
Brother of woman who refused chemotherapy says mother ‘sacrificed' her daughter
Her mother, Kay 'Kate' Shemirani – who rose to prominence on social media while sharing Covid-19 conspiracy theories, is alleged to have been 'abusive' to her children and was involved in Paloma's alternative 'treatment programme'.
Paloma's twin brother, Gabriel Shemirani, told the inquest at Kent and Medway Coroners Court, in Maidstone: 'I blame my mother entirely for my sister's death', by 'obstructing' his sister from receiving treatment.
'In short I believe that she sacrificed Paloma's life for her own principles, I believe that she should be held accountable for Paloma's death,' said Mr Shemirani.
Ms Shemirani was struck off as a nurse in 2021, and a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) committee found she had spread Covid-19 misinformation that 'put the public at a significant risk of harm'.
Mr Shemirani's parents split in 2014 after a relationship which had involved domestic abuse 'both ways', he told the court.
He alleged that he and his siblings 'felt unsafe' around their mother and that she had been 'emotionally distant' and physically abusive to them as children.
He further alleged during his evidence that his father, Doctor Faramarz Shemirani, was also physically abusive to him and his brother.
At the time of Paloma's cancer diagnosis in autumn 2023, she was estranged from her mother, who then advised her against conventional medicine, the court heard.
Mr Shemirani said: 'Paloma had a complicated relationship with our mother, maybe it is because she had a complicated relationship that she decided to rekindle that relationship when she became ill.
'In my opinion, Kay Shemirani directed her resentment that she held towards my other siblings and I towards Paloma.'
Mr Shemirani brought a High Court case to assess his sister's ability to exert her capacity to take medical decisions while living with her mother in April 2024.
He claimed that when Paloma was first diagnosed, she was considering chemotherapy, before their parents started to pressure her against it.
Her father sent a message to his daughter saying 'don't consent to anything from the doctors they try and kill you' and that Ms Shemirani had said 'I'm the only one that can help you, don't bite the hand that feeds', the inquest heard.
'There was no disagreement from her that this was cancer, she never expressed that to me and she never expressed it to doctors either,' said Mr Shemirani.
Paloma Shemirani (Gareth Fuller/PA)
His parents asked questions as interested persons which alleged that Mr Shemirani was influenced and funded by others to bring the High Court case and that his actions were a factor in Paloma's death during his evidence.
'My sister didn't die from stress from the court case, my sister died from cancer and I think that's clear,' said Mr Shemirani.
Before the High Court case, Mr Shemirani also referred the situation to social services but he felt they were 'slow moving', the court heard.
He added that his younger sister had been taken away from their mother when she was 16 and that the case was 'only driven by my love and concern for my twin sister'.
Dr Shemirani claimed his son was an 'irrational' and 'unreliable witness', and that his actions had been a 'major contributing' factor to her death.
'This is not a public forum to air grievances,' Coroner Catherine Wood said.
'I don't have any aggrievances, I don't have any aggrievances,' Dr Shemirani said.
'Sounds like it,' Mr Shemirani responded.
When his questions concluded, Dr Shemirani said: 'Finally may our lord almighty exercise you from the demons that possess you amen.'
Previously, Dr Ali Ajaz, a forensic psychiatrist, provided an assessment of Paloma during High Court proceedings which read: 'I have no concerns that Ms Shemirani has been coerced or unduly influenced by any individual when making a decision about her own medical treatment.'
Mr Shemirani asserted that Dr Ajaz's sessions with his sister were 'coloured by my mother's control', which the doctor said was speculation.
On Wednesday afternoon, Mr Shemirani told the court that his sister was terrified of cancer, but used gallows humour as a defence mechanism.
'Are you a psychologist Gabriel?' his mother asked him.
'Are you a nurse?' he replied.
