logo
Can't sleep? Scientists reveal foolproof FOOT hack that's guaranteed to help you doze off

Can't sleep? Scientists reveal foolproof FOOT hack that's guaranteed to help you doze off

Daily Mail​4 days ago

There's nothing worse than tossing and turning in bed, unable to doze off.
But the days of counting sheep are finally a thing of the past.
That's because scientists have revealed an ingenious foot-based hack that's guaranteed to help you doze off.
A viral Instagram post, shared by the account @biohackyourselfmedia, recommends sleeping with one foot outside the covers.
'Ever wondered why you instinctively stick one foot out from under the covers?' the post reads.
'Turns out, science has your back—and your feet!
'A fascinating 2023 study published in the Journal of Physiological Anthropology has confirmed that sleeping with one foot outside the blanket isn't just a quirky habit—it's a legit sleep hack.'
While this sounds simple, research has shown that the change really can make a big difference to your quality of sleep.
The reason this unusual trick works is because a reduction in core body temperature is one of the key signs that tells your body it's time to fall asleep.
As the body's temperature falls, a signal is sent to your brain, triggering the production of melatonin - a chemical that eases the body to sleep and regulates the circadian rhythm.
In their post, @biohackyourselfmedia says: 'The soles of your feet have special blood vessels designed to dump heat fast.
'Exposing just one foot to cooler air helps lower your core body temperature.'
Dropping your core body temperature will raise your melatonin levels and reduce the time taken to fall asleep as well as improve overall sleep quality.
On social media, commenters flocked to share the success they have had using this simple hack.
One commenter wrote: 'I do it always. Usually the whole one leg.'
Another added: 'I've been doing this my whole life.'
On Instagram, commenters responding the hack shared how much this simple trick had helped them to sleep
However, some commenters pointed out that sleeping with a foot exposed to the air is a trigger for a surprisingly common fear.
As one commenter wrote: 'This is what a foot grabbing monster would say.'
'So the shadow man can pull me under the bed!!! Nice try but I don't think so,' another chimed in.
While another asked: 'Who wrote this, the boogie man?!'
Others had more practical concerns about sleeping with their leg exposed to the open air.
A commenter complained that this might work fine 'until the mosquitos attack.'
As another added that this is a good plan 'unless you have a cat.'
While some people might not like the idea, science shows that keeping your feet cool really is one of the best ways to drift off.
Although it isn't clarified in the post, the 2023 paper mentioned is likely a study conducted by Japanese researchers on the effects of bathing before bedtime.
This study found that having a long, hot bath before getting into bed significantly improved sleep duration and sped up falling asleep.
This might sound counterintuitive, but it is the total drop in core body temperature which causes the body's sleep reaction and not just being cold.
By temporarily raising the core body temperature one to two hours before bed, you can create a bigger change and a more powerful sleep reaction.
Getting your skin hot in the bath triggers a process that causes blood to rush to veins near the surface of the skin in a process called vasodilation.
When you get out of the bath, more blood will be running through the exposed veins on your feet, allowing for even faster cooling.
One 2023 study conducted by Chinese researchers recommended that taking a 24-minute footbath at 42°C (108°F) before bed was the optimal way to increase sleep quality.
Keeping your feet exposed afterwards allows for even faster cooling and a greater sleep reaction.
In order to boost the cooling power of your feet, studies recommend taking a hot bath before bed. This opens up the blood vessels near the surface and improves cooling rates. These graphs show how a long bath before bed reduces the time taken to fall asleep (top) and improves sleep efficiency (bottom)
But if you let your feet get too cold the blood will stop flowing to the surface - a process called vasoconstriction - and the cooling process will be inhibited.
Some studies have even recommended wearing socks to bed in order to maintain vasodilation and keep the core body temperature cool.
A study conducted by Korean researchers found that participants slept significantly better and fell asleep faster while wearing warming socks that kept their feet 1.3°C (2.34°F) warmer.
On average this led to participants getting 30 minutes extra sleep per night and falling asleep 7.5 minutes quicker.
ABOUT CIRCIDIAN RHYTHMS
Our internal circadian rhythms, or circadian clock, is responsible for waking our bodies up in the morning and ensuring they get a good night's rest.
In a healthy person, cortisol levels peak at around 8am, which wakes us up (in theory), and drop to their lowest at 3am the next day, before rising back to its peak five hours later.
Ideally, this 8am peak will be triggered by exposure to sunlight, if not an alarm. When it does, the adrenal glands and brain will start pumping adrenaline.
By mid-morning, the cortisol levels start dropping, while the adrenaline (for energy) and serotonin (a mood stabilizer) keep pumping.
At midday, metabolism and core body temperature ramp up, getting us hungry and ready to eat.
After noon, cortisol levels start their steady decline. Metabolism slows down and tiredness sets in.
Gradually the serotonin turns into melatonin, which induces sleepiness.
Our blood sugar levels decrease, and at 3am, when we are in the middle of our sleep, cortisol levels hit a 24-hour low.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Cambridge centre specialises in children with bowel diseases
New Cambridge centre specialises in children with bowel diseases

