Jason Oppenheim Says Fire Insurance Rates Will Stay Heavily Inflated After L.A. Fires
We caught up with the "Selling Sunset" star outside LAVO -- a popular Italian restaurant in West Hollywood -- Friday night while he was headed out to his birthday dinner ... and, we had to ask him about the cost of fire insurance going through the roof.
Oppenheim says rates went way up in the immediate aftermath of the fires ... and, while they're coming down as the market corrects, they won't be returning to pre-fire prices.
JO tells us fire insurance rates will stay up about 20 or 30% higher than they used to be for all Californians -- not just Angelenos. Oppenheim half-jokes that until A.I. drones can immediately put out fires, the rates won't be moving down.
While many in CA are seeing their rates go up, Jason says his clients are now renting after their homes burned in the January fires ... so, they're not paying fire insurance at all.
Jason also gives a way for buyers to get better rates ... relying on free market capitalism. Watch the clip until the end to hear his explanation.
On top of chatting with Jason, we also spoke with several housing and insurance experts ... like Karl Susman of Susman Insurance Agency who tells us the property insurance market has been trying to rebalance for years with rates slowly going up because of increased risk.
January fires were the last straw ... an example of massive wildfires happening too often and destroying too much for insurance companies to put an accurate price on a catastrophic loss like this.
Susman says the industry has to go through a bureaucratic process to figure out who they will insure and for how much ... but, it takes time -- and, in the interim, the rates will stay incredible high.
We're told Susman sees a lot of people trying to figure out their plans ... whether they want to rebuild in CA or move somewhere else altogether.
Rodeo Realty's James Respondek adds things are going to be "totally different" when it comes to home insurance prices ... claiming State Farm is seeking an emergency 22% rate hike on homeowners insurance -- so people can expect prices to soar.
Climate change, Respondek says, will lead to these kinds of issues everywhere, not just CA ... and, insurance companies are totally leaving Los Angeles because it's just too difficult to insure.
When it comes to these bigger houses, homeowners are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a year on fire insurance, Respondek adds.
We also chatted with Walter Lopes -- who says he's the first person to have his home rebuilt in Pacific Palisades.
Lopes says he was adamant about getting the house built again ... and, he says he's no insurance experts -- so he doesn't know if they're overcharging him. But, he wants an insurance company that has his back -- adding if they're going to charge more but guarantee smooth sailing if the house burns again, then he's fine with it.
Walter is changing his insurance plan though ... 'cause his coverage wasn't sufficient for this most recent disaster.
The Los Angeles wildfires burned through thousands of acres, destroyed hundreds of structures and reportedly killed 30 people ... and, it looks like it's impact has completely changed California's insurance industry forever.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Statement from Marcus Lemonis, Executive Chairman of Bed Bath & Beyond
MURRAY, Utah--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Beyond, Inc. (NYSE:BYON) has issued the following statement from Marcus Lemonis, Executive Chairman of Bed Bath & Beyond: We will not open or operate retail stores in California. This decision isn't about politics — it's about reality. California has created one of the most overregulated, expensive, and risky environments for businesses in America. It's a system that makes it harder to employ people, harder to keep doors open, and harder to deliver value to customers. The result? Higher taxes, higher fees, higher wages that many businesses simply cannot sustain, and endless regulations that strangle growth. Even when the state announces a budget surplus, it's built on the backs of ordinary citizens who are paying too much and businesses who are squeezed until they break. At Bed Bath & Beyond, our responsibility is to our customers and our shareholders. We will not participate in a system that undermines both. Instead, we are investing in a California strategy that works: 24–48-hour delivery, and in many cases, same-day service. Californians will continue to get the products they love through — but without the inflated costs created by an unsustainable model. We're taking a stand because it's time for common sense. Businesses deserve the chance to succeed. Employees deserve jobs that last. And customers deserve fair prices. California's system delivers the opposite. That's why Bed Bath & Beyond will serve California customers directly through on our terms, and with their best interests at heart. — Marcus Lemonis Executive Chairman, Bed Bath & Beyond About Beyond Beyond, Inc. (NYSE:BYON), based in Murray, Utah, is an ecommerce-focused retailer with an affinity model that owns or has ownership interests in various retail brands, offering a comprehensive array of products and services that enable its customers to enhance everyday life through quality, style, and value. The Company currently owns Bed Bath & Beyond, Overstock, buybuy BABY, and other related brands and websites as well as a blockchain asset portfolio. The Company regularly posts information and updates on its Newsroom and Investor Relations pages on its website, Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements include all statements other than statements of historical fact, including but not limited to statements regarding our strategy, store openings, our geographic footprint, and the timing of any of the foregoing. Additional information regarding factors that could materially affect results and the accuracy of the forward-looking statements contained herein may be found in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2025, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025, filed with the SEC on July 29, 2025, and in our subsequent filings with the SEC.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scratch-off worth $1 million sold in Miami Valley
