‘Luxury prison': Epstein accomplice Maxwell quietly moved to low-security camp
The family of Virginia Giuffre – the American-Australian woman who was among Epstein's most well-known sex-trafficking accusers – said in a statement that Maxwell's transfer reflected 'the justice system failing victims right before our eyes'.
Giuffre died by suicide on April 25 this year at her farm in Neergabby, north of Perth, aged 41.
'It is with horror and outrage that we object to the preferential treatment convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has received,' her family said in a statement – reported by The Washington Post – that was also signed by other women who said they were victims of Epstein and Maxwell.
'Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency. Yet, without any notification to the Maxwell victims, the government overnight has moved Maxwell to a minimum-security luxury prison in Texas.'
Loading
The prison camp is about 150 kilometres north-west of Houston on about 15 hectares of land. It held about 650 women, AP reported in 2023.
According to a 2016 FPC Bryan inmate handbook, those eligible to work could earn up to $US1.15 ($1.78) an hour in their job assignments, which include food service roles and factory employment operated by Federal Prison Industries.
There, Maxwell will be surrounded by women serving shorter sentences and considered less likely to be violent or have gang affiliations.
Camp inmates are assigned to dormitory-style housing and have considerable freedom to move around within the facility, according to Paperny, who said he had advised Shah.
Giuffre, who had accused Britain's Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by Epstein, has been a central figure in conspiracy theories tied to the case. Andrew has always denied those claims; the two reached an out-of-court settlement in 2022, and he was stripped of royal duties.
Loading
Earlier this week, her family had expressed shock at hearing US President Donald Trump say that Epstein 'stole' Giuffre and other young women from the spa at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida – and urged that Maxwell remain in prison.
'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago,' the family's earlier statement said.
'We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this.'
Prosecutors have said Epstein's sex crimes could not have been done without Maxwell, but her lawyers have maintained that she was wrongly prosecuted and denied a fair trial, and have floated the idea of a presidential pardon. They have also asked the US Supreme Court to take up her case.
Trump said on Friday night Washington time (Saturday AEST) that no one had asked him about clemency for Maxwell.
'I'm allowed to do it but nobody's asked me to do it,' he told Newsmax in an interview. 'I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it. I have the right to give pardons, I've given pardons to people before, but nobody's even asked me to do it.'
Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the Justice Department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex-trafficking investigation.
Loading
The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up.
Since then, administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts.
Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse over two days last week by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The House Oversight Committee had also said that it wanted to speak with her.
Maxwell's lawyers have said they would be open to an interview, but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution.
In a letter on Friday to Maxwell's lawyers, Representative James Comer, the committee chair, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September.
Loading
Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance.
AP, Reuters, Bloomberg
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
3 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘They're coming home': Donald Trump announces Apple's significant US investment plan
US President Donald Trump has been joined by Apple CEO Tim Cook to announce a significant investment by the tech company in America. 'Today, Apple is announcing that it will invest $600 billion ... in the United States over the next four years,' he said. 'This is the largest investment Apple has ever made in America and anywhere else, and it's just an honour to have you. 'They're coming home ... the company's also unveiling its ambitious new American manufacturing program, which will bring factories and assembly lines across our country all roaring to life.'


