ASB forecasts Reserve Bank may need to make deeper OCR cuts
'As a result, the Official Cash Rate (OCR) will be lower than it would otherwise be.'
The RBNZ has previously signalled the OCR to fall to a neutral rate about 3% by the end of the year, but noted in its April decision there was much uncertainty and future cuts would be influenced by medium-term inflation expectations continuing to fall.
Smith said the Government's Budget cut would trim about 0.3% off the value of the economy, which would be a dampener on an already struggling economy.
That would help ease possible inflation pressures, but raised the prospect the RBNZ might need to support the economy with interest rate cuts and cheaper borrowing costs.
But too much stimulation can cause inflation, while inflation risks are raised by tariffs and trade wars, justifying a high OCR.
BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis said 'Trumpflation' — a simultaneous mix of rising inflation and poor growth caused by higher tariffs — was causing leading central banks around the world headaches in forecasting and pointing to their interest rate strategies.
The RBNZ might find itself following the lead of the Bank of Canada and the European Central Bank in not issuing guidance on interest rates in the May 28 monetary policy statement, he said.
Slowing growth and rising inflation — stagflation — is not in the playbook, and will have the RBNZ dusting off one of its favourite soundbites — 'least worse choice'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
Sweeping reforms to laundering laws
The Government has unveiled sweeping reforms to the country's anti money laundering laws to crack down on dirty money. Set to be in place by the next election, the changes to New Zealand's Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism regime aim to shut down dodgy deals, tighten financial loopholes, and take on the criminal underworld, while cutting unnecessary red tape for law-abiding citizens. It's estimated that a staggering $1.35 billion is generated from money laundering in New Zealand every year. The Detail talks to Lloyd Kavanagh, a financial services lawyer and deal maker from Minter Ellison Rudd Watts, about the changes, which include giving police greater powers to freeze bank accounts more quickly, banning cryptocurrency ATMs, introducing a more risk-based system for selling property from family trusts, and making it easier for parents to open bank accounts for their children. Kavanagh also welcomes efforts to streamline and simplify the system by introducing one supervision layer to oversee the rules. 'Currently, we have three supervisors who supervise different segments of the market,' he tells The Detail. 'You have the Reserve Bank, who is the [anti money laundering] supervisor for banks, you have the FMA who oversees securities market participants broadly, and then you have the Department of Internal Affairs, who looks after casinos and everybody else … lenders, lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and quite a wide range of smaller businesses. 'What the Government is proposing is … we should have a single supervisor so that they can be consistent in the guidance that they give to reporting entities, and have a total overview of what's going on in the sector. So that is one measure which I think will have a significant impact. 'Some of the other measures … are actually to relieve the administrative burden – one of them is, at the moment, you have to verify your customer's address, which proves to be really difficult for a lot of people … so, the change will mean you only have to do that if you have got reasons for thinking it's a high-risk customer. 'I am actually optimistic that by removing some of the mandatory bureaucracy, resources will get refocused in doing what I think, and I certainly hope all New Zealanders are keen to do, which is to use the pressure on what happens to the proceeds of crime to help us detect crime in the first place.' Kavanagh does have some concerns about giving greater powers to police. 'I'm a little reserved about simply giving additional powers to the police if you don't have the right checks and balances'. And questions the ban on cryptocurrency ATMs, which are kiosks that allow users to buy and sell cryptocurrency using cash. 'I'm somewhat puzzled by that inclusion because I haven't seen the evidence as to why that would be a particular priority.' But ultimately, he believes the law changes will make a difference. 'We all benefit if there is less crime in New Zealand. These people [money launderers] make business decisions as to which countries are easier to operate in and profitable to operate in. 'And we know from the reports that have come from the Government over the last year that New Zealand has an increasing level of drug abuse. We know that we are more and more connected in a world where there are all sorts of transactions going on. 'What we need to do is just make ourselves a little bit harder to do bad things in. So, I think these [law changes] are positive steps.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Unemployment tipped to hit nine-year high as labour market weakens
