What does Kent and Sussex think of the disposable vape ban?
When vapes were first commercially available, they were meant to be used as a way for smokers to ditch cigarettes.As of 2024, there were 5.6m adults vaping in Great Britain, according to public health charity Action on Smoking Health. But of those, 8% said they had never tried a cigarette before.
What is changing?
The ban has two objectives, which are to reduce environmental damage and help cut the number of young people addicted to nicotine.Businesses will be no longer be allowed to sell or supply single-use vapes, either in shops or online.In England, those found to have broken the law will receive a £200 fine and face up to two years in prison for repeat offences. The fines differ in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.Reusable vapes will remain largely available, as the government defines a reusable vape as one which can be refilled with liquid and recharged. A vape would be illegal if it cannot do both.
How does vaping affect children?
There has been an increase in youth vaping in recent years, with a quarter of 11 to 15-year-olds admitting they had tried it, despite it being illegal to sell them to people under 18, according to Minister for Public Health and Prevention, Andrew Gwynne.Dr Jack Jacobs, a GP in Hamstreet, Kent, said vaping was a particular problem for young and developing lungs."The health concerns are all very documented now - it can cause damage to lungs and high doses of nicotine can potentially lead to heart arrhythmia," he said."I think the ban sends a message about the dangers and will help to limit the variety available."
Earlier this year, the Welsh government's health minister, Sarah Murphy, said children were starting secondary school already addicted to vaping.Ms Murphy said teachers told her that children were leaving lessons "two or three times" to vape, and were struggling to sit through their mock exams.Steve Reed, the UK government's environment secretary, has promised that "rogue traders" who continue to sell disposable vapes to children would face "serious penalties"."Single-use vapes get kids hooked on nicotine and blight our high streets, and we won't stand for this any longer," he added.
What about the environment?
It is nearly impossible for the plastic used in disposable vapes to completely break down.Instead, the plastic breaks into tiny microplastics, which can enter the food chain and contaminate the environment.All retailers that sell vapes must legally take them back once they are empty. But with an average of eight disposed of each second, most end up in landfill.
"For the small number of single-use vapes which are sent for recycling, it's a difficult job because they contain many chemical components and are not designed to be taken apart," a government spokesperson said."They usually have to be disassembled by hand – a slow and tricky process which struggles to match the avalanche of vapes that are produced and discarded."In 2022, the Material Focus group found that more than 40 tonnes of lithium in single-use vapes were thrown out – the same amount needed to power 5,000 electric vehicles.The were also 1,200 bin lorry fires in 2023 caused by vapes being incorrectly disposed of.
Here's what you had to say
A public consultation in February last year found that 69% of people were in favour of the ban – including many who work in the vape industry.An employee at a vape shop in Hove, East Sussex, who asked to remain anonymous, told the BBC he and his colleagues were in favour of the ban."You're disposing of a whole battery every time, which is just no good for anyone, so we're all really happy for it," he said."We always try to tell people how much money they would be saving [with a reusable vape] and you always get more control with the nicotine, whereas all the disposables are just the strongest you can get."But some doubted the ban will work as the government hoped, instead pushing the vape trade "underground".Hove resident Brendan Barclay said: "It probably won't be effective. There's so many manufacturers out there that people will just get it by any means necessary, it's the same with drugs."It's just more work for the police to be honest."And some disagree with the ban altogether, with one man calling it "another lack of freedom".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
16 minutes ago
- Daily Record
SNP handling of Flamingo Land resort appeal 'appears unlawful' as scrutiny mounts
The Scottish Government is facing questions over its conduct in the ongoing appeal over controversial plans to build a holiday resort in Loch Lomond. SNP ministers have been accused of 'unlawful and biased' conduct in an appeal over Flamingo Land's controversial Loch Lomond resort. The claim is part of a letter of complaint lodged by Green MSP Ross Greer through his lawyer – which also raises fears key documents may have been falsified. It comes after the Scottish Government 'called in' the £43million bid for a resort on the shore at Balloch, Dunbartonshire, proposed by theme park operator Flamingo Land. Scottish Government civil servants had granted the planning application – overturning an earlier rejection by Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park. But this was met by fury from campaigners and politicians against the bid – including Greer and Labour's Jackie Baillie, who threatened a parliamentary vote. Now ministers have been forced to reconsider the case. But Greer has now hit out at 'deeply questionable' decisions in the government's recent handling of the case – including sanctioning a new sped-up draft planning agreement led by Flamingo Land's developers. It follows the reappointment of a senior official, Reporter David Buylla, to organise the case and recommend to ministers despite being the one who approved the resort. Greer, who is running to be Scottish Greens co-leader, said: 'They refuse to hold any public hearings and have asked the same official who tried to approve the plans to mark his own homework by making recommendation for a fresh decision. 