
Are Gay Dating Apps Threatening To Expose Republicans? What We Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A social media post has gone viral after claiming that gay dating apps are threatening to out closeted Republican officials and members of Congress who have accounts on their platforms if the Supreme Court overturns its same-sex marriage ruling.
Why It Matters
The U.S. Supreme Court is facing a choice about whether to take a case filed by former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis that urges the court to overturn its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide.
Members of the court, including Justice Clarence Thomas, have signaled an openness to revisiting the case as the court has shifted to the right—a change defined by its 2022 ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, which for decades guaranteed abortion rights.
If the court overturns same-sex marriage nationwide, the issue would likely return to the states.
A composite image shows same-sex marriage supporter Vin Testa waving an LGBTQIA pride flag in front of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C., on June 26, 2023, and the Grindr app in Apple's...
A composite image shows same-sex marriage supporter Vin Testa waving an LGBTQIA pride flag in front of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C., on June 26, 2023, and the Grindr app in Apple's App Store on an iPhone 12 Pro Max in Berlin on January 26, 2021. More/Christoph Dernbach/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images
What To Know
On X, the account @HalfwayPost wrote earlier this week, "BREAKING: Several gay dating apps are reportedly threatening that, if the Supreme Court bans gay marriage, they'll reveal all the closeted Republican officials and members of Congress who have accounts on their platforms."
The post has been viewed more than 7 million times, with many social media users believing it to be a statement of fact. However, the account—run by comedian Dash MacIntyre and self-described as "comedy and satire"—says in its bio, "I don't report the facts, I improve them."
This isn't the first time @HalfwayPost has gone viral over such a claim, and rumors about gay dating apps disclosing the identities of Republican officials on their platforms have circulated online for years—often in response to news that affects the LGBTQ+ community.
In 2023, following Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' Parental Rights in Education Act, which critics dubbed the "Don't Say Gay" bill, the claim circulated widely online.
The dating app space is highly saturated, with a number of apps available to users across the sexuality spectrum. Newsweek spoke with Grindr, Feeld and Hornet, three of the most popular LGBTQ+ apps in the U.S. All three apps denied any threats to expose Republican politicians.
"This claim is false," a spokesperson for Grindr told Newsweek. "At Grindr, we take our role as a connector for the queer community very seriously and are committed to upholding high standards of trust and user safety, protecting the privacy of all of our users."
Feeld's press office shared a statement with Newsweek, which said in part: "Feeld is built on a commitment to our members' privacy and safety. We would never release members' data or information publicly without the appropriate consent being given."
Christof Wittig, the founder and CEO of the dating app Hornet, told Newsweek: "We have never threatened to expose users' identities or personal information at Hornet. Privacy and safety are core to our mission, and we remain committed to protecting the trust of our community."
Newsweek also spoke with experts about why such claims continue to resonate widely online.
"Rumors like this gain traction because the LGBTQ community is deeply aware that some of their most vitriolic opponents are hypocrites in high places," Brett Krutzsch, a scholar of religion at the Center for Religion and Media at New York University and the editor of the Revealer, told Newsweek via email.
"The LGBTQ community has a long history of debating the merits of outing conservatives against their will," Krutzsch said. "When facing the possibility of the Supreme Court overturning Obergefell, the idea of outing closeted Republicans taps into a form of queer power, even if it isn't coordinated by a dating app or if it doesn't produce the desired political result."
Shaka McGlotten, a professor of media studies and anthropology at Purchase College, told Newsweek, "On one level, these viral revenge fantasies function as pressure valves, redirecting energy that could go toward organizing into liking, sharing, and commenting."
McGlotten added: "Personally, though, this is what I think is actually happening: Republicans have exposed themselves by helping to build a political culture that weaponizes sexual identity and that thrives on using anxieties about sex and gender against minorities. When you participate in creating that, you shouldn't be surprised when it turns on you."
What People Are Saying
Grindr said in a statement shared with Newsweek: "It is our mission to support a world in which the lives of our users are free, equal, and just, and we condemn any attempts to undermine the rights of LGBTQ people."
Feeld's press office said in a statement shared with Newsweek: "Our goal has always been to create safer, more inclusive spaces and to protect our community with the highest standards of trust and care."
Christof Wittig, the founder and CEO of the dating app Hornet, told Newsweek: "While we vehemently oppose any and all efforts to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges—especially in a political climate already marred by anti-LGBTQ legislation—we do not condone such behavior, even in the name of advocacy."
Sasha Costanza-Chock, a faculty associate at the Berkman-Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, told Newsweek via email: "Satire has always been a valuable tool for oppressed communities to ridicule their oppressors. The widespread popularity of this satirical news headline reflects the massive disconnect between right-wing efforts to suppress the LGBTQI+ community and the reality that a wide majority of people now support LGBTQI+ rights. In particular, people are targeting the hypocrisy of closeted queer elected officials who do harm to their own communities."
Shaka McGlotten, a professor of media studies and anthropology at Purchase College, told Newsweek via email: "The viral claim originated from a satirical account. It spreads because it offers the fantasy of revenge in a time when so many people feel powerless. Platforms like X amplify inflammatory content, and this story delivers a perfect mix of scandal and justice for engagement."
