Pakistan's history of dubious terror probes: 4 times India's neighbour ignored evidence
'The recent tragedy in Pahalgam is yet another example of this perpetual blame game, which must come to a grinding halt. Continuing with its role as a responsible country, Pakistan is open to participating in any neutral, transparent and credible investigation,' Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said while addressing the army-cadets passing-out parade at the Pakistan Military Academy in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa's Kakul.
Sharif's offer came three days after New Delhi unveiled a raft of punitive measures against Pakistan, including suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, closure of the only operation land border crossing at Attari and downgrading of diplomatic ties.
While there was no immediate response from the Indian government to Sharif's proposal, Jammu & Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah questioned the legitimacy of the offer. 'First they (Pakistan) did not accept that something had happened in Pahalgam. Then they even said it was done by India. They were the ones who first accused us, so it's difficult to say anything about them,' he said.
This is not the first time Pakistan has offered to assist in investigating a terror attack in India with cross-border connections. After the 2016 attack on the Pathankot air force base by Jaish-e-Mohammed, which left eight people dead, Pakistan dispatched a joint investigation team - including members of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) - to India from March 27 to 31, 2016. Their mission was to gather, review, and document evidence, and to interview key witnesses and victims alongside the National Investigation Agency (NIA). However, the collaboration ultimately yielded no tangible results.
India has sent Pakistan judicial requests, detailed dossiers, even DNA samples of terrorists related to various attacks but it has ignored the evidence.
India handed over dossiers to Pakistan containing evidence against LeT chief Hafiz Saeed, and other handlers. A judicial panel from Pak was also allowed to visit India. However, it never took any concrete action against the perpetrators. Saeed has been held and released several times over the past decade.
A Pak Joint Investigation Team was allowed to visit the airbase and collect evidence from Indian investigators. It was decided that an NIA team would visit Pak, but Islamabad violated the terms of reciprocity and didn't share any evidence with India.
A Letter Rogatory (LR) or judicial request was sent to Pakistan with details of DNA samples of the terrorists. Islamabad, however, failed to act on the evidence.
NIA sent a detailed LR seeking information on four Pak-based perpetrators and three Pakistanis who came to India to execute the attack. Pak failed to share any details and instead portrayed itself as a terrorism victim.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Opening India's agriculture to a free-for-all would have serious repercussions for the sector
It is not enough to say that agriculture contributes only 16 per cent to India's GDP. Nor is it sufficient to state that small farmer households earn about one lakh rupees annually. These statistics do not capture the full extent of the story. For those, particularly outside India, who are unfamiliar with the agricultural and rural heartlands of India, this data conceals a larger narrative. I say this both as a farmer and as a former finance minister: The impacts go far beyond the economy. What is at risk is social stability and what it could bring is a cultural upheaval that we are not prepared for. For instance, 250 million people are directly dependent on farming, and there are 700 million Indians who are directly or indirectly connected to farming and the rural sector. Protecting the farm sector is not just a policy. It is a survival mechanism for millions, crucial to maintaining economic, social, political and cultural stability. The argument around agricultural subsidy and tariffs often centres on the Minimum Support Price (MSP) provided to select crops. In the US and much of the EU, the terminoogy and approach vary, but the issue remains the same. If India has MSP, the US has ERP, PLC, ARC and DMC. Let me elaborate. ERP is the Effective Reference Price, analogous to the MSP. In the US, farmers receive direct payments from the government if market prices fall below this level, and it is called PLC or Price Loss Coverage. Both PLC and ARC (Agriculture Risk Coverage) cover 22 major crops, ranging from wheat and corn to soybean and cotton. These systems are not restricted to farming alone as they also extend to the dairy sector under the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) programme. The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provides income support via direct payments if prices fall below intervention levels, which are akin to MSPs. The crucial difference is that, while in India, the government procures crops at the MSP, in the US the government does not procure crops but instead pays farmers directly if prices fall below