'Now they're asking Flamingo Land to draft their own planning conditions on their own terms, against the wishes of the National Park. Is it any wonder that local people get the feeling that the cards are being stacked against them?' It comes as lawyers for the National Park last week criticised the new process as 'highly unorthodox'. In a separate letter to Scotland's Chief Planner, Greer's lawyer Ian Cowan warned ministers aren't following proper procedure and their handling of the called-in appeal 'appears to be both unlawful' and 'tainted by bias'. He said the process should be 'abandoned' and replaced with a fairer one. Cowan added: 'My client does not question Mr Buylla's professionalism. But the recall of the appeal should have meant that he played no further part in it.' He also questioned 'anomalies' in key files published by the government's appeals division last month. A 'minute of appointment' reappointing Mr Buylla to prepare a report for ministers was published on July 4, but purportedly signed off by a senior planning official on June 24. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. However, the document doesn't carry the official's digital signature - and the document's properties show it was created on July 4 - 15 minutes after a different letter by Mr Buylla was published setting out the new process. Cowan has questioned officials on why the document was backdated. Greer told the Sunday Mail: 'I hope there is a simple explanation for this inconsistency in the date of the official's appointment, because it is hugely concerning. 'There needs to be full transparency here if the public are to have any confidence in this process.' The Scottish Government said it decided to recall the appeal as 'the proposed development raises issues of national significance'. It added: 'As this is a live planning appeal it would not be appropriate to comment further." Flamingo Land 's lawyers have said complaints about the new process are 'without substance'.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Smugglers advertising Channel crossings on social media could face five years in prison
Anyone who advertises Channel crossings or fake passports on social media could face up to five years in prison under new government plans. Research suggests about 80% of migrants arriving to the UK by small boat used internet platforms during their journey - including to contact agents linked to smuggling gangs. While it is already illegal to assist illegal immigration, ministers hope the creation of a new offence will give police more powers and disrupt business models. 1:42 Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is also planning to introduce a fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog, meaning decisions will be made within weeks. It comes as official figures show more than 25,000 people have arrived on small boats so far in 2025 - a record for this point in the year. Ms Cooper said it is "immoral" for smugglers to sell false promises online, adding: "These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media. "We are determined to do everything we can to stop them, wherever they operate." The new offence prohibiting the online promotion of Channel crossings is set to be included in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill already going through Parliament. 0:27 Officials from the National Crime Agency already work with tech giants to remove such posts - with more than 8,000 taken offline last year. A Preston-based smuggler who was jailed for 17 years had posted videos of migrants thanking him for his help. Meanwhile, Albanian smugglers have created promotions for £12,000 "package deals" which claim to offer accommodation and a job in the UK on arrival. The Conservatives have described the measures as "too little, too late" - and say automatic deportations are the only way to tackle small boat crossings. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "Labour still has no clear plan to deter illegal entry, no effective enforcement and no strategy to speed up removals. This is a panicked attempt to look tough after months of doing nothing." 0:49 It comes as protests outside hotels believed to be housing asylum seekers continue in towns and cities across the UK. Several demonstrators were detained - with police breaking up brief clashes - outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in north London yesterday. The government is legally required to provide accommodation and subsistence to destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being decided, most of whom are prohibited from working.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Why are child vaccination rates the lowest they have been in more than a decade?