BBC News

time42 minutes ago

  • BBC News

New Cambridge centre specialises in children with bowel diseases

A new centre focused on improving the lives of children with inflammatory bowel diseases has opened in Cambridge. The Cambridge Centre for Children's Gut Health will see cutting-edge research from scientists at the University of Cambridge, including the study of "mini-guts".The mini organs are created from the cells donated by children, which allow scientists to study the bowel diseases and identify potential new treatments. Matt Zilbauer, director of the centre, said children and young people were "enthusiastic" about helping to better understand their conditions. Professor Zilbauer, who is also a consultant at Addenbrooke's Hospital, hoped the new centre would help identify ways of personalising also wanted it to give children access to the latest drugs, clinical trials and outstanding clinical care. Their study of mini-guts with a team at the Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, showed DNA changes may play an important role in Crohn's publishing their study, the team recruited a further 500 patients and generated nearly 1,000 organoids. "To study these diseases, we need our children and young people to donate a few extra tissue cells when we're investigating their condition," he said. "We couldn't do our research without their help."The children are amazing – they're all really keen to help us and to contribute to finding new treatments, even when they know these treatments may not benefit them directly."The centre will also have a psychiatric Glemas, research nurse and patient engagement lead at Cambridge University Hospitals, said: "Inflammatory bowel diseases are lifelong conditions with no cure. "It's really tough for the children and young people we see, so it's important that we look after every aspect of their health. By looking after their mental health alongside their physical health, we hope to make their lives easier." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Kara Tointon: Why I had a double mastectomy at 39
Kara Tointon: Why I had a double mastectomy at 39

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Kara Tointon: Why I had a double mastectomy at 39