the minimum. Given the literacy levels, or lack thereof, and the paperwork involved with enrolling in these various EU and US policies, asking Indian farmers to transition to these systems would create another level of bureaucracy. Moreover, rolling out the US and EU models in India would take years, if not decades. The pressure on India to dismantle its farm mechanisms, whether MSP or tariffs, and open up to international market forces would be justifiable, if the US and EU were not subsidising their own agricultural sectors. The US spends about $20 billion and the EU about $50 billion on agricultural subsidies. In fact, many of these subsidies remain hidden, while the Indian MSP system is much more transparent. The focus of US subsidies is large farms, whereas Indian farm policy centres on small farmers. US policy priorities include market stabilisation, income protection, and climate adaptation, while India focuses on supporting small farmers and landholderscol, ensuring regular upliftment of the rural economy. EU subsidies are targeted more toward income support, environmental goals, climate and biodiversity targets. In the US and much of Europe, 80 per cent of subsidies go to large farms, while in India, it is the reverse with 80 per cent going to small and medium farmers. The EU, in its latest budget provisions, is trying to move away from the US approach towards the Indian model, by targeting small farmers. In fact, the EU's latest provision in its Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is 387 billion euros ($451 billion) for 2021-2027, and as recently as last month, they proposed a cap of 1,00,000 euros per year per farmer, in an attempt to shift support from larger farmers to smaller ones. That translates to a cap of one crore of subsidy per farmer. For India, the real issue is that of equitable and development-centred agreements. Just as the Indian MSP is clear, transparent and focused on the Indian context, the alphabet soup of CAP, ERP, PLC, ARC and DMC is tailored to the US and EU contexts. This perspective arises not only from economics, but also from society, politics and culture. Opening the entire agriculture sector to a free-for-all, when US and EU subsidies distort the market in their favour, would create a kind of asymmetric warfare, with tumultuous consequences for Indian society. The upheaval would be massive. This stance has been clearly articulated at the highest levels. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently said: 'For us, the interest of our farmers is top priority. India will never compromise on the interests of its farmers, dairy farmers and fishermen. I know I will personally have to pay a heavy price but I am prepared for it.' The writer is the former Finance Minister of Punjab
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Prioritise women empowerment this I-Day
Every citizen will have a sense of pride on August 15 when India commemorates its 79th Independence Day on Friday. It is a day when we must remember the struggle and sacrifice of our freedom legends, show a sincere expression of gratitude for our freedom fighters with a spirited display of national pride as a measure of celebrating Independence. Freedom is a basic human right that comes with obligation and compulsion. It is not about being for or against an ideal but creating one's own existence from scratch. This privilege to me means freedom to choose and act and fulfill my desires according to my will, if my freedom does not trespass and impinge upon somebody else's. Freedom to me is annihilation of caste and creating a nation where fellow human beings are treated equally. It is to live and let others live. Being liberated neither means licence to unleash mayhem and carry out anti-national or anti-social activities nor show disrespect to others' sentiments or emotions. Your freedom ends where that of the others' starts. Indians are all seven-day wonders; when a new issue crops up, we conveniently forget the old and move on. We chase shadows, comforts and ephemeral pleasures. It's time we give a clarion call to find meaning, purpose, goals and dreams for ourselves. However, despite significant progress since achieving independence, the country's women still face various challenges. Their slogans stress the importance of freedom from patriarchy. The Indian woman irrespective of her class, caste and society suffer discrimination under the garb of culture. Women-abuse, physical, mental and sexual harassment is everyday headlines in the media. Dowry deaths, honour killings and parading women in a humiliating way to take revenge has become a daily affair in recent times. They are victimized even after crimes against them and suffer silently as they lack support from society and even family members. People should raise a collective voice against all every sort of indiscrimination. The fact of the matter is that freedom for women is still a long way to go. Even today, stepping out of homes, seeking employment or dealing with domestic issues has remained a bigger hurdle for them. Governments change but women still need to think twice before stepping out regarding