The inquest continues.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
'New cotton bud'. Plastic hygiene product should be banned
A group of 20 organisations, including campaigns, charities and businesses, has issued the letter urging the Scottish Government to ban them. Flossers join a long list of personal hygiene and other products that have littered Scotland's coastlines, including not only cotton buds, but wipes, plastic cutlery, sanitary towels, pharmaceutical blister packs, Covid masks, interdental brushes and straws. Some, like cotton buds and straws, have been banned. But others continue to make their way into waterways, landfill and sewage systems, contributing to the rising deluge of global plastic pollution that is showing no signs of slowing. The call comes in the run up to the final round of talks for the UN global plastics treaty, which is looking at how to tackle both plastic waste and plastic at source. This new form of waste is just one element in the rising tide of pollution driven by production levels are set to triple by 2060. 'The dental flosser may be a small, innocuous-looking item,' the letter observes, 'but single use dental flossers are being sold in multi-packs by most supermarkets and pharmacies, and they are littering our streets, parks and beaches. We have collated photo evidence of these items across Scotland, from the pristine beach of the island of Colonsay, to the city streets of Edinburgh and Glasgow, to the east coast by St Abbs." A move like this, the authors point out, would align with the [[Scottish Government]]'s forthcoming Circular Economy Strategy, which has targets to reduce plastic production and waste, as well as the New Plastics [[Economy]] Global Commitment, which the [[Scottish Government]] signed in 2018. A dental flosser found on the Isle of Colonsay (Image: Rachael Revesz) Concerned signatories include campaigner and social media influencer Laura Young, also known as 'Less Waste Laura', who led the campaign against disposable electric vapes and Don MacNeish, a founder of the Community of Arran Seabed Trust (COAST), one of the voices in David Attenborough's recent Ocean documentary. Some of the signatories are clean up groups who have noticed the rise in dental flossers in litter picks. Marion Montgomery of Paws on Plastic said: 'They are something that our members find regularly on walks, in parks, on streets. Not only are they an example of unnecessary single use plastic but they also pose a potential risk to animals and an environmental hazard for generations.' Waste from Arrochar litter sink (Image: The GRAB Trust) Beach cleaners from Scottish Coastal Clean Up observed that the flossers tended to be found "wherever we find wipes". The letter points out that while dental flossers, also called, 'dental harps', 'may be more accessible for some people to maintain dental hygiene', there are alternative products. Even so-called 'eco flossers', it notes, are problematic since they are made from 'equally harmful bioplastics'. 'We urge policy makers to turn the tide against our throw-away culture by banning the sale of an item that is barely used for a few seconds before it spends decades, if not centuries, in landfill," the letter said. In recent years Scotland has banned plastic straws, drink stirrers and polystyrene food containers. "We've charged a fee on plastic bags," says the letter, "and we've banned single use vapes. These have been bold moves, and they've had a remarkable impact. READ MORE: Scottish scientists discover new threat to marine life: sunscreen meeting plastic 'The beach crunched': Scotland's extreme beach cleans Less than 10% of plastic produced globally comes from recycled materials – study The problem, Ms Young pointed out, is that the flosser is just one of many single-use items contributing to wider plastic pollution, with ever more new items entering the market. 'Plastic dental flossers are yet another example of unnecessary single-use waste polluting our environment. I've seen them in towns and cities, littering streets and clogging gutters, and on our beaches, alongside other toiletry-related waste like plastic cotton buds, tampon applicators, and wet wipes.' Progress, she noted, has already been made on some items, with bans like plastic cotton buds and straws. 'But the rest? Still polluting our environment and wasting resources.' "It's frustrating that we continue to act only after these plastics become a visible problem. We need upstream solutions, not piecemeal bans. The United Nations Global Plastics Treaty meeting this month is a chance for us collectively to go beyond voluntary pledges and weak commitments. We need binding global action that holds corporations accountable, enforces plastic reduction targets, and redesigns the systems driving overconsumption. "Individuals can choose better, businesses must do better, and governments must act faster and smarter. The planet can't wait." Kat Jones, director of Action to Protect Rural Scotland, said that the ban would be a "start" but that laws are needed "to encourage and incentivise producers make responsible products." "Producers are constantly inventing new types of throw-away item while persuading us that we can't live without them. The one-use flosser is an absolute prime example. "Until producers can turn their skills in innovation and technical knowhow to the service of sustainability, rather than thinking of the next throw-away gimmick, we are always going to be battling waste, litter and the pollution of our seas item by item." Personal hygiene litter collected by beach clean artist Lil Vischer (Image: Vicky Allan) The letter is also not the only one to be issued as the UN Global Plastic Treaty talks begin in Geneva, calling for action and commitment from the Scottish Government. Another open letter to the first minister, from 18 groups including Friends of the Earth Scotland and Stop Climate Chaos Scotland, has outline the damage created by plastic, and called for the Scottish Government to act now to prevent further harm. Kim Pratt, circular economy campaigner for Friends of the Earth Scotland said: 'We all want a future free from plastic pollution, but the Scottish Government is failing to take the actions needed to protect people and nature from the growing harms of the plastics crisis. "Promises at an international level will only be meaningful if they are backed up with action at a local level. Industry-backed solutions, such as recycling, do not address the underlying cause of the plastics crisis – that there is too much plastic to begin with and more is being made every day. 'It doesn't have to be this way. The Global Plastics Treaty is an incredible opportunity internationally, and a chance for the Scottish Government to reset the way plastics are used in Scotland too. 'There are practical steps the Scottish Government should be taking today to halt the plastics crisis. These include immediately banning the burning of plastic waste, forcing companies to be responsible for cleaning the products they sell, and investing in reuse services.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Scotland was the first part of the UK to implement a ban on some of the most problematic single-use plastic products and we continue to work with our partners to reduce many sources of plastic pollution as possible and also to support the removal of rubbish from our seas and coastline. 'In addition, the Circular Economy (Scotland) Act 2024 increases the powers available to the Government to take action on waste in Scotland, and we are also progressing with international efforts to address major pollution sources such as plastic pellets, as well as supporting the removal of rubbish from our seas and beaches.'


