Honda Prelude review: no seriously, it's not a crossover! Reviews 2025
The car that you see in these rather rushed images from Honda is the exact car that we drove. It's a pre-production car but Honda bosses told us that it was '99 per cent' faithful to the one that you'll be able to buy in the near future.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Those same Honda folk were also keen to point out that we were only at Thruxton for its relative proximity to Goodwood, not because the new Prelude will be a lightweight, stripped-out track toy. Shame.
This car was whipped out of the Festival of Speed under the cover of darkness on Thursday night and needed to be back in the Duke's garden for a run up the hill on Saturday morning, so while Thruxton may be the fastest race circuit in the UK, we weren't out to set any records during this very short stint. What sort of VTEC wizardry is under the bonnet?
Ah, well… erm.
Of course, we already knew that the new Prelude was going to be a hybrid, and we always expected it to use a similar powertrain to the eHEV setup in the Civic. In fact, it's pretty much exactly the same.
Advertisement - Page continues below
It's a 2.0-litre four-pot petrol engine that only drives the wheels when cruising at motorway speeds. The rest of the time it's running at more efficient revs per minute and is powering a generator motor which converts the engine's output into electricity and either uses it to charge a small battery, or to power a second electric motor which then drives the wheels.
The engine can also be off completely with just battery power being used to propel the Prelude, but that'll only be for a short while because in the Civic at least it's a 1.05kWh tiddler.
The Prelude's chief engineer Tomoyuki Yamagami confirmed to TG that the power figure is the same as in the Civic, so you're looking at 181bhp being sent to the front wheels.
Sounds complicated, but in reality it's a smooth system and one that we like in the Civic very much. Would be nice if the Prelude still came with a 2.2, though.
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox.
Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
Well, it certainly looks rather sleek, doesn't it? Honda claims to have taken inspiration from gliders for the form, although if you can see the 'linear togetherness of an acrobatic flight' in the Prelude then you're better at translating design-speak than we are.
Still, it's a neat car with a shorter wheelbase than a Civic and a track that's about as wide as the Civic Type R's. Narrower tyres though, of course.
It weighs around 1,500kg and also gets the adaptive suspension from the recently retired hot hatch king, although the spring rate and anti-roll bar stiffness has apparently been decreased for a more comfortable ride. Skip 8 photos in the image carousel and continue reading
We weren't able to test the ride quality on the smooth surface at Thruxton, but through bends the Prelude seems to allow a little bit of body roll in Comfort while being more taught in Sport mode. Even that doesn't feel as harsh as the softer settings in a Type R, though. The steering also weights up nicely as you move up into the GT and Sport modes. What's this 'gearbox' all about?
Here's where the Prelude further distances itself from the standard Civic. Honda has created something that it's calling S+ Shift technology. Essentially this simulates an eight-speed auto gearbox (the eHEV powertrain doesn't need a gearbox at all) with close ratios for lots of sporty 'shifting'. And yep, there are paddles mounted behind the steering wheel for you to 'change gear' yourself. Whole lot of air quotes needed here.
And yet, on first impressions the system seems to do its job very well. You activate it by pressing a large S+ button on the centre console, which then brings up a rev counter on the digital dial display that 'redlines' at 6,000rpm. That's the limit because this is an Atkinson-cycle petrol engine that's focussed on efficiency in a hybrid powertrain, and Honda says it wanted to be honest about the actual revs of the engine even if the 'shifts' weren't real.
Engine noise is played through the speakers and is most prominent in Sport mode, but we're also told that this is the real engine note that's amplified rather than being a completely fake sound.
Manually 'shifting' on a circuit certainly helps with your sense of speed, particularly on the way into a corner, and you'll never be caught out by hitting the rev limiter on exit because there isn't one. It'll just 'change up' for you.
We'll need more time with the Prelude to make a call on whether the S+ setup is a bit of a gimmick or not, but our first thought is that it's a clever addition that adds a welcome bit of driver engagement. Didn't do the Ioniq 5 N any harm, did it? Anything else I need to know about the way it drives?
It certainly isn't rapid, so don't go expecting the Prelude to be a proper Toyota GR86 rival. The brake pedal is nice and firm though despite it blending regen and actual friction, and there's a keenness to the acceleration thanks to the electric motor and its instant torque driving the wheels. In its sportier modes it does feel like it's egging you on.