There was anecdotal evidence that firms holding on to labour were not experiencing the pick-up in demand they expected, which meant more jobs were at risk, he said. 'A degree of 'labour hoarding' appears to have suppressed unemployment in recent quarters,' he said. 'If a recovery in economic momentum doesn't do the heavy lifting when it comes to 'right-sizing' firms' labour input, a further reduction in headcount may be needed.' With the high-frequency data pointing to an economic slowdown, risks around employment growth over the next few quarters were skewed to the downside, he said. Workman expects unemployment will rise to 5.3%, worse than the Reserve Bank's forecast of 5.2%. He also forecasts the employment rate falling 0.1% (down 0.9% for the year). It is likely that the level of participation in the labour market – already low and flattering the unemployment rate – also fell. Westpac senior economist Michael Gordon was no more optimistic. 'Monthly data has pointed to further job losses over the quarter, particularly among younger people,' he said. 'We expect that many of these people will have exited the workforce altogether, dampening the extent of the rise in the unemployment rate.' The labour market typically lagged the broader economic cycle, so it was understandable we would still be seeing softness at this stage, he said. 'But it's possible that this lag will be more prolonged than usual.' ASB senior economist Mark Smith said he expected the Reserve Bank would likely take 'more signal from trends in labour costs than the unemployment rate'. 'Labour cost growth is expected to cool, with the balance of power firmly tilted towards employers,' he said. The Labour Cost Index should increase by 0.5% for the quarter, with annual labour cost growth cooling to 2.1%, he said. That would be the lowest in four years. More moderate April 2025 increases in the minimum wage would deliver a more modest than usual second-quarter increase. Annual public sector labour cost growth was expected to ease towards 3% given the Government's fiscal belt-tightening, he said. 'We expect wider measures to generally confirm that wage pressures are easing.' BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis noted none of this was 'supportive of household spending, which remains critical to a broader economic recovery'. 'Weak employment is a headwind on its own but comes with a kicker of raising concerns around job security,' he said. 'Combined with above-average inflation in some essential items like food and electricity, it is another factor threatening the timing and extent of the pick-up in household spending that many are forecasting.' This Wednesday's data would confirm the need for more rate cuts, Kiwibank economists wrote. 'Last week's inflation data was the first test for the RBNZ given its data-dependent approach,' they said. 'We believe it opened the door to a rate cut in August.' Headline inflation rose, but the drivers appeared to be temporary. Domestic inflation was heading in the right direction. 'Next week's labour market is the second test for an August rate cut. And should the data print the way we expect, the door to a rate cut remains firmly open.' Downside risks to medium-term inflation were growing, given the soft labour market and dimming global outlook, they said. 'We expect the RBNZ to cut the cash rate by 25 basis points at the August meeting. And they'll need to go to 2.5% eventually.' Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
The Government says it's fixing the cost of living, so what happens if voters don't believe it?
It was clearly designed to assuage fears, fanned by the Opposition, that the Government had put the entire Crown infrastructure build on ice, leading to the mass exodus of construction labour to Australia. The tactic isn't an unfair one. All Governments indulge in the vice of reannouncing things to focus attention on them. A billion or so dollars spent on a road earns the Government a few hundred bites of the PR cherry, or so the political arithmetic goes. So no, the tactic wasn't unfair or even ridiculous - but nor was Labour's criticism that a fair whack of the projects were funded by the last Government. (Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop's riposte that Labour might have funded some of the projects, but it certainly didn't do a good job of delivering them, was equally true.) This early success evaporated on Monday, when Luxon held one of the most bizarre press conferences since taking office. Alongside Finance Minister Nicola Willis, he spoke for more than 10 minutes to mark the first anniversary of the Government's tax package coming into effect. He listed every other cost-of-living policy the Government had implemented since taking office. Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Trade Minister Todd McClay spoke about US tariffs yesterday. Photo / Mark Mitchell Again, there's nothing inherently wrong with reannouncing something old. Former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern liked to mark anniversaries too. Some years, she'd put out a press release celebrating the fact that superannuation payments were increasing in line with wages - despite the fact that this annual increase is written into primary legislation. But Monday's announcement, coming as voters' economic sentiment bounces along the bottom and the country seems on the verge of rioting over the butter price, seemed vacuous. There was something ever so faintly Soviet about a Government thinking that, simply by telling voters it had a policy to fix their problems, they'd believe those problems were being fixed. There are two obvious pathways for how the next few months might pan out. The Government is clinging to several good forward economic indicators: business confidence surveys report okay-ish vibes from firms and suggest something of a recovery next year; the primary sector, far from being the villain of the butter crisis, is driving an export-led recovery in the regions; the Reserve Bank is likely to continue cutting interest rates, spurring investment and growth in 2026, giving Luxon an