The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Why cancer patients may have to avoid popular sugar substitute
New research from the University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center suggests that sucralose, a popular sugar substitute, may interfere with the effectiveness of certain cancer treatments. Patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer who consumed high levels of sucralose responded worse to immunotherapy and had poorer survival rates. The study, primarily conducted on mice, found that sucralose disrupts gut bacteria, leading to a depletion of the amino acid arginine, which is essential for T-cell function and effective immunotherapy. Researchers discovered that supplementing with arginine counteracted the negative effects of sucralose on immunotherapy treatments in mice. Future plans include pursuing clinical trials to determine if arginine supplementation can mitigate sucralose's effects in humans and investigating the impact of other artificial sweeteners on the immune system and cancer treatments.


Daily Mirror
16 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I was fit and healthy until I noticed cough that led to devastating diagnosis
Flight attendant Warren, 39, was a health enthusiast and loved running until he noticed a persistent cough that changed his life in a way he never would have expected For many of us, a tickly cough is fleeting and quickly dissipates, but for one "fit and healthy" cabin crew member, a persistent led to an unexpected and life-altering diagnosis that landed him in hospital. Warren - who enjoys running, has never smoked, and maintains good health - initially dismissed the intermittent cough when he first noticed it in 2021. During the Covid pandemic, the flight attendant was frequently tested for the virus as part of his job, with all results coming back negative. In a conversation with Cancer Research, Warren recounted his experience, saying he wasn't particularly worried when he first visited his GP in June 2021. He explained: "I was prescribed antihistamines, which didn't make any difference, and then omeprazole when I went back, as it was then thought the problem might be acid reflux." Eager to understand what was affecting his health, Warren underwent a chest X-ray and a CT scan. It wasn't until a consultant noticed something unusual in one of his lungs and mentioned the need for surgery just after Christmas. Warren revealed: "In February 2022, finally got a diagnosis of Stage 3a lung cancer. Some of my lymph nodes had been taken out during the surgery, and cancer was found in two of them." READ MORE: Man orders a latte in Spain and 'unfair' bill leaves him floored He reflected on his lifestyle and health, adding: "I'm a runner, I've always been fit and healthy and never smoked, so I didn't think it would be cancer." Warren's operation was subsequently followed by rounds of chemotherapy treatment. He described experiencing "horrendous" adverse effects, including hair loss and persistent feelings of exhaustion and nausea. Lung cancer ranks as the third most prevalent cancer across the UK and stands as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. With lung cancer awareness month currently underway, Warren has shared a stark warning based on his personal journey. In a message posted across Cancer Research's social media platforms, Warren stated: "Even if you've never smoked or think you're too young - anyone can get cancer, and I would encourage you to speak to your GP if you feel something isn't quite right. You should never think it can't happen to you." By January 2023, after undergoing four monthly examinations that all returned clear results, Warren received medical clearance to resume flying and was able to get back to his career. He has since returned to long-haul aviation work and has rediscovered his passion for running, covering roughly 15-20 miles weekly. Nevertheless, Warren acknowledged: "Although I am living my best life again, I am planning to start counselling to help me cope with the anxiety over whether my cancer will come back, as I have been agitating at every little sign of illness. I am also planning to do some fundraising runs for Cancer Research UK and other charities like the Roy Castle Trust." Lung cancer warning signs The NHS cautions that lung cancer frequently presents no clear symptoms during its initial phases. A persistent cough lasting beyond three weeks could signal concern, particularly one that continues to deteriorate. Recurring chest infections, discomfort or pain when coughing, persistent breathlessness, fatigue or low energy could all be indicators of lung cancer. A loss of appetite or unexplained weight loss might also signal the disease. If you're experiencing any of these primary symptoms of lung cancer, or if you have any health concerns at all, it's crucial to consult a GP. Further information can be found on the NHS website.