logo
Environment minister claims Scottish water is dirtier than England's

Environment minister claims Scottish water is dirtier than England's

STV News2 days ago
The Scottish Government has demanded an apology after the UK environment minister said Scotland's water is dirtier than England's.
Steve Reed said that 'pollution levels in Scotland are worse than they are in England'.
Scotland's climate action secretary Gillian Martin said the claim was 'inaccurate and misleading'.
According to the latest independent water commission report, Scotland has more waterways in 'good' ecological condition compared to England and Wales.
Martin called for Reed to apologise for his comments made during an interview on Channel 4 News on Monday.
In a letter to the environment secretary on Tuesday, she said: 'I cannot understand how you could make such an inaccurate comment when the very report that you were on the programme to discuss clearly states the opposite.
'I am therefore asking that you acknowledge that your comments were inaccurate, apologise publicly for them, and seek to correct them.'
The row emerged after the final report from the Independent Water Commission found that 66% of Scotland's water bodies were of good ecological status, compared with 16.1% in England and 29.9% in Wales.
While Martin said there is 'clearly more to do', 87% of Scotland's entire water environment is assessed by SEPA as having a high or good classification for water quality – up from 82% in 2014.
'Whilst we of course need to be careful how these figures are used, as they are not calculated on the same basis, it is clear that Scotland has a higher performance,' Martin said.
When asked about public ownership of water during a Channel 4 News interview on Monday night, Reed said: 'In any case, it is not guaranteed to work… and we know that from looking north of the border where, in Scotland, they have a nationalised water company but pollution levels in Scotland are worse than they are in England.'
The Independent Water Commission report was led by Sir Jon Cunliffe and was prohibited from looking at the possibility of nationalising water companies in England and Wales.
Reed warned that nationalisation would cost £100bn and would slow down efforts to cut pollution.
Martin accused Reed of seeking to 'undermine the idea of public ownership'.
She said Scotland's comparatively high water performance is 'in part, due to water being a publicly owned asset, allowing for investment without shareholder returns or the pressure to make profits'.
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
STV News is now on WhatsApp
Get all the latest news from around the country
Follow STV News
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump isn't a lame duck yet, but US politicians are looking out for signs of a limp
Donald Trump isn't a lame duck yet, but US politicians are looking out for signs of a limp

Scotsman

time23 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Donald Trump isn't a lame duck yet, but US politicians are looking out for signs of a limp

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... This is the week that the Don returns to Scotland. Much like the circus coming to town, we can expect a spectacle that generates a lot of noise and, no doubt, some fury. We know how Trump's last visit here was received. Should we expect more of the same as Lewis's most notable grandson steps off Airforce One? In large measure, probably yes. Performative politics is never far from the surface in modern Scotland so brace yourself for protestors wrapped in saltires proclaiming Scottish exceptionalism. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Or maybe not. Our First Minister has apparently decided to take a more mature approach and to meet the president. Well done him. Six months on from his inauguration as US president, it is already apparent that Trump Two will be a different administration from Tump One. Gone are the days of chaos when those around the President sought to manage upwards and to head him off at the pass. This time the Whitehouse is stuffed with people who seek to deliver on his pronouncements rather than to mitigate them. Donald Trump is the only show in town until the US mid-term elections (Picture: Win McNamee) | Getty Images Praise for UK in Washington DC If that is the understanding that has informed our First Minister in meeting the president, then it is to be welcomed. Talking to senators, diplomats and lobbyists for much of this week in Washington DC has been a revelation. Firstly, though it pains me to say it, there is widespread praise here for the UK and how it has played its hand since Trump's return. Anyone holding shares in Peter Mandelson before he arrived in DC could sell today and expect a healthy return on their investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, for now, we are sitting pretty as others work hard to catch up. Accepting the realpolitik of today, however, is not the same as signing up for the whole Trump agenda. The revelation of a few days spent in DC is that there is a lot more politics to play out here than you would know from watching any news channel in the UK. Don't expect any early bravery from either the Democrats or what we used to think of as the mainstream Republicans. They, like everyone else here, are too busy waiting to see what the midterms bring next year. Until then, Trump is the only show in town. Vance to inherit Maga support? Let us not forget that Trump Two is a one-term phenomenon. He may not yet be a lame duck but everyone in DC is watching closely for the first signs of a limp. What comes next? Can JD Vance hold together the Maga crowd? If not Vance, then who? And what of the still-traumatised Democrats? Can they emerge from under the stairs and put up a fight? The most optimistic analysis that I heard on Capitol Hill this week has been 'this too will pass'. It may be true but no one should depend on it. The circus is coming to town. Where it goes from here is anyone's guess but the answer will affect us all.

