. Staging grounds Another source said that staging grounds for the offensive are being prepared in the desert areas of Rasafah, on the road between Palmyra to Raqqa, and in Sukhnah, which links Palmyra with Deir Ezzor. Turkish proxies in the governorate of Aleppo, now part of the new Syrian army, would move against SDF positions east of the Euphrates river, near Tishreen Dam, once the multipronged attack begins. In the past eight years of the Syrian civil war, Turkey had carved out a zone in northern Syria, reliant on rebel allies now in power in Damascus, to limit the territorial expansion of the SDF. Arab tribesmen, thousands of whom had joined the SDF, would be expected to turn against the group at the start of military action, the source said. Around 30 per cent of the 70,000 core SDF members are members of Arab tribes. 'They have so many scores to settle with the Kurds,' the source said, referring to an SDF land grab of Arab areas since the US set up the Kurdish force in 2015 as the main ground component in the war against ISIS in Syria. Even a major advance by the government would leave the SDF with the province of Hasakah, where the Kurdish population is significant. Raqqa and Deir Ezzor are overwhelmingly Arab. The Kurds account for around 10 per cent of Syria's 23.8 million population, according to the CIA's World Factbook. However, currently SDF-held areas account for most of Syria's output of commodities, electrical power, and energy. US State Department officials have been urging the SDF to compromise, although it is seen as retaining strong support within US security branches. The SDF wants a federal system, an anathema Damascus, and to remain as a single unit, even if its joins the Syrian army. During the civil war, Russia, Iran, Turkey and the US built their own zones of influence in the country. But only Turkish and American forces have remained in Syria. Most of an estimated 20,000 Turkish force are deployed near SDF area, while the 1,000 American troops are mainly on bases within SDF territory.