West Australian
8 minutes ago
- West Australian
AI productivity roundtable: More jobs created than lost through artificial intelligence, expert claims
Major technological advances can boost job creation but Australia must fully realise the gains of artificial intelligence to turbocharge its economy, the co-author of a major new Productivity Commission report has said. Optimism about the augmentation of jobs through AI must also be balanced with equipping workers for change and support for retraining in new skills, Productivity Commissioner Julie Abramson told The Nightly in an exclusive interview. Ms Abramson co-authored the Productivity Commission's new report on 'harnessing data and digital technology' with Dr Stephen King, to assess the potential impact of the artificial intelligence revolution on Australia's economy. As a lawyer with over 30 years regulatory experience at both State and Federal levels, she also cautioned against adding unnecessary layers to existing regulation governing rapidly evolving technologies, which could risk stifling innovation. The report recommends the Government avoid new AI-specific laws and pause steps to mandate guardrails until reviews of gaps posed by AI to current regulatory structures are completed. 'The most important thing that we would say is that we're not lessening regulation in terms of AI,' she said. 'What we're saying is, let's have a really systematic, methodical look at where laws actually are, what are the harms that we're seeking to prevent?' The report is one of five Productivity Commission research papers ahead of the Government's economic reform roundtable later this month which will be dominated by AI issues, and it predicts that new technology could inject $116 billion into the economy. But it also acknowledges that like all previous technological changes, the shifting workplace environment will increase the demand for workers in some professions and not others, leading to 'painful transitions' as well as 'new opportunities.' Concerns have already been raised about the impact the new tech will have on jobs and creative industries, specifically around copyright. The Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance immediately decried the PC report's 'resistance to much-needed legislation and regulation,' that would protect the industry from AI theft. The MEAA flagged widespread concern about stolen work and future job losses without more mandatory 'guardrails' on AI, highlighting its opposition to the relaxation of copyright rules that would enable the transfer of resources to foreign tech companies with no chance of compensation. 'More than 90 per cent of workers want AI regulation and for technology giants to be forced to pay for the work they steal,' it said in a statement. The union found an unlikely ally in Coalition leader Sussan Ley, who agreed that it was 'not appropriate for big tech to steal' Australian intellectual property and lashed the government for being weak on protecting copyrighted content from AI firms. 'I'm not hearing from this government about guardrails to protect Australian content,' the Opposition Leader said. 'It is not appropriate for big tech to steal the work of Australian artists, musicians, creators, news media, journalism and use it for their own ends without paying for it. 'AI is important. We should embrace the technology with respect to AI, but we have to get the balance right so that we can power the economy. 'And we have to protect people. We have to protect content creators, and I don't see that. A spokesperson for Seven West Media, publisher of The Nightly, also warned the Productivity Commission's AI recommendations on copyright could have significant ramifications for Australian-made content. 'AI platforms need to stop stealing Australian-made content and adhere to our copyright laws, which are already fit-for-purpose,' the spokesperson said. 'To think they can hide behind fair dealing is ridiculous. It is just straight theft. No other industry is allowed to use other people's work the way big tech currently is, so why is the Productivity Commission considering an exemption? 'From our journalists, to our editors, producers, writers and camera operators – everyone at Seven works incredibly hard to create our own content for Australian audiences. This content creation comes with significant investment but it is something we are very proud to do. To the extent that AI is disrupting our ability to commercialise that investment, we are very concerned. 'The Government should be similarly concerned that AI will ultimately lead to a significant reduction in content investment and creation in Australia by trusted news sources.' In a sign of the fiery debate ahead, the Business Council of Australia welcomed the Commission's report for taking a 'sensible middle ground approach to regulation' to use existing laws to ensure the AI opportunity could be grasped while also providing appropriate protections. 'AI can help us work smarter, not harder, supporting workers and businesses to spend more time on the things that matter most,' chief executive Bran Black said. Ms Abramson described the report's estimate of the $116 billion AI boon to the economy as 'conservative' but recognised that job fears had to be adequately addressed, including with efforts to help displaced workers retrain. 'It's very important to acknowledge [concerns], but I think our starting point would say that we do know over the long term that major advances in technology do add jobs,' she said. The report cites forecasts from the World Economic Forum that predict, at a global level, a net growth of 2 million jobs due to AI and information processing technologies within five years. Overall, the WEF predicts wider job growth due to AI at 11 million compared to a displacement of 9 million by 2030. The newly Productivity Commission analysis does not make its own precise forecasts about how many roles would be augmented or automated by AI, deferring to an upcoming study by Jobs and Skills Australia But the researchers observed in a number of workplaces how AI was used to relieve workers of mundane tasks, said Ms Abramson, calling for 'balanced conversations' about the challenges ahead. 