Last year I made one of the biggest decisions of my life. I chose to have a double mastectomy and have my fallopian tubes removed. I didn't have cancer, but my decision was driven by it. Six years ago, my mother, Carol, underwent chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. During that time, she was tested for the BRCA1 and 2 gene alterations, which put you at greater risk of breast and ovarian cancers, because we know they run in our family. It was suggested that my sister, Hannah, and I also take a test. We did so in our own time, when we felt ready. My result came back positive. Hannah's, thankfully, came back negative. She had convinced herself that we would enter the process together and so it took a moment for her to be able to talk about it, but she has been a rock for me and has been with me every step of the way. Finding out about the gene alteration gave us all a clarity and an explanation of the generations of women we'd lost in my family, all too early, to cancer. My mum had lost her mother to cancer at the age of 13. In 2002, my Auntie June died lost a ten-year battle to both ovarian and breast cancer and in 2019, two and a half years after her initial diagnosis and three months after my first son, Frey, was born, cancer claimed Mum's life too. For the next five years after my test I was put under 'surveillance' — I had mammograms and MRIs once per year. Doctors had told me about the option of having a mastectomy when I first took the BRCA alteration test in 2018, but I was hoping to have a second child before I went through any major surgery. The first scan showed a benign lump. When tested, this wasn't cancerous, but the risk suddenly felt a lot more real. When these lumps showed up again in a few more scans, it was enough to convince me that I wanted the double mastectomy. The process was surprisingly straightforward. After attending various meetings where everything was explained to me, I waited for the date of surgery. In April last year, I went into the Royal Marsden hospital for one night and returned home the next day with drainage tubes, two mesh layers under my skin where my breasts used to be, and implants underneath. The procedure usually takes up to three hours. My surgeon told me that, although some patients' are able to use fat from their abdomen and buttocks to reconstruct, this wasn't an option for me at this time, hence us choosing implants. Within a few weeks I was up and about; within two months I was able to lift things. The operation did take a mental toll — I found myself surprisingly tired for about three months, but to a certain extent that was overridden by the overwhelming sense of relief. I still have some procedures to complete but I'm very happy with the results and the decision I've made. Five months later, when I had just turned 40, I had a second surgery to remove my fallopian tubes, which reduced my risk of ovarian cancer without me needing to go into an early menopause. When I am closer to a natural menopause, I will have my ovaries removed to further reduce my risk. The procedure and my recovery was relatively quick, and again I only spent one night in hospital. One of the biggest fears people have around this type of surgery is the physical scars it leaves and, while I do have those, I don't worry about them. How you look becomes far less of a concern when you've seen your body heal from two potentially life-saving operations. I now live a peaceful life in Sogne, southern Norway, with my partner, Marius, and our two sons, but I hope I can use my experience to spread awareness of the tests and operations that can help defend against breast and ovarian cancer. Many people are afraid to speak about cancer; Mum certainly was. My childhood growing up in the picturesque Westcliff-on-Sea in Essex was joyful and I'm lucky to have such a close family, but there was one thing Mum would never speak about: her health. For me, speaking about my procedures with other women and hearing their stories makes me feel less alone. That's why I decided to share my experience on Instagram last month. I'd seen a video on my feed of somebody else sharing theirs and it gave me such comfort. At first I felt nervous posting something so personal, but the kind messages I received from other women, many of them going through the same thing, really moved me. Having the BRCA alteration test and preventive surgery is a personal decision and one with many different considerations, but it was the right one for me. I was able to take back some autonomy — cancer once dominated my family but I feel like I am no longer controlled by it. I will always grieve that more treatment options were not available to my mum, but I know that she would want me to give other women a message: don't ignore your body; confronting your health head-on could save your life. Kara is an ambassador for The Eve Appeal — the leading gynaecological cancers charity, which funds research and raises awareness for the prevention and earlier diagnosis of all gynae cancers. You can find information on BRCA gene alterations, genetic testing and preventive options at

Futurist who predicted the iPhone reveals date humans will cheat death
Futurist who predicted the iPhone reveals date humans will cheat death

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Futurist who predicted the iPhone reveals date humans will cheat death