It'll be efficient, too, with the Civic claiming just over 60mpg for the boggo spec hybrid on little wheels. And after half a day of being left running between very short bursts on track, even the car we were in was showing 25mpg. Not bad for a two-door coupe. What's it like inside?
The driving position is good with a slightly sporty feel to it. There's a flat-bottomed steering wheel too with a centre marker and some supportive seats, although sadly we weren't able to jump in the back to try out the two dinky rear seats. That may have been for the best – we might not have been able to extract ourselves before the Goodwood run the following day. Any word on how much it'll cost?
In a word, no. Expect it to be slightly more than a standard Civic, though, where prices start at £35,780. It shouldn't get up to the cost of a £50k+ Civic Type R.
So, we'll reserve final judgement for when we get hold of a proper production car for longer than the time it takes to make a cup of tea, and we'll give the Prelude a score out of 10 at that point too.
For now, all that's left to do is thank Honda once again for not sticking the name on a small SUV.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Rochford Council to trial 30-minute free parking scheme
Drivers will be able to park for free for up to 30 minutes in a council's car parks in a move to support local Council in Essex has agreed to try out the free parking scheme at most of its 11 car parks for the next three months "to help boost footfall".The council's leader, Conservative Danielle Belton, said the decision was something requested by business and residents "for a number of years".According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, a meeting of the council's economic development, regeneration, and tourism committee heard the trial could cost the authority up to £42,000 for the three month period. Belton said it could also help with parking issues around schools, as parents could use short-term free spaces at drop off and pick up to council documents, the cost of a 30-minute stay in most surface car parks in the district was reduced last year from 70p to 55p in an effort to stimulate activity on the high said: "Ultimately, the council is dedicated to supporting our local businesses and especially the town centres, and it's a documented fact in other towns that short stay parking can help boost footfall. She added the council had built up more money from the car parks than it had spent, meaning it now had reserves to implement the new policy."The end goal is we see a better footfall in the town, which then creates more of a drive for other businesses to consider coming here, if they see we've offerings where people can pop into town, grab a coffee, grab a takeaway, do some errands, whatever it may be."The free parking will not apply to The Approach near Rayleigh Train Station and Hockley Woods Car Park. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
The US-EU trade deal in numbers - how it compares to UK deal
Donald Trump has struck an agreement with the European Union that means the US will not impose the 30% tariffs - export taxes - on EU imports that the US president had the EU will still face a new 15% tariff on the goods it sells into is higher than the 10% tariffs the UK faces on goods exports to the US as part of an earlier agreement struck between London and how does the EU agreement compare with the UK's - and are there potential economic benefits now arising for the UK?Most analysts judge the UK's agreement with the US will likely prove more advantageous to the UK than the EU's agreement with the US will be for the EU, given the UK's lower headline tariff they also stress that the detail of the final US-EU agreement is key - and that there remains uncertainty about how the US will treat imports from the EU of steel and pharmaceuticals. What's the difference between the deals? On the face of it, the UK's lower baseline tariff rate (10% vs 15%) could offer an advantage to UK-based firms competing with EU-based companies for sales into the US - allowing UK exports to be more competitively priced for the US market after the tariffs have been applied."In principle, the UK is in a more advantageous position than other countries – so there is the potential to benefit from this," Michael Gasiorek, director of the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy (CITP) told BBC there are complexities in the two agreements and a lack of clarity around both, which make it tricky to compare them. In the case of car exports, the UK-US agreement specifies that exports of cars from the UK to the US will face a 10% tariff, which is lower than the 15% rate that will be faced by EU firms selling cars in the the UK's 10% rate only applies to a quota of 100,000 vehicles a year, which is roughly the number of cars the UK sells into the US at the vehicle sold above that quota would be hit with the US's 25% tariff on car imports, which would be higher than the 15% tariff facing all EU car 2024 the EU sold around 758,000 vehicles to the US, almost seven times are many as the UK exported to America in that year. The UK-US agreement also says the UK will negotiate an agreement to avoid future US tariffs on pharmaceutical imports. But the US has not imposed those particular tariffs yet, and we don't know what the nature of any UK exception would is also a lack of clarity about whether the US-EU 15% tariff would always apply to pharmaceuticals or not. On Sunday the US president suggested it would not, but EU commission president Ursula Von der Leyen suggested it it's unclear whether the EU's 15% baseline tariff incorporates existing US import tariffs, or whether, as in the case of the UK's 10% tariff, it will be applied on top of existing import answer to that could have an influence on the relative advantage of UK exports. If the UK's tariffs