'You're always going to hear the story about the job losses. It's not often that you're going to hear the story about the job gains,' she said. 'Our point is that we're doing jobs differently,' argued Ms Abramson, pointing to her own experience as a young lawyer sifting through volumes of documents – a job now alleviated by technology. 'In some areas, the ability of AI to crunch vast quantities of data has actually meant that humans can focus on much more interesting tasks and perhaps do things that they couldn't do before,' she said. 'It's a real opportunity to get growth in our economy.' The PC report mentions early estimates that suggest AI will increase multifactor productivity by 0.5 per cent to 13 per cent over the next decade. After its own examination of the assumptions underpinning these studies, the Commission concludes that 'productivity gains above 2.3 per cent are likely' that would translate into about 4.3 per cent labor productivity growth over the next decade. It cautions, however, that there is considerable uncertainty about the precise magnitude. To illustrate productivity gains, it refers to examples including Lyro Robotics developing an avocado-sorting robot to identify the ripeness of the fruit, and Commonwealth Bank of Australia figures that show a 30 per cent drop in customer-reported fraud due to AI alerts. However, Treasurer Jim Chalmers struck a note of caution on Wednesday, pledging to take a 'middle path' on AI between the 'Let It Rip' crowd and people 'who pretend we can turn back the clock.' While AI was a 'game changer', Dr Chalmers said the Government had to find ways to ensure it benefited workers and did not make them victims to technological change. He said he was 'optimistic that AI can be a force for good' while 'also realistic about the risks.' AI 'has the potential to support all of our major economic goals, making our economy more productive stronger, lifting living standards over time and every single part of our lives will be impacted over time by artificial intelligence,' said Dr Chalmers. He also downplayed concerns that copyright rules would be relaxed to enable data mining to train AI models. Industry Minister Tim Ayres was looking at the issue closely and the Government would keep engaging with concerned parties to get it right, he said. Copyright laws were already in force, differentiating the Australian regime with other jurisdictions. 'So there's no ambiguity about that. Australian law, whether it's criminal law or civil law, applies now,' he said, adding that the Government's focus was on how AI impacts the workplace and not working up ways to change the copyright regime.


SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Trump says 'great progress' made in US envoy Witkoff's meeting with Putin
United States President Donald Trump said his special envoy Steve Witkoff had made "great progress" in his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, as Washington continued its preparations to impose secondary sanctions. The meeting came two days before a deadline set by Trump for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions. Trump has been increasingly frustrated with Putin over the lack of progress towards peace and has threatened to impose heavy tariffs on countries that buy Russian exports. A White House official said while the meeting had gone well, secondary sanctions that Trump has threatened against countries doing business with Russia were still expected to be implemented later this week. "My Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, just had a highly productive meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Great progress was made!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come," he added. Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, who was present, told Russian news outlet Zvezda: "We had a very useful and constructive conversation". He said the two sides had exchanged "signals" on the Ukraine issue and discussed the possibility of developing strategic cooperation between Moscow and Washington, but declined to give more details. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he believed Moscow was now more amenable to a ceasefire. "It seems that Russia is now more inclined to a ceasefire. The pressure on them works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details — neither us nor the US, " Zelenskyy said in his nightly address. Writing separately on the X social media platform, Zelenskyy said he had discussed Witkoff's visit to Russia with Trump, adding that he had reiterated Ukraine's support for a just peace and its continued determination to defend itself. "Ukraine will definitely defend its independence. We all need a lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it itself started," Zelenskyy said, adding that European leaders had joined the call with Trump. Trump on Truth Social said he had updated some of Washington's European allies following Witkoff's meeting. Since the two sides resumed direct peace talks in May, Russia has carried out its heaviest air attacks of the war, killing at least 72 people in the capital Kyiv alone. Trump last week called the Russian attacks "disgusting". Ukraine continues to strike Russian refineries and oil depots, which it has hit many times. Pressure on India Meanwhile, Trump took a key step toward punitive measures when he imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. No similar order was signed for China, which also imports Russian oil. The new measure raises tariffs on some Indian goods to as high as 50% — among the steepest faced by any US trading partner. The Kremlin says threats to penalise countries that trade with Russia are illegal.