A leading futurist who accurately predicted the rise of the iPhone has now set the date for humanity's most phenomenal breakthrough yet, the ability to cheat death. Ray Kurzweil, a former Google engineering director, has long been known for his bold predictions about the future of technology and humanity. His forecasts often focus on the convergence of biotech, AI, and nanotechnology to radically extend human capabilities. Now, Kurzweil claims humanity is just four years away from its most transformative leap yet, achieving 'longevity escape velocity' by 2029. While some experts remain skeptical, Kurzweil's influence in Silicon Valley ensures his predictions continue to shape the broader conversation around life extension and the future of human health. Longevity escape velocity (LEV) is a hypothetical scenario where the rate of medical advancement outpaces the aging process, leading to an ever-increasing life expectancy. Kurzweil believes that threshold is within reach because of recent exponential growth in the fields of line gene editing, mRNA vaccines, drug discovery led by artificial intelligence, and synthetic biology. He pointed to the development of COVID-19 vaccines as proof of humanity's rapid progress. 'We got the COVID vaccine out in 10 months,' he said in an interview with Bessemer Venture Partners. 'It took two days to create it. Because we sequenced through several billion different sequences in two days,' Kurzweil added. The controversial idea has long stirred debate in tech and scientific circles, with many gerontologists and longevity experts warning that the science is not yet close to achieving such a feat. In recent study, researchers noted that while some treatments have extended lifespan in animals, translating those results to humans remains a major challenge. Others, like Charles Brenner, a biochemist at City of Hope National Medical Center known as a 'longevity skeptic,' have cautioned against the hype surrounding claims of defeating aging and life-extension theories. We can't stop aging, he told the crowd. We can not use longevity genes to stay young because getting older is a fundamental property of life. But Kurzweil insists the world is on the verge of achieving it, pointing to exponential advances in AI, nanotechnology, and regenerative medicine as indicators that 'longevity escape velocity' could be reached within the decade. The concept hinges on cutting edge medicine becoming universally accessible, something many experts warn is far from guaranteed. While it does not promise immortality, it does suggest that death from old age could be delayed indefinitely, as technology advances over time. 'There's many other advances happening,' Kurzweil said. 'We're starting to see simulated biology being used and that's one of the reasons that we're going to make so much progress in the next five years.' Kurzweil has built a career on predicting the future, with many of his past forecasts coming true during the exact year he stated it would happen. He correctly foresaw the rise of portable computing in the 1990s, predicted the internet boom in the mid-1990s, and a computer would defeat a chess grandmaster by 1997. A milestone reached when IBM's Deep Blue defeated Garry Kasparov that year. Still, critics argue that forecasting a future without death, is far more complex than spotting tech trends. Venki Ramakrishnan, a Nobel Prize winning biologist, explained in his book ' ' that aging happens because of many connected biological factors, not just one cause. This makes it a very complex problem. Unlike technology, which usually improves in clear and predictable steps, the process of aging is much harder to understand and predict. Even if longevity escape velocity is technically possible by 2029, experts warn that widespread access could be limited by socioeconomic and ethical challenges. The technology needed to extend life in this way, such as genetic reprogramming, precision medicine, or nanobots, is expensive and still largely experimental. Medical advancements have significantly improved life expectancies, but achieving longevity escape velocity is not the same as achieving immortality. Kurzweil acknowledged that broad adoption is a massive hurdle. 'This doesn't mean you're going to live forever. A 10-year-old might have decades of potential, but they could still die tomorrow,' he said. There are limits. Randomness still plays a role. Cancer, for example, isn't a single disease but hundreds of mutations with no universal cure. While self-driving cars may reduce accidents, they won't eliminate them. Equally concerning is the disparity in global health care. Diseases like tuberculosis, which has a known cure, still kill more than a million people annually because treatments are unevenly distributed. The last few years have seen major breakthroughs in life-extension science. mRNA technology is now being adapted for cancer vaccines. CRISPR gene editing is being used in clinical trials to treat hereditary blindness and sickle cell disease. Meanwhile, researchers are growing entire organs in labs and experimenting with reversing aging in mice using cellular reprogramming techniques. AI is also accelerating biology. DeepMind's AlphaFold project solved one of biology's biggest puzzles, predicting how proteins fold in a feat that could revolutionize drug discovery. These advances are what Kurzweil cites as evidence that the human clock may soon start ticking backwards. Still, the idea of LEV captures something deeper, a human desire to defy mortality, to stay a step ahead of the inevitable. Kurzweil is not promising a magic pill or overnight change. He is predicting a tipping point in the near future, when medical progress starts to outpace aging in small, accumulating ways. If his timeline holds true, the early 2030s could mark the beginning of a very different relationship with aging, one in which dying of old age is no longer an assumed endpoint.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store