logo
Delhi govt's school fee hike Bill looks out for middle class that helped BJP return to power in Capital

Delhi govt's school fee hike Bill looks out for middle class that helped BJP return to power in Capital

Indian Express30-04-2025

Months of protests by parents and run-ins with the AAP over the issue, the BJP government in Delhi went where no government in the city has gone before – devising a potential law to curb unwarranted fee hikes and charges by private schools, a first for the Capital.
The Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation & Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta announced on Tuesday, will apply to all private schools in the city and ensure 'transparent, strict and clear provisions regarding school fee determination'.
It provides for a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh for violation, which will double or triple in case more such instances are reported.
Following the big-ticket announcement of implementing Mahila Samridhi Yojana in Delhi – the BJP government's most significant poll promise directly impacting the poor – the new policy aimed to rein in private schools will directly impact the middle and lower middle class.
These sections bore the brunt of 'unfair' fee hikes head-on, bringing parents to the streets and propelling the matter into court.
A BJP government returning to power in the Capital after 27 years — 10 of which saw the AAP at the helm — has been largely attributed to the support the party had received from these two sections.
Both the campaign for the February Delhi elections, which saw promises such as no tax liability for income up to Rs 7.5 lakh and a continuity in power and water subsidies, among others, being made to middle class voters – who account for over 67% of Delhi's population as per a 2022 report of People Research on India's Consumer Economy (PRICE) – and the poll results, underline the significance of the middle class in sending the BJP to the Vidhan Sabha.
The issue of fee hikes is a contentious one, with the Delhi government and private schools going head to head in courts several times. In the most recent instance, the Delhi High Court had last year issued an interim stay on a government order that told school that they could not hike fees without its permission.
It was this seeming free hand, combined with the fact that some schools had brought in significant hikes since Covid-19 pandemic, that led schools to come up with revised fee structures, sources said. It is also an issue that the AAP made the centre of its politics in 2017-18.
After complaints from parents of children studying in private schools and allegations that then AAP government only made policies for the poor, the government pursued cases against private schools for 'unjust fee hikes' as per the provisions under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.
Eventually, under court orders, more than 450 private schools were forced to refund fees for sessions 2009-10 and 2010-11, including DPS, Amity International, Sanskriti, Modern School, and Springdales.
With fee hikes of up to 40% being implemented in some schools this year, and because of sustained pressure from the middle class, the BJP seemingly took up the issue on priority.
Sources in the Education department said the first time that they were told to start studying similar laws in other states was in mid-March, as parents' protests intensified.
The decision to come up with the draft Bill was solidified after the HC pulled up Delhi Public School, Dwarka, for forcing children of those parents who were opposing the fee hike and had refused to pay to sit in the library instead of joining their peers in in classes.
Asked why the BJP government had thrown its weight behind the Bill seemingly suddenly, Education Minister Ashish Sood told The Indian Express that a Bill to resolve the issue had been on the government's agenda since the beginning it assumed office.
'The education sector is a key priority area for us. We began researching and chalking out the way to implement the policy within days of our government's formation,' Sood said, adding that similar policies were in place in states such as Uttar Pradesh and Haryana.
He added that the Delhi government had, through this policy, exhibited political will to ensure that both parents and their children were not 'subjected to extortion' in the name of fees and other charges by schools' managing bodies.
'We are very clear about this. We will not allow parents and children to be exploited in the name of one charge or the other. Gundagardi nahin chalne denge. Sab ke liye ek paardarshi vyavastha sunishchit karenge (We will not let hooliganism like this slide. We will ensure a transparent system for everyone),' he added.
Leader of Opposition in the Delhi Assembly, Atishi, who served as the Education minister in the previous AAP government, however, termed the policy 'an eyewash'.
'The government has on the one hand not even a shared a copy of the policy in the public domain nor is it willing to answer what happens to the current fees and charges, which have already been hiked by schools,' she said.
In a letter to the CM over the issue on Wednesday, she stated, 'You will appreciate that this draft Bill was necessitated due to sudden spurt in the unregulated and arbitrary fee hike by many private schools immediately after the formation of BJP government in Delhi. This unprecedented situation put thousands of children and their parents in extremely distressing situation.'
'What will happen to all the parents who are facing these problems in the current academic year, 2025-26? An order should be issued stopping all fee hike and new charges introduced by private schools for the current academic year,' she demanded, in addition to making the draft Bill available in the public domain for feedback.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC grants relief to candidates
HC grants relief to candidates