Child vaccination uptake is the lowest it has been in more than a decade, with a death from measles in Liverpool reigniting calls for increased awareness of the dangers of not getting jabs. A report from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) this month reiterated that none of the routine child vaccinations have met the World Health Organisation's recommended target of 95% since 2021. Uptake in some local authorities is as low as 60%, while the England-wide rate for the final quarter of 2024/25 for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) was 88.8%, down from 92.7% 10 years ago. The latest UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) figures show there were 145 new measles cases in England in July. With outbreaks across Europe and elsewhere, public health officials are concerned families may bring the virus back to the UK when they return to school from the summer holidays. We look at why vaccination rates have declined, and the reasons some parents are still hesitant to get their children immunised. When did uptake start declining - and where is it worst now? Routine childhood vaccinations largely consist of the 6-in-1 vaccine, which covers diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Hib, and hepatitis B; the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella; and the MenB vaccine, which covers the meningococcal group B bacterium that can cause meningitis and sepsis. They are all administered free of charge across two or three doses before children are five, with most in the first year. WHO recommends countries set targets of 95% coverage of all three to ensure herd immunity and to protect those who are immunocompromised and cannot have the vaccines themselves. In the UK, MMR rates have consistently been the lowest. The most recent decline began in 2013/14, when uptake at two years peaked at 92.7%. Overall, they have been lower in England than Scotland and Wales, with areas such as London and the North West seeing particularly low levels. In Hackney, east London, only 60% of children had received both their MMR jabs by their fifth birthday in the year 2023/24. The North West, and Liverpool in particular, also had lower uptake, with only 73% vaccinated against MMR by the age of five. Of the 674 measles cases reported in 2025, almost half (48%) have been in London, 16% in the North West, and 10% in the East of England. At local authority level, the most cases were reported in Hackney (12%), Bristol (7%), and Salford (5%), with almost all cases concentrated in either children under 10 or teenagers and young adults. 1:04 Why have rates declined? Although the recent drop began a decade ago, a much sharper decline happened in the 1990s. It saw the two-year MMR uptake in England go from 91.8% in 1995/96 to 79.9% in 2003/04. In 2006, person-to-person measles transmission was re-established in the UK, and a year later, rates exceeded 1,000 for the first time in 10 years. This came after the British doctor Andrew Wakefield published a now-discredited report in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet in 1998, which linked the MMR vaccine to autism. The study was reported by media outlets worldwide and resulted in the safety of the jab being questioned. After it proved baseless, The Lancet retracted the study in 2010. Wakefield was banned from practising medicine after being found guilty of dishonesty and the "abuse" of developmentally delayed children by subjecting them to unnecessary and invasive medical procedures without ethical approval. However, hesitancy around childhood vaccinations persisted. Professor Stephen Griffin, a virologist at the University of Leeds, says: "As widely debunked as it was, it set the cat among the pigeons and poisoned everything." 1:34 What could be behind the latest drop? The increased prevalence of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic saw a resurgence in "anti-vax" sentiment, with many questioning the quick rollout of the jabs. Others pushed back against mandatory vaccines in certain settings, such as health and social care in the UK, and across most federal government departments in the US, citing a breach of freedom of choice. Hesitancy also proved stronger in some minority communities, which experts have linked to a general mistrust in healthcare services due to the disproportionate outcomes experienced by those groups. "Well-organised and well-funded anti-vaccine movements latched onto mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, because while it's not a brand new technology, COVID was the first time they had been used en masse," Professor Griffin says. "There was a lot of disinformation around them, and they just seized on it." However, WHO had already highlighted "vaccine hesitancy" as one of the top 10 global health threats in 2019, before the pandemic began. Some of this was attributed to Wakefield's study. Separately, with the rise of social media and misinformation, unevidenced conspiracy theories around vaccines have circulated, such as them being used by Microsoft founder Bill Gates to track people's movements. More recently, US President Donald Trump has expressed sentiments that nod to views shared by vaccine sceptics. In an interview with Time Magazine in 2024, he was asked if he would consider ending childhood vaccination programmes in the US. He said he would have a "big discussion" with Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who he appointed as his health secretary and who has consistently expressed vaccine sceptic views. Mr Trump said: "The autism rate is at a level that nobody ever believed possible. If you look at things that are happening, there's something causing it." While not directly referencing it, his comments appeared to echo the baseless claims made in Wakefield's study. Professor Griffin says that "reputable" figures, such as politicians and scientists who continue to endorse the view of Wakefield, and other false narratives around vaccine efficacy, have legitimised the anti-vax movement and "normalised" the decision not to immunise children. "They've essentially said 'there's no smoke without fire' and drawn attention to a question that they've created themselves," he says. "It's really upsetting because we've got this brilliant vaccine that people aren't taking because of basic nonsense, and that has serious consequences. A person infected with measles is likely to infect between 15 and 20 others if they are unvaccinated. "But the MMR vaccine is a victim of its own success. Measles was a large cause of infant mortality before we had the vaccine, but now people don't remember why we tried to make vaccines against it in the first place. "So we need to educate people because they aren't aware of how dangerous it is." 1:30 'Lack of access' One children's health expert told Sky News the main issue is a lack of access. Helen Bedford, a professor of children's health at the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute, says everything from knowing how to book an appointment, to having the means to get there can be a barrier to children getting vaccinated. "People may not know when vaccines are due, how to make an appointment, then there's actually getting to the appointment," she says. "For some parents who are suffering the impact of poverty, paying a bus fare to get your child to a GP surgery may be a step too far, even though they understand vaccination is very important." A shortage of health visitors and other staff who can answer questions from vaccine-hesitant parents is also having an impact, she says. "We want parents to ask questions but unfortunately, due to lack of personnel, they can't always get answers or even an opportunity to have a discussion," she said.