A scratch-off ticket worth $1 million was recently sold in the Miami Valley. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The winning Extreme Millions ticket was purchased by one lucky man at the Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway on Hollywood Boulevard, according to the Ohio Lottery. TRENDING STORIES: New pizza restaurant announces opening date in Montgomery County Italian restaurant announces grand opening in area this week 60-year-old man seriously injured in motorcycle crash on I-70 He won the scratch-off's $1-million annuity second-tier prize and accepted the annuity payment of $40,000 a year for 25 years before taxes. The winner beat the odds of one in 468,085 to win, the Ohio Lottery said. As of now, there are 15 $1 million prizes, one $10 million prize, and more prizes remaining. The overall odds of winning a prize at 1 in 2.87, the Ohio Lottery stated. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter] Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Finally, a smart solution for downtown L.A.'s empty skyscrapers
Los Angeles faces two land use crises. On one hand, L.A. is beset by a desperate housing shortage in the hundreds of thousands of units, born mostly by beleaguered low-income and moderate-income Angelenos for whom renting and homeownership is increasingly out of reach. Meanwhile, our downtown is afflicted by increasing emptiness, with 28% of office space sitting vacant due to pandemic-era changes in the structure of work, and flight to Culver City and Century City. Angelenos may want to come home to downtown, but too few want to work there. These twin challenges may dovetail, conveniently, into one solution: convert those empty towers into housing. Indeed, a recent report from BAE Urban Economics makes the case that vacant offices should be redeveloped to create a new generation of apartments and condos. The conditions are particularly ripe for these in conversions in L.A. The city already has a nation-leading 'adaptive reuse' ordinance that smooths the path for conversions like these, state and local leaders are eagerly reviewing other regulatory changes to further support these conversions, and a growing fiscal crisis could be ameliorated by breathing life into downtown. Not so fast. While authors from Downtown Works LA — a nonprofit that aims to expand the city's economic opportunities and 'uplift its reputation as a dynamic, inclusive and welcoming urban center' — correctly point out the considerable fiscal benefits of stabilizing property values and bringing new foot traffic to the area, they don't fully understand the cost. Without public subsidy, 'conversion projects are largely financially infeasible,' the group concedes, calling for additional research into the size of subsidy needed. It's likely that a sizable share of the steep costs would come from the city and state to ultimately make these projects pencil, raising the question of whether they're the best use of finite public funds. And in an odd twist, prices for the higher-end and luxury units that these conversions would most often produce have actually fallen by 15% downtown since the onset of the pandemic, undermining the private investment case as well. There's a better way, one that offers significantly greater bang for the city's buck. According to a February report by the architecture firm Gensler and Pew Charitable Trusts, 'co-living' conversions can outcompete with apartments and condos by about a third of the cost per square foot while producing about three times as many units. These co-living spaces, sometimes referred to as 'dorms for adults,' are made up of small studio apartments featuring single beds, desks and closets, with tenants sharing communal kitchens and bathrooms. That means they're significantly more affordable to the renter. Under Pew's design, dwellings would clock in at just $1,000 per month, putting them within reach for any Angeleno making at least $40,000 annually. Under this plan, the public and private sector would split a more modest cost of about $225,000 per unit, a steal compared to the average affordable studio. These savings originate from some boring but fairly consistent facts about tall office buildings. The bathrooms and kitchens of these towers tend to be concentrated in the center of each floor; extending plumbing to the dozens of new bathrooms and kitchens needed across each floor of the building is increasingly expensive. Additionally, the depth of these buildings' floor plates (in other words, the distance from the elevator to the window) makes them awkward to divvy up into apartments, further driving up costs. Co-living solves both problems, keeping plumbing in the middle of the floor and using deep floor plates to create common space. These new homes would be small, with little to no frills. Each floor would be designed to host up to 48 beds, and each would include four kitchens, two central bathrooms with six toilets and four showers each, and two shared community rooms for lounging and entertainment. But they offer something precious: an affordable, private resting space in the heart of our city's walkable, jobs-rich center. And the low sticker price even includes some amenities, like multiple laundry rooms on each floor, a gym, utilities and basic furnishings. Especially for recent immigrants, college students or young grads, service workers, and those who have fallen on hard times — often, unfortunately, including veterans and seniors — these homes could be a valuable stepping stone or safety net. In fact, the eradication of such cheap and small options, starting in the 1970s, is speculated by experts to have contributed to the rise of modern homelessness. To be sure, these types of conversion projects aren't without challenges. Relative to the residential alternatives, they're less tested and can be expensive to manage — developers prefer to take on lower-risk, cookie-cutter projects. Converting just a few floors thus might be a good start to prove the model. But leaders across the city should step in to help and broaden the horizons of our ambition; philanthropy, universities, nonprofits and city government can all help make these projects less risky, whether by facilitating property purchase, serving as anchor tenants or offering loan guarantees. Indeed, this could be a reenergizing moment for L.A.'s civic life in a painful and deflating year. Of course, the tens of thousands of new homes that could be unlocked by this work, while life-changing for many of their tenants, will still be a drop in the bucket of what's needed. Wonky reforms on whether city building codes still serve our needs must follow, as must difficult conversations around the strictness of L.A.'s residential zoning. But at the present juncture, downtown's moment of land use crisis calls for a straightforward and potentially unifying answer: co-living over condos. Joshua Seawell is the head of policy at the Inclusive Abundance Initiative and lives in Los Feliz.
