How Japan's Generals Defended the Homeland Against the Soviet Invasion
One of those conflicts was the Battle of Shumshu Island, reported on August 10 in The Sankei Shimbun . Even after Japan accepted the Potsdam Declaration, the Soviet army pressed on with its invasion. In response, Lieutenant General Kiichiro Higuchi, commander of the 5th Army, ordered, "Resolutely counterattack and crush the landing forces." Shumshu Island, located at the northern tip of the Kuril Islands.
After a fierce battle on Shumshu Island, located in the northeasternmost of the Kuril Islands, a ceasefire was reached, with Japan maintaining the upper hand.
Also facing active aggression from Russia, Lieutenant General Hiroshi Nemoto, then commander of the army stationed in Mongolia, refused to disarm in the face of the Soviet army's continued advancement through Manchuria and China. General Nemoto's gravesite in Sukagawa, Fukushima Prefecture. (©Robert D Eldridge)
While holding back their attacks, Nemoto protected Japanese civilians until the last group fled by train. It is said that the Soviet Union had plans to occupy the northern half of Hokkaido. Without such acts of self-defense, the very map of Japan might have been altered.
This is a piece of history worth remembering on the 80th anniversary of the war's end.
Author: The Sankei Shimbun
(Read this in Japanese )
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Forward
18 hours ago
- Japan Forward
The Peril of Japan's 'Peace Trap'
In Japan, the word "peace" holds special reverence in August. Meanwhile, the word "war" is unequivocally condemned as an absolute evil. This is because August marks the anniversaries of the two atomic bombings and Japan's defeat in World War II. It's a national custom to reflect on the devastation of conflict, the value of human life, and honor those who perished. The United States, in contrast, attaches conditions such as freedom and independence to peace, viewing war as sometimes unavoidable in the name of defending justice and the nation. Even when hearkening back to its war with Japan, Americans often celebrate their victory on the premise that wars are sometimes necessary. Seen from this juxtaposition, Japan's August "peace chorus" prompts a question: What of Japan's national security? The idea of peace invoked in Japan every August refers solely to the absence of war without examining its quality or substance. Most other nations, including the US, take for granted that the peace they pursue must be bound to the freedom and independence of both the state and its people. For instance, when President Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, he remarked, "For peace is not merely the absence of visible conflict. Only a just peace based on the inherent rights and dignity of every individual can truly be lasting." Nobel Committee Chairman Thorbjorn Jagland presents President Barack Obama with the Nobel Prize medal at Oslo City Hall in Oslo, Norway, Dec. 10, 2009. (©White House/Samantha Appleton) Ho Chi Minh, who led Vietnam's revolutionary struggle to victory, frequently said that "there is nothing more precious than independence and freedom." He was determined to sacrifice peace in pursuit of independence and freedom for his nation. On the other hand, Japan's conception of peace holds that as long as there is no war, all is well. By this logic, it rejects the necessity of war under any circumstances. Apply this "peace chorus" to present-day situations like Ukraine. It would mean leaving Russia free to occupy Ukrainian territory in its entirety. Of course, peace is preferable to war at the individual level. Japan's "peace chorus" often leads even children to declare that war is utterly unacceptable. This can be understood in light of the human tragedy of Japan's loss in World War II. That said, if denied the right to wage war in self-defense against foreign invasion, a nation will be forced to surrender without resistance. The Hiroshima Peace Memorial (originally the Hiroshima Prefectural Industrial Promotion Hall) photographed by Shigeo Hayashi in October 1945, two months after the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. (Courtesy of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum) Peace Memorial Ceremony held at Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park on August 6, 2024. Japan's "peace chorus" is troubling in this regard, as it offers no guidance on how to sustain peace or avert war. This is in stark contrast to the first Trump administration's National Security Strategy, which stated that the best way to prevent war is to prepare for war and maintain the "ability to fight and win across any plausible conflict that threatens US vital interests." In other words, a country that projects assured victory, even when under imminent threat, deters any nation from daring to challenge it. Every country in the world maintains its military capabilities and resolve for self-defense. The idea is that such readiness discourages aggression and safeguards the peace — it's a policy of deterrence. In Japan, people so often gather to chant "peace," seemingly from their hearts. Yet this does not guarantee anything, because true peace depends on Japan's relations with the outside world, not on conditions within its borders. No matter how fervently Japanese citizens call for peace, it's ultimately external forces that hold the power to undermine it. The excessive fixation on the word "peace" could thus compel Japan to abandon defending its homeland from the very outset. And what outcome could this bring, other than peril? Author: Yoshihisa Komori, Associate Correspondent in Washington, The Sankei Shimbun (Read this in Japanese )
Calgary Herald
a day ago
- Calgary Herald
Trade partners grow restless waiting for Trump's tariff breaks
Article content Cecilia Malmström, the former European commissioner for trade who's now a nonresident fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, cautioned that any delays may be purely administrative. Article content But 'if nothing happens, there will be huge pressure on the European Commission to retaliate or to act in some way, especially from carmakers in Germany, Italy, France, Sweden and others,' she said. 'There are so many other things that are vague in the EU-US deal — and in the others as well — so it is likely we will see forever negotiations and a lot of filibustering.' Article content At a press briefing on Aug. 14, European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said Washington and Brussels are finalizing a joint statement. 