Simplified: Why SIS won its Selangor fatwa challenge at Federal Court in 3-1 ruling
Want to know why and how the Federal Court came to this decision? Read on for a quick summary:
But first, how does the Federal Court decision impact SIS?
Selangor's 2014 fatwa said:
SIS Forum (Malaysia) and any individual, organisation, institution with 'liberalism and religious pluralism' beliefs are 'deviant' from Islamic teachings;
any publication with liberalism and religious pluralism elements should be banned and can be seized;
the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) should block social sites that go against Islamic teachings and Islamic law;
any individual who holds on to liberalism and religious pluralism beliefs should repent and return to Islam.
Muslim women's rights group Sisters in Islam (SIS) operates through the company SIS Forum (Malaysia).
Because of Selangor's fatwa, SIS was at risk of having its publications seized and its social media accounts blocked.
Now, the Federal Court has decided that the Selangor fatwa does not apply to companies such as SIS Forum, and that the state-issued fatwa also cannot direct federal agencies to block social media accounts.
The Federal Court made this decision through its majority ruling by three judges, while one judge disagreed.
Here's a simplified summary which highlights some of the main points in the full 40-page majority judgment:
Look, it's not about religion, but about the Federal Constitution and administrative law
Although the SIS Forum court case involves a fatwa, the Federal Court said it was not making any decisions about Islamic beliefs, Islamic law or the religion.
For example, the Federal Court made no comments on whether the Selangor fatwa was correct according to Islamic law, such as whether or not 'liberalism and religious pluralism beliefs are deviant from Islamic teachings'.
Lawyers representing the Selangor fatwa council and Selangor Islamic religious council (Mais) hold a press conference at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya on June 29, 2025. — Picture by Choo Choy May .
The Federal Court said this was because that phrase is an Islamic law matter, and that it would come under the jurisdiction of the Selangor fatwa committee and the Shariah courts.
Instead, the Federal Court was looking at whether Selangor had acted within its powers under the Federal Constitution when it issued the fatwa.
The three key points from the Federal Court's majority
1. Only the civil courts have powers to decide on Federal Constitution and judicial review
SIS Forum's constitutional challenge was filed in the civil courts, and both the High Court and Court of Appeal previously said the Shariah courts should decide the case.
After analysing the Federal Constitution's Article 121 and 121(1A) and based on a long list of past Federal Court decisions, the Federal Court made it clear that:
only the civil courts can interpret the Federal Constitution's provisions and all laws (including state laws);
the civil courts are the one with judicial review powers
So the Federal Court was saying it could decide on this court
2. Can a company be treated as a 'person professing the religion of Islam'?
The Federal Court said no.
It said only individuals are able to 'profess' the religion of Islam, as companies cannot do things such as fasting in the Ramadan month or performing the Muslims' holy pilgrimage (hajj).
Previously, the Federal Court had in two other cases in 1998 and 2022 also decided that companies cannot or are incapable of professing a religion.
Why is this important?
This is because the Federal Constitution gives states like Selangor the power to make laws on 'persons professing the religion of Islam'.
That is why the Federal Court said Selangor's 2014 fatwa is only valid when it refers to individuals, and another part of the fatwa — which labelled SIS Forum, organisations and institutions as deviant — is invalid.
3. Directing federal bodies to take action goes beyond a state's powers
Based on Malaysia's two federal laws (the Printing Presses and Publications Act (PPPA) and the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA)), it is the federal authorities that have the power to control publications.
The Federal Court said the Selangor fatwa had clearly ordered the seizure of publications and also instructed federal body MCMC to take action on social media platforms.
But Selangor had gone beyond the state's powers, as it was intruding into federal law and federal powers with such orders in the fatwa.
The Federal Court confirmed Selangor does not have the power to include directives or orders — to the federal government's agencies — when the state makes fatwas.
The Federal Court declared that these parts of the Selangor fatwa had gone against the two federal laws (PPPA and CMA).
Sisters in Islam and its supporters celebrate after the Federal Court's decision at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, on June 20, 2025. — Picture by Choo Choy May
Conclusion
In other words, the Federal Court said only these two parts of the Selangor fatwa are still valid:
Any individual who holds on to liberalism and religious pluralism beliefs are deviant from Islamic teachings,
Any individual who holds on to liberalism and religious pluralism beliefs should repent and return to Islam.
Read the full majority judgment here.
What the dissenting Federal Court judge said
The minority judgment's main point was that the Shariah courts are the ones that have the power to decide on the validity of a fatwa, and not the civil courts.
The dissenting judge also gave his view that a fatwa can still be binding on companies especially in the SIS Forum case, and also said that the Shariah court should decide issues such as whether the Selangor fatwa had breached the two federal laws.
