RFK Jr. Hit With Instant Backlash After Blowing Up $500M in Vaccine Projects
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Department of Health and Human Services is terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because 'the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu,' Kennedy said in a statement.
'We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted,' said Kennedy, who recently replaced the independent experts on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory panel with a motley crew of anti-vaccine allies and activists.
His statement didn't say which science was reviewed, which experts were consulted, or what those experts said.
The canceled projects include efforts by some of the nation's leading pharmaceuticals companies to prevent and treat influenza, COVID-19 and H5B1 bird flu.
'Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them. That's why we're moving beyond the limitations of mRNA and investing in better solutions,' Kennedy said.
Peer-reviewed studies have found that the COVID-19 vaccine saved millions of lives, and the ground-breaking mRNA discoveries that led to its rapid development were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Medicine.
Doctors immediately blasted Kennedy's decision to abandon a medical breakthrough that is widely seen as Americans' best hope against future pandemics.
'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, told the Associated Press.
Dr. Jake Scott, an infectious diseases specialist with Stanford University, said in a social media post that HHS was 'abandoning the most adaptable, scalable vaccine platform we've ever had' and 'undermining pandemic preparedness at a time when we can least afford it.'
The Daily Beast has reached out to HHS for comment.
Like all vaccines, mRNA vaccines work by training the body to recognize pathogens and create antibodies to fight them.
Traditional vaccines introduce a deactivated virus, a weakened virus or a piece of the virus' protein to trigger the body's immune response, according to the Cleveland Clinic.
Messenger RNA vaccines don't actually introduce any parts of the virus. Instead, they deliver an mRNA molecule that gives the body instructions to produce the virus' protein, which in turn triggers the immune response and produces antibodies.
Their big advantage is that unlike traditional vaccines, which can take years to develop and test, mRNA shots can be made within months and can be quickly altered as the virus evolves, according to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations.
Many doctors also believe researchers are on the brink of massive breakthroughs in using mRNA technology to create vaccines that prevent cancer and HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, and lower remission rates for especially deadly cancers such as pancreatic cancer.
The HHS's statement said that 'other uses of mRNA technology within the department are not impacted by this announcement,' though it failed to provide specifics.
Researchers have worried for months that the Kennedy's broadside attacks on mRNA technology could impede research into cancer as well as infectious diseases, The Guardian reported in July.
The HHS said Tuesday that its Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, which oversees vaccine development, would focus platforms with 'stronger safety records and transparent clinical and manufacturing data practices,' such as whole-virus vaccines.
That technology, however, is more than 100 years old. The U.S. hasn't used a whole-cell vaccine for whooping cough, for example, since the 1990s because side effects included high fevers and seizures, The New York Times reported.
'After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses,' Kennedy said in a video posted to social media.
Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health, told the Times that by making false claims about mRNA, Kennedy was 'demonstrating his commitment to his long-held goal of sowing doubts about all vaccines.'
For years, Kennedy has spread debunked conspiracy theories about vaccines, falsely claiming the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine causes autism, and that the COVID-19 vaccine is the 'deadliest ever made.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GE HealthCare (GEHC) Introduces AI-Powered Digital X-Ray System
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC) is one of the 11 Best Under-the-Radar Stocks to Buy Right Now. On July 24, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC) announced the commercial launch of a new advanced digital X-ray system called Definium Pace Select ET. This floor-mounted digital X-ray system is designed to offer high-image quality and increased efficiency in highly demanding environments. hin255/ According to the report by GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC), the Definium Pace Select ET automates manual, repetitive tasks and reduces physical strain on technologists. The system leverages AI to make sure patients are positioned accurately while also providing consistent image quality across various clinical conditions. It makes the technologist's work easier and improves the experience for patients. This new system is built on GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GEHC) trusted Definium platform. It offers advanced automation and workflow features on a flexible, floor-mounted system with an elevating table, in-room exam control, and a user-friendly interface to help technologists. GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC) is a global medical technology company that provides digital infrastructure, data analytics, and decision support tools to help in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients. While we acknowledge the potential of GEHC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Best Revenue Growth Stocks to Buy Now and 14 Best Aggressive Growth Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Medscape
4 minutes ago
- Medscape
Long-Term Use of Metformin May Prevent AMD in Diabetes
SOURCE: The study was led by Alexander T. Hong of the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. It was published online Aug. 11, 2025, in Ophthalmology Retina . LIMITATIONS: Due to its retrospective design, the study could not show if taking metformin was actually protecting against AMD. There may have been coding errors and missing information as electronic health records data were used. The cohort analysis only included patients with annual health encounters for 5 years prior to the second eye care visit, potentially excluding those who changed institutions or had gaps in care. DISCLOSURES: The study was partly supported by grants from the National Eye Institute, Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, and All May See Foundation, Inc. One author disclosed receiving consulting fees and having personal financial interests with certain organizations unrelated to this study. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. Lead image: The National Institute of Health
CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
Remember ‘The Biggest Loser'? Docuseries ‘Fit for TV' explores the harm the show did in the name of health