are "stacked" but those of the EU are not, the overall effective tariff imposed on some EU goods could end being lower than what's imposed on some UK text of the EU-US agreement has yet been published, making it impossible to be certain at this stage. What about steel? UK steel exported to the US is currently subject to a 25% tariff, which is lower than the 50% global rate on imports of the metal imposed by Donald Trump in president granted the UK this partial exemption to allow time for implementation of the US-UK trade officials are working with their US counterparts to resolve technical issues that they hope will mean UK firms will be able to export steel to the US up to a certain quota that avoids even this 25% US officials have briefed that under the EU-US deal, EU steel will remain subject to the US's global 50% tariff on metal would seem to significantly benefit UK steel exporters relative to their EU counterparts when it comes to selling to the the EU Commission president has also suggested that Brussels and Washington remain in talks about a quota system, whereby EU steel exports under the quota would also be subject to a lower could ultimately erode any relative advantage for UK steel theory, EU manufacturers - in steel and other sectors - could move some of their production to the UK to benefit from lower tariffs when exporting to the USBut some analysts are sceptical about the likelihood of this."I doubt companies in modern supply chains are going to make big, long-term relocation decisions based on marginal tariff differences," says David Henig, the UK director of the European Centre For International Political Economy (ECIPE)."To take advantage of any such tariff differences businesses need to feel reasonably secure that the differences will last. Given the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, that certainty is currently not there," agrees Michael Gasiorek. What about wider economic impacts? The US is the UK's single largest national trade 2024, the UK exported £196bn of goods and services to the US, 22.5% of all the countries of the European Union collectively account for a larger share of UK trade than the US. In 2024, the UK exported £358bn of goods and services to the EU, 41% of all exports."Demand for EU exports from the United States is likely to fall and, if that were to lead to a slowdown in the European Union, that would be bad for the United Kingdom as it would lead to a reduction in demand for our exports from our largest trading partner," Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) told economists also expect Trump's tariffs to ultimately slow the growth of the US economy, which would also harm UK firms exporting to the US. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Driving test warning as top school warns situation ‘cannot get much worse'
Learner drivers across Britain are facing waits of more than five months to book a test, with new figures revealing that four out of five test centres have the maximum possible waiting time. As of 5 May, 258 locations – 81 per cent of all sites – had a 24-week backlog for a driving test, a significant increase from 161 at the start of the year. AA Driving School, which obtained the data from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA), warned that the situation "cannot get much worse". The average waiting time across all test centres has now reached 22 weeks, up from 14 weeks in February 2024. The DVSA attributes the delays to a surge in demand and candidates booking tests much earlier than previously. Officials hope that an increase in the number of tests conducted will help to reduce these extensive waiting times. The number of future bookings in the DVSA's system was 122,000 higher in June compared with the same month last year. Public spending watchdog the National Audit Office recently announced it will investigate the 'root causes' of delays to booking tests, and 'how the DVSA is responding'. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said in April the Labour Government 'inherited an enormous backlog' but was 'acting fast'. She told the Commons Transport Select Committee her department aimed to reduce the average waiting time to seven weeks by summer 2026. A Government consultation on amending the test booking system closed last week. This featured a plan aimed at stopping bots mass-booking new slots so they can be resold on the black market for inflated prices. The Department for Transport also instructed the DVSA to offer additional overtime payments to incentivise instructors to conduct more tests. Staff at the agency qualified to conduct tests are being asked to voluntarily return to the front line, while the number of permanent trainers for new examiners is being doubled. Emma Bush, managing director of AA Driving School, said: 'With the vast majority of driving test centres now showing waits at the maximum the system will allow, the situation cannot get much worse. 'New measures designed to start bringing down waiting times were implemented at the start of April by the DVSA. 'There are signs of recovery though, putting both the industry and learners on tenterhooks for more signs of improvement in the coming months. 'While we would expect these changes to take a few months to show a positive impact, it is still disappointing to see that learners are continuing to face an uphill battle when it comes to booking their driving test.' DVSA chief executive Loveday Ryder said: 'DVSA's goal is to make booking a driving test easier and fairer for learner drivers. 'We are making progress on our plans. 'We're really grateful to everyone who has responded to our recent consultation, including learners, parents and driving instructors. 'We're now analysing the survey responses. 'Using your feedback, we'll be able to plan our next steps on improving car test booking rules.'
