
OVO Energy announces 'critical' update that will benefit millions of UK customers
OVO Energy is gearing up to host an energy summit aimed at strengthening the Labour Government's community energy ambitions. Just last week, OVO teamed up with Kerry McCarthy, Bristol East MP and Climate Minister, to gather policy makers, industry experts and leading green businesses.
The collective groups discussed the urgent need to speed up community energy development. MP McCarthy underscored the crucial role of community energy in achieving the Labour Government's clean power targets, while also providing tangible benefits to constituents and businesses throughout her area.
Attendees explored how community-led energy projects, from solar panels to local wind initiatives, can tackle the climate crisis while enhancing local job opportunities, boosting resilience, and fostering innovation, potentially benefiting millions of UK households in the future.
This comes on the heels of OVO's introduction of People Powered: How Communities Can Fund and Sell Their Own Power, a guidebook aimed at making community energy more accessible to the average person.
The manual offers practical advice on funding, regulatory compliance, and community engagement, aiming to overcome the hurdles that often stall grassroots initiatives, according to the Mirror.
Stephen Harris, VP Energy Markets and Optimisation, stated: "Community energy has a critical role to play in the net zero transition – not just in generating clean power, but also in ensuring that communities benefit from the investment made into decarbonisation. We are thrilled to be launching our community energy toolkit, alongside our MP Kerry McCarthy, to help more people access the benefits of local, renewable power."
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
In their toolkit, OVO declared: "At OVO, we believe community energy has a critical role to play in the net zero transition. Through our work setting up Power Purchase Agreements with community energy projects across the UK, we've seen first-hand the determination and ambition these groups bring to delivering local, renewable energy.
"But it's also clear that the system isn't always set up to let this ambition thrive – with regulatory, financial and structural barriers too often standing in the way."
They added: "Across the UK, communities are already leading the charge. But getting a project off the ground isn't always easy.
"That's why we've created People Powered: How Communities Can Fund and Sell Their Own Power – a practical guide to help community groups navigate the complex world of finance and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)."
As stated on their website, OVO is dedicated to becoming a net-zero carbon business by 2035. This commitment is detailed in their Plan Zero strategy, which aims to lessen their dependence on offsets and assist UK households in reducing their bill costs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Nigel Farage's Reform UK secures another Welsh council seat in by-election
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Reform UK has celebrated another victory in a local authority by-election in Wales. The party, led by Nigel Farage, now has its second councillor in Carmarthenshire, following Carmelo Colasanto's comfortable win over Plaid Cymru and Welsh Labour for a council seat. The by-election for the Llangennech seat on Carmarthenshire County Council took place on Thursday, August 6, after the death of the much-respected Labour councillor Gary Jones. This result follows hot on the heels of South East Wales Senedd member, Laura Anne Jones, announcing her defection from the Tories to Reform at the Royal Welsh Show, making her the first Reform MS in the Senedd. The latest victory marks the fourth time a Reform candidate has won an election in Wales. Torfaen county councillor David Thomas, who himself switched allegiance from independent to Reform last year, hailed the by-election as "proof that people are ready for real change". In a post on X, he exclaimed: "WE DID IT! A massive congratulations to Councillor Carmelo Colasanto, newly elected in Llangennech and Bryn Ward for Carmarthenshire County Council!", reports Wales Online. "This is a huge win for Reform UK Wales - proof that people are ready for real change, and that Labour's grip is slipping. Well done Carmelo, the team, and every single volunteer who made this possible. "The tide is turning - and this is just the beginning. Reform is rising across Wales." It is also being reported that there was more success for the party overnight, with Reform stating that candidate Martin John Stevens was elected as the new community councillor for Goytre ward in Monmouthshire. There are also four Reform councillors in Powys and three representatives in Torfaen who either defected from other parties or were previously independent. Conwy also now has two Reform councillors. The full results of the Llangennech ward by-election are as follows: Carmelo Colasanto - Reform UK – 694 Richard Talog Jones – Plaid Cymru, The Party of Wales - 489 Jordan Sargent - Welsh Labour – 380 Justin Griffiths - Welsh Liberal Democrats - 26 Edward Evans - Welsh Conservative - 14 Wayne Erasmus - Gwlad - 6 The turnout was 39.37%. Join the North Wales Live WhatsApp community group where you can get the latest stories delivered straight to your phone Find out what's happening near you


Evening Standard
2 hours ago
- Evening Standard
List of Government departures since Labour won general election