Read the full minority judgment here.
Recommended reading:
•'Deviant' or not? Sisters in Islam awaits Federal Court verdict today on Selangor fatwa
• Federal Court declares Selangor fatwa partially invalid, no more 'sesat' or deviant label for SIS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Cops begin sedition probe of viral video featuring Akmal
The investigation into a video featuring Dr Akmal Saleh was taken over by Bukit Aman's special crime investigation unit today, Penang police said. PETALING JAYA : Police have launched an investigation into a viral Facebook video featuring Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh making statements that were considered to be 'hate speech' that could disturb public peace. Penang police chief Azizee Ismail said an investigation under the Sedition Act and the Penal Code (for criminal intimidation) was launched after a report was lodged on Aug 12. The case was taken over today by the special crime investigation unit of Bukit Aman, he said in a statement this evening. Azizee Ismail. 'To date, two police reports have been filed by members of the public in Penang, and both reports are currently being investigated,' he said. It was not clear which video is the subject of the investigation. However, in recent days, Akmal has posted videos concerning a Jalur Gemilang mishap at a Penang hardware store, where the national flag was hoisted upside down. The store owner later corrected the mistake and apologised, but was briefly arrested before being released on bail. In one of Akmal's videos, he said prosecutors had two days to charge the shop owner, failing which he said he would personally 'teach this 'Ah Pek' (uncle) how to correctly put up a flag'. Akmal is scheduled to give a statement at the Dang Wangi police headquarters at 11pm tonight.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Address gaps in permanent parliamentary committee proposal, MPs told
The Dewan Rakyat passed amendments to several provisions of its Standing Orders on Aug 12. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The G25 group of prominent retired civil servants has called on MPs to close the gaps in the government's plan to make parliamentary special select committees (PSSCs) permanent. While it backed the government's move on the matter, the group warned that the current proposal had gaps that could undermine its effectiveness. Its concerns included the standing orders committee's proposed cap of 10 PSSCs, which G25 said would be insufficient to cover all ministries and cross-ministerial portfolios, which could overburden MPs and leave key policy areas without scrutiny. 'The absence of a requirement for future governments to place all ministries and major public institutions under committee oversight could also result in serious blind spots. 'If ministerial roles change or new agencies are created without this requirement, some of them might escape proper oversight,' it said in a statement today. The group also said that vital institutions such as the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission were not explicitly included in the proposed structure, leaving them without this avenue of accountability. G25 also called for amendments to Standing Order 54(1) so that bills are automatically referred to the relevant committee, except in urgent cases. It said committee reports should be debated and voted on in the main chamber rather than in the special chamber, where ministers may not be obliged to respond. The group added that committees should review annual and supplementary budgets, and be empowered to summon witnesses, compel documents, and hold public inquiries when necessary. 'A permanent committee system, if designed with sufficient scope, powers, and resources, has the potential to transform Malaysia's parliamentary culture and strengthen the checks and balances in our institutions. 'This is essential to building Malaysia's democratic maturity,' it said. The Dewan Rakyat passed amendments to several provisions of its Standing Orders on Aug 12 to elevate PSSCs to standing committees, codify parliamentary practices, and improve MPs' ability to conduct House business.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Puad defends Akmal's flag antics, hails his patriotism
Umno Supreme Council member Puad Zarkashi said those who tried to arrest displays of patriotism were 'the real hoodlums'. PETALING JAYA : An Umno Supreme Council member has backed Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh in his antics over the hoisting of the national flag upside down. Puad Zarkashi said Akmal should be praised for his patriotism in defending the proper use of the flag. Puad said in a Facebook post that a flag represented a country, and hoisting a flag upside down would be a crime if it was done intentionally, while doing so accidentally meant one was apathetic and less patriotic. 'So why can't such actions (of hoisting the flag upside down) be reprimanded?' he said. He questioned why defenders of the flag were labelled political gangsters. 'Do we just let it be? It's not like Akmal and Umno Youth want to go on a rampage. They only want to gather,' Puad said. Akmal had recently led some 200 members from the youth wing to gather in front of a hardware shop in Kepala Batas, Penang, after its owner was investigated for flying the Jalur Gemilang upside down. He later said he was prepared to face legal action for defying a police directive and allegedly disrupting public order by means of a gathering. Earlier today, Akmal said he had been summoned by police to provide his statement at the Dang Wangi police station tonight, adding that if it was the price he had to pay 'to defend the country's dignity, I am willing and will fight to the end.' Puad pointed out that Akmal did not come to the defence of Terengganu Umno following a similar gaffe involving the national flag. 'This is why Akmal should be praised for his patriotism,' Puad said. 'Those who try to arrest such patriotism are the real hoodlums.'
