logo
Media curbs deepen as 25 books banned in India's Kashmir

Media curbs deepen as 25 books banned in India's Kashmir

Canada News.Net4 days ago
SRINAGAR, India: Indian authorities have prohibited 25 books in Kashmir, alleging that they promote "false narratives" and "secessionism" in a region where media restrictions have tightened sharply in recent years.
The ban, which carries potential prison terms for selling or possessing the works, targets writings by Booker Prize-winning novelist and activist Arundhati Roy, constitutional expert A.G. Noorani, and prominent academics and historians including Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden, and Victoria Schofield.
The order, issued this week by the region's Home Department—under the direct authority of Lt. Governor Manoj Sinha, New Delhi's top administrator in Kashmir—declares the 25 titles "forfeit" under India's new 2023 criminal code. This removes them from circulation and makes their possession or access illegal within the Himalayan region. Under the code, offenses involving forfeited media can carry prison sentences of three years, seven years, or even life, though no one has yet been prosecuted under these provisions.
According to the Home Department's notice, the identified books "excite secessionism" and threaten the "sovereignty and integrity of India." Officials said such works have "played a critical role in misguiding the youth, glorifying terrorism and inciting violence against the Indian State." The ban follows "investigations and credible intelligence" indicating the "systemic dissemination of false narratives and secessionist literature," which authorities claim is "often disguised as historical or political commentary."
Following the order, police searched bookstores, roadside book vendors, and other outlets in Srinagar and across the region to confiscate the banned works. Authorities did not confirm whether any copies had been seized.
The Press Trust of India reported that Sumantra Bose, a political scientist whose 'Kashmir at Cross Roads' is among the banned titles, rejected "any and all defamatory slurs" in his work.
Since 2019, the government has intensified measures against dissent in Kashmir, showing zero tolerance for narratives that challenge India's sovereignty over the territory. In February, police raided bookstores and confiscated hundreds of titles linked to a prominent Islamic organization.
Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, a prominent Kashmiri leader, condemned the latest ban.
The move comes less than a year after an Indian court lifted the decades-long prohibition on Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses, noting there had never been an official order banning the book since its withdrawal in 1988 during Congress Party rule.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored
Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored

Vancouver Sun

time10 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored

VANCOUVER — A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Federal Court says the Canadian government wrongfully denies people status under the country's Indian Act if their ancestors 'voluntarily' gave up Indigenous status under laws that predate Confederation. Plaintiffs Charles Wesley, Christopher Wesley, Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas filed a statement of claim in Vancouver this month seeking damages from the federal government for 'being deprived of the benefits' of status under the act. The claim says they all have 'at least one direct ancestor' who was 'enfranchised' under Canadian law, where they gave up their status and received the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The lawsuit says their 'family history of enfranchisement' means they and their children and grandchildren are not eligible to register for status, depriving them of 'tangible economic, educational, and health benefits of Indian status.' The claim says the federal government has already 'conceded' that the act's registration provisions are unconstitutional in a legal challenge filed by Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas in B.C. Supreme Court, a case heard earlier this year with a decision pending. The claims says it is 'misleading' to refer to enfranchisement as voluntary because it was often done 'under considerable duress' because it spared their children from residential schooling, and women and children were also automatically enfranchised if their husbands or fathers applied. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored
Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored

Edmonton Journal

time11 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored

Article content VANCOUVER — A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Federal Court says the Canadian government wrongfully denies people status under the country's Indian Act if their ancestors 'voluntarily' gave up Indigenous status under laws that predate Confederation. Article content Plaintiffs Charles Wesley, Christopher Wesley, Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas filed a statement of claim in Vancouver this month seeking damages from the federal government for 'being deprived of the benefits' of status under the act. Article content Article content Article content The claim says they all have 'at least one direct ancestor' who was 'enfranchised' under Canadian law, where they gave up their status and received the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship. Article content Article content The lawsuit says their 'family history of enfranchisement' means they and their children and grandchildren are not eligible to register for status, depriving them of 'tangible economic, educational, and health benefits of Indian status.' Article content The claim says the federal government has already 'conceded' that the act's registration provisions are unconstitutional in a legal challenge filed by Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas in B.C. Supreme Court, a case heard earlier this year with a decision pending. Article content The claims says it is 'misleading' to refer to enfranchisement as voluntary because it was often done 'under considerable duress' because it spared their children from residential schooling, and women and children were also automatically enfranchised if their husbands or fathers applied. Article content

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return
Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

Vancouver Sun

time11 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

VANCOUVER — A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Federal Court says the Canadian government wrongfully denies people status under the country's Indian Act if their ancestors 'voluntarily' gave up Indigenous status under laws that predate Confederation. Plaintiffs Charles Wesley, Christopher Wesley, Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas filed a statement of claim in Vancouver this month seeking damages from the federal government for 'being deprived of the benefits' of status under the act. The claim says they all have 'at least one direct ancestor' who was 'enfranchised' under Canadian law, where they gave up their status and received the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The lawsuit says their 'family history of enfranchisement' means they and their children and grandchildren are not eligible to register for status, depriving them of 'tangible economic, educational, and health benefits of Indian status.' The claim says the federal government has already 'conceded' that the act's registration provisions are unconstitutional in a legal challenge filed by Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas in B.C. Supreme Court, a case heard earlier this year with a decision pending. The claims says it is 'misleading' to refer to enfranchisement as voluntary because it was often done 'under considerable duress' because it spared their children from residential schooling, and women and children were also automatically enfranchised if their husbands or fathers applied.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store