Province touts positive fiscal numbers for N.B., but economist urges caution
The provincial government released its "2024 Economy in Review" on Wednesday.
The report indicates the provincial economy grew by 1.8 per cent last year, slightly up from 1.7 per cent growth in 2023.
In a statement on the province's website, Finance Minister René Legacy said that while there was uncertainty, "these results are encouraging."
But Herb Emery, an economist at the University of New Brunswick, said any results may already be out of date.
"It fits with sort of an attempt that's going on in the region to put forward a positive spin," Emery.said.
"We already know that those statistics are out of date, and we're forecast to have the slowest growth in New Brunswick of all the provinces in the upcoming year."
The 'real economy'
Emery said none of the positive economic movement is related to the "real economy," including manufacturing.
He points to a population that increased 2.7 per cent as a complicated driving factor in the positive economic numbers.
While the province said the increase was largely attributable to immigration from outside Canada, it also includes migration from within Canada, and the demographics wouldn't point to an economic boon for the province.
"A lot of that immigration wasn't working age population," Emergy said. "It's just people who want to reside here and have sources of income like pensions from somewhere else."
Emery also said much of the positive job numbers, employment rose by 2.9 per cent, aren't economically sustainable.
"It's really been government spending and government employment that's been driving a lot of that growth," he said.
Trump and Carney
Emery said the future of the province's economy will largely be affected by two men, Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump.
With Trump, the issue is his capricious treatment of Canada since he started a trade war, and the usually strong trading relationship between Canada and the United States.
"This is Trump's thing … you have to get Donald's approval to get into anything," Emery said.
"By creating that kind of world where it's your relationships with people and not rules, it's going to create a lot of transaction costs."
As for Carney, the prime minister will have several competing visions about what projects to support and where to cut expenditures, Emery said.
It's not certain the province will come out in a better position.
"We're so heavily dependent on the federal government to do anything in this province … that if those federal transfers get squeezed, if not cut, in the next five years … then we're going to have our own fiscal crisis in the province that's going to limit what we can do in terms of economic development.
Among other findings in the report on 2024:
Employment rose 2.9 per cent, the fourth consecutive year of growth.
The labour force grew 3.5 per cent, making for a higher unemployment rate, which, at seven per cent, was still lower than it was during most of the last 50 years.
Labour shortages eased, turning to levels close to those before the COVID pandemic.
Average weekly earnings were about $1,145, up 3.7 per cent, which is not as high as the national increase.
Retail and manufacturing sales were up 3.3 per cent and 1.6 per cent respectively.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
a minute ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Talks with Trump's team constructive before boosted tariff announced, ambassador says
Canada's ambassador to the United States says a lot of progress has been made with her American counterparts on trade — despite President Donald Trump's decision to boost tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent today. Kirsten Hillman, who also serves as Canada's top negotiator with the U.S., says there were professional and constructive conversations with Trump's team throughout the week. But ultimately, Hillman says, the right deal for Canada wasn't on the table. While Trump's latest tariffs appear staggering, Hillman says it's important to remember that there is a carveout for goods compliant under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Read the full report from The Canadian Press


Fox News
2 minutes ago
- Fox News
TikTok famous investing experts explain how to maximize your money
Panelists Taylor Price and Jessica Inskip discuss how Gen Z is making big gains in the investment world on 'America Reports.'

Associated Press
2 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge pauses Trump administration's push to expand fast-track deportations
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge agreed on Friday to temporarily block the Trump administration's efforts to expand fast-track deportations of immigrants who legally entered the U.S. under a process known as humanitarian parole — a ruling that could benefit hundreds of thousands of people. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb in Washington, D.C., ruled that the Department of Homeland Security exceeded its statutory authority in its effort to expand 'expedited removal' for many immigrants. The judge said those immigrants are facing perils that outweigh any harm from 'pressing pause' on the administration's plans. The case 'presents a question of fair play' for people fleeing oppression and violence in their home countries, Cobb said in her 84-page order. 'In a world of bad options, they played by the rules,' she wrote. 'Now, the Government has not only closed off those pathways for new arrivals but changed the game for parolees already here, restricting their ability to seek immigration relief and subjecting them to summary removal despite statutory law prohibiting the Executive Branch from doing so.' Fast-track deportations allow immigration officers to remove somebody from the U.S. without seeing a judge first. In immigration cases, parole allows somebody applying for admission to the U.S. to enter the country without being held in detention. Immigrants' advocacy groups sued Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to challenge three recent DHS agency actions that expanded expedited removal. A surge of arrests at immigration courts highlights the lawsuit's high stakes. The judge's ruling applies to any non-citizen who has entered the U.S. through the parole process at a port of entry. She suspended the challenged DHS actions until the case's conclusion. Cobb said the case's 'underlying question' is whether people who escaped oppression will have the chance to 'plead their case within a system of rules.' 'Or, alternatively, will they be summarily removed from a country that — as they are swept up at checkpoints and outside courtrooms, often by plainclothes officers without explanation or charges — may look to them more and more like the countries from which they tried to escape?' she added. A plaintiffs' attorney, Justice Action Center legal director Esther Sung, described the ruling as a 'huge win' for hundreds of thousands of immigrants and their families. Sung said many people are afraid to attend routine immigration hearings out of fear of getting arrested. 'Hopefully this decision will alleviate that fear,' Sung said. Since May, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have positioned themselves in hallways to arrest people after judges accept government requests to dismiss deportation cases. After being arrested, the government renews deportation proceedings but under fast-track authority. President Donald Trump sharply expanded fast-track authority in January, allowing immigration officers to deport someone without first seeing a judge. Although fast-track deportations can be put on hold by filing an asylum claim, people may be unaware of that right and, even if they are, can be swiftly removed if they fail an initial screening. 'Expedited removal' was created under a 1996 law and has been used widely for people stopped at the border since 2004. Trump attempted to expand those powers nationwide to anyone in the country less than two years in 2019 but was held up in court. His latest efforts amount to a second try. ICE exercised its expanded authority sparingly at first during Trump's second term but has since relied on it for aggressive enforcement in immigration courts and in 'workplace raids,' according to plaintiffs' attorneys. ___ Spagat reported from San Diego.