Millions of Americans watched for 18 seasons as people pushed their bodies to the limits physically, ate as few calories as possible, and underwent sometimes mortifying challenges to be crowned 'The Biggest Loser.' It was discomfort worth grappling with for a shot at better health and a new life, many of the contestants said. But 'Fit for TV: The Reality of 'The Biggest Loser,'' a Netflix docuseries premiering Friday, suggests that the cultural phenomenon may not have been healthy for the contestants or the country at large. When creating the new show, filmmakers asked themselves whether 'The Biggest Loser' was, in fact, part of an industry promoting health and wellness in the United States, said Skye Borgman, the director of the docuseries. 'Everybody always wants a magic bullet that's real. And the thing about magic bullets — they're never real.' 'Fit for TV: The Reality of 'The Biggest Loser'' investigates how the highly popular show affected the contestants and conversations around health. The docuseries also explores the implications of so many viewers being willing to watch –– and sometimes laugh at –– people attempting to lose weight. 'It was such a huge phenomenon and absolutely reflected and perpetuated some of the really harmful messages around weight and weight loss,' said Dr. Rebecca Pearl, associate professor of clinical and health psychology at the University of Florida. In a show claiming to transform people's health, what did the contestants' regimens look like? Men were advised to cut their calories down to 1,500 to 2,000 per day and women to 1,200 per day, said Dr. Robert Huizenga, physician on 'The Biggest Loser,' in the series. But sometimes, trainers might have recommended as few as 800 calories daily, he added. The amount of exercise was also intense, sometimes spanning eight hours a day, former contestant Danny Cahill said in the docuseries. The series showed clips of contestants dropping to the floor from a treadmill run, many people vomiting in the gym, and instances when caffeine pills were utilized to curb appetite. 'There's not any way that an entertaining show and a health show can 100% exist together. … One of them is always going to take the lead,' Borgman said. 'In the case of 'The Biggest Loser,' I feel like the entertainment value of the show far outran the health aspects of the show.' An extreme diet and exercise regimen is associated with significant health risks, Pearl said. Losing too much weight too quickly or not getting enough calories can lead to gallbladder complications, muscle loss and nutritional deficits, she said. Overexercising can result in heart problems, dehydration and injury –– which also prevents people from maintaining healthy behaviors. Eating a balanced diet and getting movement in your day is generally good for health, but the punishing approach to food and exercise showcased on 'The Biggest Loser' also worked against long-term health-promoting activities, Pearl added. 'One predictor and one recommendation for engaging in physical activity long term is to find an activity you enjoy,' she said. 'The kind of grueling, suffering activity that was shown on that show is not setting someone up to build a healthy, positive relationship with physical activity or with their body.' One theme that may have kept viewers coming back to the show was the hope that someone could make a dramatic, lasting change to their body. But a weight loss transformation that stood the test of time wasn't always necessarily the result even in 'The Biggest Loser,' Borgman said. A 2017 study following 14 contestants in the years after 'The Biggest Loser' wrapped found that many regained much or all the weight they had lost over the course of the show. The return of the weight makes sense, said Dr. Larissa McGarrity, clinical psychologist in physical medicine and rehabilitation at University of Utah Health. The degree of calorie restriction and intensity of exercise were at levels that neither the contestants nor the viewers could implement at home in a realistic way, she said. Also, the amount of weight lost from week to week was extreme. At times, show participants were losing up to double digits at each weekly weigh in. Experts tend to recommend a sustainable weight loss rate of 1 to 2 pounds per week, McGarrity said — adding that the best guidance is to utilize the methods you can keep up long-term. 'The answer instead is probably, 'how do I slowly make changes in my life that help me to get in the right nutrients to help my body feel good? How do I move in a way that will allow my body and mind to feel at its best over time?'' she said. 'Making too many changes at once tends to not go well for most people from a psychological or behavioral standpoint.' Even if viewers at home could implement the stringent protocol followed by 'The Biggest Loser' contestants, research suggests metabolic changes from the dramatic weight loss depicted on the show made it harder to keep the weight off. Six years after contestants were on the show, the 14 studied on average still had a slower metabolisms, even if they had regained about two-thirds of the weight they had lost, according to the study. Their bodies were naturally burning fewer calories throughout the day and increasing hunger cues. 'It essentially means that keeping the weight off long term is nearly impossible without continued extreme measures over many years, because your body will fight against you to maintain that weight or defend that weight at that initially higher level,' McGarrity said. Often interwoven into 'The Biggest Loser' –– from coaches, in depictions of bodies, and in the audience interactions –– was a lot of shame, McGarrity said. The format supported a myth around weight: that the size of a person's body is totally under their control, and having a larger body is a sign of lack of willpower or moral failing, she said. That myth ignores the realities of things like genetics, environment and individual metabolisms, and it paves the way for denigration and callousness, she said. 'Cruelty, verbal abuse, sort of indirect physical abuse, in terms of being forced to really torture your body in unhealthy ways –– there was a sense that if you're in a larger body, you deserve this,' said Oona Hanson, a parent coach who specializes in helping families navigate diet culture and eating disorders. 'It made us participate as viewers in kind of like a pity or even disgust response in terms of the way people's bodies were portrayed, in the way they talked about their bodies,' she added. The docuseries showed just how dehumanizing or degrading those images could be, with cameras shaking as contestants fell to make it look like they caused an earthquake or challenges asking contestants to carry whole loaves of bread in their mouths. 'Without really being completely aware of it, the show succeeded in making fun of fat people,' Borgman said. Some contestants did say that they found empowerment and representation in being part of a competition in which they succeeded in goals and accomplished physical feats, she added. But it isn't hard to find a clip from 'The Biggest Loser' in which contestants are put in disparaging situations, Pearl added. Content that stigmatizes the size of a person's body and emphasizes thinness at all costs impacts not just the contestants, but also the viewers at home, Hanson said. It's hard for those viewers not to internalize those negative stereotypes, affecting how people see their communities and themselves. 'The Biggest Loser' may have been canceled years ago, but 'Fit for TV' shares that the reality show's lasting influence underscores the fact that the United States has not elevated the way people talk about weight and bodies, Borgman added. 'We as a culture feel like we're super evolved. … We don't judge. We take people for who they are,' she said. 'I don't think that's true at all. So, I hope people walk away from this series and look at themselves a little bit more and how we treat people.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