What Happens Next
Concerns about the Supreme Court overturning same-sex marriage are ongoing. It remains to be seen whether the court will decide to hear Davis' case.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ron DeSantis Slams 'Suspiciously-Timed' Congressional Stock Trades, 'Windfall Profits:' Says Nancy Pelosi Outperforms The Best Hedge Funds
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday aimed at members of Congress over what he characterized as well-timed and unusually profitable stock trades, while singling out former House Speaker, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in his criticism. 'Suspiciously-Timed' Stock Trades In a post on X, DeSantis called out the 'suspiciously-timed' stock trades that seem to 'generate windfall profits,' which he says has become a feature of the modern Congress. He also highlights the fact that the portfolio of certain lawmakers outperforms even the most sophisticated fund managers. 'Pelosi and company do better than the best investment funds in the world,' he says, before adding a note of sarcasm, saying, 'Gee, I wonder why that is?' Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — DeSantis posted this while quoting his wife, Casey DeSantis's post on the same topic. In her post, Casey says, 'Serving in Congress should mean serving the people, not your stock portfolio.' Traders In Congress Outperform Leading Fund Managers Amid Calls For A Ban Pelosi and her husband, Paul Pelosi, witnessed a significant rise in their combined net worth in 2024, at $413 million, up from $370 million the prior year. A significant portion of this comes from their investment portfolio, which returned 54% in 2024 and 65% in 2023. Other active traders in Congress have outperformed Pelosi by wide margins, with annualized returns ranging from 70% to 149%, amid growing calls for a ban. However, Pelosi herself has backed a proposal to ban Congressional stock trading, coming out in support of a bill named 'The HONEST Act,' which up until recently was called the PELOSI Act. 'If legislation is advanced to help restore trust in government and ensure that those in power are held to the highest ethical standards, then I am proud to support it,' she said, adding that she will back the proposal, 'no matter what they decide to name.' Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Photo courtesy: Shutterstock This article Ron DeSantis Slams 'Suspiciously-Timed' Congressional Stock Trades, 'Windfall Profits:' Says Nancy Pelosi Outperforms The Best Hedge Funds originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Over 200 rallies are expected across the country to protest Trump-led redistricting plans
Donald Trump Congressional newsFacebookTweetLink Follow At parks, coffee shops, churches and government buildings around the country, hundreds of people are expected to gather today with a simple message: 'Stop the Trump takeover.' The rallies are a bid to combat Republican-led plans to redraw congressional maps. The main event will take place in Texas, where a new congressional map backed by President Donald Trump that could net Republicans five additional seats in the 2026 midterm elections inspired the state's Democratic lawmakers to flee the state – preventing the quorum needed to vote. 'Trump is terrified of the American people,' said the Texas for All Coalition, which is helping organize the events, in a news release. 'He knows he can't win on his ideas, so he's trying to take Congress by hook or by crook – and he's doing it by silencing the voices of communities of color. We're not going to let that happen.' Organizers emphasized 'a commitment to nonviolence' at all events in event page descriptions. Over 200 events are planned in 34 states, according to the event's official website. The Democratic National Committee is helping organize events, it announced in a news release. 'From coast to coast, people will be showing up at their statehouses, city halls, and community spaces to make it clear – we see what Trump is doing, and we won't stand for it,' said the DNC. A swath of nonprofits and other organizations are also supporting the effort, including Planned Parenthood, the Working Families Party and Human Rights Campaign. Trump described the proposed Texas congressional map as a 'very simple redrawing' at the White House. 'We pick up five seats,' he added. But it doesn't end with Texas. Republican leaders in other states, too, have proposed changing their congressional maps ahead of next year's midterms. The White House is pushing Missouri legislators to consider a special session to redraw maps. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has floated the idea of changing his state's maps, and has said he thinks the Trump administration should give the state another seat. In Ohio, maps must be redrawn due to a quirk of state law – which may make the state's delegation even more Republican and carve up two Democratic seats, according to a report in June from CNN's Fredreka Schouten. Democratic lawmakers have announced their own plans to fight back, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who kicked off his own redistricting push on Thursday. Here's more on what we know about today's protests. Today's largest protest is slated to happen in Austin, Texas. Over 1,000 people have RSVPed for the event, which will start at the state's Capitol. 'Texas is being used as a testing ground for extremist policies and partisan games that don't reflect our values,' reads the event page. 'Thousands of Texans have shown up against the racially gerrymandered congressional map lawmakers are trying to force through in order to weaken the voting power of communities of color.' Former Congressman Beto O'Rourke, United Farm Workers cofounder Dolores Huerta, Democratic US Rep. Greg Casar and Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas are expected to speak, according to a news release from the Texas for All Coalition. Drag queen Brigitte Bandit and singer Gina Chavez are also expected to perform. Across Texas, events are also planned in Houston, Dallas, San Angelo, Tyler, McAllen, Conroe and Kingwood. Events and rallies are also scheduled in dozens of other states, both in Democratic strongholds and Republican-majority states. Local organizers are planning each city-specific event. In New York City, demonstrators are expected to gather in Central Park. In Washington, DC, where Trump has deployed the National Guard and declared a federal takeover of the local police department, organizers are painting banners and signs to place around the city. Protesters in Raleigh and Durham, North Carolina, plan to hold a 'bridge brigade,' holding signs on 16 different bridges. Demonstrations are also planned in Cincinnati, Ohio; Sarasota, Florida; and Jefferson City, Missouri, among other cities. The planned events include rallies, teach-ins, banner drops and art-making at locations that include a bookstore in Jacksonville, Florida, and a Tesla showroom in Palo Alto, California. The demonstrations follow a string of other protests organized since Trump took office for the second time in January, including the 'No Kings' protests in June and demonstrations against the president's deportation campaign in July. Drucilla Tigner, the executive director of statewide coalition Texas For All, said in a news release that the fight extends far past Texas. 'Across Texas, and across the country, communities are speaking out in a united voice to call for an end to the Trump takeover,' she said. 'Though this fight started in Texas, it doesn't end here. This isn't just about redistricting or one state's politics.' 'It's about the future of our democracy.'

2 hours ago
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
WASHINGTON -- Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights. ___