If I was John Swinney, here's what I would say to Donald Trump
If I was John Swinney, here's what I would say to Donald Trump

The National

time41 minutes ago

  • The National

If I was John Swinney, here's what I would say to Donald Trump

You might expect me to want the First Minister to boycott a meeting with the current US president. I personally would not have actively sought out a meeting, but heads of state meet heads of state and talking to people you don't like is part of geopolitics. That does not mean prostrating yourself, or complying – but it also doesn't mean grandstanding. This is not a serious meeting and there is nothing at stake. Talk about the weather for a bit and smile for the camera. It won't change US policy. READ MORE: Donald Trump protest planned near mother's birthplace during Scotland visit Of course most of us want to see someone put Donald Trump in his place, but posing is meaningless – it is what you do that counts. So Scotland's First Minister should courteously welcome Donald Trump back to Scotland and otherwise do his best to say as little as possible – while the rest of us make boaking gestures in the background. That does not mean Scotland should treat this current incarnation of the USA passively. The US has not only become an unreliable partner, it is much less important to us than it was. In reality the British establishment is clinging to the US almost wholly because we have degraded our defence capabilities to the extent that we are entirely reliant on the US for defence. There are also sectors of the Scottish economy that heavily export to the US (notably whisky and textiles) and in turn the US supplies us with a number of software systems on which we rely. In terms of access to markets, however, it is China that is manufacturing cost-effective batteries, solar panels, wind turbines and electric vehicles. We need those more than we need Oreos. And yes the US still controls the global reserve currency, but Scotland is less exposed to 'dollar bullying' since we don't have our own distinct currency. This gives us some leeway to insulate ourselves from the erratic behaviour of the US. First, we should be tasking our economic development agencies to work with producers to diversify their markets. If China, India, Brazil, Mexico and others aren't buying enough whisky then we need to help them because they're clearly missing out. In the turbulent world in which we currently live, any exporter overly reliant on a single nation state is vulnerable. Second, we need to start to develop direct trading relationships with what used to be known as the Brics counties – because they are dominant among the emerging economic players and all of them have large-scale production capacity that links to our needs. We assume that US corporations will always act as go-betweens and we need to stop assuming that. Third, we should look at areas of vulnerability which could be exposed if the US's behaviour gets more erratic still (we're only one eighth of the way through Trump's term and it isn't clear what is coming next). If a nation state has indicated a willingness to use economic blackmail as a policy tool then you should look at where you might have exposure. One example of this is in software. Think of the public sector's ability to operate and now ask what would happen if a technology boycott was ever enacted – it has already been used against China. How would we cope?Other nations are quietly already addressing this weakness. Denmark has dropped public sector use of all Microsoft Office products and is exploring dropping Microsoft more generally. It has shifted to using open source applications such as OpenOffice (which is what we use in Common Weal). France has also shifted much of its public sector IT to OpenOffice (or rather a version known as LibreOffice) and Germany has just announced it is doing the same. Extending this to a logical conclusion it is simply mad that Scotland is relying solely on US corporate AI. Other nations are training bespoke, public-good AI systems which they then own. Scotland should do the same. Fourth, we should start to move our soft power diplomacy. There is almost a reflex reaction that 'overseas' means 'US'. How much more might we get tapping in to diaspora in Canada, Australia and New Zealand? Might a Tartan Week in Bejing achieve more than one in New York? Does the average Indian policy-maker know we exist? We are moving rapidly into a multipolar world and Scotland must adapt. Insulting the US President is frankly a stupid way to do business – but pretending he isn't a threat to our national interests is unrealistic and being inactive in the face of that risk is really dangerous. Scotland shouldn't stand on the steps and waggle its bare bum at Trump even if it makes us feel better. We should suck up the reality of global diplomacy, do what is needed to get Trump out the country without having developed one of his crazy grudge matches – and then we should roll up our sleeves and take concrete action to make sure no nation can ever bully us like this again.

Trump's Scotland visit is 'distraction' from Epstein association, says professor
Trump's Scotland visit is 'distraction' from Epstein association, says professor

STV News

timean hour ago

  • STV News

Trump's Scotland visit is 'distraction' from Epstein association, says professor

Donald Trump's four-day Scotland visit will be used as a distraction from his association with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a professor of American history has said. Fabian Hilfrich, a senior lecturer at the University of Edinburgh, said the visit is 'in Trump's interest' because it will take him away from the United States, where he said the US President's involvement in the Epstein case 'doesn't seem to be going away'. Less than 24 hours ahead of the US President's visit, the White House downplayed reports that Trump's name appears in Justice Department files about the convicted sex trafficker. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi told the President that his name appeared in documents related to the Epstein case in May. Getty Images The White House denies this, saying it is another example of 'fake news stories'. Trump had previously been friends with Epstein, who was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. Epstein killed himself in his cell in New York City while awaiting trial. His former girlfriend, the British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, was later convicted at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking, conspiracy and transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity. President Trump filed a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch a day after the newspaper published a story reporting on ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein. The newspaper described a sexually suggestive letter that it said bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday. On Thursday, a subcommittee in the US House of Representatives voted to subpoena the Department of Justice for the files relating to the Epstein investigation. Dr Hilfrich said the question is whether or not the Justice Department will release the files and what they might contain. He called Trump 'the ultimate Teflon president' – a convicted felon and who has had many cases run against him that have all been dismissed by his base. However, Dr Hilfrich said the Epstein case feeds into far-right conspiracy theories about historic child abuse rings propagated by some of the President's closest allies. 'Now that there is potential that their own hero is involved or implicated with cases having to do with historic child abuse, it is, for some of them, a bridge too far,' Dr Hilfrich said. Dr Hilfrich said Trump will spin his Scottish visit as a 'slightly nostalgic, romantic, and certainly business-related trip' to open his newest golf course in Aberdeenshire. 'I think quite broadly, this [visit] is very much at the moment in Trump's interest because it will certainly be nice for him to be away from the US where his involvement in the Epstein case doesn't seem to be going away,' Dr Hilfrich said. 'If he can find any way of distracting from it at the moment, he'll be glad to do so. 'I don't think we can expect any big policy pronouncements or anything like that. Although Trump being Trump, he's always good for a surprise. So we'll have to wait and see.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store