'The US has made political commitments to us in this respect and we look forward to them being implemented,' he said. Article content Japan's Uncertainty Article content Article content Less than a week before the EU's announcement, the US and Japan clinched a surprise deal on July 22 that lowered across-the-board tariffs and car levies to 15%. So far the broader duties have been implemented but the added tax on autos remains at 25%. Article content Officials in Asia's No. 2 economy are waiting for an executive order from Trump to bring down the car levies, as well as an official directive — like the EU already received — to clarify that the universal tariffs don't stack on top of existing duties. Article content Akazawa has mentioned how a Japanese carmaker is losing ¥100 million ($680,000) every hour due to the tariffs. Article content Last month Nissan Motor Corp. said it foresaw a ¥300 billion hit from the lower tariff rate, down from a previous estimate of ¥450 billion. But Chief Executive Officer Ivan Espinosa has warned of the difficulties in giving an accurate forecast as long as it's unclear when the tariffs will take effect and in what way. Article content Article content Akazawa flew to the US earlier this month to confirm that the US will be adjusting its executive order soon to remove the stacking, and pay back overcharges on tariffs. Neither has yet to materialize. Article content Hyundai, Kia Article content Facing similar questions is South Korea, which announced a trade agreement with Washington on July 31. That pact would impose a 15% tariff on imports to the US, including autos, alongside a $350 billion Korean investment pledge focused on shipbuilding, and $100 billion in energy purchases. Article content The 15% universal tariff took effect earlier this month under Trump's order, but like Japan, the sectoral auto tariff remain at 25%. While South Korea's exports overall have stayed resilient in the first half of the year, thanks to front-loading by companies anticipating higher US tariffs, the value of car shipments to the US fell nearly 17%, and steel exports dropped more than 11%, trade data showed. Article content South Korea's top automaker Hyundai Motor Co. and affiliate Kia Corp. could face as much as $5 billion in additional costs this year even under the new 15% auto tariff, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Joanna Chen. While avoiding a 25% levy will save more than $3 billion, the duty squeezes margins amid softer demand and tighter subsidies, intensifying competition with Japanese automakers, Chen said. Article content Korean President Lee Jae Myung's planned summit with Trump on Aug. 25 — their first meeting since Lee took office in June — will test the durability of the $350 billion investment pledge, as well as their alliance over sensitive issues like defense spending, US troop levels and North Korea policy. Article content 'Just Overwhelmed' Article content For Starmer and the UK, most aspects of the pact have now come into force, including a 10% so-called reciprocal rate that's the lowest among all US trading partners. Yet Trump's 25% tax on British steel still chafes amid the delays in cutting it. Article content Article content Among the issues to resolve is the US's insistence that steel should be melted and poured in the UK in order to qualify. That's a requirement which Tata Steel UK, one of the country's biggest producers, is no longer able to fulfill after closing down its blast furnace last year. Its new electric arc furnace is not due to be ready until late 2027. Article content People familiar with the government's thinking are cautiously optimistic they might be able to secure exemptions to the melt-and-pour rule, whereby steel imported from certain European countries before being further processed in the UK is allowed to qualify as British. Article content 'It's not for lack of trying by the UK government,' said Tim Rutter, director of public affairs at Tata Steel. 'We hear that US departments are just overwhelmed.' Article content A spokesperson for the UK Department for Business and Trade said officials will continue to work with Washington to implement the deal as soon as possible. Article content Article content Late on Friday in Washington, the US Customs and Border Protection agency issued new inclusions to steel and aluminum product lists for tariffs that take effect Monday, with some of the guidance affecting imports from the UK. Article content Japan's Akazawa acknowledged that even with the UK, actual implementation of key parts of their deal took 54 days. As a result, he's said that it's 'not bad' if an executive order from the US comes by around mid-September. Article content 'It's just further confirmation that negotiations never really end,' especially with more US tariffs coming for sectors including pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, said Sam Lowe, a partner at Flint Global in London and head of its trade and market access practice.
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Fatal explosion at U.S. Steel's plant raises questions about its future, despite heavy investment
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The fatal explosion last week at U.S. Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the U.S. — along with profits, share prices and steel prices — have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. 'We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley,' David Burritt, U.S. Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. 'You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time.' Will the explosion change anything? The explosion killed two workers and hospitalized 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the U.S. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its 'commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong' and that it sent 'technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support.' Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that 'this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay.' U.S. Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend $100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get U.S. Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two — where the explosion occurred — were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, U.S. Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odor into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organization, said U.S. Steel has been forced to pay $57 million in fines and settlements since Jan. 1, 2020, for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he 'found no indication that U.S. Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance program for the Clairton plant.' The Clairton plant, he wrote, is 'inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design.' U.S. Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said U.S. Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. Will Clairton be modernized? It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest $11 billion into U.S. Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the $2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, U.S. Steel had signaled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that U.S. Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. Relics of steelmaking's past In many ways, U.S. Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, U.S. steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the U.S. has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favor. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the U.S., there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. 'I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe,' Briem said. 'If the market does not bode well for U.S. Steel, for American steel, is Nippon Steel really going to keep these things?' ___ Follow Marc Levy on X at