Hans India

time36 minutes ago

  • Hans India

HC grants relief to candidates

New Delhi : The Delhi High Court on Friday granted relief to CLAT-PG candidates over alleged discrepancies in the answer key and directed the consortium of NLUs to declare results soon. A bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela's decision came over the plea of students in relation to a couple of answers in the key. The court, however, rejected the objection with respect to the declared answer to a third question, and asked the consortium of national law universities (NLUs) to accordingly award marks to the candidates. The court passed the order while deciding three pleas seeking rectification of errors in the final answer key of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT)-PG 2025. The bench's verdict highlighted the issue of a high fee of Rs 1,000 charged by the consortium per question for raising the objection to the provisional answer key, observing there ought to be a 'fine balance' between the concerns of the candidates and the institutions. While comparing the fee charged for objected questions by other organisations, the fees sought by the consortium 'appeared to be excessive and disproportionate' but the consortium's concern that it was required to keep frivolous individuals and coaching institutes at bay also did not appear to be 'fanciful or imaginative', it added. The bench, however, expected the consortium to take heed of its observations and take appropriate steps to 'avoid such excessive fee in the next examinations'. 'It may be advisable for the consortium to place this issue before the committee headed by Justice G. Raghuram (retd) for his valuable opinion which may be adhered to by it,' the bench said. The court ruled on the correctness of the answers in the answer key after considering each question and the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners and the consortium. CLAT determines admissions to undergraduate and postgraduate law courses in national law universities in the country. CLAT PG 2025 was held on December 1, 2024. Multiple pleas were filed in different high courts alleging several questions in the exam were wrong. On February 6, the Supreme Court transferred all the petitions over the issue to the Delhi High Court for a 'consistent adjudication'. The top court passed the direction on the transfer petitions of the consortium.

'Match-fixing will come to Bihar next': Rahul Gandhi attacks BJP over Maharashtra polls; alleges 'rigging'
'Match-fixing will come to Bihar next': Rahul Gandhi attacks BJP over Maharashtra polls; alleges 'rigging'

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Match-fixing will come to Bihar next': Rahul Gandhi attacks BJP over Maharashtra polls; alleges 'rigging'

NEW DELHI: Leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Saturday again accused the Bharatiya Janata Party of engaging in "poll rigging". Citing last year's Maharashtra polls, he cautioned against similar "match-fixing" activities by the saffron party in the upcoming Bihar polls. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "How to steal an election? Maharashtra assembly elections in 2024 were a blueprint for rigging democracy," he said as he went on to list out the alleged sequence. He noted that the alleged tampering begins by "rigging the panel for appointing the Election Commission". Step 1: Rig the panel for appointing the Election Commission Step 2: Add fake voters to the roll Step 3: Inflate voter turnout Step 4: Target the bogus voting exactly where BJP needs to win Step 5: Hide the evidence "It's not hard to see why the BJP was so desperate in Maharashtra. But rigging is like match-fixing - the side that cheats might win the game, but damages institutions and destroy public faith in the result. All concerned Indians must see the evidence. Judge for themselves. Demand answers. Because the match-fixing of Maharashtra will come to Bihar next, and then anywhere the BJP is losing. Match-fixed elections are a poison for any democracy," he added. The opposition parties have consistently raised the allegations of poll rigging in Maharashtra polls, with leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge even calling for a going back to ballot paper system terming electronic voting machines (EVMs) as "fraud" and something that put the opposition at "disadvantage". The Election Commission, has however, rejected Rahul's charge of unexpected voter's spike in the Maharashtra polls calling it "nothing unusual". "During the assembly elections in Maharashtra 6,40,87,588 electors, who reached the polling station from 7 am to 6 pm, voted. About 58 lakh votes were polled per hour, on an average. Going by these average trends, nearly 116 lakh voters could have voted in the last two hours. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Therefore, casting of 65 lakh votes by electors in two hours is much below the average hourly voting trends," a senior EC functionary had said earlier this year. They also pointed out that Congress's own polling agents were present at every booth during the elections and did not raise any credible complaints about irregular voting — neither during the scrutiny by returning officers nor before election observers the following day.

Census delay a sinister move to weaken southern states: MK Stalin slams Centre
Census delay a sinister move to weaken southern states: MK Stalin slams Centre

India Today

time41 minutes ago

  • India Today

Census delay a sinister move to weaken southern states: MK Stalin slams Centre

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has alleged that the delay in conducting the National Census and the upcoming delimitation exercise are part of a calculated move by the Union Government to undermine the political representation of southern states. "The Census delay is no accident. The delimitation plan is not a coincidence," says the delay in the Census a 'sinister design,' Stalin warned that states like Tamil Nadu, which followed population control policies, would now be penalised for their progress. 'The 2027 Census will form the basis for the next delimitation, replacing the 1971 data. This gives the Union BJP Government the means to restructure Parliamentary representation to its advantage, at the cost of the Southern States,' he questioned the credibility of the Union Government's assurances, saying, 'The Ministry of Home Affairs claims that the concerns of affected States will be addressed. But these are vague remarks. What is needed is a clear Parliamentary commitment and a suitable constitutional amendment.' Drawing parallels with the situation in Jammu and Kashmir, the Chief Minister remarked, 'While the Union Government spoke of restoring statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, Article 370 was abrogated. Elections were held. Assurances were given in the Supreme Court. Yet, Jammu and Kashmir remains a Union Territory. This is the track record of the BJP we are dealing with.'Warning of the potential consequences of the proposed delimitation, Stalin said, 'If the Union Government proceeds with the delimitation based on the 2027 Census, the democratic power of peninsular India will be reduced to irrelevance. The danger I warned of is at our doorstep.'Taking a swipe at the opposition AIADMK and its leader, Edappadi K Palaniswami, Stalin said, 'Even if betrayers like the AIADMK choose to kneel before the BJP for their political survival, the people of Tamil Nadu led by the DMK will never allow our state to be punished for its progress.'Must Watch IN THIS STORY#Muthuvel Karunanidhi Stalin

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store