economic tailwind of good vibes and rising house prices in election year. The snow will soon melt, the ground will thaw, and New Zealanders may spend their summer holidays contemplating having endured the worst of it. Luxon and his colleagues may return to work in January, set the election date and wonder what on earth they were so worried about in winter. That's one scenario, sure. There's another. For every positive data point, there is an equally negative one. The Reserve Bank's GDP tracker suggests what every New Zealander feels in their bones: the economy has been shrinking, and could shrink further. A small recession, measured by the glib but powerful two-negative-quarters definition, could be on the cards. The most recent ANZ business confidence survey showed residential construction intentions tanking, to use the words of the bank's economists. If things continue to follow that negative trajectory, another scenario opens up: one of panic, as the once-distant prospect of a first-term defeat becomes more plausible. If the economy continues to worsen, and National's polling materialises into gloomy party vote numbers, don't entirely rule out a leadership change. A change is not 'on' - you'd be a fool to put money on it — but you'd also be a fool to bet against it. There's no real affection for Luxon in the caucus room, and National has little patience for underperformance, particularly from its leaders. Luxon's intense self-belief could count against him. He does not seem to observe that, of all his frontbenchers, he is the one who is struggling the most. Despite the whole Cabinet fighting fires on every front, National's ministers do a decent job of rebuffing their Labour opposite numbers during Question Time. Health Minister Simeon Brown has come under the most pressure, but has so far survived in the House. Chris Bishop seems unbothered by Kieran McAnulty and seemed to be enjoying himself on Thursday when he answered finance questions on behalf of Willis, who was away (the caucus enjoyed it too). Willis herself never breaks a sweat debating her opposite number, Barbara Edmonds. FBI director Kash Patel visited Wellington to open a new office. Photo / Ola Thorsen Luxon is the most challenged of the lot and was devoured, degustation-style, by Chris Hipkins in the debating chamber this week. Hipkins, who can excel in the House when he wants to, wasn't even trying a particularly sophisticated line of questioning. He resorted to a past Luxon tactic of using each supplementary question to list another case of something going terribly wrong in the economy - migration to Australia, construction jobs, board director remuneration - and then asking the Prime Minister what he thinks about it. Luxon should be able to answer questions like that easily, but could not. His belief in the power of political marketing is so fundamental that he undervalues the importance of backing up that marketing with substance; even more than most prime ministers, he's too quick to answer every question with a canned line and not quick enough to respond by substantively dismantling the question and defending himself. He seems to think this doesn't matter. He's disdainful of Question Time, or of anything that happens in Wellington. But it does matter - and you could tell from the ashen faces behind Luxon as he answered Hipkins' questions that the backbench is worried. If the economy doesn't turn around meaningfully, there's a chance the Government could be in serious trouble, however scary they think a Labour-Green-Te Pāti Māori Government might be. Slumps such as this one are difficult for centre-right governments. They're instinctively anti-intervention. When the public demands 'something must be done', centre-left governments have no shortage of ideas for that 'something'. The National benches regularly look despondent during Question Time - as pictured here in March. Photo / Mark Mitchell For the right, recovery comes from automatic stabilisers like benefits doing their job, before the fiscal part of the Government gets out of the way of the monetary side, allowing the reduction of interest rates to encourage firms to borrow and invest. It's a less politically attractive recovery because it involves substantially less ribbon-cutting, but that doesn't make it any less sensible a strategy. Ultimately, however much a government tries to pump-prime an economy back to life with fiscal policy, eventually private firms will need to pick up some slack too - and that means low interest rates. Luxon, to his credit, has been explicitly articulating this as his vision for the economic recovery. Last month, he successfully rebuffed one of Hipkins' questions, noting that the construction sector was 'hit hard because of high interest rates. High interest rates happened because Government spending was out of control, and you let inflation get out of control'. Not bad. Grim economic times will always be tough for a government, but they needn't be as tough as these. Back in 2012, net migration to Australia was even higher than it is now and the unemployment rate, in September of that year, was higher than at any point in the past 25 years. Yet that economic malaise failed to find its way into politics. National's party vote polling peaked at 48.8% in October 2012, rising - strangely - in tandem with the unemployment rate. Prime Minister John Key's popularity was unassailable. A government can be popular when an economy is under strain. But that appears to require the public to have faith that the government has a plan to make things better. Voters don't have that faith currently and, after this week, who could blame them?