their safety. Improved safety and security, with stricter enforcement of laws against gender-based violence, harassment and discrimination, is the need of the hour. Access to quality healthcare, including reproductive health care, menstrual health, hygiene and nutrition and mental health support, support for caregivers and working mothers such as childcare facilities and flexible work arrangements need to be addressed by the government. Access to digital literacy, technology and online safety, skill development and entrepreneurship opportunities need priority. It is the responsibility of all of us to bring women power to the fore in the form of national power. Every obstacle that prevents them from progressing needs to be removed. Over the last decades, women voters have turned into a decisive force that can make or break the fate of the electoral contenders. The gap between female voter turn- out and male voter turn -out has not only closed but reversed. After 18 general elections since independence women voter participation now outshines male participation. This is because of self-empowerment, gaining more political knowledge, literacy and media exposure. It is essential to acknowledge the progress made towards women's empowerment, while also recognizing the ongoing challenges and needs. Addressing these will help create a more inclusive and equitable society for all. Let women not be caged birds whose freedom is clipped despite being gifted with wings. The greatness of a country totally depends on the undying ideals of love and sacrifice that inspire the women of the race. A roof over every head, food in every household plate, basic health care and amenities and education for all is what we all want. Respect for women, love and care and educational opportunities for every girl should be the priority of all. Modi's Amrit Kal vision and Viksit Bharat-2047 aim to shape India's future and transform it into a developed entity. Addressing these needs is crucial for women empowerment and inclusive nation building will continue to be the primary focus.
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Asim Munir's anti-India statement: He is is only as big a problem as Delhi let's him be
Issuing nuclear threats seems to be an easy way to grab global headlines. A former Russian president did it twice in recent weeks. Joining him now is Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, the newly promoted Field Marshal, Asim Munir. Addressing the Pakistani diaspora in the United States, on his second visit in under two months, he reportedly declared: 'We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' Incidentally, Munir's remark came on the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Nagasaki during the World War II — the last time nuclear weapons were used in warfare. For now, though, for all his undisguised bombast, Munir appears to be enjoying a moment in the sun, having lunch with the US President, theatrically threatening India. New Delhi's official reaction to what it has described as his 'nuclear sabre-rattling' was to reaffirm its refusal to yield to nuclear blackmail and assert that India would take all measures necessary to safeguard national security. Yet, given the clearly staged nature of Munir's provocations — he also repeated the 'jugular vein' remark on Kashmir that he had made ahead of the Pahalgam attack — delivered on the soil of a nation friendly to India despite the recent trade-related turbulence, New Delhi would do well to not take them too seriously. Munir's tirade does offer a window to understanding the Pakistani military's inclination towards economic warfare. He reportedly vowed to target Reliance Industries' Jamnagar refinery in Gujarat, the largest single-site refining complex in the world, in the event of a future conflict. He invoked the Indus Waters Treaty, which New Delhi placed in abeyance after the Pahalgam attack, threatening missile strikes should India proceed with dam construction. Far from projecting strength, these remarks present a sorry picture of a Field Marshal straining to cast Pakistan as a viable rival to India. The reality is different: India's GDP is roughly 10 times Pakistan's, and the gap is widening, not just economically but also in terms of the two countries' global standing. Munir's own analogy likening India to a Mercedes and Pakistan to a dump truck is telling of the military establishment's mindset: That, in a conflict, India has far more to lose. Yet, much like three decades ago, when Rawalpindi invested significant time and effort in nefarious cross-border activities aimed at destabilisation, India should continue to press ahead with diplomatic partnerships, accelerate economic reforms, strengthen technological capabilities, and foster internal unity. Ultimately, Field Marshal Asim Munir can only become as big for India as India allows him to be. Pakistan is far more than the folie de grandeur of one man bent on forcing India-Pakistan hyphenation on the international stage — unsuccessfully. India must keep its eye on the big picture, and focus on partnerships with nations pivotal to its rise as an economic power.