1. Louise Haigh (November 28 2024). Resigned as transport secretary after failing to correct police records in 2013 regarding a stolen mobile phone.2. Tulip Siddiq (January 14 2025). Resigned as economic secretary to the Treasury after an investigation by the independent adviser on ministerial standards.3. Andrew Gwynne (February 8 2025). Sacked from job as under-secretary of state for public health and prevention for comments in a WhatsApp group.4. Lord Cryer (February 14 2025). Resigned as government whip in the House of Lords due to personal reasons.5. Annalise Dodds (February 28 2025). Resigned as international development minister and minister for women over cuts to the international aid budget.6. Lord Hunt (May 22 2025). Retired after holding post of minister of state in Department for Energy Security.7. Baroness Curran (June 6 2025). Resigned as minister of state in Department for Energy Security due to ill health.8. Vicky Foxcroft (June 19 2025). Resigned as government whip in the House of Commons over proposed cuts to disability benefits.9. Lord Moraes (July 22 2025). Resigned as government whip in the House of Lords due to personal reasons.10. Rushanara Ali (August 7 2025). Resigned as homelessness minister in Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government after allegations she increased rent on a property she owned.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
If mansion owners paid a fair council tax, local authorities wouldn't be in such a mess
At last a Labour government has found itself a wealth tax – or thinks it has. Its proposed adjustment to council tax in England is crude and possibly cruel, and does nothing to help with Rachel Reeves's 'missing £40bn'. It is designed merely to shift money from rich regions to poor ones, and thus correct an imbalance in Britain's regional wealth. As such it is overdue and welcome. British budgetary policy used to be classy. It was top hats and secrets and standing room only in parliament. Now it comprises a scruffy marathon of leaks, squeaks and denials. Lobbies form, rebels threaten and ministers pledge and unpledge. The local government secretary, Angela Rayner, has sought advice on a scheme to adjust the regional burden of council tax, unreformed since it replaced poll tax in 1993. The change is aimed at correcting its most severe defect: that poor people pay more in tax than in fairness they should, and rich people pay less. Government grants do not compensate councils accordingly. Thus at its crudest, the system means that a band H property in Hartlepool, County Durham, pays £3,000 a year more in council tax than a multimillion-pound townhouse in Westminster. On my own two-bedroom house in Wales, the basic council tax is £3,862. On my London house, many times its value, the tax going to the local borough is half that, just £1,850. Ever since this tax was introduced 30 years ago no government minister has dared order a national revaluation of properties, despite wild leaps in house prices. Nor has there been any widening of tax bands. A revaluation due in 2005 was ditched by the then local government secretary, David Miliband, who admitted it was done out of sheer fear. Keir Starmer has no excuse for letting this continue. He has a big majority. Local government finance is in chaos. Many councils face bankruptcy. Services are closing everywhere, especially discretionary ones such as youth clubs, childcare and museums. He is clearly minded to do something, but he appears terrified of radicalism. He simply wants to tilt central grants more towards poorer councils at the expense of rich ones, and leave the system the same. A study of the plan by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) suggests some bizarre consequences. The central government grant to local councils is to be reallocated through a morass of algorithms assessing local needs. Central grants would be slashed for 186 councils and increased for 161. Thirty councils would see their grants cut by more than 10% in the next three years, and some inner London boroughs by as much as 25%. The maths is beyond comprehension. The south-east does badly, which is to be expected. Yorkshire, Manchester and, for some reason, the East Midlands do well. Norwich, Crawley and indeed Enfield and Hillingdon also fare well. Suffolk and Leicestershire are losers, while Slough and Harlow are winners. Indeed, the more you look down the list, the more you wonder how officials worked it out, beavering away in their Whitehall attic. It seems suspiciously tilted to areas gained by Reform UK. The change would go some way to meeting Boris Johnson's bid to 'level up' regional Britain, though he did little levelling himself beyond inventing the phrase. He rightly drew attention to the fact that the UK's disparity in disposable income between rich and poor, south and north, is now statistically wider than that of any country in the EU. Regional poverty impedes productivity, investment and national growth. As for council tax, even when he was mayor of London, Johnson protested at the gap between what 'a Russian oligarch is paying on his stuccoed schloss in Kensington' and 'what such a gentleman might be asked to pay in Paris or New York'. At least if the oligarch had a second home in Cornwall or Wales, he might now be hit with a council tax surcharge that could reach up to £10,000 a year. In other words, Starmer and Rayner may be hoping to reverse some of the disparity between councils in rich and poor parts of the country. They will hardly be reversing it between rich and poor individuals. Taxpayers in rich areas may see their bills rise steeply, perhaps even by more than the normal limit of 5%. But that is the nearest this reform gets to a mansion tax. What Rayner appears to lack the guts to do is tackle the central unfairness built into the council tax. The time is surely overdue to revise the wildly out-of-date valuations of taxable properties, and the wildly limited range of bands by which the tax is assessed. It is absurd for the richest houses to be charged just three times the poorest. A two-bedroom flat should not be paying only a third of what a sumptuous palace pays. A clear basis for revaluation is outlined by the IFS. It should be adopted. The government is tinkering with a broken wheel. It is gesturing in the direction of levelling up, but merely by reforming a centralist device – a grant. It should dare to be leftwing and go for the jugular. Houses should be taxed for their proper value. If you cannot call it a mansion tax, call it what it is: a property tax. But make sure it's a proper one. Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist